复合干扰下雷达-红外特征融合目标识别方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.08.11

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 2626-2637.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.08.11

• 传感器与信号处理 • 上一篇

复合干扰下雷达-红外特征融合目标识别方法

孙殿星¹^,², 窦钥聪¹, 彭锐晖¹, 王国宏²

1. 哈尔滨工程大学信息与通信工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
2. 海军航空大学信息融合研究所，山东烟台 264001

收稿日期:2025-03-28 修回日期:2025-05-10 接受日期:2025-06-11 出版日期:2026-02-11 发布日期:2026-02-11
通讯作者: 窦钥聪
作者简介:孙殿星（1983—），男，工学博士，哈尔滨工程大学硕士生导师，主要研究方向为雷达抗干扰、雷达目标探测、信息融合等
彭锐晖（1979—），男，工学博士，哈尔滨工程大学教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为智能雷达抗干扰、电磁散射控制等
王国宏（1963—），男，工学博士，海军航空大学教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为多传感器信息融合、多目标跟踪、目标识别、电子战等
基金资助:
部委基金项目（2023-JCJQ-LB-016）资助课题

Radar-infrared feature fusion target recognition method with complex jamming

Dianxing SUN¹^,², Yuecong DOU¹, Ruihui PENG¹, Guohong WANG²

1. College of Information and Communication Engineering，Harbin Engineering University，Harbin 150001，China
2. Information Fusion Research Institute，Naval Aeronautical University，Yantai 264001，China

Received:2025-03-28 Revised:2025-05-10 Accepted:2025-06-11 Online:2026-02-11 Published:2026-02-11
Contact: Yuecong DOU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在现代战场环境下，舰船受到反舰导弹的攻击之后会同时释放雷达干扰和红外干扰，这对雷达-红外复合导引头精准打击目标产生很大影响。针对雷达间歇采样干扰和红外诱饵干扰同时释放这一场景，设计了一种在复合干扰下雷达-红外特征级融合目标识别算法，从雷达红外信息同源入手，采用角度关联初次滤除干扰；对于在关联门限之内的干扰，提取雷达回波时频特征，与红外图像匹配作为融合网络的输入，采用雷达-红外特征融合的方式二次滤除干扰，从而保证导引头在同时存在间歇采样干扰和红外诱饵干扰的场景下精准打击目标。所提方法可以有效提升导弹对目标的识别能力，所做工作对抗干扰领域具有参考意义。

关键词: 复合干扰, 雷达红外复合制导, 目标识别, 特征融合

Abstract:

In the modern battlefield environment, ships release both radar jamming and infrared jamming after being attacked by anti-ship missiles, which has a great impact on the precision of radar-infrared composite seeker. Aiming at the situation that intermittent sampling jamming and infrared decoy jamming of radar are released at the same time, a radar-infrared feature level fusion target recognition algorithm is designed with complex jamming. Starting from the homology of radar infrared information, angle correlation is used to filter the jamming first. For the jamming within the correlation threshold, the time-frequency features of radar echoes are extracted, matched with infrared images as the input of fusion network, and the jamming is filtered twice by means of radar-infrared feature fusion, so as to ensure that the seeker can accurately strike the target in the scene where intermittent sampling jamming and infrared decoy jamming exist at the same time. The proposed method can effectively improve the missile’s ability to identify the target, and the work is of reference significance in the field of anti-jamming.

Key words: composite jamming, radar infrared composite guidance, target recognition, feature fusion

中图分类号:

TN 974

孙殿星, 窦钥聪, 彭锐晖, 王国宏. 复合干扰下雷达-红外特征融合目标识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(8): 2626-2637.

Dianxing SUN, Yuecong DOU, Ruihui PENG, Guohong WANG. Radar-infrared feature fusion target recognition method with complex jamming[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(8): 2626-2637.

图/表 16

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表1

图11

表2

图12

表3

表4

参考文献 30

1	PENG R H, WU X R, WANG G H, et al. Intelligent recognition and information extraction of radar complex jamming based on time-frequency features[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 35 (5): 1148- 1166. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2024.000073
2	QU Q Z, WEI S J, LIU S, et al. JRNet: Jamming recognition networks for radar compound suppression jamming signals[J]. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69 (12): 15035- 15045. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3032197
3	DONG X, GUO S H, FANG W, et al. Radar active composite jamming recognition based on characteristic parameters[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information, 2024: 415−420.
4	ZHANG J X, LIANG Z N, ZHOU C, et al. Radar compound jamming cognition based on a deep object detection network[J]. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59 (03): 3251- 3263. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3224695
5	白爽, 卫鑫. 雷达/红外成像复合制导反舰导弹干扰方法[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2020, 42 (04): 117- 122.
	BAI S, WEI X. Research on jamming method against radar/infrared imaging composite guidance anti-ship missile[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2020, 42 (04): 117- 122.
6	LIU C X, Ren B B, FU D, et al. A GNSS Composite Interference Recognition Method Based on YOLOv5[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology, 2024: 1157−1162.
7	KONG Y K, XIA S L, DONG L X, et al. Compound jamming recognition via contrastive learning for distributed MIMO radars[J]. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, 2024, 73 (6): 7892- 7907. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3358996
8	LV Q Z, QUAN Y H, FENG W, et al. Radar deception jamming recognition based on weighted ensemble CNN with transfer learning[J]. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60, 5107511.
9	WU Z H, QIAN J, ZHANG M, et al. High confidence sample augmentation based on label-guided denoising diffusion probabilistic model for active deception jamming recognition[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2023, 20, 3508305.
10	ZHOU H P, WANG L, GUO Z Y. Recognition of radar compound jamming based on convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59 (6): 7380- 7394. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3288080
11	魏毅寅, 杨文华. 海战场典型干扰对抗场景及反舰导弹应对策略研究[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2020, 5 (5): 1- 8.
	WEI Y Y, YANG W H. Study on typical jamming scenes in naval battle field and countermeasures of anti-ship missile[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2020, 5 (5): 1- 8.
12	ZHI X K, ZHOU H Q, TANG Y. Infrared-radar multimodal target detection algorithm combining position prior information[C]//Proc. of the SPIE, 2024: 13105.
13	YANG L, ZHANG X Y, LI L, et al. Research on composite deception interference recognition and suppression technology based on multi-dimensional features[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Signal, Information and Data Processing, 2019.
14	MENG Y Y, YU L, WEI Y S. Multi-label radar compound jamming signal recognition using complex valued CNN with jamming class representation fusion[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15 (21): 5180. doi: 10.3390/rs15215180
15	ZHOU H P, WANG L, MA M H, et al. Compound radar jamming recognition based on signal source separation[J]. Signal Processing, 2024, 214, 109246. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2023.109246
16	LV Q Z, FAN H X, LIU J L, et al. Multilabel deep learning-based lightweight radar compound jamming recognition method[J]. IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024, 73, 2521115.
17	张军周, 尹天宫. 对抗新型反舰导弹有源无源协同干扰策略研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2020, 40 (5): 35- 39.
	ZHANG J Z, YIN T G. Research on active and passive cooperative jamming method against new anti-ship missiles[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2020, 40 (5): 35- 39.
18	李文俊, 刘承禹, 魏建功, 等. 一种有源无源复合干扰方法研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2021, 41 (2): 73- 76.
	LI W J, LIU C Y, WEI J G, et al. Study on the method of active-passive-complex electronic counter-measures[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2021, 41 (2): 73- 76.
19	LIU S X, WU H, WANG D H, et al. Multimode composite guidance data fusion method and its experimental validation[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2025, 33 (4): 512- 520. doi: 10.37188/OPE.20253304.0512
20	李文召, 齐晓辉. 基于雷达/红外量测重构的抗干扰跟踪算法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2023, 48 (9): 137- 143，151.
	LI W Z, QI X H. Anti-jamming tracking algorithm based on reconstruction of radar/IR measurements[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2023, 48 (9): 137- 143，151.
21	TANG Z Y, DENG Y K, WANG R, et al. Intermittent sampling deceptive jamming suppression for sar based on azimuth phase coding[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2019: 513−516.
22	FAISAL K N, SHARMA R R. Cross-terms reduction in WVD using sliding window-based variational mode decomposition[C]//Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks, 2023: 58−63.
23	SZMAJDA M, GÓRECKI K, MROCZKA J. Gabor transform, Gabor-Wigner transform and SPWVD as a time-frequency analysis of power quality[C]//Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power, 2010.
24	VARGHESE R, SAMBATH M. YOLOv8: a novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robustness[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems, 2024.
25	XU S B, ZHENG S C, XU W H, et al. HCF-Net: hierarchical context fusion network for infrared small object detection[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2024.
26	YANG B, ZHANG X Y, ZHANG J, et al. EFLNet: Enhancing Feature Learning Network for Infrared Small Target Detection[J]. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62, 5906511.
27	WOO S, PARK J, LEE J Y, et al. CBAM: convolutional block attention module[C]//Proc. of the Computer Vision – ECCV 15th European Conference, 2018.
28	LIN T Y, GOYAL P, GIRSHICK R, et al. Focal loss for dense object detection[J]. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020, 42 (2): 318- 327. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2858826
29	ASHISH V, NOAM S, NIKI P, et al. Attention is all you need[C]// Proc. of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017: 6000−6010.
30	PRANNAY K, PIOTR T, CHEN W, et al. Supervised contrastive learning[C]//Proc. of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020: 18661−18673.

实验组	准确率	召回率	F1分数
a	0.713	0.729	0.722
b	0.746	0.792	0.769
c	0.869	0.897	0.883
d	0.972	0.963	0.967

样本类别	匹配数据	准确率
正样本	红外目标与雷达目标匹配	0.941
负样本	红外干扰与雷达目标匹配	0.948
	红外目标与雷达干扰匹配	0.946
	红外干扰与雷达干扰匹配	0.954

实验	数据	识别准确率
单模雷达	雷达	0.739
单模红外	红外	0.713
本文方法	雷达+红外	0.941

方法	自注意力机制	SupCon损失	目标识别正确率
基线方法	—	—	0.882
添加模块	√	—	0.913
添加模块	—	√	0.920
本文方法	√	√	0.941

[1]	董健, 邹俊杰, 侯斐斐, 肖程望. 基于HRRP特征统计特性的雷达目标识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(7): 2206-2217.
[2]	黄琼丹, 刘露露, 韩洁婧, 王佳鹏, 康仕林. 基于差异特征反投影融合的图像超分辨重建[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(6): 1809-1818.
[3]	丁昊, 唐天宇, 曹政, 于恒力, 董云龙. 基于多尺度排列熵特征的海上漂浮目标识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(6): 1880-1892.
[4]	王鹏昊, 何迪, 尤明懿, 郭细平. 基于随机共振和多尺度特征融合调制识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(6): 2096-2104.
[5]	陈垣光, 刘晓凯, 肖思瑶, 张顺生, 崔红元, 陈晓莹, 刘莹. 低信噪比下面向时空特征融合的雷达目标智能检测方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(5): 1523-1531.
[6]	杨跃能, 孔希, 张士峰, 邓少永. 低空小型旋翼无人机近距拦截捕获方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 1010-1017.
[7]	田弘宇, 葛松虎, 郭宇, 崔中普, 梁潇. 低干噪比下多特征融合的通信干扰识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 1061-1071.
[8]	王瑶, 胥辉旗, 曹司磊, 王磊. 基于深度学习的舰船关键部位检测算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 410-421.
[9]	刘恒燕, 方君, 凌青, 闫文君, 于柯远, 张立民. 基于1D-2D-GRU-ResNet的辐射源个体识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 727-735.
[10]	范睿嘉, 刘杰, 于君明, 冯晓峰, 徐文静, 尹良. 基于形状和骨架特征匹配的小样本三维点云目标识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(1): 76-86.
[11]	蒋明煜, 张顺生, 肖思瑶. 面向轻量级交叉注意力卷积网络的SAR目标识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(9): 2853-2861.
[12]	付卫红, 彭文洪, 刘乃安. 混合注意力优化的SAR图像小目标检测方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(8): 2519-2526.
[13]	周东平, 阮航, 沙明辉, 王崇宇, 崔念强, 鲁耀兵. 基于特征融合的Fast-CNN的复杂波形调制识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(7): 2165-2175.
[14]	张琬滢, 高由兵, 李泽一, 李鹏飞, 张伟. 基于双路径特征融合网络的背景信号抑制算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(7): 2406-2413.
[15]	张新征, 闫梦可, 朱晓林. 噪声伪标签容忍的半监督SAR目标识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(6): 1796-1805.

复合干扰下雷达-红外特征融合目标识别方法

Radar-infrared feature fusion target recognition method with complex jamming

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价