面向不确定多任务场景的海上联合作战装备体系贡献率评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.12.22

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the problems of various equipment types, complex composition and many factors involved in capability generation of maritime joint combat equipment system of systems (SoS), an evaluation method of equipment SoS contribution rate for uncertain mission scenes is proposed. Firstly, the structure of equipment SoS, the composition of uncertain multi task scene and the composition of equipment SoS effectiveness evaluation index in maritime joint operations are analyzed. Then, based on intuitionistic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, an evaluation method of equipment SoS contribution rate for uncertain multi mission scene is proposed. Finally, an example is given to analyze the calculation process of the SoS contribution rate evaluation method, which shows the effectiveness of the proposed method for the contribution rate evaluation of maritime joint combat equipment SoS.

Key words: maritime joint operation, uncertain task, equipment system of systems (SoS), contribution rate assessment

CLC Number:

E917

Depeng KONG, Yiqing MA, Baohua ZHENG, Qi WANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Zhenqiang ZHAO. Contribution rate assessment method of maritime joint operations equipment system of systems for uncertain multi-mission scenes[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3775-3782.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 36

1	杨克巍, 杨志伟, 谭跃进, 等. 面向体系贡献率的装备体系评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (2): 311- 321.
	YANG K W , YANG Z W , TAN Y J , et al. Review of the evaluation methods of equipment system of systems facing the contribution rate[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (2): 311- 321.
2	LIU P , LI J C , XIA B Y , et al. Weapons equipment portfolios selection based on equipment system contribution rate[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (3): 584- 595. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2021.000050
3	梁家林, 熊伟. 武器装备体系贡献度评估方法综述[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39 (4): 67- 71. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2018.04.016
	LIANG J L , XIONG W . Overview of evaluation method of contribution of weapon equipment system[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39 (4): 67- 71. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2018.04.016
4	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 项华春, 等. 装备体系贡献率评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1789- 1794.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , XIANG H C , et al. Review of the evaluation methods of equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1789- 1794.
5	WANG Z , LIU S F , FANG Z G . Research on SoS-GERT network model for equipment system of systems contribution evaluation based on joint operation[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 14 (3): 4188- 4196. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2956549
6	林木, 李小波, 王彦锋, 等. 基于QFD和组合赋权TOPSIS的体系贡献率能效评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1802- 1809.
	LIN M , LI X B , WANG Y F , et al. Capability-effectiveness evaluation of contribution ratio to system-of-systems based on QFD and combination weights TOPSIS[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1802- 1809.
7	罗小明, 杨娟, 何榕. 基于任务-能力-结构-演化的武器装备体系贡献度评估与示例分析[J]. 装备学院学报, 2016, 27 (3): 7- 13. doi: 10.3783/j.issn.2095-3828.2016.03.002
	LUO X M , YANG J , HE R , et al. Research and demonstration on contribution evaluation of weapon equipment system based on task-capability-structure evolution[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 2016, 27 (3): 7- 13. doi: 10.3783/j.issn.2095-3828.2016.03.002
8	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 张洋铭, 等. 基于混合参数证据网络的装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39 (12): 2488- 2496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.12.023
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , ZHANG Y M , et al. Evaluation of equipment contribution rate to system-of-systems based on hybrid parameter evidential network[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39 (12): 2488- 2496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.12.023
9	游雅倩, 姜江, 孙建彬, 等. 基于证据网络的装备体系贡献率评估方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1780- 1788.
	YOU Y Q , JIANG J , SUN J B , et al. Evidential network-based evaluation method of contribution to weapon system-of-systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1780- 1788.
10	李际超, 杨克巍, 张小可, 等. 基于武器装备体系作战网络模型的装备贡献度评估[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
	LI J C , YANG K W , ZHANG X K , et al. Equipment contribution degree evaluation method based on combat network of weapon system-of-systems[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
11	周琛, 宋笔锋, 尚柏林, 等. 基于作战网络可靠度的体系贡献率评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (7): 1875- 1883.
	ZHOU C , SONG B F , SHANG B L , et al. System of systems contribution rate evaluation based on operational network reliability[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (7): 1875- 1883.
12	LI J C , ZHAO D L , JIANG J , et al. Capability oriented equipment contribution analysis in temporal combat networks[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2021, 51 (2): 696- 704. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2882782
13	王飞, 司光亚. 武器装备体系能力贡献度的解析与度量方法[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2016, 30 (3): 10- 15.
	WANG F , SHI G Y . Analysis and measurement of capability contribution of weapon equipment system[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2016, 30 (3): 10- 15.
14	张先超, 马亚辉. 体系能力模型与装备体系贡献率测度方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (4): 843- 849.
	ZHANG X C , MA Y H . Capability model of combat system of systems and measurement method of armament contribution to combat system of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (4): 843- 849.
15	罗小明, 朱延雷, 何榕. 基于SEM的武器装备作战体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 装备学院学报, 2015, 26 (5): 1- 6.
