多阶段任务装备体系作战能力评估

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.11.16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

现代战争战场形势复杂多变, 武器装备之间功能相互交互, 装备体系作战能力应保证最大限度发挥。基于作战环理论, 提出针对多阶段任务的装备体系总作战能力评估方法。通过检测装备体系作战能力指标的动态变化, 考察单个装备对装备体系发挥最佳作战能力的影响, 进而保证装备体系总作战能力最大。根据阶段任务对应的能力指标, 建立装备体系总作战能力指标体系; 基于作战环理论的装备体系作战能力评估模型, 引入区间联系数和灰数带的概念, 从多阶段任务出发, 对同类型的不同装备所在装备体系的作战能力进行评估; 利用信息熵法及装备体系在不同阶段任务中作战能力的排序向量对相应阶段任务的能力指标进行客观权重的确定。以某装备体系为例, 应用所提方法完成了总作战能力评估, 为装备优先发展、配合作战提供了决策支撑。

关键词: 作战环, 区间联系数, 灰数带, 信息熵, 作战能力

Abstract:

The battlefield situation of modern war is complex and changeable, and the functions of weapons and equipment interact with each other, so the combat capability of equipment system should be maximized. Based on the combat ring theory, a method for evaluating the total combat capability of equipment system for multi-phase mission is proposed. By detecting the dynamic change of the combat capability index of the equipment system, the influence of single equipment on the optimal combat capability of the equipment system is investigated, so as to ensure the maximum total combat capability of the equipment system. The total combat capability index system of equipment system is established according to the capability index corresponding to phase task. Based on the combat ring theory, the evaluation model of the combat capability of the equipment system is introduced, and the concepts of interval connection number and grey number band are introduced to evaluate the combat capability of the equipment system of different equipment of the same type from the multi-phase mission. By using information entropy method and the ranking vector of combat capability of equipment system in different phases of mission, the objective weight of capability index of corresponding stages of mission is determined. Taking a certain equipment system as an example, the proposed method is applied to complete the evaluation of total combat capability, which provides decision support for equipment development and cooperation.

Key words: combat ring, interval connection number, gray number zone, information entropy, operational capability

中图分类号:

E837

王博, 周文雅, 汪涛, 郭继唐. 多阶段任务装备体系作战能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(11): 3498-3506.

Bo WANG, Wenya ZHOU, Tao WANG, Jitang GUO. Operational capability evaluation of multi-phase mission equipment system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(11): 3498-3506.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

图8

图9

表2

图10

图11

表3

参考文献 20

21	张先超, 马亚辉. 体系能力模型与装备体系贡献率测度方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (4): 843- 849.
	ZHANG X C , MA Y H . Capability model of combat system of systems and measurement method of armament contribution to combat system of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (4): 843- 849.
22	JIANG J , LI X , ZHOU Z J , et al. Weapon system capability assessment under uncertainty based on the evident reasoning approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38 (11): 13773- 13784.
23	张宇, 黄建新. 应用OODA环模型研究装备对体系贡献程度[J]. 现代防御技术, 2017, 45 (2): 177- 182.
	ZHANG Y , HUANG J X . Study on contribution degree of equipment to system of systems using OODA loop model[J]. Mo-dern Defense Technology, 2017, 45 (2): 177- 182.
24	朱刚, 谭贤四, 王红, 等. 复杂信息关系集成的指挥控制模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015, 12 (1): 53- 61.
	ZHU G , TAN X S , WANG H , et al. Command and control model based on complex information relation integration[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2015, 12 (1): 53- 61.
25	杨耀华, 王维平, 包战. 面向作战网络的层次化涌现建模方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2011, 23 (12): 2777- 2782.
	YANG Y H , WANG W P , BAO Z . Hierarchic emergence approach for networked combat model[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2011, 23 (12): 2777- 2782.
26	BERNDT B. The dynamic OODA loop: amalgamating boyd's OODA loop and the cybermetic approch to command and control[C]// Proc. of the 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2007.
27	DU M , CHENG Z H , MA W N , et al. Research on evaluating method of army air defense force's fighting capacity based on index system[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 1176 (4): 042085.
28	LIU W , SONG Z Y . Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure networks[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2020, 193 (C): 106617.
29	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 胡旭, 等. 基于作战环和自信息量的装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53 (6): 741- 748.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , HU X , et al. Evaluation method of equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems based on operation loop and self-introduction quantity[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2019, 53 (6): 741- 748.
30	张国强, 刘小荷, 蒋方婷, 等. 基于"作战环"的区域反导装备体系效能评估[J]. 系统工程, 2016, 34 (5): 154- 158.
	ZHANG G Q , LIU X H , JIANG F T , et al. Effectiveness evaluation of regional anti-missile equipment system based on "combat ring"[J]. Systems Engineering, 2016, 34 (5): 154- 158.
31	刘思峰, 党耀国, 方志耕. 灰色系统理论及其应用[M]. 3版北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
	LIU S F , DANG Y G , FANG Z G . Grey system theory and its application[M]. 3rd ed Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
32	曾波, 刘思峰, 谢乃明, 等. 基于灰数带及灰数层的区间灰数预测模型[J]. 控制与决策, 2010, 25 (10): 1585-1588, 1592.
	ZENG B , LIU S F , XIE N M , et al. Prediction model for interval grey number based on grey band and grey layer[J]. Control and Decision, 2010, 25 (10): 1585-1588, 1592.
33	龚日朝, 李诗音, 谭可星. 带分布区间数的可能度计算模型及其排序[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41 (9): 2428- 2446.
	GONG R C , LI S Y , TAN K X . Possibility calculation model of symmetric distribution interval number and its ranking method[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2021, 41 (9): 2428- 2446.
34	孙欣宇, 杨德智, 徐永会, 等. 基于模糊层次权重法的合成作战能力模型[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2022, 42 (3): 93- 95.
1	IGOR K . Experimental investigations of a precision sensor for an automatic weapons stabilizer system[J]. Sensors, 2016, doi: 10.3390/s17010023
2	陈文英, 张兵志, 史力晨, 等. 新型智能装甲作战系统体系贡献率评估研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39 (9): 1841- 1849. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.09.022
	CHEN W Y , ZHANG B Z , SHI L C , et al. Research on evaluation of contribution rate of a new intelligent armoured combat system to army weapon system-of-systems[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39 (9): 1841- 1849. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.09.022
3	刘鹏, 赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 等. 面向多任务的武器装备体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1763- 1770.
	LIU P , ZHAO D L , TAN Y J , et al. Multi-task oriened contribution evaluation method of weapon equipment system of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1763- 1770.
4	谢晓阳, 陈轶迪, 赵晓宁, 等. 基于作战环的综合型武器装备体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2020, (3): 122- 126.
	XIE X Y , CHEN Y D , ZHAO X N , et al. Evaluation method of integrated weapon equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems based on operation loop[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2020, (3): 122- 126.
5	柯宏发, 杨晶, 李巧丽. 基于相近和相似机理的装备作战效能评估模型[J]. 国防科技, 2022, 43 (2): 82- 91.
	KE H F , YANG J , LI Q L . Evaluating the operational effectiveness of equipment based on proximity and similarity mechanisms[J]. National Defense Science & Technology, 2022, 43 (2): 82- 91.
6	HE X H , WANG Q , CHEN G S , et al. Weapons combat capability evaluation based on CAS[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 380-384, 2221-2225.
7	杨雪, 董爱, 赵文婷, 等. 防空导弹武器系统体系贡献度研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2018, 46 (3): 1-8, 47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2018.03.001
	YANG X , DONG A , ZHAO W T , et al. System contribution rate of the antiaircraft missile weapon[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46 (3): 1-8, 47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2018.03.001
34	SUN X Y , YANG D Z , XU Y H , et al. Synthetic combat capability model based on fuzzy hierarchy weight method[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2022, 42 (3): 93- 95.
8	谭跃进, 杨克巍, 赵青松, 等. 基于作战环的武器装备体系作战网络作战效能评估方法[P]. 中国: CN105306248A, 2016-02-03.
	TAN Y J, YANG K W, ZHAO Q S, et al. Combat effectiveness evaluation method of weapon equipment system combat network based on combat ring[P]. China: CN105306248A, 2016-02-03.
9	CARES J R , DICKMANN J Q . Operations research for unmanned system[M]. New York: Wiley, 2016.
10	齐小刚, 刘学星, 张博孜, 等. 基于结构方程模型的武器装备体系涌现性度量模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41 (2): 406- 416.
	QI X G , LIU X X , ZHANG B Z , et al. Emergence measurement model of armament systems based on SEM[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41 (2): 406- 416.
11	GAO D, HUANG J M, YU H, et al. Research on combat SD model based on OODA loop[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Information Science & Control Engineering, 2015: 707-711.
12	李怡勇, 李智, 管清波, 等. 武器装备体系贡献度评估刍议与示例[J]. 装备学院学报, 2015, 26 (4): 5- 10.
	LI Y Y , LI Z , GUAN Q B , et al. Discussion and demonstration on contribution evaluation of weapon equipment system[J]. Journal of Academy of Equipment, 2015, 26 (4): 5- 10.
13	武博祎, 芦翰晨. 武器装备体系贡献度评估研究进展及展望[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2022, 43 (8): 1221- 1228.
	WU B Y , LU H C . Development status and prospect of contribution assessment for military equipment system[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2022, 43 (8): 1221- 1228.
14	李际超, 杨克巍, 张小可, 等. 基于武器装备体系作战网络模型的装备贡献度评估[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
	LI J C , YANG K W , ZHANG X K , et al. Equipment contribution degree evaluation method based on combat network of weapon system-of-systems[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
15	梁家林, 熊伟. 基于作战环的武器装备体系能力评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1810- 1819.
	LIANG J L , XIONG W . Capabilities assessment of the wea-ponry system based on combat ring[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1810- 1819.
16	蒋彦, 潘进, 顾香, 等. 基于区间数的指挥信息系统作战效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39 (7): 175- 178.
	JIANG Y , PAN J , GU X , et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation of command information system based on interval number[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2014, 39 (7): 175- 178.
17	DAVID J , BRYANT . Rethinking OODA: toward a modern cognitive framework of command decision making[J]. Military Psychology, 2006, 18 (3): 183- 206.
18	沈丙振, 缪建明, 李晓菲, 等. 基于改进结构方程模型的陆军武器装备体系作战能力评估模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42 (11): 2503- 2512.
	SHEN B Z , MIAO J M , LI X F , et al. Evaluation model of land force weapon equipment system combat capability based on improved SEM[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42 (11): 2503- 2512.
19	樊延平, 郭齐胜, 王金良. 面向任务的装备体系作战能力需求满足度分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38 (8): 1826- 1832.
	FAN Y P , GUO Q S , WANG J L . Task-oriented requirement satisfactory degree analysis method for combat capability of equipment system of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (8): 1826- 1832.
20	管清波, 冯书兴. 一种新的武器装备体系能力指标变权算法[J]. 装备学院学报, 2014, 25 (1): 112- 115.
	GUAN Q B , FENG S X . A novel variable weight algorithm for equipment system capability[J]. Journal of Academy of Equipment, 2014, 25 (1): 112- 115.

任务阶段	能力指标	中间值法				本文算法
任务阶段	能力指标	1号	2号	3号	4号	1号	2号	3号	4号
侦察阶段	发现目标能力	2	4	3	1	2	4	3	1
	跟踪目标能力	3	1	2	4	3	1	2	4
	目标成像能力	1	3	2	4	1	3	2	4
	信息融合能力	4	3	1	2	4	3	1	2
决策阶段	指挥人员认知能力	4	2	3	1	4	2	3	1
	系统筹划能力	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3
	突发应变能力	1	3	2	4	1	3	2	4
打击阶段	软毁伤能力	1	3	4	2	1	3	4	2
	硬毁伤能力	4	3	2	1	4	3	2	1
	精确毁伤能力	1	3	3	2	1	3	4	2

任务阶段	中间值法				本文算法
任务阶段	1号装备	2号装备	3号装备	4号装备	1号装备	2号装备	3号装备	4号装备
侦察	2	4	1	3	2	4	1	3
决策	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3
打击	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1

排序方法	装备编号
排序方法	1号	2号	3号	4号
中间值法	4	1	2	3
本文方法	4	1	2	3

[1]	何燕秋, 王有元, 何俐萍. 基于最大信息熵的长寿命产品可靠度置信区间Bootstrap估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(6): 1880-1892.
[2]	卢盈齐, 范成礼, 付强, 朱晓雯, 李威. 基于改进IFRS相似度和信息熵的反导作战目标威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1230-1238.
[3]	郭斐然, 于剑桥, 宋豹. 基于指派模型的导弹装备体系弹种优化设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 850-862.
[4]	米新平, 陈西宏, 刘赞, 刘永进, 刘强. 基于熵评价模态分解的雷达信号双谱特征识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2116-2123.
[5]	周琛, 宋笔锋, 尚柏林, 王耀祖, 科尔沁. 基于作战网络可靠度的体系贡献率评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1875-1883.
[6]	魏东涛, 刘晓东, 李鹏, 陈玉金. 基于节点重要度与改进信息熵的装备体系效能评估方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3614-3623.
[7]	杨圩生, 王钰, 杨洋, 唐亮. 基于作战环的不同节点攻击策略下的作战网络效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228.
[8]	张雷雷, 解龙, 高旭, 孙天宇, 张峰. 高价值弹药可靠性综合评定方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3399-3404.
[9]	李恒璐, 陈伯孝, 丁一, 张钊铭. 基于信息熵权的最近邻域数据关联算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(4): 806-812.
[10]	雷震烁, 刘松涛, 葛杨, 温镇铭. 干扰效果在线评估参数筛选与特征表示方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(12): 2755-2760.
[11]	李晨, 杨俊安, 刘辉. 基于信息熵和GA-ELM的调制识别算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(1): 223-229.
[12]	刘鹏, 赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 杨克巍, 豆亚杰. 面向多任务的武器装备体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1763-1770.
[13]	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 项华春, 王莉莉. 装备体系贡献率评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1789-1794.
[14]	梁家林, 熊伟. 基于作战环的武器装备体系能力评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1810-1819.
[15]	杨克巍, 杨志伟, 谭跃进, 赵青松. 面向体系贡献率的装备体系评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(2): 311-321.