基于资源感知与意图转译的路由协议切换研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.04.32

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 1431-1440.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.04.32

• 通信与网络 • 上一篇

基于资源感知与意图转译的路由协议切换研究

李芫芫¹(), 冯涛²^,*, 黄姣蕊¹, 杨春刚¹

1. 西安电子科技大学通信工程学院，陕西西安 710071
2. 军事科学院系统工程研究院，北京 100039

收稿日期:2024-12-26 修回日期:2025-05-31 出版日期:2026-01-24 发布日期:2026-01-24
通讯作者: 冯涛 E-mail:3108442748@qq.com
作者简介:李芫芫（2000—），女，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为意图驱动网络、资源感知和协议切换
黄姣蕊（1995—），女，博士研究生，主要研究方向为意图驱动网络、人工智能和行为树
杨春刚（1982—），男，教授，博士，主要研究方向为意图驱动智简网络、智能网络信息体系、软件定义网络自治、认知天地网络融合和双终通信博弈论
基金资助:
省部级项目（JZX6Y202207010351）资助课题

Routing protocol switching research based on resource awareness and intent refinement

Yuanyuan LI¹(), Tao FENG²^,*, Jiaorui HUANG¹, Chungang YANG¹

1. School of Telecommunications Engineering，Xidian University，Xi’an 710071，China
2. Institute of Systems Engineering，Academy of Military Sciences，Beijing 100039，China

Received:2024-12-26 Revised:2025-05-31 Online:2026-01-24 Published:2026-01-24
Contact: Tao FENG E-mail:3108442748@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

面对网络流量的动态变化与用户需求的多样化，现有路由协议切换机制缺乏动态适应性。为此，基于云开放网络软件设计一种融合资源感知与意图转译的路由协议切换机制。其中，资源感知通过实时监测各路由节点的计算资源与链路状态等关键指标，实现对网络运行态势的动态感知与反馈；意图转译则将用户表达的模糊、高层次服务需求转化为可量化的性能约束与协议偏好，从而驱动协议的自适应调整。首先回顾路由协议切换的研究现状，分析现有机制在适应性与灵活性方面的不足。基于此，构建一个基于资源感知与意图转译的协议切换决策模型，设计执行流程。最后，通过实验评估该机制在响应时延与通信开销的表现，并在不同流量场景下开展模拟实验，验证其可行性。本研究为提升路由协议切换在复杂网络环境下的自适应性与灵活性提供了一种新的解决路径。

关键词: 路由协议切换, 云开放网络软件, 资源感知, 意图转译

Abstract:

Faced with dynamic network traffic and diverse user demands, existing routing protocol switching mechanisms lack dynamic adaptability. To address this, a routing protocol switching mechanism based on software for open networking in the cloud, which integrates resource awareness and intent refinement is designed. Resource awareness dynamically monitors key indicators such as computing resources and link status at each routing node, enabling real-time network situational awareness and feedback. Intent refinement converts users’ vague, high-level service requirements into measurable performance constraints and protocol preferences, driving adaptive protocol adjustments. The current research on routing protocol switching is firstly reviewed and the limitations in adaptability and flexibility of existing mechanisms are analyzed. Based on this, a decision model for protocol switching is constructed, incorporating resource awareness and intent translation, with an implementation process designed. Finally, experiments evaluate the mechanism’s response latency and communication overhead, and simulations in various traffic scenarios validate its feasibility. This research provides a novel solution to enhance the adaptability and flexibility of routing protocol switching in complex network environments.

Key words: routing protocol switching, software for open networking in the cloud, resource awareness, intent refinement

中图分类号:

TP 273

李芫芫, 冯涛, 黄姣蕊, 杨春刚. 基于资源感知与意图转译的路由协议切换研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(4): 1431-1440.

