目标运动要素自主隐蔽解析的微分进化策略

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.02.04

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of poor noise adaptability in the independent concealment analysis of the traditional target motion elements, a differential evolution strategy of factor autonomous analysis is proposed. Firstly, the autonomous concealment analysis process of the target motion elements is briefly discussed. Secondly, the covariance propagation process of the autonomous analysis of the elements is derived, the corresponding relationship between the target motion element variance and the target observation azimuth variance is given, and the influence of azimuth observation mean square error is analyzed. Then a differential evolution algorithm on the autonomous analytical model is proposed again. Finally, the optimization strategy is verified by simulation. The results show that when the azimuth error of 0.1° exists in the azimuth, the mean square error of the initial distance D₀ is about 12 Cab, and the mean square errors of the velocity components V_mx and V_my are about 5 Kn and 6 Kn respectively. The accuracy of the elements autonomous analysis is obviously improved by the optimization of the differential evolution strategy.

Key words: element solution, least squares estimation, covariance propagation, azimuth error, differential evolution

CLC Number:

U675.9

Yuhao SHAN, Xiaodong YANG, Wang WANG. Differential evolution strategy for autonomous concealment analysis of target motion elements[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(2): 277-283.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

References 33

1	CHEN H , HAN C Z , ZHANG Y C . Research on tracking of maneuvering multi-target based on bionics for IRST system[J]. Journal of Supercomputing, 2011, 58 (1): 106- 121. doi: 10.1007/s11227-010-0534-8
2	CHEN H , LI C . Data association approach for two dimensional tracking based on bearing-only measurements in clutter environment[J]. Journal of Software, 2010, 5 (3): 336- 343.
3	MALLIK R G , DAINGADE S , SINHA A . Scalable multi-agent formation with bearing only measurement: consensus based approach[J]. European Journal of Control, 2016, 27, 28- 35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2015.10.002
4	HUEMMER C , HOFMANN C , MAAS R , et al. Estimating parameters of nonlinear systems using the elitist particle filter based on evolutionary strategies[J]. IEEE/ACM Trans.on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 2018, 26 (3): 595- 608. doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2017.2788183
5	GUO C F , DAI Z X , YANG L , et al. Application of the strong tracking UKF in the maneuvering target tracking[J]. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2016, 679 (1): 12- 48.
6	ZHOU Y Y , ZHANG Q C , WANG H , et al. EKF-based enhanced performance controller design for nonlinear stochastic systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Automatic Control, 2018, 63 (4): 1155- 1162. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2017.2742661
7	LI B . An improved Bernoulli particle filter for single target tracking[J]. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 29 (3): 799- 819. doi: 10.1007/s11045-017-0471-2
8	LI K L , CHANG L B . Robust Gaussian particle filter based on modified likelihood function[J]. IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 2018, 12 (1): 132- 137.
9	胡振涛, 路杨, 刘宇. 量测提升策略下两级更新RBPF纯方位被动跟踪[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42 (S1): 161- 166.
	HU Z T , LU Y , LIU Y . Bearings-only passive tracking based on two stages update Rao-Blackwellised particle filter in lifting scheme of observation[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2013, 42 (S1): 161- 166.
10	鹿传国, 冯新喜, 张迪. 基于改进容积卡尔曼滤波的纯方位目标跟踪[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2012, 34 (1): 28- 33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2012.01.06
	LU C G , FENG X X , ZHANG D . Pure bearing tracking based on improved cubature Kalman filter[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34 (1): 28- 33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2012.01.06
11	SABET M , FATHI A R , DANIALI MOHAMMAD H R . Optimal design of the own ship maneuver in the bearing-only target motion analysis problem using a heuristically supervised extended Kalman filter[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 123, 146- 153. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.07.028
12	CAVAZZINI G , PAVESI G , ARDIZZON G . A novel two-swarm based PSO search strategy for optimal short-term hydro -thermal generation scheduling[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 164, 460- 481. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.012
13	MADOLIAT R , KHANMIRZA E , POURFARD A . Application of PSO and cultural algorithms for transient analysis of natural gas pipeline[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 149, 504- 514. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.09.042
14	ZHANG J H , XIA P Q . An improved PSO algorithm for parameter identification of nonlinear dynamic hysteretic models[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 389, 153- 167. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.006
15	JAFARI R , SMITH B K . Fluid genetic algorithm(FGA)[J]. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2017, 4 (2): 158- 167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcde.2017.03.001
16	COSTA P R D O D , MAUCERI S , CARROLL P , et al. A genetic algorithm for a green vehicle routing problem[J]. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, 2018, 64, 65- 74. doi: 10.1016/j.endm.2018.01.008
17	PARINAM S , SHARMA A , PRAVEEN KUMAR V S R S , et al. Optimization of optical parameters for the design of multilayer bandpass filter using genetic algorithm[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, 5 (2): 5091- 5096. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.088
18	ABED-ALGUNI B , ALKHATEEB F . Novel selection schemes for cuckoo search[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2017, 42 (8): 3635- 3654. doi: 10.1007/s13369-017-2663-3
19	YANG X S , DEB S . Cuckoo search: recent advances and applications[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2014, 24 (1): 169- 174. doi: 10.1007/s00521-013-1367-1
20	AZIZ M E A E , HASSANIEN A E . Modified cuckoo search algorithm with rough sets for feature selection[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 29 (4): 925- 934. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2473-7
21	STORN R , PRICE K . Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, 11 (4): 341- 359. doi: 10.1023/A:1008202821328
22	王勇, 蔡自兴, 周育人, 等. 约束优化进化算法[J]. 软件学报, 2009, 20 (1): 11- 29.
	WANG Y , CAI Z X , ZHOU Y R , et al. Constrained optimization evolutionary algorithms[J]. Journal of Software, 2009, 20 (1): 11- 29.
23	李智勇,黄滔,陈少淼,等.约束优化进化算法综述[J]. 2017, 28(6): 1529-1546.
	LI Z Y, HUANG T, CHEN S M, et al. Overview of constrained optimization evolutionary algorithms[J]. Journal of Software, 2017, 28(6): 1529-1546.
24	郑建国, 王翔, 刘荣辉. 求解约束优化问题的ε-DE算法[J]. 软件学报, 2012, 23 (9): 2374- 2387.
	ZHENG J G , WANG X , LIU R H . ε-differential evolution algorithm for constrained optimization problems[J]. Journal of Software, 2012, 23 (9): 2374- 2387.
25	APOLLONI J , GARCÍA-NIETO J , ALBA E , et al. Empirical evaluation of distributed differential evolution on standard benchmarks[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2014, 236, 351- 366. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.03.083
26	段海滨, 张祥银, 徐春芳. 仿生智能计算[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 113- 120.
	DUAN H B , ZHANG X Y , XU C F . Bionic intelligent computing[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 113- 120.
27	苏海军, 杨煜普, 王宇嘉. 微分进化算法的研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2008, 30 (9): 1793- 1797. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.09.046
	SU H J , YANG Y P , WANG Y J . Review of differential evolution algorithms[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, 30 (9): 1793- 1797. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.09.046
28	DA PELO P , MAZZIA F , MININNI R M . State and parameter estimation in solenoid nonlinear equations[J]. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 2017, 39 (2): 809- 818.
29	TONG Q Q , YUAN Z Y , ZHENG M L , et al. A novel nonlinear parameter estimation method of soft tissues[J]. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, 2017, 15 (6): 371- 380.
30	CHIOU J P . Variable scaling hybrid differential evolution for large- scale economic dispatch problems[J]. Electric Power System Research, 2007, 77 (3/4): 212- 218.
31	PIOTROWSKI A P . Review of differential evolution population size[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2017, 32, 1- 24. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2016.05.003
32	AHRARI A , SHARIAT-PANAHI M . An improved evolution strategy with adaptive population size[J]. Optimization, 2015, 64 (12): 2567- 2586. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2013.836651
33	CHEN T S , TANG K , CHEN G L , et al. A large population size can be unhelpful in evolutionary algorithms[J]. Theoretical Computer Science, 2012, 436, 54- 70. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2011.02.016

要素均方差	方位均方差
要素均方差	σ_F1=σ_F2=σ_F3=σ_F4=σ_F5=0.1°	σ_F1=σ_F2=σ_F3=σ_F4=σ_F5=0.2°	σ_F1=σ_F2=σ_F3=σ_F4=σ_F5=0.3°	σ_F1=σ_F2=σ_F3=σ_F4=σ_F5=0.4°
σ_D0/Cab	14.31	19.05	23.34	27.42
σ_Vmx/(m/s)	5.68	7.95	9.86	11.08
σ_Vmy/(m/s)	7.26	10.01	11.88	13.54

测方位	F₀/(°)	F₁/(°)	F₂/(°)	F₃/(°)	F₄/(°)	F₅/(°)	D₀	V_mx	V_my
要素真值	140.00	139.64	139.21	138.70	136.35	133.25	60.00 Cab或11 112.00 m	-4.13 Kn或-8.03 m/s	5.90 Kn或11.47 m/s

算例	测方位	F₀/(°)	F₁/(°)	F₂/(°)	F₃/(°)	F₄/(°)	F₅/(°)	D₀	V_mx	V_my
算例1	自主解析结果	139.84	139.58	139.25	138.56	136.17	133.19	41.41 Cab或7 670.00 m	0.51 Kn或-0.99 m/s	1.17 Kn或-2.27 m/s
算例1	DE优化结果	139.93	139.60	139.23	138.74	136.39	133.29	57.25 Cab或10 602.70 m	-3.97 Kn或-7.71 m/s	5.54 Kn或10.76 m/s
算例2	自主解析结果	140.14	139.54	139.37	138.80	136.27	133.37	35.64 Cab或6 600.53 m	1.26 Kn或2.44 m/s	-0.83 Kn或-1.61 m/s
算例2	DE优化结果	139.90	139.58	139.18	138.69	136.34	133.15	56.82 Cab或10 523.06 m	-3.73 Kn或-7.26 m/s	5.32 Kn或10.34 m/s
算例3	自主解析结果	139.92	139.64	139.31	138.58	136.31	133.07	50.16 Cab或9 289.63 m	-2.61 Kn或-5.07 m/s	3.81 Kn或7.41 m/s
算例3	DE优化结果	140.03	139.70	139.20	138.67	136.31	133.28	59.54 Cab或11 026.81 m	-3.64 Kn或-7.08 m/s	5.46 Kn或10.62 m/s

[1]	Wantong CHEN, Shuyu TIAN, Julian ZHANG, Qing LIU, Shiyu REN. Research on modeling of debris diffusion distribution for suborbital disintegration accident [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(9): 2922-2928.
[2]	Mulai TAN, Dali DING, Lei XIE, Wei DING, Chenghui LYU. UCAV escape maneuvering decision based on fuzzy expert system and IDE algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 1984-1993.
[3]	Yunxiang CHEN, Yi RAO, Zhongyi CAI, Zezhou WANG. Remaining useful lifetime prediction and economic reserve strategy of equipment components based on improved similarity [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(9): 2688-2696.
[4]	Wenhai WU, Xiaofeng GUO, Siyu ZHOU, Li GAO. Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm with random neighborhood-based strategy and generalized opposition-based learning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(7): 1928-1942.
[5]	Wenhai WU, Xiaofeng GUO, Siyu ZHOU, Li GAO. Improved differential evolution algorithm for solving weapon-targetassignment problem [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1012-1021.
[6]	Bing WAN, Wei HAN, Yong LIANG, Xichao SU. Research on optimization of carrier-based aircraft fleetrecovery scheduling based on index function [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2918-2930.
[7]	Longwen WU, Baoying WANG, Junjie WEI, Shengyang HE, Yaqin ZHAO. AOA based dual-aircraft passive positioning model and its location methods [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(5): 978-986.
[8]	Wenhai WU, Xiaofeng GUO, Siyu ZHOU. Path planning algorithm based on NURBS and GOBL-ACDE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(5): 1073-1082.
[9]	Jun LUO, Jianqiang LIU, Yanan PANG. Multi-threshold image segmentation of 2D Otsu based on neighborhood search JADE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(10): 2164-2171.
[10]	LI Shihao, DING Yong, GAO Zhenlong. UAV air combat maneuvering decision based on intuitionistic fuzzy game theory [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(5): 1063-1070.
[11]	WANG Yadong, SHI Quan, ZHANG Fang, YOU Zhifeng, XIA Wei. Multi-stage spare parts supply optimization based on dynamic evolutionary algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(11): 2514-2523.
[12]	LI Zhiliang, LI Xiaojiang, ZHANG Donglai. Proactive scheduling of agile imaging satellite based on improved differential evolution algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(2): 353-359.
[13]	XIA Boyuan, ZHAO Qingsong, ZHANG Xiaoxiong, ZHAO Danling. Robust weapon system portfolio decision based on dynamic capability requirements [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(6): 1280-1286.
[14]	HUANG Liuyu, GAO Shuping, WANG Junning, XUE Xiaona. Hybrid frog leaping algorithm based on differential evolution [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(10): 2382-2392.
[15]	LIU Han, YIN Cheng-you, LIU Wei. Optimization and design of wideband antenna with adaptive differential evolution algorithm based on hybrid coding method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(4): 773-777.

Differential evolution strategy for autonomous concealment analysis of target motion elements

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 33

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments