高光谱卫星舰船目标检测效能分析与建模研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.05.06

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1432-1442.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.05.06

• 电子技术 • 上一篇

高光谱卫星舰船目标检测效能分析与建模研究

孙文¹, 程娟², 王一豪²^,*, 曹开臣¹, 葛萌萌¹, 黄刘¹, 张耿²

1. 中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所, 四川成都 610036
2. 中国科学院西安光学精密机械研究所, 陕西西安 710119

收稿日期:2024-09-23 出版日期:2025-06-11 发布日期:2025-06-18
通讯作者: 王一豪
作者简介:孙文 (1987—), 男, 高级工程师, 博士, 主要研究方向为效能评估、目标检测跟踪、人工智能
程娟 (1992—), 女, 助理研究员, 博士, 主要研究方向为定量遥感建模、高光谱数据处理
王一豪 (1989—), 男, 助理研究员, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为高光谱遥感数据处理、高光谱相机数字模型
曹开臣 (1981—), 男, 研究员, 硕士, 主要研究方向为体系建模、人工智能信息处理
葛萌萌 (1996—), 女, 高级工程师, 博士, 主要研究方向为效能评估、人工智能信息处理
黄刘 (1990—), 男, 高级工程师, 博士, 主要研究方向为人工智能信息处理
张耿 (1984—), 男, 研究员, 博士, 主要研究方向为高光谱遥感影像处理应用、干涉光谱复原、计算机视觉

Effectiveness analysis and modeling of ship target detection utilizing hyperspectral remote sensing satellites

Wen SUN¹, Juan CHENG², Yihao WANG²^,*, Kaichen CAO¹, Mengmeng GE¹, Liu HUANG¹, Geng ZHANG²

1. The 10th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Chengdu 610036, China
2. Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of CAS, Xi'an 710119, China

Received:2024-09-23 Online:2025-06-11 Published:2025-06-18
Contact: Yihao WANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高光谱卫星效能评估是高光谱遥感卫星发展的重要内容, 对高光谱遥感卫星设计、研制和在轨性能监测具有很强的现实意义。效能分析与建模是开展高光谱遥感卫星效能评估工作的第一步, 针对此问题, 首先介绍典型星载高光谱遥感成像仪, 其次解析高光谱目标检测效能指标, 并且深入分析影响高光谱遥感卫星舰船目标检测效能的关键因素。同时, 对舰船目标检测效能的影响因素进行量化, 以目标发现概率为例, 构建目标检测效能模型框架, 并且采用两种公开的舰船目标数据集分别开展实验分析与模型验证, 表明了模型构建的合理性及有效性, 对高光谱卫星舰船目标检测效能评估具有重要意义。

关键词: 遥感, 高光谱卫星, 舰船检测, 影响因素, 效能评估

Abstract:

The effectiveness evaluation of hyperspectral satellites is an important part of hyperspectral remote sensing satellites development, holding significant practical implications for their design, development, and in-orbit effectiveness monitoring. Effectiveness analysis and modeling serve as the initial step in conducting an effectiveness evaluation of hyperspectral remote sensing satellites. To tackle this issue, firstly, typical spaceborne hyperspectral remote sensing imagers is introduced. Then, the effectiveness indicators for hyperspectral target detection is dissected and a deep analysis of the key factors is conducted that influence the effectiveness of hyperspectral satellite-based ship target detection. Meanwhile, the factors that impact the effectiveness of ship target detection are quantified. Taking the target detection probability as an example, a framework for the target detection effectiveness model is established. Subsequently, experimental analysis and model validation are performed using two publicly available ship target datasets, respectively, demonstrating the rationality and validity of the constructed model. This work holds significant importance for evaluating the effectiveness of hyperspectral satellite-based ship target detection.

Key words: remote sensing, hyperspectral satellite, ship detection, influencing factors, effectiveness evaluation

中图分类号:

TP751.2

孙文, 程娟, 王一豪, 曹开臣, 葛萌萌, 黄刘, 张耿. 高光谱卫星舰船目标检测效能分析与建模研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1432-1442.

