基于元模型的装备体系知识图谱构建

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.07.19

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming to address the problems of low data standardization, inconsistent entities and entity relationships in the current military domain knowledge graph describing the equipment system, a method for constructing ontology model in the military field based on meta-model is proposed. The method uses the concept data model and logical data model under the framework of system architecture meta-model technology to define the equipment system domain ontology, thus generating the knowledge graph of the equipment system, avoiding the impact of inconsistent ontology of equipment systems in different branches and operation domains. An ontology application of unmanned aerial vehicle cluster equipment system is constructed for a cooperative strike mission scenario, and a knowledge graph is generated by importing into Neo4j software. The results show that the proposed method can meet the requirements for constructing a knowledge graph of equipment system.

Key words: equipment system, system architecture meta-model, knowledge graph, ontology

CLC Number:

E117

Nuanchen WANG, Xiaolong WANG, Ge MU, Xinjin LI. Construction of equipment system knowledge graph based on meta-model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2374-2382.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 1

Fig.8

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 31

1	王博, 周文雅, 汪涛, 等. 多阶段任务装备体系作战能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (11): 3498- 3506.
	WANG B , ZHOU W Y , WANG T , et al. Operational capability evaluation of multi-phase mission equipment system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (11): 3498- 3506.
2	ZHENG X W, YU X, WEI S, et al. COVID19-OBKG: an ontology-based knowledge graph and web service for COVID19[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2021: 2456-2462.
3	KOZAKI K, KUSHIDA T, YAMAMOTO Y, et al. Buliding knowledge graph across different subdomains using interlinking ontology for biomedical concepts[C]//Proc. of the Joint International Conference of Semantic Technology, 2019: 182-190.
4	ANTONIAZZI F , VIOLA F . Building the semantic web of things through a dynamic ontology[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, 6 (6): 10560- 10579. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2939882
5	李肖, 刘德生. 面向武器装备体系知识图谱的本体构建[J]. 兵工自动化, 2022, 41 (3): 25- 41.
	LI X , LIU D S . Ontology construction for knowledge map of weapon equipment system[J]. Ordnance Indusry Automation, 2022, 41 (3): 25- 41.
6	周育伟, 杨朝宏, 王宏宇. 军事领域本体构建[J]. 计算机时代, 2022, 21 (9): 96- 99.
	ZHOU Y W , YANG C H , WANG H Y . Ontology construction of military field[J]. Computer Era, 2022, 21 (9): 96- 99.
7	CHEN Z K, ZHAO Y. The technology of military knowledge graph construction based on multiple open data source[C]//Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering, 2020: 1993-1997.
8	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version 2.0[R]. Washington D.C. : Department of Defense, 2009.
9	United Kingdom Ministry of Defense. UK Ministry of Defense Framework (MoDAF) Version 1.2[R]. London: United Kingdom Ministry of Defense, 2008.
10	North Atlantic Treaty Organization Consultation Command and Control (C3) Board. The North Altlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Architecture Framework Version 3.0[R]. Brussels: North Altlantic Treaty Organization, 2007.
11	TOGAF 9.2. The open group architecture framework[S]. UK: The Open Group, 2018.
12	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework profile (UAFP) Version1.0[EB/OL]. [2023-05-01]. http://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/20170515/UAFP-Profile.xmi.
13	KVSTER J M . Definition and validation of model transformation[J]. Software and System Modeling, 2006, 5 (3): 233- 259. doi: 10.1007/s10270-006-0018-8
14	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD Architecture Framework Version2.02. Changel Volume3: Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) meta-model ontology foundation and physical exchange specification[R]. Washington D.C. : Department of Defense, 2015.
15	谢文才, 罗雪山, 罗爱民. 基于元模型的军事信息系统体系结构建模方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2012, 34 (1): 82- 87.
	XIE W C , LUO X S , LUO A M . Meta-model based modeling of military information system architecture[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2012, 34 (1): 82- 87.
16	谭贤四, 朱刚, 王红, 等. 基于IDEAS的联合论证元模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37 (1): 85- 92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2015.01.15
	TAN X S , ZHU G , WANG H , et al. Joint demonstration meta-model based on IDEAS[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37 (1): 85- 92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2015.01.15
17	LV H N, XIE J, LIU K. Research on the architecture of shipborne UAV target indication command and control system based on DoDAF[C]//Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Intelligent Control, 2021: 162-171.
18	高悦, 茹乐, 迟文升, 等. 基于体系结构设计的空战系统任务元模型建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (11): 3229- 3238. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.23
	GAO Y , RU L , CHI W S , et al. Task meta-model modeling of air combat system based on system architecture design[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (11): 3229- 3238. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.23
19	SINGHAL A . Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings[J]. Official Google Blog, 2016, 6 (9): 15- 22.
20	REN H , CHEN Z W , LIANG X J , et al. Association hierarchical representation learning for plant-wide process monitoring by using multilevel knowledge graph[J]. IEEE Trans.on Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 4 (4): 636- 649.
21	LU X Y , WANG L F , JIANG Z J , et al. MRE: a translational knowledge graph completion model based on multiple relation embedding[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering: MBE, 2023, 20 (3): 5481- 5900.
22	QI Y L , MAI G C , ZHU R , et al. EVKG: an interlinked and interoperable electric vehicle knowledge for smart transportation system[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2023, 27, 949- 974.
23	ZHOU B , SHEN X W , LI X Y , et al. Semantic-aware event link reasoning over industrial knowledge graph embedding time series data[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2022, 61 (12): 4117- 4134.
24	DEBELLIS M , DUTTA B . From ontology to knowledge graph with agile methods: the case of COVID-19 CODO knowledge graph[J]. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 2022, 18 (5/6): 432- 452.
25	TAMAŠAUSKAITÉ G , GROTH P . Defining a knowledge graph development process through a systematic review[J]. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2022, 32 (1): 27.
26	HAO X J , JI Z , LI X H , et al. Construction and application of a Knowledge Graph[J]. Remote Sense, 2021, 13 (13): 2511.
27	DURÁN C K , MEDINA-RAMÍREZ R C , NIETO M A , et al. Process of building an educational and a military ontology for the Mexican context[J]. Research in Computing Science, 2019, 148 (5): 43- 50.
28	International Defense Enterprise Architecture Specification Group. International defense enterprise architecture specification[EB/OL]. [2023-05-10]. http://www.ideas-group.prg, 2011.
29	GHOSH S , SUNIL K C . A knowledge organization framework for influencing tourism-centered place-making[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2021, 78 (2): 157- 176.
30	SAAD M , ZHANG Y Z , TIAN J H , et al. A graph database for life cycle inventory using Neo4j[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 393, c136344.
31	YANG D S , LI Q , ZHU F H , et al. Parallel emergency management of incidents by integration OODA and PREA loops: the C2 mechanism and modes[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2023, 53 (4): 2160- 2172.