Yuanyuan LI, Tao FENG, Jiaorui HUANG, Chungang YANG. Routing protocol switching research based on resource awareness and intent refinement[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(4): 1431-1440.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 22

1	KHAN I U, QURESHI I M, AZIZ M A, et al. Smart IoT control-based nature inspired energy efficient routing protocol for flying ad hoc network （FANET）[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 56371- 56378. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981531
2	KAMBHAMPATI R T. Routing and switching: foundations of modern network design and implementation[J]. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology, 2024, 15 (4): 610- 621.
3	JAIN N, PAYAL A, JAIN A. Effect of data packet size on the performance of RIP and OSPF routing protocols in hybrid networks[J]. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2021, 17 (4): 361- 376. doi: 10.1108/IJPCC-02-2021-0036
4	BIRADAR A G. A comparative study on routing protocols: RIP, OSPF and EIGRP and their analysis using GNS-3 [C]// Proc. of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering, 2020.
5	ALABADY S A, HAZIM S, SALIH A A M. Performance evaluation and comparison of dynamic routing protocols for suitability and reliability[J]. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 2018, 11 (7): 41- 52. doi: 10.14257/ijgdc.2018.11.7.05
6	NARISETTY S K, BALSU S K. Performance comparison of EIGRP and ISIS/RIP protocols[J]. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Ad Hoc Networks, 2011, 3, 63- 66.
7	邵天竺, 王晓亮, 陈文龙, 等. 一种减少网络振动的智能路由选择算法设计[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2021, 58 (6): 1261- 1274. doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2021.20201073
	SHAO T Z, WANG X L, CHEN W L, et al. Design of an intelligent routing algorithm to reduce routing flap[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2021, 58 (6): 1261- 1274. doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2021.20201073
8	KUMAR K P, SIVANESAN P. Cost optimized switching of routing protocol scheme for IoT applications[J]. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 2022, 41 (1): 67- 82. doi: 10.32604/csse.2022.018867
9	MISRA S, BERA S, ACHU THAN ANDA M P, et al. Situation-aware protocol switching in software-defined wireless sensor network systems[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2018, 12 (3): 2353- 2360. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2017.2774284
10	KHALID N A, BAI Q, AL-ANBUKY A. Adaptive trust-based routing protocol for large scale WSNs[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 143539- 143549. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944648
11	ABDOLLAHI M, ASHTARIS, ABOLHASANM, et al. Dynamic routing protocol selection in multi-hop device-to-device wireless networks[J]. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, 2022, 71 (8): 8796- 8809. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3172923
12	张秀英. 智慧标识网络资源感知机制设计与实现 [D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.
	ZHANG X Y. Design and implementation of resource awareness mechanism in smart identification network [D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015.
13	PANG L, YANG C G, CHEN D Y, et al. A survey on intent-driven networks[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 22862- 22873. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2969208
14	W3C. RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax [EB/OL]. [2024-10-26] https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/.
15	刘人鹏, 胡博, 李鹤群. 星地融合网络中基于多目标优化的星间切换决策方法[J]. 天地一体化信息网络, 2023, 4 (3): 59- 66.
	LIU R P, HU B, LI H Q. Inter-satellite handover method based on multi-objective optimization in satellite-terrestrial integrated network[J]. Space-Integrated-Ground Information Networks, 2023, 4 (3): 59- 66.
16	ALDEA C L, BOCU R, SOLCA R N. Real-time monitoring and management of hardware and software resources in heterogeneous computer networks through an integrated system architecture[J]. Symmetry, 2023, 15, 1134. doi: 10.3390/sym15061134
17	CHENG S, SHI Y H, QIN Q D. On the performance metrics of multiobjective optimization [C]// Proc. of the Advances in Swarm Intelligence, 2012.
18	DEB K, JAIN H. An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: Solving problems with box constraints[J]. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18 (4): 577- 601. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535
19	李铭轩, 曹畅, 唐雄燕, 等. 基于可编程网络的UPF边缘调度机制研究[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2022, 4 (2): 74- 86.
	LI M X, CAO C, TANG X Y, et al. Research on edge scheduling mechanism of UPF based on programmable network[J]. Frontiers of Data and Computing, 2022, 4 (2): 74- 86.
20	CHAUHAN D, SHARMA S. Performance evaluation of different routing protocols in IPv4 and IPv6 networks on the basis of packet sizes[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 46, 1072- 1078. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.01.019
21	马武彬, 王锐, 王威超, 等. 基于进化多目标优化的微服务组合部署与调度策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (1): 90- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.01.13
	MA W B, WANG R, WANG W C, et al. Micro-service composition deployment and scheduling strategy based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (1): 90- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.01.13
22	LI K, DEB K, YAO X Y. R-Metric: evaluating the performance of preference-based evolutionary multiobjective optimization using reference points[J]. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 2018, 22 (6): 821- 835. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2017.2737781

名称	描述	具体功能
Ubuntu系统	Ubuntu 22.04 LTS	仿真系统环境
GNS3	gns3 2.2.52	拓扑搭建平台
SONiC	sonic-vs4.22	网络操作系统
Docker	docker 27.3.1	将应用及依赖打包成功能容器
ETCD	etcd v3.5.8	存储资源数据
Python	python 3.10	系统后端环境
C++	c++ 20	模块开发
Drogon	drogon 1.9.8	C++ Web框架
Iperf3	iperf3 3.18	网络性能测试

[1]	孟祥瑞, 王常虹, 马广程, 夏红伟, 钟佳朋, 崔总泽. 超精密轴向定位平台力特性分析及自抗扰控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 1000-1009.
[2]	王浩宇, 姜斌, 张绍杰, 杨知沐, 李莹雪. 导弹集群切换拓扑去中心化微分博弈协同制导[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 1050-1060.
[3]	李宗刚, 邱进涛, 宁小刚, 陈引娟. 多智能体系统周期动态事件触发二分一致性[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(1): 278-289.
[4]	单晨宇, 李少凡, 齐瑞云. 多智能体系统故障临机处理下的快速任务重分配[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(1): 185-197.
[5]	冯建鑫, 李昊阳, 巩建雄, 龚柏春. 基于改进鲸鱼优化算法的超声电机自抗扰控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(12): 4166-4173.
[6]	张佳龙, 赵迪, 张普, 叶磊. 通讯受限下无人机集群自适应追踪控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(10): 3401-3410.
[7]	刘艳君, 武禹辰, 陈晶, 丁锋. 基于最小角回归的稀疏辨识与优化PID控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(8): 2706-2714.
[8]	杨知沐, 张绍杰, 张朝原, 王浩宇, 赵卯卯. 基于微分博弈的导弹避撞协同制导律设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(8): 2667-2675.
[9]	夏国清, 栾添添, 孙明晓, 仲伟东, 刘彦文. 基于主成分约简和突变级数的舰载机出动能力综合评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(2): 330-337.
[10]	时建明, 王洁, 刘少伟. 时变时滞不确定系统模糊自适应H_∞控制[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(3): 549-554.
[11]	师五喜, 郭利进, 郭文成. 多变量非线性系统的直接自适应模糊预测控制[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(3): 544-548.
[12]	李猛, 王道波, 盛守照, 沈自然. 基于加权k-均值聚类与粒子群优化的多航迹规划[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(3): 512-516.
[13]	肖小石, 毛志忠. 时滞大系统的模型参考鲁棒自适应分散控制[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(11): 2501-2505.
[14]	刘博, 方舟, 李平. 定量反馈理论在鲁棒飞行控制律设计中的应用[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(11): 2458-2462.
[15]	马力伟, 田作华, 施颂椒. 网络化控制系统观测器/控制器集成设计方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(2): 395-398.

基于资源感知与意图转译的路由协议切换研究

Routing protocol switching research based on resource awareness and intent refinement

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价