Wen SUN, Juan CHENG, Yihao WANG, Kaichen CAO, Mengmeng GE, Liu HUANG, Geng ZHANG. Effectiveness analysis and modeling of ship target detection utilizing hyperspectral remote sensing satellites[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(5): 1432-1442.

图/表 13

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表3

参考文献 32

1	TOTH C , JÓŹKÓW G . Remote sensing platforms and sensors: a survey[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2016, 115 (5): 22- 36.
2	ESMAEILI M , ABBASI-MOGHADAM D , SHARIFI A , et al. Hyperspectral image band selection based on CNN embedded GA (CNNeGA)[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2023, 16 (3): 1927- 1950.
3	OMIA E , BAE H , PARK E , et al. Remote sensing in field crop monitoring: a comprehensive review of sensor systems, data analyses and recent advances[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15 (2): 354. doi: 10.3390/rs15020354
4	张良培. 高光谱目标探测的进展与前沿问题[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39 (12): 1377- 1394.
	ZHANG L P . Advance and future challenges in hyperspectral target detection[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39 (12): 1377- 1394.
5	XU F L , ZHANG G , SONG C , et al. Multiscale and cross-level attention learning for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61, 5501615.
6	ZHANG H T , YAO J , NI L , et al. Multimodal attention-aware convolutional neural networks for classification of hyperspectral and LiDAR data[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2022, 16, 3635- 3644.
7	PARK J J , PARK K A , KIM T S , et al. Spectrum analysis and detection of ships based on aerial hyperspectral remote sensing experiments[J]. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2024, 45 (3): 214- 223. doi: 10.5467/JKESS.2024.45.3.214
8	屈博, 郑向涛, 钱学明, 等. 高光谱遥感影像异常目标检测研究进展[J]. 遥感学报, 2024, 28 (1): 42- 54.
	QU B , ZHENG X T , QIAN X M , et al. Research progress on hyperspectral anomaly detection[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2024, 28 (1): 42- 54.
9	KANJIR U , GREIDANUS H , OSTIR K . Vessel detection and classification from spaceborne optical images: a literature survey[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 207, 1- 26. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.033
10	ZHAO T Q , WANG Y C , LI Z , et al. Ship detection with deep learning in optical remote-sensing images: a survey of challenges and advances[J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16 (7): 1145. doi: 10.3390/rs16071145
11	CHEN H F , XUE J X , WEN H Y , et al. EfficientShip: a hybrid deep learning framework for ship detection in the river[J]. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2024, 138 (1): 310- 320.
12	ZHU C R , ZHOU H , WANG R S , et al. A novel hierarchical method of ship detection from spaceborne optical image based on shape and texture features[J]. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48 (9): 3446- 3456. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2046330
13	SONG W S , YAN D M , YAN J , et al. Ship detection and identification in SDGSAT-1 glimmer images based on the glimmer YOLO model[J]. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2023, 16 (2): 4687- 4706. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2023.2277796
14	PARK J J , PARK K A , KIM T S , et al. Aerial hyperspectral remote sensing detection for maritime search and surveillance of floating small objects[J]. Advances in space research, 2023, 72 (6): 2118- 2136.
15	周鹏. 高分辨率光学遥感卫星效能评估与参数敏感性分析研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2020.
	ZHOU P. Research on effectiveness evaluation and parameter sensitivity analysis for the high resolution optical remote sensing satellite[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2020.
16	孙文. 不确定信息下的评估指标权重配置方法[J]. 电讯技术, 2023, 63 (6): 882- 888.
	SUN W . A method of weight allocation for evaluation indicators under uncertain information[J]. Telecommunication Engineering, 2023, 63 (6): 882- 888.
17	孙文. 情报保障体系能力需求满足度评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2024, 49 (4): 60- 70.
	SUN W . The evaluation method of capability requirement satisfactory degree for intelligence support system-of-systems[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2024, 49 (4): 60- 70.
18	FU Z, ZHANG T, TAN C, et al. Weapon equipment operational index evaluation method based on cloud model[C]//Proc. of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023.
19	王玉菊, 岳丽军. 基于模糊层次分析法的卫星探测效能评估算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2012, 24 (8): 1665-1668, 1673.
	WANG Y J , YUE L J . Algorithm for satellite detection capability based on fuzzy AHP assessment[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2012, 24 (8): 1665-1668, 1673.
20	刘锋, 李琳. 光学遥感卫星信息获取能力指数的评估[J]. 光学精密工程, 2017, 25 (9): 2454- 2460.
	LIU F , LI L . Evaluation of information acquisition capability of optical remote sensing satellites[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2017, 25 (9): 2454- 2460.
21	刘银年. 高光谱成像遥感载荷技术的现状与发展[J]. 遥感学报, 2021, 25 (1): 439- 459.
	LIU Y N . Development of hyperspectral imaging remote sensing technology[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2021, 25 (1): 439- 459.
22	QIAN S E . Hyperspectral satellites, evolution, and development history[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14, 7032- 7056.
23	高海亮, 顾行发, 余涛, 等. 环境卫星HJ1A超光谱成像仪在轨辐射定标及光谱响应函数敏感性分析[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2010, 30 (11): 3149- 3155.
	GAO H L , GU X F , YU T , et al. HJ1A/HSI radiometric calibration and spectrum response function sensitivity analysis[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2010, 30 (11): 3149- 3155.
24	ZUCCO M, PISANI M, MARI D. A novel hyperspectral camera concept for SWIR-MWIR applications[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace, 2017: 386-390.
25	VANHELLEMONT Q , RUDDICK K . Atmospheric correction of Sentinel-3/OLCI data for mapping of suspended particulate matter and chlorophyll-a concentration in Belgian turbid coastal waters[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 256, 112284.
26	WARREN M A , SIMIS S G H , MARTINEZ-VICENTE V , et al. Assessment of atmospheric correction algorithms for the Sentinel-2A MultiSpectral Imager over coastal and inland waters[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 225, 267- 289.
27	WERDELL P J , MCKINNA L I W , BOSS E , et al. An overview of approaches and challenges for retrieving marine inherent optical properties from ocean color remote sensing[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2018, 160, 186- 212.
28	CHEN M R , CHI W , JIN L G . Extraction method of the contrast feature of ship wake images[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 712, 2403- 2406.
29	陈丽, 李临寒, 王世勇, 等. MMShip: 中分辨率多光谱卫星图像船舶数据集[J]. 光学精密工程, 2023, 31 (13): 1962- 1972.
	CHEN L , LI L H , WANG S Y , et al. MMShip: medium resolution multispectral satellite imagery ship dataset[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2023, 31 (13): 1962- 1972.
30	STOIAN A . Ship detection in Sentinel 2 multi-spectral images with self-supervised learning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13 (21): 4255.
31	CHEN Y W, et al. Ship detection in optical sensing images based on yolov5[C]//Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Graphics and Image Processing, 2021.
32	LIU Z H , ZHANG W J , YU H , et al. Improved yolov5s for small ship detection with optical remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2023, 20, 8002205.

指标	高光谱载荷
指标	Hyperion	CHRIS	FTHSI	AHSI	HysIS	PRISMA	EnMAP	HyspIRI	CHIME
卫星平台	EO-1	PROBA	HJ-1-A	GF-5	IMS-2	PRISMA	German HS	HyspIRI	CHIME
轨道类型	LEO	LEO	LEO	LEO	LEO	LEO	LEO	LEO	LEO
轨道高度/km	705	550~670	540	705	630	615	652	N/A	N/A
分光方式	光栅	棱镜	傅里叶干涉	光栅	N/A	棱镜	棱镜	N/A	N/A
发射年份	2000	2001	2008	2018	2018	2019	2022	预计2024(未发射)	预计2029
光谱范围/μm	0.4~2.5	0.4~1.0	0.45~1.05	0.45~2.5	0.4~2.4	0.4~2.51	0.42~2.5	0.38~2.51	0.4~2.5
光谱通道数	220	62	105	330	256	237	244	212/8	210
光谱分辨率/nm	10	1.25~11	2~9	5/10	10	12	5/10	10/80~540	10
空间分辨率/m	30	25~50	100	30	30	30	30	60	20~30
幅宽/km	7.7	13	50	60	30	30	30	150	120

参数类型	参数名称	参数说明
载荷固有参数	焦距	从透镜中心到光聚集之焦点的距离
	光谱定标精度	成像结果的光谱位置精度
	辐射定标精度	成像结果的辐射能量值精度
	探测器尺寸	探测器长度和宽度方向的像元数
	像元大小	单个像元的物理尺寸, 通常以微米为单位
	量化位数	存储数字图像单像素二进制位数, 通常为10 bit或12 bit
	动态范围	通常指高光谱成像系统能记录地物目标有效信息的最亮和最暗值的比率
	帧频	成像系统每秒成像次数
	积分时间	成像系统单次成像曝光时间
载荷性能参数	成像幅宽	给定成像距离下, 一次成像所覆盖地物宽度
	谱段范围	成像系统所有谱段覆盖的范围, 通常为可见光到短波红外
	光谱分辨率	各个谱段的光谱响应带宽
	谱段数	装备成像的通道数量
	各谱段信噪比	图像各谱段的信号数值比噪声数值
	各谱段MTF	各谱段的光学系统调制传递函数, 表征成像系统空间分辨能力
平台参数	成像距离	高光谱成像系统平台距离观测目标的距离
	观测姿态角	平台的俯仰、侧摆及偏流角
	平台速度	高光谱成像系统搭载平台相对于观测目标的移动速度
	平台稳定度	高光谱成像系统搭载平台移动、转动过程的稳定度(通过像移误差衡量)

评价指标	效能评估模型
评价指标	尺寸特征-单因素模型	强度特征-单因素模型	光谱特征-单因素模型	多因素模型
SSE	0.039	0.855	0.917	2.69
RMSE	0.049	0.212	0.276	0.005 8
R²	0.953	0.871	0.567	0.339

[1]	邵凯, 李浩刚, 梁燕, 宁婧, 陈戊. 跨尺度特征融合的遥感微小目标检测算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1421-1431.
[2]	袁彰求, 杨朝旭, 荣海军. 面向定性与定量指标的轻量化高空飞艇效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 817-826.
[3]	韩维, 郭放, 刘玉杰, 苏析超, 刘洁. 基于三角模糊数作战环的航母编队作战效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 893-903.
[4]	潘超凡, 李润生, 胡庆, 包全福, 保永强. 基于惯性预测的遥感场景舰船多目标跟踪模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(1): 41-51.
[5]	吴巍屹, 贾云献, 姜相争, 史宪铭, 刘洁, 刘彬, 董恩志, 朱曦. 面向阶段任务的携行器材品种确定方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(6): 2054-2064.
[6]	卢海梁, 范清彪, 李鹏飞, 李一楠, 严颂华, 郎量, 靳榕, 李青侠. 综合孔径微波辐射成像技术发展现状与趋势[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1143-1156.
[7]	陈雪梅, 刘志恒, 周绥平, 余航, 刘彦明. 基于HRNet的高分辨率遥感影像道路提取方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1167-1173.
[8]	邵子康, 张晓玲, 张天文, 曾天娇. 基于锚框自适应和多尺度增强的SAR舰船检测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1204-1211.
[9]	郑丽莎, 尹东亮, 王旋. 基于改进D-S证据理论的相控阵雷达作战效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1330-1336.
[10]	马力, 师鹏, 陈宇, 李文龙. 天基信息支援体系离散事件仿真与效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(3): 906-913.
[11]	张亚丽, 冯伟, 全英汇, 邢孟道. 基于多源遥感图像多级协同融合的舰船识别算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 407-418.
[12]	胡涛, 申立群, 朱镜达, 孙成会, 董伟锋. 基于FAST和Sobol指数法的雷达系统效能敏感性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 561-569.
[13]	薛峰涛, 孙天宇, 杨益民, 杨健. 基于全局特征融合的SAR图像旋转舰船目标检测算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(12): 4044-4053.
[14]	陈宇, 师鹏, 马力, 李文龙. 天基信息支援体系建模与效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(10): 3407-3415.
[15]	曹嘉平, 欧萌歆, 李易珊, 姜江, 李际超. 岛礁防空电子对抗装备体系构建与效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2784-2792.

高光谱卫星舰船目标检测效能分析与建模研究

Effectiveness analysis and modeling of ship target detection utilizing hyperspectral remote sensing satellites

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价