基于DoDAF-OPM-SD的武器装备体系可执行动态建模与评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.09.21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对装备体系早期评估中架构视图难以直接驱动连续仿真、动态能力评估效率较低等问题，提出一种基于美国国防部体系结构框架、对象过程方法与系统动力学的混合建模方法。首先，以对象过程方法构建统一的对象—过程模型，明确架构要素到系统动力学库存—流率结构的映射，使架构视图可直接驱动连续仿真。然后，结合追踪标识、自动映射与三级参数池，确保模型转换一致和求解稳健性。最后，以情报监视侦察—火力打击任务开展对比仿真验证。结果表明，所提方法可为装备体系早期设计与优化决策提供量化支撑。

关键词: 武器装备体系, 可执行体系架构, 对象过程方法, 动态能力评估

Abstract:

To address the issues such as the difficulty in directly driving continuous simulation from architectural views and the low efficiency of dynamic capability evaluation in early-stage equipment system of systems evaluations, a hybrid modeling method based on Department of Defense Architecture Framework, object−process methodology, and system dynamics is proposed. Firstly, object-process methodology is used to construct a unified object–process model and clarify mappings from architectural elements to system dynamics stock–flow rate structures, enabling architectural views to directly drive continuous simulation. Secondly, combine trace identifiers, automated mapping and three-level parameter pool to ensure consistent model transformation and robust solution. Finally, comparative simulation verification is conducted using an intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance–fire strike mission. The results indicate that the proposed method can provide quantitative support for early design and optimization decision-making of equipment system of systems.

Key words: weapon equipment system of systems, executable system of systems architecture, object?process methodology, dynamic capability evaluation

中图分类号:

E 917

程磊, 肖刚, 邢继娟, 李泽民, 彭斯明. 基于DoDAF-OPM-SD的武器装备体系可执行动态建模与评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(9): 3079-3088.

Lei Cheng, Gang Xiao, Jijuan Xing, Zemin Li, Siming Peng. Executable dynamic modeling and evaluation method of weapon equipment system of systems based on DoDAF-OPM-SD[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(9): 3079-3088.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

表2

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表3

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 44

1	United States Department of Defense. FY2025 weapons systems budget[R]. Washington D. C. : United States Department of Defense, 2024.
2	王博, 周文雅, 汪涛, 等. 多阶段任务装备体系作战能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (11): 3498.
3	Frederick J, Higgins C, Moore A. The challenge of enabling dynamic innovation with rigor[J]. Insight, 2023, 26 (1): 8. doi: 10.1002/inst.12423
4	李子航, 王国新, 马君达, 等. 复杂系统的MBSE建模及可靠性评估方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2025, 47 (2): 183.
5	苗学问, 董骁雄, 钱征文, 等. 基于DoDAF的航空装备智能保障系统体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46 (2): 640.
6	United States Department of Defense. DoD architecture framework version 2.02[R]. Washington D. C. : United States Department of Defense, 2010.
7	曹嘉平, 欧萌歆, 李易珊, 等. 岛礁防空电子对抗装备体系构建与效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (9): 2784.
8	Helle P, Gibletti, Levier P. An integrated executable architecture framework for system of systems development[J]. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2013, 10, 435. doi: 10.1177/1548512913477259
9	Teixeira P G, Graciano N V V, Lebtag B G A. A systematic mapping on executable models for the architectural design of systems-of-systems[EB/OL]. [2025-06-01]. https://doi.org/10.5753/MSSIS.2022.225662.
10	Robinson B E. A system dynamics approach to planning systems-of-systems modernization: a wireless telecommunicationsinterface standard case study[D]. Washington D.C.: George Washington University, 2019.
11	Chetcuti S C. A framework for developing executable architecture for aerial intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance systems-of-systems: a systems dynamics approach[D]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2020.
12	Graciano N V V, Nakagawa E Y, Manzano W. Dynamic-SoS: an approach for the simulation of systems-of-systems dynamic architectures[J]. The Computer Journal, 2020, 63 (5): 709. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxz028
13	Miller B. Applying model-based systems engineering in search of quality by design[D]. Fort Collins: Colorado State University, 2022.
14	Kimposon J M. Investigating potential improvements to MBSE software tools to support DoDAF[D]. Melbourne: Florida Institute of Technology, 2024.
15	黄冉, 彭祺擘, 武新峰, 等. 基于DoDAF的载人登月体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (7): 2131.
16	Cederbladh J, Krems D. Early validation of SysML architectures by extending MBSE with co-simulation using FMI and SSP[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2024, 34(1): 106.
17	ISO 19450: 2024. Automation systems and integration—object-process methodology[S/OL]. https://www.iso.org/standard/84612.html.
18	Kohen H, Jbara A, Dori D. OPCloud: an OPM integrated conceptual-executable modeling environment for Industry 4.0[C]//Systems Engineering in the 4 Industrial Revolution: Big Data, Novel Technologies, and Modern Systems Engineering, 2020: 243.
19	Mordecai Y, James N K, Crawley E F. Object-process model-based operational viewpoint specification for aerospace architectures[C]//IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2020.
20	Medvedev D, Dori D. Object-processmethodology as an alternative to human factors task analysis[J]. Human Factors, 2023, 65 (7): 1451. doi: 10.1177/00187208211048384
21	Shani U, Dori D. An integration of OPM with an LLM for design assistants[C]//2024 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, 2024.
22	Levi-soskin N, Marwedel S, Jbara A, et al. Enhancing conceptual models with computational capabilities: a methodical approach to executable integrative modeling[J]. Systems Engineering, 2024, 27 (4): 759. doi: 10.1002/sys.21750
23	韩琦, 李为民, 李宁, 等. 作战概念及其建模研究综述[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2023, 9 (2): 123.
24	Ha D. Simulation study of military command and control system based on system dynamics[J]. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2024, 9 (1): 1.
25	Turan H H, Gordon L, Elsawah S. A decision support methodology to support military asset and resource planning[J]. Journal of Simulation, 2024, 18 (2): 154. doi: 10.1080/17477778.2023.2165460
26	刘志琦, 曹江, 叶雄兵. OPM模型到DoDAF作战视图的转换方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2021, 46 (12): 120.
27	冯蕴雯, 陈俊宇, 路成, 等. 基于领域系统的复杂装备技术状态管理建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47 (1): 126.
28	Gan L, Yang G, Li X H, et al. An architecture decomposition method of pneumatic catapult system based on OPM and DSM[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36 (8): 168. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2023.05.013
29	孙建广, 李港庆, 张凯旋, 等. 基于OPM的协同创新设计过程模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2024, 30 (9): 3020.
30	Juarez-Quispe J, Rojas-Chura E, Espinoza V A J, et al. Advancing sustainable infrastructure management: insights from system dynamics[J]. Buildings, 2025, 15 (2): 210. doi: 10.3390/buildings15020210
31	Wang X F, Wang T, Zhou X, et al. Research on strategic risk identification method of equipment system development based on system dynamics[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34 (5): 1225. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000124
32	翟豆豆. 基于系统动力学的装备体系建模与仿真[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2020.
33	齐小刚, 翟豆豆, 刘学星. 基于系统动力学的海上反舰兵力损耗分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (4): 836.
34	张冬冬, 王春平, 付强. 基于特征增强网络的SAR图像舰船目标检测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (4): 1032.
35	施国强, 刘泽伟, 林廷宇, 等. 面向复杂产品建模与仿真系统的开放式云架构设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34 (3): 442.
36	翟翠红, 汪建均, 冯泽彪. 基于高斯过程模型的多响应稳健参数设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (12): 3683.
37	王玉龙, 彭文成, 董志明, 等. 一种基于延迟的仿真交互可信度贝叶斯评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2020, 45 (8): 161.
38	王耀祖, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 等. 基于杀伤链的作战体系网络关键节点识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (3): 736.
39	王文顺, 崔俊杰, 刘勇, 等. 基于BN-AHP的装甲车辆动力系统故障状态评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2024, 45 (3): 86.
40	张鸿运, 王磊, 张旭, 等. 考虑子系统执行能力的多无人机协同任务规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (1): 127.
41	Salehi F, Ozger M, Neda N, et al. Ultra-reliable low-latency communication for aerial vehicles via multi-connectivity[C]//Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G Summit, 2022.
42	Wilson B, Tierney S, Toland B, et al. Small unmanned aerial system adversary capabilities[R]. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2020.
43	Putney A, Ellnger E. Small uncrewed aircraft systems (SUAS) in divisionalbrigades: survey of SUAS[R]. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2025.
44	Chapman B. sUAS and counter-sUAS: essential capabilities for the CAF[R]. Toronto: Canadian Forces College, 2024.

规程编号	映射关系	语义描述
GMR-1	状态→库存变量	OPM模型中每个对象的状态自动映射为SD模型的独立库存变量
GMR-2	过程→流率函数	OPM模型中的每个过程自动映射为SD模型的流率函数，体现对象状态之间的变化速率
GMR-3	执行者→流率函数参数	OPM模型中执行者的数量作为流率函数中的资源投入量，与单一资源的能力系数共同决定流率函数的数值大小

要素	场景设定
作战对象	装甲机动集群，每分钟目标到达0.5~2辆（泊松假设）
装备编成	察打一体无人机，遥感卫星，指控中心，远程精确打击平台
地域/链路	平原地带/通讯延迟参数基于文献[41] 战术数据链的典型特性设定

性能指标	基线	ISR改进	ISR+决策	最终优化
15 min识别率/%	72.4	84.5	92.6	93.8
15 min毁伤率/%	34.1	35.8	55.2	63.1
30 min总毁伤量/个	25.1	26.4	32.3	35.2
总响应时间/min	12.8	11.1	9.4	9.1

[1]	马昌伟, 王亚平, 张煜, 胡灿灿. 基于资源动态补足的装备体系能力规划方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(12): 4108-4115.
[2]	曹嘉平, 欧萌歆, 李易珊, 姜江, 李际超. 岛礁防空电子对抗装备体系构建与效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2784-2792.
[3]	任浩亮, 张建超, 程会川. 基于SysML的武器装备体系能力需求建模分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2843-2851.
[4]	陈启宏, 赵青松, 邱薇, 陈甲. 基于动态博弈的武器装备体系发展规划论证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3124-3133.
[5]	陈志伟, 王靖, 谷长超, 章健淳, 钟季龙. 考虑动态重构的装备体系可用性及弹性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2347-2354.
[6]	马钧文, 张安, 高飞, 毕文豪. 基于置信规则推理的武器装备体系贡献度评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(7): 1519-1526.
[7]	刘鹏, 赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 杨克巍, 豆亚杰. 面向多任务的武器装备体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1763-1770.
[8]	梁家林, 熊伟. 基于作战环的武器装备体系能力评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1810-1819.
[9]	葛冰峰, 李际超, 赵丹玲, 杨克巍, 谭跃进. 基于元路径的武器装备体系作战网络链路预测方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(5): 1028-1033.
[10]	杨克巍, 杨志伟, 谭跃进, 赵青松. 面向体系贡献率的装备体系评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(2): 311-321.
[11]	王小燕, 孙建彬, 赵青松, 常雷雷, 邹志刚. 不完备信息条件下基于置信规则库的能力满足度评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2507-2513.
[12]	司光亚, 王飞, 李聪, 张昱. 基于交互网测量的武器装备体系鲁棒性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(7): 1506-1512.
[13]	李大喜, 张强, 李小喜, 许勇, 杨建军. 基于DoDAF的空基反导装备体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(5): 1036-1041.
[14]	辜磊, 王书宁, 赵峰. 基于期望效能的武器装备体系能力规划模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(2): 329-334.
[15]	赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 李际超, 夏博远, 豆亚杰, 姬升平. 基于作战环的武器装备体系贡献度评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(10): 2239-2247.