序号	概念1	概念2	关系类型	关系表述
1	执行者	活动	交叠关系	执行者执行装备体系活动
2	指南	活动	交叠关系	指南约束装备体系活动
3	资源	位置	属性	资源需要部署在某位置
4	资源	度量	属性	资源可以度量
5	活动	度量	属性	活动效果可以度量
6	活动	条件	属性	活动需要在一定条件下执行
7	人员	技能	属性	人员具备专业技能

概念名称		专用属性
资源	执行者	度量, 位置, 性能\技能, 编成序列, 数量, 职务
	物资	度量, 位置, 型号, 功能, 用途
	信息	度量, 存储地址, 信息格式, 交换格式, 用途
活动		度量, 条件, 能力需求, 期望效果, 远景
指南		信息, 名称, 适用范围, 时效

序号	关系名称	关系类型	含义	概念类
1	执行	交叠关系	执行者执行作战、保障等活动	执行者→活动
2	约束	交叠关系	指南约束活动/执行者	指南→活动、执行者
3	支持	交叠关系	物资支持执行者执行活动	物资→执行者
4	产生/消耗	交叠关系	活动产生/消耗资源	活动→资源
5	隶属	整体部分关系	人员隶属某组织	人员→组织
6	编成	整体部分关系	装备体系编成装备系统	装备系统→装备系统
7	顺承	前后关系	某活动紧接着另一活动执行	活动→活动
8	并发	前后关系	某活动与另一活动同时发生	活动→活动

[1]	Ruipeng LUAN, Jing ZHANG, Likun LIU. Knowledge graph ontology construction for data governance in equipment testing and indentification field [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 1013-1020.
[2]	Linhu CONG, Yuqi CHEN, Liming CHEN, Yuliang CHEN, Chao WANG. Overall evaluation of mission success of SoS based on HDSPN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 616-630.
[3]	Lan MA, Shijun MENG, Zhijun WU. Intention mining for civil aviation radiotelephony communication based on BERT and generative adversarial [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 740-750.
[4]	Zeyang JI, Chungang YANG, Fuqiang LI, Ying OUYANG, Xianglin LIU. Intent-driven network representation based on natural language processing [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(1): 318-325.
[5]	Haoliang REN, Jianchao ZHANG, Huichuan CHENG. Modeling and analysis method of weapon equipment system capability requirements based on SysML [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(9): 2843-2851.
[6]	Bin LIU, Jiacai YI, Li YAO, Yanjuan WANG, Zhaoyun DING, Xianqiang ZHU. Situational awareness ontology modeling for threat from space cyber operations [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(3): 745-754.
[7]	Tongxin LI, Weiping WANG, Tao WANG, Xiaobo LI. Strategic agent BDI model based on knowledge graph [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 119-126.
[8]	Renjie XU, Lin GONG, Jian XIE, Xin LIU, Kewei YANG. Operation network link importance evaluation and recovery strategy based on equipment system-of-systems resilience [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 139-147.
[9]	Yiyang LUO, Qingsong ZHAO, Huachao LI, Yong LI, Jianbin SUN. Framework and modeling method of weaponry utilization knowledge [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 841-849.
[10]	Weijian PANG, Hui LI, Qian HUANG, Peng LI, Xianming MA. Review on ontology-based task planning for unmanned systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 908-920.
[11]	Shuting WANG, Xiaobing LIU, Junhua ZHOU, Zhaoyang BAI, Xiang ZHAI. Ontology based knowledge representation and reuse method for complex product maintenance engineering cases [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 557-568.
[12]	Depeng KONG, Yiqing MA, Baohua ZHENG, Qi WANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Zhenqiang ZHAO. Contribution rate assessment method of maritime joint operations equipment system of systems for uncertain multi-mission scenes [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3775-3782.
[13]	Tiejun JIANG, Chun YU, Chengjie ZHOU. Fleet level repair plan optimization considering expected system effectiveness attenuation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3571-3578.
[14]	Qihong CHEN, Qingsong ZHAO, Wei QIU, Jia CHEN. Demonstration method of weapon equipment system development planning based on dynamic game [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(10): 3124-3133.
[15]	Yufeng MA, Nan XIANG, Yajie DOU, Jiang JIANG, Kewei YANG, Yuejin TAN. Application and research of knowledge graph in military system engineering [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 146-153.

Construction of equipment system knowledge graph based on meta-model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments