对抗势能的原理及计算方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.12.13

Abstract

Abstract:

Potential energy is a physical quantity that exists widely in physical system. There is also a similar physical quantity in the military confrontation system. It can reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the confrontational situation and can be transformed into operational effectiveness by combat operations. Learning from the concept of potential energy in physics, the confrontational potential energy is defined as the potential of the existing attack opportunities being transformd into damage. Based on the analysis of the attack opportunities generation process, the concepts of the confrontation potential field and the energy level are proposed for quantifying attack opportunities. A formula for calculating the potential energy in one-to-one combat is suggested, and is extended to a many-to-many case. Also, a correction method for two typical potential energy overestimation cases is proposed.

Key words: confrontational potential energy, attack opportunity, confrontation potential field, energy level

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Fei WANG, Guangya SI, Zongping HE, Qiang WANG. Theory and calculation method of confrontational potential energy[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(12): 2771-2778.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.7

Table 3

References 27

1	全军军事术语管理委员会. 中国人民解放军军语[M]. 北京: 军事科学出版社, 2011.
	Military Terminology Management Committee of the People's Liberation Army . Dictionary of military terminology of the people's liberation army of China[M]. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2011.
2	ENDSLEY M R . Measurement of situation awareness in dyna-mic systems[J]. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995, 37 (1): 65- 84.
3	ENDSLEY M R . Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings[J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2015, 9 (1): 4- 32.
4	GUTZWILLER R S, HUNT S M, LANGE D S. A task analysis toward characterizing cyber-cognitive situation awareness (CCSA) in cyber defense analysts[C]//Proc.of the IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, 2016: 14-20.
5	LI X Y, ZHAO H. Network security situation assessment based on HMM-MPGA[C]//Proc.of the 2nd International Conference on Information Management, 2016: 57-63.
6	YU Y, WANG J, LIU J Q, et al. Multi-dimension threat situation assessment based on network security attributes[C]//Proc.of the 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks, 2018: 1-2.
7	ZHANG R Z, CHENG J R, TANG X Y, et al. DDoS attack security situation assessment model using fusion feature based on fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Cloud Computing and Security, 2018: 654-669.
8	ALBUQUERQUE D J P , HERFORT B , BRENNING A , et al. A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2015, 29 (4): 667- 689. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2014.996567
9	YIN J , LAMPERT A , CAMERON M , et al. Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2012, 27 (6): 52- 59. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2012.6
10	SANCHES M F, JUNIOR V A P, SOUZA J O, et al. Objects assessment approach using natural language processing and data quality to support emergency situation assessment[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2016: 238-244.
11	PANTELI M , KIRSCHEN D S . Situation awareness in power systems: theory, challenges and applications[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2015, 122, 140- 151. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.01.008
12	ENDSLEY M R . Designing for situation awareness: an approach to user-centered design[M]. Florida: CRC press, 2016.
13	ENDSLEY M R . Autonomous driving systems: a preliminary naturalistic study of the Tesla model S[J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2017, 11 (3): 225- 238.
14	NOH S, AN K, HAN W. High-level data fusion based probabilistic situation assessment for highly automated driving[C]//Proc.of the IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, 2015: 1587-1594.
15	LI W N , ZHANG W G , SHI J P , et al. A battlefield target grouping method based on M-CFSFDP algorithm[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36 (6): 1121- 1128. doi: 10.1051/jnwpu/20183661121
16	ZHAO K X, HUANG C Q. Air combat situation assessment for UAV based on improved decision tree[C]//Proc.of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2018: 1772-1776.
17	YANG H Y , ZHANG S W , LI X Y . Modeling of situation assessment in regional air defense combat[J]. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 2019, 16 (2): 91- 101. doi: 10.1177/1548512918809514
18	MCANALLY K , DAVEY C , WHITE D , et al. Inference in the wild: a framework for human situation assessment and a case study of air combat[J]. Cognitive Science, 2018, 42 (7): 2181- 2204. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12636
19	MISLEVY R J , HAERTEL G , RICONSCENTE M , et al. Evidence-centered assessment design[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2017.
20	D'ANIELLO G , GAETA A , LOIA V , et al. A granular computing framework for approximate reasoning in situation awareness[J]. Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (3): 141- 158. doi: 10.1007/s41066-016-0035-0
21	GARCIA J, REIN K, BIERMANNN J, et al. Considerations for enhancing situation assessment through multi-level fusion of hard and soft data[C]//Proc.of the 19th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2016: 2133-2138.
22	BRELGER R , CARLEY K , PATTISON P . Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: workshop summary and papers[M]. Washington: National Academy Press, 2003.
23	MOON I C , CARLEY K M . Modeling and simulating terrorist networks in social and geospatial dimensions[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2007, 22 (5): 40- 49. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2007.4338493
24	MOON I, KIM E J, CARLEY K M. Automated influence network generation and the node parameter sensitivity analysis[C]//Proc.of the ICCRTS, 2008: 972-980.
25	李志强, 胡晓峰, 司光亚, 等. 一种基于人工势场的战场态势分析模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2006, 18 (12): 3604- 3605.
	LI Z Q , HU X F , SI G Y , et al. New battlefield situation analysis model based on artificial potential field[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2006, 18 (12): 3603- 3607.
26	CARES J R.网络中心战的效能度量[M].费爱国,王新辉,译.北京:军事科学出版社, 2005.
	CARES J R. Effectiveness measurement of network-centric warfare[M]. FEI A G, WANG X H, trans. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2005.
27	司光亚, 王飞, 李聪, 等. 基于交互网测量的武器装备体系鲁棒性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (7): 1506- 1512.
	SI G Y , WANG F , LI C , et al. Robustness assessment method for armament system of systems based on measuring of interaction network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (7): 1506- 1512.

变量	说明
红方传感器(S, S=1为加入实验, S=0为不加入实验)	①天波超视距雷达距交战区域500 km左右部署,接入情报网络; ②反隐形雷达的部署密度可以基本控制空战区域; ③先进空基侦察手段为电子、图像、合成孔径卫星组成的星座
红方4代机(F)	规模为20,占机群总数的一半,与普通战机混合编组
红方驱逐舰(D)	4艘装备相控阵雷达的防空驱逐舰
蓝方4代机加入	规模为25,占机群总数的一半,与普通战机混合编组

红方装备组合	蓝方部署
红方装备组合	基本	升级
(S, F, D)=(0, 0, 0)	①	②
(1, 0, 0)		③
(0, 1, 0)		④
(0, 0, 1)		⑤
(1, 1, 1)	⑥	⑦

红方装备	蓝方部署
红方装备	基本	升级
传感器		35.6%
4代机		82.9%
传感器+4代机	75.9%	105.3%¹⁾
传感器+4代机	75.9%	20.6%²⁾

[1]	Wei ZHANG, Jing HE, Xiaowei XIE, Guoqiang ZHAO, Zhen CHEN. Design and implementation of simulation evaluation system for joint battlefield navigation countermeasure [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(10): 3182-3189.
[2]	Jun MA, Jingyu YANG, Xi WU. Evaluation of operational system of systems effectiveness based on pre-clustering active semi-supervised learning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 1889-1896.
[3]	Luying REN, Qingguo WANG, Qian MA, Haifeng ZHANG, Weiwei XU. Modeling method study for virtual prototyping of complex products based on meta model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(5): 1609-1614.
[4]	Yuanyuan ZHANG, Yang GAO, Peng ZHU, Jintao LIU, Shushan GU. UAV reconnaissance tactical planning based on colored Petri nets [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 900-907.
[5]	Tongliang LU, Wenhao CHEN, Bingfeng GE, Qiling DENG. Multi-layer network modeling for combat system-of-systems under information support [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 520-528.
[6]	Ketao FENG, Xiaoyi LI, Chen QU, Shentao WANG, Mou CHEN. Simulation research on effective coverage of civil aviation ground to air VHF communication based on DEM [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 684-695.
[7]	Jun MA, Jingyu YANG, Liyan ZOU. Generation method of operational system of systems capability graph based on Stacking integrated meta-model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 154-163.
[8]	Ziyan LIU, Shanshan MA, Jing LIANG, Mingcheng ZHU, Lei YUAN. Attention mechanism based CNN channel estimation algorithm in millimeter-wave massive MIMO system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 307-312.
[9]	Guangxun ZENG, Guanghong GONG, Ni LI. Combat system-of-systems simulation scenario generation approach based on semantic matching [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(8): 2154-2162.
[10]	Chunsi XIE, Zhiying LIU, Yu SANG. Target recognition model of ship-to-land missile based on feature matching [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(8): 2244-2253.
[11]	Yonglin LEI, Yan WANG, Qinzhang YU, Zhi ZHU, Wei DONG, Yifan ZHU. Design method of sequential neighbor exploratory experimental for complex simulation metamodeling [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(5): 1232-1239.
[12]	Guowei CHEN, Yujing ZHOU, Lei REN. SD optimization of equipment cost structure facing system performance maximization [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1022-1029.
[13]	Zehai GAO, Cunbao MA, Haotian NIU. Performance degradation Lévy model of integrated modular avionics [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1144-1152.
[14]	Zhiying LIU, Chunsi XIE, Jinjun LI, Yu SANG. Smoke region segmentation recognition algorithm based on improved Deeplabv3+ [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 328-335.
[15]	Xiangxuan TIAN, Zhiqiang SHI. Simulation data generation algorithm based on evolutional generative adversarial networks for command information system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 163-170.

Theory and calculation method of confrontational potential energy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments