基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.17

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 139-147.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.17

• 系统工程 • 上一篇

基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略

徐任杰¹^,³, 宫琳¹^,²^,*, 谢剑¹, 刘欣¹, 杨克巍³

1. 北京理工大学机械与车辆学院, 北京 100081
2. 北京理工大学长三角研究院(嘉兴), 浙江嘉兴 314019
3. 国防科技大学系统工程学院, 湖南长沙 410073

收稿日期:2021-01-07 出版日期:2023-01-01 发布日期:2023-01-03
通讯作者: 宫琳
作者简介:徐任杰 (1998—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为管理科学与复杂系统管理、作战体系韧性评估及优化
宫琳 (1979—), 男, 副教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为复杂系统设计与创新、体系设计与评估、知识工程
谢剑 (1991—), 男, 实验师, 博士, 主要研究方向为系统创新设计与评估、设计科学
刘欣 (1994—), 男, 助理教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为数据科学、可再生能源、工业大数据
杨克巍 (1977—), 男, 教授, 博士研究生导师, 博士，主要研究方向为体系需求建模、体系结构设计与优化、系统建模与仿真
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划专项(2018YFB1700802);国防科工局重大专项(JCKY2016203A017);国家自然科学基金(72071206);湖南省科技创新计划(2020RC4046)

Operation network link importance evaluation and recovery strategy based on equipment system-of-systems resilience

Renjie XU¹^,³, Lin GONG¹^,²^,*, Jian XIE¹, Xin LIU¹, Kewei YANG³

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2. Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing 314019, China
3. College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received:2021-01-07 Online:2023-01-01 Published:2023-01-03
Contact: Lin GONG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

韧性可以全面描述装备体系吸收打击或干扰、并从打击或干扰中恢复的能力, 体现了体系的综合性能。针对装备体系的韧性提出了一种量化评价方法, 以对装备体系作战网络链路进行重要度评估。首先给出了装备体系韧性的明确定义, 并建立了量化韧性的数学模型; 其次提出了基于韧性增加值的链路重要度指标, 并构建了一种基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估模型; 然后构建了不同的恢复策略，并分析了其对作战网络性能恢复的影响; 最后通过应用案例验证了所提方法与模型的适用性和合理性, 为优化体系结构、保障和提高体系作战性能提供了理论支撑, 也为进一步开展基于装备体系韧性的作战网络应用研究提供了参考借鉴。

关键词: 装备体系, 韧性, 作战网络, 链路重要度评估, 恢复策略

Abstract:

Resilience can comprehensively describe the ability of equipment system-of-systems (SoS) to absorb or recover from strikes or interferences, reflecting the comprehensive performance of the SoS. A computational evaluation method is proposed to assess the resilience quantitatively and to evaluate the importance of combat network links of equipment SoS. Firstly, the definition of equipment SoS resilience is provided and a mathematical model for quantifying resilience is established. Secondly, a link importance index based on the resilience-added value is proposed to recognize critical links and a combat network link importance evaluation model is constructed accordingly. Thirdly, various recovery strategies are presented and their effects on the performance recovery of combat network are analyzed. Finally, the applicability and rationality of the proposed method is verified via a simulation case. Experimental results demonstrate the theoretical contribution of the paper to the architecture optimization of equipment SoS, which ensures and improves the combat performance of SoS. Also, this research lays a critical foundation for further research on relevant combat network applications based on the equipment SoS resilience.

Key words: equipment system-of-systems (ESoS), resilience, combat network, link importance evaluation, recovery strategy

中图分类号:

E917

徐任杰, 宫琳, 谢剑, 刘欣, 杨克巍. 基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 139-147.

Renjie XU, Lin GONG, Jian XIE, Xin LIU, Kewei YANG. Operation network link importance evaluation and recovery strategy based on equipment system-of-systems resilience[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 139-147.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

表2

表3

图6

表4

图7

参考文献 33

1	周琛, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 等. 基于作战环的航空武器装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 51 (8): 16- 26.
	ZHOU C , SHANG B L , SONG B F , et al. Aviation armament system of systems contribution evaluation based on operation loop[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 51 (8): 16- 26.
2	LI J C , JIANG J , YANG K W , et al. Research on functional robustness of heterogeneous combat networks[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13 (2): 1487- 1495. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2828779
3	LUBAS D G. Department of defense system of systems reliability challenges[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2014.
4	SCOTT V , DUNN R . A prototype method to rate the link vulnerability of strategic rural roads[J]. Road and Transport Research, 2015, 24 (2): 3- 12.
5	GWAK Y , KIM J H , KIM J Y , et al. Comparison of vulnerabi-lity analysis and live fire test and evaluation of weapon system components using COVART[J]. Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020, 44 (11): 795- 803. doi: 10.3795/KSME-A.2020.44.11.795
6	PATRIARCA R , BERGSTRÖM J , GRAVIO G D , et al. Resi-lience engineering: current status of the research and future challenges[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 102 (2): 79- 100.
7	LIU W , SONG Z Y . Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure networks[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2020, 193, 106617. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
8	石建伟, 刘俊先, 姜志平, 等. 基于超网络的军事体系韧性评估[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2017, 3 (3): 213- 217.
	SHI J W , LIU J X , JIANG Z P , et al. Evaluating military system of systems resilience using super networks[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2017, 3 (3): 213- 217.
9	丁峰, 周芳, 赵鑫, 等. Cyber攻击下韧性信息服务云环境能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (12): 2722- 2728.
	DING F , ZHOU F , ZHAO X , et al. Evaluating the capability for resilient information service cloud environment under Cyberattack condition[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (12): 2722- 2728.
10	PAN X , WANG H X , YANG Y J , et al. Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (5): 920- 930. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.05.10
11	刘涛, 白光晗, 陶俊勇, 等. 面向任务的复杂系统韧性评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (4): 1003- 1011.
	LIU T , BAI G H , TAO J Y , et al. Mission-oriented resilience evaluation method for complex system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (4): 1003- 1011.
12	李际超, 杨克巍, 张小可, 等. 基于武器装备体系作战网络模型的装备贡献度评估[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
	LI J C , YANG K W , ZHANG X K , et al. Equipment contribution degree evaluation method based on combat network of weapon system-of-systems[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
13	WAN C P , YANG Z L , ZHANG D , et al. Resilience in trans portation systems: a systematic review and future directions[J]. Transport Reviews, 2018, 38 (4): 479- 498. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
14	CIMELLARO G P , REINHORN A M , BRUNEAU M . Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32 (11): 3639- 3649.
15	HOLLIN C S . Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4 (4): 1- 23.
16	WOODS D D . Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering[J]. Reliability Engi-neering & System Safety, 2015, 141, 5- 9.
17	HOSSEINI S , IVANOV D , DOLGUI A . Review of quantitative methods for supply Chain resilience analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2019, 125, 285- 307.
18	ZHOU Y M , WANG J W , YANG H . Resilience oftransportation systems: concepts and comprehensivereview[J]. IEEE Trans.on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20 (12): 4262- 4276.
19	United States Department of Defense. Department of defense science and technology emphasis areas[R]. Washington DC: United States Department of Defense, 2011.
20	GEORGE W H , PATELLI E . Efficient availability assessment of reconfigurable systems with interdependencies[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 165, 431- 444.
21	BUCHANAN K , GOERGER S R , RINAUDO C H , et al. Resilience in engineered resilient systems[J]. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2020, 17 (4): 435- 446.
22	GOERGER S R , MADNI A M , ESLINGER O J . Engineered resilient systems: a DoD perspective[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 28, 865- 872.
23	PAN X , WANG H X . Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13 (9): e0203894.
24	陈志伟, 王靖, 谷长超, 等. 考虑动态重构的装备体系可用性及弹性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (8): 2347- 2354.
	CHEN Z W , WANG J , GU C C , et al. Performance availability and resilience analysis of weapon system of systems considering dynamic reconfiguration[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (8): 2347- 2354.
25	吕彪, 管心怡, 高自强. 地铁网络服务韧性评估与最优恢复策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21 (2): 198- 205.
	LYU B , GUAN X Y , GAO Z Q . Evaluation and optimal recovery strategy of metro network service resilience[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21 (2): 198- 205.
26	LIU W , SONG Z Y , OUYANG M . Lifecycle operational resilience assessment of urban water distribution networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, 198, 106859.
27	CARES J R . An information age combat model[M]. Newport: Alidade Incorporated, 2004: 85- 90.
28	谭跃进, 张小可, 杨克巍. 武器装备体系网络化描述与建模方法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786.
	TAN Y J , ZHANG X K , YANG K W . Research on networked description and modeling methods of armament system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Systems and Management, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786.
29	穆中林, 于雷, 廖俊, 等. 编队对地攻击作战效能评估指标体系[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2011, 36 (1): 87- 89.
	MU Z L , YU L , LIAO J , et al. Research on the index system of operational effectiveness evaluation for formation attaching ground targets[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2011, 36 (1): 87- 89.
30	赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 李际超, 等. 基于作战环的武器装备体系贡献度评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (10): 2239- 2247.
	ZHAO D L , TAN Y J , LI J C , et al. Armament system of systems contribution evaluation based on operation loop[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (10): 2239- 2247.
31	WEN M L , CHEN Y B , YANG Y , et al. Resilience-based component importance measures[J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2020, 30 (11): 4244- 4254.
32	FANG Y P , PEDRONI N , ZIO E . Resilience-based component importance measures for critical in frastructure network systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Reliability, 2016, 65 (2): 502- 512.
33	潘星, 蒋卓, 杨艳京. 基于弹性的体系组件重要度及恢复策略[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43 (9): 1713- 1720.
	PAN X , JIANG Z , YANG Y J . Resilience-based component importance and recovery strategy for system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43 (9): 1713- 1720.

编号	链路	长度	编号	链路	长度
1	T→S₁	3	10	D₁→I₃	5
2	T→S₂	6	11	D₁→D₂	1
3	T→S₃	7	12	D₂→I₁	4
4	S₁→D₂	3	13	D₂→I₂	2
5	S₂→D₁	2	14	D₂→D₁	1
6	S₂→D₂	2	15	I₁→T	2
7	S₂→S₂	1	16	I₂→T	6
8	S₃→D₁	3	17	I₃→T	7
9	D₁→I₂	4	—	—	—

编号	链路	构成作战环数量	受到打击或干扰后的作战网络性能/%	链路重要度/%	排序
1	T→S₁	7	1.908	2.879	7
2	T→S₂	25	1.697	13.234	1
3	T→S₃	5	1.920	2.329	9
4	S₁→D₂	7	1.908	2.879	6
5	S₂→D₁	15	1.906	2.942	5
6	S₂→D₂	10	1.935	1.663	13
7	S₂→S₂	10	1.954	0.856	17
8	S₃→D₁	5	1.948	1.122	16
9	D₁→I₂	14	1.870	4.585	3
10	D₁→I₃	7	1.924	2.149	11
11	D₁→D₂	14	1.935	1.659	14
12	D₂→I₁	8	1.876	4.319	4
13	D₂→I₂	8	1.934	1.699	12
14	D₂→D₁	15	1.940	1.469	15
15	I₁→T	8	1.920	2.315	10
16	I₂→T	22	1.726	11.683	2
17	I₃→T	7	1.908	2.855	8

时间	RRS	MOLNFRS	MLIFRS
0	1.535	1.535	1.535
1	1.635	1.757	1.757
2	1.743	1.819	1.840
3	1.850	1.908	1.908
4	1.974	1.974	1.974
5	1.974	1.974	1.974

[1]	孔德鹏, 马溢清, 郑保华, 王琦, 张志强, 赵珍强. 面向不确定多任务场景的海上联合作战装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3775-3782.
[2]	蒋铁军, 于淳, 周成杰. 考虑期望体系效能衰减的舰艇编队等级修理计划优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3571-3578.
[3]	陈启宏, 赵青松, 邱薇, 陈甲. 基于动态博弈的武器装备体系发展规划论证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3124-3133.
[4]	杜敏, 程中华, 董恩志. 陆军防空旅装备体系贡献率评估理论研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 209-217.
[5]	陈志伟, 王靖, 谷长超, 章健淳, 钟季龙. 考虑动态重构的装备体系可用性及弹性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2347-2354.
[6]	陈宇奇, 徐廷学, 郝建平, 逯程, 李志强. 基于FDN的装备体系任务能力依赖性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(6): 1721-1728.
[7]	刘涛, 白光晗, 陶俊勇, 张云安, 方依宁. 面向任务的复杂系统韧性评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 1003-1011.
[8]	潘星, 张振宇, 张艳梅, 王冉冉. 基于Sobol敏感性分析的装备体系保障效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(2): 390-398.
[9]	周鑫, 王维平, 朱一凡, 王涛, 井田. 基于顺次分配机制的无人装备体系架构方案空间搜索方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3211-3219.
[10]	潘星, 左督军, 张跃东. 基于系统动力学的装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 112-120.
[11]	马钧文, 张安, 高飞, 毕文豪. 基于置信规则推理的武器装备体系贡献度评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(7): 1519-1526.
[12]	刘鹏, 赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 杨克巍, 豆亚杰. 面向多任务的武器装备体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1763-1770.
[13]	游雅倩, 姜江, 孙建彬, 赵丹玲, 杨克巍. 基于证据网络的装备体系贡献率评估方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1780-1788.
[14]	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 项华春, 王莉莉. 装备体系贡献率评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1789-1794.
[15]	梁家林, 熊伟. 基于作战环的武器装备体系能力评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1810-1819.

基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略

Operation network link importance evaluation and recovery strategy based on equipment system-of-systems resilience

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

编号	装备构成	作战环广义长度	作战环时间	作战环性能
1	T, S₁, D₂, I₁	12	12	0.402
2	T, S₁, D₂, I₂	14	14	0.379
3	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
4	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
5	T, S₂, D₁, I₃	20	20	0.334
6	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
7	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
8	T, S₂, D₁, I₃	20	20	0.334
9	T, S₃, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
10	T, S₃, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
11	T, S₃, D₁, I₃	22	22	0.324
12	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
13	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
14	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, I₃	21	21	0.328
15	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, I₂	17	17	0.353
16	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, I₂	17	17	0.353
17	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, I₃	19	19	0.340
18	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
19	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
20	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₃	21	21	0.328
21	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₃	15	15	0.369
22	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	17	17	0.353
23	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	15	15	0.369
24	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	17	17	0.353
25	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	17	17	0.353
26	T, S₃, D₁, D₂, I₂	19	19	0.340
27	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
28	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
29	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₃	22	22	0.324
30	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	16	16	0.361
31	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	18	18	0.346
32	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	14	14	0.379
33	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	16	16	0.361
34	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	18	18	0.346
35	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	16	16	0.361
36	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	17	17	0.353
37	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	19	19	0.340