	LUO X M , ZHU Y L , HE R . SEM-based evaluation method of contribution to system warfighting for weapons and equipments[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 2015, 26 (5): 1- 6.
16	卜广志. 基于AOE模型的装备对作战体系的贡献率评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2020, 45 (12): 18- 22.
	BU G Z . An assessment method of armament contribution to operational system based on AOE model[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2020, 45 (12): 18- 22.
17	殷小静, 胡晓峰, 郭圣明, 等. 基于SDAE+Softmax模型的体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2021, 46 (6): 7- 11.7-11, 20
	YIN X J , HU X F , GUO S M , et al. Evaluation method of the contribution rate to SoS based on SDAE+Softmax model[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2021, 46 (6): 7- 11.7-11, 20
18	马钧文, 张安, 高飞, 等. 基于置信规则推理的武器装备体系贡献度评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (7): 1519- 1526.
	MA J W , ZHANG A , GAO F , et al. Evaluation of weapon equipment contribution rate to system-of-systems based on belief rule-based system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (7): 1519- 1526.
19	陈斯诺, 张安, 高飞. 基于深度置信网络的装备体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2021, 43 (4): 26- 31.
	CHEN S N , ZHANG A , GAO F . Equipment contribution rate to system-of-systems evaluation method based on deep belief networks[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2021, 43 (4): 26- 31.
20	陈立新. 一种通用的装备体系贡献率评估框架[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2020, 34 (2): 33- 38.
	CHEN L X . A general equipment system contribution rate assessment framework[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2020, 34 (2): 33- 38.
21	姚天乐, 胡起伟, 齐子元, 等. 基于软计算的轻武器装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40 (5): 938- 945.
	YAO T L , HU Q W , QI Z Y . Soft computing-based assessment method of contribution rate of small arms and equipment system[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40 (5): 938- 945.
22	毕文豪, 崔俊儒, 张安, 等. 新型远程空空导弹体系贡献度评估研究[J]. 电光与控制, 2020, 27 (8): 1- 4.
	BI W H , CUI J R , ZHANG A , et al. Evaluation of new-type long-range air-to-air missile's contribution to system warfighting[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2020, 27 (8): 1- 4.
23	房桂祥, 谭跃进, 张木, 等. 基于作战环的导弹武器系统体系相对贡献率评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (8): 1734- 1739.
	FANG G X , TAN Y J , ZHANG M , et al. Evaluation of relative contribution rate of missile weapon system-of-systems based on combat ring[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (8): 1734- 1739.
24	卜晓东, 张军. 基于OODA循环的反舰导弹作战效能评估研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49 (2): 13- 19.
	BU X D , ZHANG J . Research on operational effectiveness evaluation of antiship missile based on OODA cycle[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2021, 49 (2): 13- 19.
25	王维强, 任宏光, 高忠长. 直升机载空空导弹体系贡献率评估[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2021, 41 (3): 100- 104.
	WANG W Q , REN H G , GAO Z C . Evaluation of system contribution rate of helicopter-borne air-to-air missile[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2021, 41 (3): 100- 104.
26	叶紫晴, 屈也频. 基于规则推理的海军航空作战装备体系贡献度分析[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2015, 37 (5): 29- 33.
	YE Z Q , QU Y P . Analysis of contribution degree based on rule-based reasoning for naval aviation operation equipment system[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2015, 37 (5): 29- 33.
27	李炜, 张恒, 王玮. 评价舰船装备体系贡献度的一种方法[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2015, 37 (10): 1- 5.
	LI W , ZHANG H , WANG W . An evaluation method for the contribution margin of a ship in the combat system of systems[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2015, 37 (10): 1- 5.
28	刘鹏, 赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 等. 面向多任务的武器装备体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1763- 1770.
	LIU P , ZHAO D L , TAN Y J , et al. Multi-task oriented contribution evaluation method of weapon equipment system of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1763- 1770.
29	BRYANT D J . Rethinking OODA: toward a modern cognitive framework of command decision making[J]. Military Psychology, 2009, 18 (3): 183- 206.
30	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 胡旭, 等. 基于作战环和自信息量的装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53 (6): 741- 748.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y C , HU X , et al. Evaluation method of equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems based on operation loop and self-information quantity[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019, 53 (6): 741- 748.
31	赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 李际超, 等. 基于作战环的武器装备体系贡献度评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (10): 2239- 2247.
	ZHAO D L , TAN Y J , LI J C , et al. Armament system of systems contribution evaluation based on operation loop[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (10): 2239- 2247.
32	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 何桢, 等. 基于故障树分析的航空装备体系结构贡献率评估方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2021, 43 (1): 155- 162.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , HE Z , et al. Evaluation method of aviation equipment's structure contribution rate to system-of-systems based on fault tree analysis[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43 (1): 155- 162.
33	李小波, 王维平, 林木, 等. 体系贡献率评估的研究框架、进展与重点方向[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
	LI X B , WANG W P , LIN M , et al. The research framework, progress, and key directions of system-of-systems contribution ratio evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
34	ATANASSOV K T . Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20 (1): 87- 96.
35	XU Z S . Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J]. IEEE Trans.on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15 (6): 1179- 1187.
36	ZENG S Z , CHEN S M , KUO L W . Multiattribute decision making based on novel score function of intuitionistic fuzzy values and modified VIKOR method[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 488, 76- 92.

作战场景	效能指标	u₁	v₁	u₂	v₂	u₃	v₃	u₄	v₄
S₁⁽¹⁾	f	0.62	0.19	0.45	0.40	0.64	0.12	0.61	0.29
	s	0.76	0.17	0.52	0.25	0.55	0.25	0.70	0.20
	a	0.71	0.17	0.77	0.19	0.61	0.24	0.45	0.29
S₂⁽¹⁾	f	0.72	0.09	0.39	0.22	0.46	0.46	0.39	0.51
	s	0.52	0.13	0.50	0.31	0.60	0.28	0.36	0.26
	a	0.51	0.27	0.43	0.43	0.76	0.17	0.59	0.15
S₃⁽¹⁾	f	0.78	0.13	0.42	0.32	0.64	0.17	0.79	0.14
	s	0.76	0.18	0.43	0.25	0.37	0.45	0.63	0.20
	a	0.66	0.29	0.47	0.37	0.32	0.49	0.54	0.38
S₁⁽²⁾	f	0.61	0.31	0.59	0.14	0.74	0.10	0.38	0.55
	s	0.55	0.24	0.64	0.08	0.56	0.13	0.71	0.21
	a	0.63	0.21	0.62	0.29	0.52	0.38	0.37	0.20
S₂⁽²⁾	f	0.72	0.22	0.50	0.28	0.63	0.24	0.52	0.15
	s	0.38	0.17	0.40	0.33	0.78	0.19	0.67	0.13
	a	0.57	0.37	0.79	0.12	0.63	0.21	0.63	0.12
S₃⁽²⁾	f	0.80	0.06	0.58	0.34	0.40	0.28	0.79	0.14
	s	0.62	0.17	0.51	0.26	0.59	0.15	0.59	0.15
	a	0.61	0.15	0.79	0.15	0.59	0.14	0.74	0.20
S₄⁽²⁾	f	0.60	0.09	0.46	0.17	0.51	0.13	0.54	0.32
	s	0.62	0.09	0.46	0.31	0.50	0.38	0.78	0.12
	a	0.35	0.41	0.51	0.13	0.38	0.25	0.56	0.23
S₁⁽³⁾	f	0.56	0.38	0.78	0.12	0.44	0.37	0.33	0.25
	s	0.63	0.29	0.69	0.21	0.60	0.19	0.30	0.37
	a	0.53	0.35	0.69	0.16	0.39	0.43	0.38	0.27
S₂⁽³⁾	f	0.40	0.43	0.76	0.13	0.39	0.24	0.59	0.28
	s	0.51	0.32	0.64	0.23	0.40	0.41	0.36	0.40
	a	0.53	0.31	0.48	0.35	0.72	0.22	0.61	0.24

作战场景	u^f	v^f	u^s	v^s	u^a	v^a
S₁⁽¹⁾	0.592	0.228	0.642	0.217	0.633	0.226
S₂⁽¹⁾	0.529	0.251	0.489	0.242	0.614	0.216
S₃⁽¹⁾	0.709	0.168	0.570	0.246	0.499	0.387
S₁⁽²⁾	0.583	0.251	0.633	0.147	0.528	0.264
S₂⁽²⁾	0.609	0.209	0.587	0.196	0.660	0.178
S₃⁽²⁾	0.707	0.149	0.574	0.181	0.690	0.160
S₄⁽²⁾	0.539	0.161	0.621	0.190	0.461	0.236
S₁⁽³⁾	0.544	0.265	0.569	0.260	0.492	0.295
S₂⁽³⁾	0.553	0.265	0.496	0.326	0.612	0.265

评价值	S₁⁽¹⁾	S₂⁽¹⁾	S₃⁽¹⁾	-
P_T₁	〈0.620, 0.224〉	〈0.545 1, 0.237 4〉	〈0.615, 0.242〉	-

评价值	S₁⁽²⁾	S₂⁽²⁾	S₃⁽²⁾	S₄⁽²⁾
P_T₂	〈0.583, 0.217〉	〈0.619, 0.195〉	〈0.667, 0.162〉	〈0.545, 0.190〉

评价值	S₁⁽³⁾	S₂⁽³⁾	-	-
P_T₃	〈0.537, 0.272〉	〈0.556, 0.282〉	-	-

作战场景	效能指标	u₁	v₁	u₂	v₂	u₃	v₃	u₄	v₄
S₁⁽¹⁾	f	0.76	0.09	0.54	0.4	0.64	0.23	0.69	0.18
	s	0.66	0.31	0.53	0.13	0.62	0.19	0.73	0.17
	a	0.78	0.19	0.54	0.32	0.66	0.20	0.65	0.17
S₂⁽¹⁾	f	0.72	0.16	0.54	0.28	0.51	0.35	0.63	0.25
	s	0.72	0.13	0.71	0.15	0.60	0.20	0.56	0.34
	a	0.77	0.13	0.62	0.29	0.61	0.14	0.78	0.12
S₃⁽¹⁾	f	0.63	0.29	0.55	0.36	0.65	0.28	0.55	0.15
	s	0.72	0.21	0.60	0.23	0.53	0.14	0.65	0.12
	a	0.54	0.14	0.67	0.28	0.67	0.25	0.80	0.14
S₁⁽²⁾	f	0.68	0.28	0.64	0.27	0.65	0.29	0.75	0.18
	s	0.57	0.28	0.69	0.21	0.77	0.21	0.67	0.28
	a	0.51	0.14	0.65	0.28	0.67	0.21	0.68	0.14
S₂⁽²⁾	f	0.65	0.12	0.56	0.13	0.51	0.31	0.66	0.23
	s	0.66	0.17	0.65	0.28	0.58	0.14	0.69	0.15
	a	0.78	0.06	0.54	0.14	0.67	0.14	0.72	0.20
S₃⁽²⁾	f	0.76	0.21	0.76	0.18	0.55	0.21	0.51	0.42
	s	0.59	0.18	0.69	0.13	0.67	0.27	0.63	0.09
	a	0.70	0.14	0.54	0.41	0.71	0.26	0.62	0.20
S₄⁽²⁾	f	0.75	0.07	0.61	0.10	0.60	0.13	0.77	0.15
	s	0.77	0.12	0.72	0.17	0.68	0.13	0.56	0.36
	a	0.57	0.10	0.50	0.41	0.53	0.20	0.53	0.42
S₁⁽³⁾	f	0.59	0.10	0.51	0.27	0.69	0.08	0.73	0.22
	s	0.53	0.36	0.59	0.30	0.51	0.32	0.66	0.24
	a	0.73	0.12	0.67	0.16	0.73	0.12	0.72	0.08
S₂⁽³⁾	f	0.66	0.18	0.74	0.19	0.52	0.13	0.78	0.15
	s	0.72	0.08	0.69	0.13	0.72	0.17	0.57	0.31
	a	0.76	0.09	0.61	0.26	0.74	0.12	0.53	0.35

序号	装备体系变化情况	体系效能评估值(IFN)	装备体系贡献率/%
1	原体系(简称为SoS)	〈0.671 7, 0.090 8〉	-
2	新装备加入 (SoS+A₁)	〈0.723 7, 0.076 7〉	11.43
3	原装备升级 (SoS+A⁺-A)	〈0.703 6, 0.088 7〉	5.89
4	其他装备替代 (SoS+B-A)	〈0.655 4, 0.118 5〉	-7.57

Contribution rate assessment method of maritime joint operations equipment system of systems for uncertain multi-mission scenes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 36

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments