基于节点重要度与改进信息熵的装备体系效能评估方法研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.12.24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对装备体系网络建模过程中未充分考虑节点异质性等问题, 提出了基于节点重要度与改进信息熵的体系效能评估方法。首先, 依据作战环理论和装备分层方法构建装备体系网络模型。其次, 从网络全局、网络局部、战时装备完好性三方面综合评估节点重要度。最后, 根据节点权值和节点参与作战环数量, 建立了改进信息熵的作战效能评估模型。以轰炸蓝方指挥所作战体系为例进行分析, 验证了所提方法的可行性和合理性。

关键词: 作战体系, 作战环, 解释结构模型, 模糊评价, 信息熵

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of not fully considering the heterogeneity of nodes in the equipment system network modeling process, a system effectiveness evaluation method based on node importance and improved information entropy is proposed. Firstly, the equipment system of system network model based on the operation loop theory and equipment layering method is buit. Secondly, the importance of nodes is comprehensively evaluated from the three aspects of the overall network, the network part, and the integrity of the equipment in wartime. Finally, based on the node weights and the number of node participation operation loop, a combat effectiveness evaluation model with improved information entropy is constructed. The bombing of the enemy's rear base combat system was analyzed as an example to verify the feasibility and rationality of the method.

Key words: operation system of system, operation loop, interpretation structure model, fuzzy evaluation, information entropy

中图分类号:

N936

魏东涛, 刘晓东, 李鹏, 陈玉金. 基于节点重要度与改进信息熵的装备体系效能评估方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3614-3623.

Dongtao WEI, Xiaodong LIU, Peng LI, Yujin CHEN. Research on effectiveness evaluation method of equipment system based on node importance and improved information entropy[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3614-3623.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

表2

图8

表3

表4

表5

表6

参考文献 17

1	于芹章, 张英朝, 张静, 等. 基于整体效果的装备体系作战效能评估方法研究[J]. 系统仿真技术, 2011, 7 (3): 183- 189.
	YU Q Z , ZHANG Y C , ZHANG J , et al. Research on combat effectiveness evaluation method of equipment system based on o verall effect[J]. System Simulation Technology, 2011, 7 (3): 183- 189.
2	张送保, 张维明, 刘忠, 等. 复杂体系效能测度建模研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2007, 13 (7): 515- 519.
	ZHANG S B , ZHANG W M , LIU Z , et al. Research on modeling of complex system effectiveness measurement[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2007, 13 (7): 515- 519.
3	马力, 张明智. 网络化体系效能评估建模研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2016, 30 (1): 12- 17.
	MA L , ZHANG M Z . Research on effectiveness evaluation modeling of networked system[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2016, 30 (1): 12- 17.
4	谭跃进, 张小可, 杨克巍. 武器装备体系网络化描述与建模方法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2012.06.009
	TAN Y J , ZHANG X K , YANG K W . Networked description and modeling method of weapon equipment system[J]. Journal of Systems Management, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2012.06.009
5	卜广志. 基于信息流的武器装备体系效能模型[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2009, 34 (8): 34- 37.
	BU G Z . Weapon equipment system effectiveness model based on information flow[J]. Fire Power and Command Control, 2009, 34 (8): 34- 37.
6	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 王莉莉, 等. 基于作战环和改进信息熵的体系效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (1): 73- 80.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , WANG L L , et al. System effectiveness evaluation method based on combat loop and improved information entropy[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (1): 73- 80.
7	梁家林, 熊伟. 基于作战环的武器装备体系能力评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1810- 1819.
	LIANG J L , XIONG W . Weapon system capability evaluation method based on combat ring[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1810- 1819.
8	周琛, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 等. 基于作战环的航空武器装备体系贡献率评估[EB/OL]. [2021-01-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20201214.1727.006.html.
	ZHOU C, SHANG B L, SONG B F, et al. Assessment of contribution rate of aviation weapon equipment system based on combat loop[EB/OL]. [2021-01-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20201214.1727.006.html.
9	吴坚, 郭齐胜, 于桓凯. 基于ISM的作战活动模型的结构分析方法研究[J]. 装备指挥技术学院学报, 2011, 22 (5): 118- 122.
	WU J , GUO Q S , YU H K . Research on structural analysis method of combat activity model based on ISM[J]. Journal of t he Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, 2011, 22 (5): 118- 122.
10	刘伟强, 徐立云. 基于ISM和复杂网络的制造系统关键脆性因子辨识[EB/OL]. [2021-01-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20201126.1022.006.html.
	LIU W Q, XU L Y. Identification of key fragility factors of manufacturing system based on ISM and complex network[EB/OL]. [2021-01-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20201126.1022.006.html.
11	郑世明, 王洪军, 孙涛. 基于ISM的作战仿真模型体系结构建模[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2016, 38 (1): 23- 27.
	ZHENG S M , WANG H J , SUN T . ISM-based combat simulation model architecture modeling[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2016, 38 (1): 23- 27.
12	商慧琳. 武器装备体系作战网络建模及能力评估方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2013.
	SHANG H L. Research on modeling and capability evaluation method of weapon equipment system combat network[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013.
13	张明智, 马力. 体系对抗OODA循环鲁棒性建模及仿真分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29 (9): 1968- 1976.
	ZHANG M Z , MA L . Robustness modeling and simulation analysis of system against OODA cycle[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29 (9): 1968- 1976.
14	徐文超, 薛青, 于屏岗, 等. 作战系统网络化建模方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2014, 26 (9): 2142- 2147.
	XU W C , XUE Q , YU P G , et al. Research on network modeling method of combat system[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2014, 26 (9): 2142- 2147.
15	段佳勇, 郑宏达. 基于节点重要度的复杂网络脆弱性分析方法[J]. 控制工程, 2020, 27 (4): 692- 696.
	DUAN J Y , ZHENG H D . Complex network vulnerability analysis method based on node importance[J]. Control Engineering, 2020, 27 (4): 692- 696.
16	周漩, 张凤鸣, 周卫平, 等. 利用节点效率评估复杂网络功能鲁棒性[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61 (19): 190201.
	ZHOU X , ZHANG F M , ZHOU W P , et al. Using node efficiency to evaluate the functional robustness of complex networks[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61 (19): 190201.
17	陈春良, 昝翔, 张仕新, 等. 基于多维关系复杂网络的装备重要度评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38 (6): 1168- 1177.
	CHEN C L , ZAN X , ZHANG S X , et al. Equipment importance evaluation method based on complex network of multi-dimensional relationships[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38 (6): 1168- 1177.

i、j重要性比较	取值
相同	c_ij=c_ji=0
i强于j	c_ij=1, c_ji=－1

节点v_i	可达集R(v_i)	先行集B(v_i)	R(v_i)∩B(v_i)
S₁	S₁, S₄, D₁, D₂, I₁, I₂, I₃, I₄, T₁^θ, T₂^θ	S₁, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	S₁
S₂	S₂, D₁, D₂, I₁, I₂, I₃, I₄, T₁^θ, T₂^θ	S₂, T₁^ϑ	S₂
S₃	S₃, D₁, D₂, I₁, I₂, I₃, I₄, T₁^θ, T₂^θ	S₃, T₁^ϑ	S₃
S₄	S₄, D₁, D₂, I₁, I₂, I₃, I₄, T₁^θ, T₂^θ	S₁, S₄, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	S₄
D₁	D₁, D₂, I₁, I₂, I₃, I₄, T₁^θ, T₂^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	D₁
D₂	D₂, I₃, I₄, T₁^θ, T₂^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, D₂, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	D₂
I₁	I₁, T₁^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, I₁, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	I₁
I₂	I₂, T₂^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, I₂, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	I₂
I₃	I₃, T₂^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, D₂, I₃, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	I₃
I₄	I₄, T₁^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, D₂, I₄, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ	I₄
T₁^ϑ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, D₂, I₁, I₂, I₃, I₄, T₁^ϑ, T₁^θ, T₂^θ	T₁^ϑ	T₁^ϑ
T₁^θ	T₁^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, D₂, I₁, I₄, T₁^ϑ, T₁^θ, T₂^ϑ	T₁^θ
T₂^ϑ	S₁, S₄, D₁, D₂, I₁, I₂, I₃, T₁^θ, T₂^ϑ, T₂^θ	T₂^ϑ	T₂^ϑ
T₂^θ	T₂^θ	S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄, D₁, D₂, I₂, I₃, T₁^ϑ, T₂^ϑ, T₂^θ	T₂^θ

节点	网络全局权重	节点强度	节点效率	网络局部权重	节点重要度	节点网络权重
S₁	0.091 8	1.6	0.294 9	0.947 4	0.087 0	0.087 0
S₂	0.071 6	1.0	0.294 9	0.647 4	0.046 4	0.046 4
S₃	0.071 6	1.0	0.294 9	0.647 4	0.046 4	0.046 4
S₄	0.128 6	1.4	0.359 0	0.879 5	0.113 1	0.113 1
D₁	0.344 5	3.0	0.384 6	1.692 3	0.583 0	0.583 0
D₂	0.258 4	2.0	0.230 8	1.115 4	0.288 2	0.288 2
I₁	0.212 1	1.0	0.076 9	0.538 5	0.114 2	0.114 2
I₂	0.212 1	1.0	0.076 9	0.538 5	0.114 2	0.114 2
I₃	0.231 4	1.0	0.076 9	0.538 5	0.124 6	0.124 6
I₄	0.231 4	1.0	0.076 9	0.538 5	0.124 6	0.124 6
T₁^ϑ	0.087 4	1.2	0.488 7	0.824 4	0.072 1	0.210 9
T₁^θ	0.231 4	1.2	0	0.6	0.138 8	-
T₂^ϑ	0.025 7	0.4	0	0.2	0.005 1	0.180 1
T₂^θ	0.231 4	1.2	0.312 8	0.756 4	0.175 0	-

节点	节点生存力	节点可靠性	装备完好度	节点权重
S₁	0.923 6	1.00	0.923 6	0.080 3
S₂	0.741 4	0.91	0.674 7	0.031 3
S₃	0.816 7	0.82	0.669 7	0.031 0
S₄	0.566 0	1.00	0.566 0	0.064 0
D₁	0.741 4	0.91	0.674 7	0.393 3
D₂	0.619 4	1.00	0.619 4	0.178 5
I₁	0.816 7	0.96	0.784 0	0.089 5
I₂	0.659 4	0.97	0.639 6	0.073 0
I₃	0.616 0	0.98	0.603 7	0.075 2
I₄	0.749 9	0.95	0.712 4	0.088 7
T₁	0.800 0	1.00	0.800 0	0.168 7
T₂	0.800 0	1.00	0.800 0	0.144 0

名称	T₁-S₁	T₁-S₂	T₁-S₃	T₂-S₁
E=f(v_T, v_S)	0.638 3	0.756 7	0.517 3	0.496 2
自信息量	0.448 9	0.278 8	0.659 1	0.700 8
综合自信息量	0.006 1	0.001 5	0.003 4	0.008 1

名称	S₂-D₁	S₃-D₁	S₄-D₁	S₄-D₂
E=f(v_S, v_D)	0.856 1	0.661 9	0.768 5	0.801 2
自信息量	0.155 4	0.412 6	0.263 3	0.221 6
综合自信息量	0.001 9	0.005	0.006 6	0.002 5

名称	D₁-I₁	D₁-I₂	D₂-I₃	D₂-I₄
E=f(v_D, v_I)	0.782 1	0.654 1	0.785 6	0.831 4
自信息量	0.245 8	0.424 5	0.241 3	0.184 6
综合自信息量	0.008 7	0.012 2	0.003 2	0.002 9

名称	I₁-T₁	I₂-T₂	I₃-T₂	I₄-T₁
E=f(v_I, v_T)	0.645 2	0.774 9	0.599 8	0.810 6
自信息量	0.438 2	0.255 0	0.511 2	0.210 0
综合自信息量	0.006 6	0.002 7	0.005 5	0.003 1

名称	S₁-S₄	D₁-D₂	-	-
E=f(v_I, v_I)/E=f(v_D, v_D)	0.786 3	0.858 2	-	-
自信息量	0.240 4	0.152 9	-	-
综合自信息量	0.001 2	0.010 7	-	-