基于模型的无人机系统架构综合评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.04.21

Abstract

Abstract:

Integrated evaluation of system architecture is an important phase in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) development. Based on the conceptual and preliminary design requirements of UAV, the comprehensive and hierarchical criteria of the integrated evaluation measures relationship of the system architecture are established. According to the model-based systems engineering approach, three-level evaluation measures system is constructed. By using the simulation results of the system architecture model as the input of the evaluation measure, the integrated evaluation and analysis method of seamless connection between the system architecture model and the evaluation model is established to meet the needs of rapid closed-loop design and optimization for the conceptual and preliminary solution of UAV. Facing engineering applications, system architecture trade-off software is developed. Taking the integrated evaluation of UAV system architecture as an example, the correctness and practicability of the method and the tool are verified.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), conceptual and preliminary design, system architecture, integrated evaluation, model-based systems engineering, measures system, trade-off

CLC Number:

V221.8

Yuanjie LU, Zhimin LIU, Zhixiao SUN, Dong KAN. Model-based integrated evaluation of UAV system architecture[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(4): 1239-1245.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Table 1

References 17

1	顾诵芬. 飞机总体设计[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2002.
	GU S F . Aircraft conceptual and preliminary design[M]. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 2002.
2	余雄庆. 飞机总体多学科设计优化的现状与发展方向[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2008, 40 (4): 417- 426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2008.04.001
	YU X Q . Multidisciplinary design optimization for aircraft conceptual and preliminary design: status and directions[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2008, 40 (4): 417- 426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2008.04.001
3	SAE ARP 4754A. Guidelines for development of civil aircraft and systems[S]. Warrendale, PA: SAE International, 2010.
4	ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288. Systems and software engineering— system life cycle processes[S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2015.
5	MANN C . A practical guide to SysML: the systems modeling language[J]. Kybernetes, 2009, 38 (2): 989- 994.
6	HOFFMANN H. SysML-based systems engineering using a model-driven development approach[C]//Proc. of the INCOSE International Symposium, 2006, 16(1): 804-814.
7	WALDEN D D , ROEDLER G J , FORSBERG K J , et al. Systems engineering handbook—a guide for system life cycle processes and activities[M]. 4th ed New Jersey: Wiley, 2015.
8	AL-AHMED S, FIELDING J. Integrating combat effectiveness disciplines into the conceptual/preliminary design process[C]//Proc. of the 1st AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress, 1995.
9	MAVRIS D, DELAURENTIS D. An integrated approach to military aircraft selection and concept evaluation[C]//Proc. of the 1st AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress, 1995.
10	刘晓东, 宋笔锋. 作战飞机总体设计方案评审指标体系研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2004, 26 (4): 449- 453. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.04.008
	LIU X D , SONG B F . Research on the index systems for conceptual/preliminary design comprehensive evaluation of combat aircraft[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26 (4): 449- 453. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.04.008
11	黄俊, 武哲, 孙惠中, 等. 作战飞机总体设计评价准则和评估方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2000, 21 (1): 70- 73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2000.01.016
	HUANG J , WU Z , SUN H Z , et al. Study on evaluation criteria and assessment methodology for conceptual/preliminary design of combat aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2000, 21 (1): 70- 73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2000.01.016
12	朱力立, 李庄生, 许宗泽. 飞机综合航电系统总体设计综合评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28 (3): 685- 689. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2007.03.033
	ZHU L L , LI Z S , XU Z Z . Integrated approach to overall design evaluation for integrated avionics system of aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28 (3): 685- 689. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2007.03.033
13	SELVA D, CRAWLEY E F. Integrated assessment of packaging architectures in earth observing programs[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2010: 1-17.
14	KASLOW D, SOREMEKUN G, KIM H, et al. Integrated model-based systems engineering (MBSE) applied to the simulation of a CubeSat mission[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2014: 1-14.
15	KASLOW D, AYRES B J, CAHILL P T, et al. CubeSat model-based system engineering (MBSE) reference model-development and distribution-interim status[C]//Proc. of the AIAA SPACE, 2016.
16	CENCETTI M, PASQUINELLI M. MAGGIORE P. System modeling framework and MDO tool integration: MBSE methodologies applied to design and analysis of space system[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, 2013.
17	BAGDATLI B, KARAGOZ F, REILLEY K, et al. MBSE-enabled interactive environment for aircraft conceptual sizing & synthesis[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Scitech Forum, 2019.

三级指标	方案1	方案2
可见光识别距离/km	40	50
红外识别距离/km	70	80
激光测距距离/km	50	55
目标识别时间/ms	49.7	65.3
目标识别概率/%	84.6	72.8
无源定位精度/m	105.6	82.1
无源定位收敛时间/s	27.5	16.2

[1]	Tianye SUN, Wei SUN, Jianjun WU. UAV formation rapid assembly method based on improved Quatre algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(9): 2840-2848.
[2]	Jing YU, Enmi YONG, Hanyang CHEN, Dong HAO, Xiancai ZHANG. Bi-level mission planning method for multi-cooperative UAV air-to-ground attack [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(9): 2849-2857.
[3]	Jianfeng YANG, Heye XIAO, Liang LI, Junqiang BAI, Weihao DONG. Multi-level module partition method of UAV based on fuzzy clustering and expert scoring mechanism [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(8): 2530-2539.
[4]	Yuanyuan ZHANG, Yang GAO, Peng ZHU, Jintao LIU, Shushan GU. UAV reconnaissance tactical planning based on colored Petri nets [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 900-907.
[5]	Xuping GU, Daquan TANG. Hierarchical cooperative navigation of UAV swarm based on federated filtering algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 967-976.
[6]	Xueyong YU, Ye ZHU, Lixiang QIU, Hongbo ZHU. Energy efficient offloading strategy for UAV aided edgecomputing systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 1022-1029.
[7]	Xingjia YANG, Keqing DUAN, Xiang LI, Wei QI. Resolving range ambiguity for cooperative detection using UAV swarms [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 480-489.
[8]	Xiaowei FU, Jing PAN. Distributed formation control of UAV swarm with dynamic obstacle avoidance [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 529-537.
[9]	Dou CHEN, Xiuyun MENG. UAV offline path planning based on self-adaptive coyote optimization algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 603-611.
[10]	Buhua LIU, Dan DING, Liu YANG, Naiyang XUE, Zhongqian LIU. OFDM data transmission technology of UAV based on deep neural network [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 696-702.
[11]	Zhipeng WU, Ping ZHANG, Zhen LI, Lei HUANG, Chang LIU, Shuo GAO. Vegetation height inversion method based on light-weighted and small UAV-radar [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3667-3675.
[12]	Yujia WANG, Wei FANG, Tao XU, Yingfu YU, Boyuan DENG. Intelligent decision-making model by unmanned aerial vehicles in sea-to-air confrontation based on genetic fuzzy trees [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3756-3765.
[13]	Wenqi YANG, Jianhua LU, Xu JIANG, Yuanxin WANG. Design of quadrotor attitude active disturbance rejection controller based on improved ESO [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3792-3799.
[14]	Hanyang WANG, Liang CHEN, Hai XU, Jingbo BAI. UAV online trajectory planning based on MOEA/D-ARMS [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3505-3514.
[15]	Qiucen FAN, Wenhao BI, An ZHANG, Wenhao WANG. MBSE modeling method of civil aircraft altitude control system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 164-171.

Model-based integrated evaluation of UAV system architecture

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 17

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments