武器装备运用知识框架及建模方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.03.17

Abstract

Abstract:

The weaponry is the important material basis of modern warfare. The systematic combat mode of modern warfare puts forward higher requirements on the utilization of the weapon, especially the systematic joint utilization. However, the grasp of weaponry utilization knowledge determines whether the weaponry can be used correctly and whether it can give full play to the effectiveness of the weapon. To this end, for weaponry utilization under systematic combat, the research on the knowledge framework and modeling methods of weaponry utilization is carried out. Firstly, the factor composition of weaponry utilization knowledge and the relationship composition between factors under systematic combat are analyzed. Secondly, a knowledge framework of weaponry utilization knowledge based on multi-perspective is constructed, and its constituent products are given. Then, an ontology-based weaponry utilization knowledge modeling method is proposed, and an example is analyzed. The weaponry utilization knowledge framework and modeling method for systematic combat can provide important support for weaponry forming systematic combat capability.

Key words: weaponry utilization, multi-view, knowledge modeling, ontology

CLC Number:

E920

Yiyang LUO, Qingsong ZHAO, Huachao LI, Yong LI, Jianbin SUN. Framework and modeling method of weaponry utilization knowledge[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 841-849.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Table 1

Meaning of nodes"

序号	节点名称	含义
1	任务	任务指军队为达成预定作战目标所承担的任务; 划分为使命任务与作战任务
2	作战资源	装备运用相关的军事设施或环境条件; 划分为军事设施与环境
3	能力指标	对底层能力项进行具体描述与度量的形式
4	能力	能力是指在特定的标准和条件下, 通过综合使用各种方法、手段和资源来执行一系列活动以达成预期效果的本领
5	作战人员	在装备运用中, 执行活动并提供能力的人
6	作战单位	指基于军队编制的班、排、连、营等各级单位, 也包括针对一定目的专门组织起来的单位
7	组织	现实世界中, 为装备运用的目标, 已有的或者专门组织起来的作战人员或作战单位的集合
8	作战行动	作战行动是为完成作战任务而涉及的基于条令、战术、技术与标准操作程序的具体动作
9	评价指标	特指作战行动的评价指标, 是用于评价部队相关行动执行情况的衡量尺度与标准
10	关键技术	关键技术是指在一个武器装备发挥功能中起到重要作用且不可或缺的技术
11	通信链路	作战中组织、装备之间信息交流的物理通道
12	角色	根据作战人员承担的与装备运用相关的任务来划分的角色
13	操作	为了实现武器装备功能, 操作人员对武器装备操作杆、按钮、操作系统等的操作
14	武器装备	武器装备是用于实施和保障作战行动的武器、武器系统和军事器材的统称, 功能上相互联系、性能上相互补充的武器装备
15	系统	特指武器装备在同时运用时相互依赖、相互作用所构成的有机整体
16	挂载	武器装备作为一个作战平台时所携带的武器、设备等
17	挂载方案	武器装备作为作战平台时所携带的挂载和设备的类型以及数量
18	军事目标	国家直接用于军事目的建筑、场地和设施
19	战技指标	量化描述武器装备各项功能的指标; 划分为战术指标与技术指标
20	军用词汇	描述武器装备运用中涉及到的各个军用专有词汇
21	法规	特指对装备运用具有指导和规范作用的相关军事条令条例、教材、作战手册、装备手册等较为成熟的、已经在军内出版发行的法规材料
22	功能指标	量化描述武器装备在系统的角度下能完成的工作的指标

Table 1

Table 2

Meaning of edges"

序号	边	含义
1	任务-作战行动	作战任务拆分为作战行动
2	作战行动-作战资源	作战行动需要作战资源, 同时一些作战行动会提供作战资源
3	武器装备-任务	武器装备支撑任务
4	武器装备-作战行动	武器装备支撑作战行动
5	任务-能力	任务存在能力需求
6	武器装备-能力	武器装备自身具备能力
7	作战行动-能力	作战行动存在能力需求
8	作战行动-评价指标	评价指标量化评价作战行动的结果
9	武器装备-通信链路	武器装备上配备了通信链路
10	武器装备-挂载方案	武器装备配置了挂载方案
11	挂载方案-挂载	挂载方案中包括了各类挂载
12	武器装备-战技指标	战技指标量化描述了武器装备的各项功能
13	武器装备-系统	武器装备组成系统
14	系统-功能指标	功能指标量化描述系统的功能
15	操作-武器装备	操作的对象为武器装备
16	角色-操作	角色是执行操作的主体
17	操作-操作	操作之间存在先后顺序
18	作战行动-作战行动	作战行动间存在先后顺序
19	组织-能力	组织具有能力
20	作战人员-组织	作战人员是组织的一种
21	作战单位-组织	作战单位是组织的一种
22	作战人员-作战单位	作战人员组成作战单位
23	组织-组织	低级组织组成高级组织
24	作战人员-角色	作战人员担任角色
25	法规-任务	法规指导和约束任务
26	法规-系统	法规指导和约束系统的构成
27	法规-武器装备	法规指导和约束武器装备的运用
28	军用词汇-法规	法规中出现了军用词汇
29	武器装备-关键技术	武器装备涉及关键技术
30	系统-作战任务	系统支撑作战任务
31	系统-作战行动	系统支撑作战行动
32	武器装备-军事目标	武器装备针对军事目标

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

Multi-view based weaponry utilization knowledge products"

视角	序号	产品	内涵
武器装备视角	1	武器装备分类知识	武器装备的类别划分
	2	武器装备战技指标知识	量化表示武器装备的性能
	3	武器装备挂载方案知识	武器装备携带挂载的具体情况
	4	武器装备涉及的关键技术知识	武器装备涉及关键技术的类目
	5	武器装备的操作流程知识	为了完成武器装备功能, 所进行的操作的先后顺序
	6	武器装备的通信链路知识	武器装备所配备的通信链路及其各类属性信息
能力视角	1	能力分类知识	能力的层次结构
	2	能力的指标知识	能力的量化
	3	能力依赖关系知识	能力间存在的逻辑依赖关系
	4	作战任务、作战行动的能力需求知识	完成作战行动的目标, 所需要的武器装备的能力项
	5	作战单位所具备的能力知识	作战单位执行活动以达成预期效果的本领
组织视角	1	作战单位的组织结构知识	作战单位的建制结构
	2	组分之间的关系知识	作战单位各组分之间的相互作用关系
	3	作战单位配备的武器装备知识	作战单位所配备的武器装备的类型与数量
	4	武器装备配备人员的类型知识	操作武器装备所需要的人员角色, 以及能够胜任这些角色的人员类型
	5	对武器装备配备人员的要求知识	武器装备配备的人员需要完成训练项目或者需要具备的能力等
资源视角	1	环境条件的描述知识	环境条件的含义
	2	作战资源组成结构知识	信息、物资等作战资源的组成结构
	3	作战资源的标准知识	作战资源的各类属性标准信息
	4	环境条件的分类知识	武器装备所处的环境条件的层级结构
	5	作战行动的资源需求知识	执行具体作战行动在信息、物资、环境交互等资源方面的具体需要
	6	作战行动提供的资源知识	成功执行作战行动, 能为后续作战行动提供作战资源
	7	环境对武器装备的影响知识	各类环境条件对武器装备战技指标的影响
系统视角	1	系统的功能指标知识	量化描述武器装备在系统的角度下能完成的工作
	2	系统的接口知识	系统各组分之间资源传输的类型以及接口的类型
	3	系统的组成知识	武器装备系统的组成结构
	4	系统规则知识	对系统中的资源、功能和端口的约束
法规视角	1	法规的分类知识	法规类目划分
	2	武器装备运用依据的法规名目知识	指导和规范武器装备运用的法规名目
	3	作战行动执行依据的法规名目知识	指导和规范作战行动的法规名目
	4	军用词汇知识	军用词汇的含义
任务视角	1	任务的类型知识	任务在各个分类维度下所属于的类别
	2	任务的分解知识	任务的组成结构
	3	作战任务的流程知识	作战任务中作战行动的先后顺序
	4	作战行动的评价指标知识	量化反映行动执行情况
	5	军事目标的分类知识	军事目标的层次结构
	6	武器装备针对的目标知识	武器装备通常用于对付的军事目标的类型
	7	作战规则知识	对作战中武器装备具体运用的约束

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 30

1	NEWELL A . The knowledge level[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1982, (18): 87- 127.
2	CORTELLESSA V , MARCO A D , TRUBIANI C . An approach for modeling and detecting software performance antipatterns based on first-order logics[J]. Software & Systems Modeling, 2014, 13 (1): 391- 432.
3	PAN L Q , SONG B S . P systems with rule production and removal[J]. Fundamenta Informaticae, 2020, 171 (4): 313- 329.
4	QI X B , GUO H , ARTEM Z , et al. An interval-valued data classification method based on the unified representation frame[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 17002- 17012. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967780
5	LIUZZI A G , AGLINSKAS A , FAIRHALL S L . General and feature-based semantic representations in the semantic network[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 8931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65906-0
6	MA Z , CAPRETZ M A M , YAN L . Storing massive resource description framework (RDF) data: a survey[J]. Knowledge Engineering Review, 2016, 31 (4): 391- 413. doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000217
7	ANGLES R , THAKKAR H , TOMASZUK D . Mapping RDF databases to property graph databases[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 86091- 86110. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993117
8	AZIZ A , AHMED S , KHAN F I . An ontology-based methodo-logy for hazard identification and causation analysis[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 123, 87- 98. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.12.008
9	YAN J H , WANG C Y , CHENG W L , et al. A retrospective of knowledge graphs[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2018, 12 (1): 55- 74. doi: 10.1007/s11704-016-5228-9
10	汤再江, 徐享忠, 薛青, 等. 作战行动本体构建及基于本体的语义推理[J]. 计算机仿真, 2018, 35 (6): 7- 11, 404.
	TANG Z J , XUE X Z , XUE Q , et al. Operational action onto-logy modeling and semantic reasoning based on ontology[J]. Computer Simulation, 2018, 35 (6): 7- 11, 404.
11	JÚNIOR P S S , BARCELLOS M P , FALBO R , et al. From a scrum reference ontology to the integration of applications for data-driven software development[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2021, 136, 106570. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106570
12	CHEN J , WU Y . Rules-based object-relational databases ontology construction[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 20 (1): 211- 215.
13	李东. 决策支持系统与知识管理系统[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005.
	LI D . Decision support system and knowledge management system[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2005.
14	周忠旺, 柳少军. 基于EBI框架的战争模拟多分辨率概念建模[J]. 计算机仿真, 2014, 31 (9): 1- 4, 9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2014.09.001
	ZHOU Z W , LIU S J . Multi-resolution conceptual modeling in war game based on EBI framework[J]. Computer Simulation, 2014, 31 (9): 1- 4, 9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2014.09.001
15	WANG T , ZHOU X , WANG W P , et al. An optimal approach for combat system-of-systems architecture search under uncertainty[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 119140- 119150. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937321
16	WON B J , JUNSEOK L , DOHYUNG K , et al. Layered behavior modeling via combining descriptive and prescriptive approaches: a case study of infantry company engagement[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems Man & Cybernetics Systems, 2018, 50 (7): 2551- 2565.
17	ZHANG C, YANG S L, PENG D H, et al. Application of domain knowledge representation in the simulation tutoring for weapon utilization[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 7th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference, 2014: 487-491.
18	武勇, 曾凡, 周丘实. 智能飞行能力的知识表示方法[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2020, (1): 63- 67.
	WU Y , ZENG F , ZHOU Q S . A knowledge representation method for intelligent flight capability[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2020, (1): 63- 67.
19	GAO P D, ZHAO T Z. Question answering system over knowledge graph of weapon field[C]//Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Control, Robotics and Cybernetics, 2020.
20	LIAO F, MA L L, YANG D J. Research on construction method of knowledge graph of us military equipment based on bilstm model[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on High Performance Big Data and Intelligent Systems, 2019: 146-150.
21	BAPNAR B , KOYUNCU E . Assessment of aerial combat game via optimization-based receding horizon control[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 35853- 35863. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974792
22	JIA Z R , LU F X , WANG H Y . Multi-stage attack weapon target allocation method based on defense area analysis[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31 (3): 539- 550. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2020.000033
23	LI Q N , YANG R N , FENG C , et al. Approach for air-to-air confrontment based on uncertain interval information conditions[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (1): 100- 109. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.01.10
24	邓海军, 尹全军, 胡记文, 等. 基于MEBN的战术意图识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32 (11): 2374- 2379.
	DENG H J , YIN Q J , HU J W , et al. Tactical intention recognition based on multi-entity Bayesian network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32 (11): 2374- 2379.
25	ZHOU T L , CHEN M , WANG Y H , et al. Information entropy-based intention prediction of aerial targets under uncertain and incomplete information[J]. Entropy, 2020, 22 (3): 279. doi: 10.3390/e22030279
26	YU S B, WU L D, ZHANG X J. Research on equipment knowledge representation based on visual analytics[C]//Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids, 2017: 208-212.
27	ZHANG M M , CHEN H H , MAO Y , et al. An approach to measuring business-IT alignment maturity via DoDAF2.0[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31 (1): 95- 108.
28	王新尧, 曹云峰, 孙厚俊, 等. 基于DoDAF的有人/无人机协同作战体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (10): 2265- 2274. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.15
	WANG X Y , CAO Y F , SUN H J , et al. Modeling for cooperative combat system architecture of manned/unmanned aerial vehicle based on DoDAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (10): 2265- 2274. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.15
29	李大喜, 张强, 李小喜, 等. 基于DoDAF的空基反导装备体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (5): 1036- 1041.
	LI D X , ZHANG Q , LI X X , et al. Architecture modeling for equipment of airborne anti-missile based on DoDAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (5): 1036- 1041.
30	Multilateral Interoperability Programme (MIP). Joint C3 information exchange data model (JC3IEDM)[EB/OL]. [2021-03-23]. http://www.mip-site.org/publicsite/06-Other_Documents/MIP-NDAG_MOA.pdf.

[1]	Weijian PANG, Hui LI, Qian HUANG, Peng LI, Xianming MA. Review on ontology-based task planning for unmanned systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 908-920.
[2]	Shuting WANG, Xiaobing LIU, Junhua ZHOU, Zhaoyang BAI, Xiang ZHAI. Ontology based knowledge representation and reuse method for complex product maintenance engineering cases [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 557-568.
[3]	Xue SUN, Zhiqiu HUANG, Guohua SHEN, Jinyong WANG, Heng XU. Behavior decision method of autonomous vehicle based on ontology and BN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 452-465.
[4]	Wenwen KANG, Haomin LI. Multi-view representation method of aircraft system architecture based on model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3266-3277.
[5]	HE Hongyue, WANG Zhixue, LIANG Haomo, WANG Qinglong. Approach to mission modeling and analysis for system of systems based on ontology [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(9): 1973-1978.
[6]	CHENG Kai, CHEN Gang, YIN Chengxiang, KANG Ruizhi, KANG Xingdang. Core ontology modeling and reasoning method for course of action [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(4): 805-814.
[7]	ZHANG Yue, ZOU Huanxin, SHAO Ningyuan, QIN Xianxiang, ZHOU Shilin, JI Kefeng. Terrain classification of polarimetric SAR images based on consensus similarity network fusion [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(2): 295-302.
[8]	SUN Yufei, MA Liangli, LV Minhui, QIN Jiwei. Improved co-training based ontology matching method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(2): 459-464.
[9]	MAI Qiang, WANG Ning, AN Shi, WANG Zhao. Risk management knowledge base for aerospace engineering#br# based on Ontology-based semantic modeling [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(10): 2331-2337.
[10]	SU Zheng-lian, YAN Jun, CHEN Hai-song, ZENG Yong-hua. Construction of ontology based equipment fault knowledge base [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(9): 2067-2072.
[11]	LI Kang, LI Xin-ming, LIU Dong. Modeling method for weapon system of systems structure based on semantic meta-model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(11): 2503-2512.
[12]	TAN Xian-si,ZHU Gang,WANG Hong,BI Hong-kui,GAO Ting3. Joint demonstration meta-model based on IDEAS [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(1): 85-92.
[13]	HU Bo, WANG Zhi-xue, DONG Qing-chao. Context-aware modeling and reasoning based on OWL [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(10): 2163-2168.
[14]	LIU Juan,TANG Su-yan,LI Qun,WANG Wei-ping. Research and application of an ontology for aircraft route planning [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(6): 1258-1262.
[15]	LIU Zhong, QIAN Meng, HUANG Jin-cai, ZHANG Wei-ming. Semantic reasoning based approach to COA validation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 988-993.

Framework and modeling method of weaponry utilization knowledge

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments