基于系统动力学的装备体系贡献率评估方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.01.14

Abstract

Abstract:

The evaluation of contribution rate is very important for the construction of equipment system-of-systems (SoS). It is difficult to evaluate the contribution rate of SoS due to the emergence of SoS when studying the influence of different equipment on equipment SoS. Therefore, based on the analysis of the SoS architecture and effectiveness index, the emergence of equipment SoS effectiveness is analyzed, and the system dynamics model is used for the simulation evaluation of the equipment system effectiveness, and the evaluation method of the equipment contribution rate is proposed. Finally, a case study of contribution rate evaluation for missile equipment SoS is conducted to verify the proposed method. This paper proposes a simulation analysis method which combines qualitative and quantitative analysis of equipment system contribution rate based on system dynamics, and thus can provide reference for equipment system contribution rate evaluation.

Key words: emergence, system dynamics, contribution rate, equipment system-of-systems (SoS)

CLC Number:

N941.3

Xing PAN, Dujun ZUO, Yuedong ZHANG. Contribution rate evaluation method of equipment system-of-systems based on system dynamics[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 112-120.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Table 1

Table 2

References 25

1	KEATING C , ROGERS R , UNAl R , et al. System of systems engineering[J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2003, 15 (3): 36- 45.
2	KUMAR P , MERZOUKI R , OULD B B . Multilevel modeling of system of systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems Man & Cybernetics Systems, 2017, 48 (8): 1309- 1320.
3	LEE J , KANG S H , ROSENBERGER J , et al. A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 58 (3): 521- 527.
4	CHI Y, LI J C, YANG K W, et al. An equipment offering degree evaluation method for weapon system-of-systems combat network based on operation loop[C]//Proc.of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2015: 477-488.
5	李小波, 王维平, 林木, 等. 体系贡献率评估的研究框架、进展与重点方向[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
	LI X B , WANG W P , LIN M , et al. The research framework, progress, and key directions of system-of-systems contribution ratio evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
6	吕惠文, 张炜, 吕耀平, 等. 基于多视角的武器装备体系贡献率评估指标体系构建[J]. 装备学院学报, 2017, 28 (3): 62- 66.
	LYU H W , ZHANG W , LYU Y P , et al. Establishment of multi-perspective assessment index system of weaponry system contribution rate[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 2017, 28 (3): 62- 66.
7	SILVA E, BATISTA T, OQUENDO F. A mission-oriented approach for designing system-of-systems[C]//Proc.of the 10th System of Systems Engineering Conference, 2015: 345-351.
8	KEATING C B , PADILLA J J , ADAMS K . System of systems engineering requirements: challenges and guidelines[J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2008, 20 (4): 24- 31.
9	张兵志, 赵青松, 谭跃进. 基于体系工程的武器装备体系需求论证[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2012, 34 (12): 2479- 2484.
	ZHANG B Z , ZHAO Q S , TAN Y J . Requirement demonstration of armament system of systems based on system of systems engineering[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34 (12): 2479- 2484.
10	LI J C, FU C X, CHEN Y W, et al. An operational efficiency evaluation method for weapon system-of-systems combat networks based on operation loop[C]//Proc.of the 9th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, 2014: 219-223.
11	张维超, 何新华, 屈强, 等. 基于涌现的武器装备体系作战能力建模研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43 (9): 6- 10, 14.
	ZHANG W C , HE X H , QU Q , et al. Research on combat capability modeling of weapon system based on emergence[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43 (9): 6- 10, 14.
12	FAN C Y , FAN P S , CHANG P C . A system dynamics modeling approach for a military weapon maintenance supply system[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 128 (2): 457- 469.
13	ZHANG J, XIONG W, MA J R, et al. Discussion on demands-oriented quality evaluation of missile equipments[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering, 2012: 1387-1390.
14	BUENO A , CARREÑO L T , DELGADO D J , et al. Executable architecture based on system dynamics: an integrated methodology composed by standard system dynamics modelling and DoDAF operational view models[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 36, 87- 92.
15	ZHU D X, SHI X M, MA Z X, et al. Research on maintenance support system of civil military integration equipment based on DODAF[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Sports, Arts, Education and Management Engineering, 2017: 342-346.
16	GRIENDLING K, MAVRIS D N. Development of a DoDAF-based executable architecting approach to analyze system-of-systems alternatives[C]//Proc.of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2011.
17	YANG W J, YUAN C X, ZHAO J, et al. Research on weapon and equipment requirement analysis method based on DoDAF[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Virtual Reality and Intelligent Systems, 2019: 317-319.
18	RAHUL B , SADHAN K G . Model for a predictive maintenance system effectiveness using the analytical hierarchy process as analytical tool[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48 (3): 1463- 1468.
19	SINHA P . Towards higher maintenance effectiveness[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2015, 32 (7): 754- 762.
20	DOU Y J , ZHOU Z X , ZHAO D L , et al. Weapons system portfolio selection based on the contribution rate evaluation of system of systems[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (5): 905- 919.
21	DONG P, QIN D G. Evaluation of contribution rate of weapon equipment system of systems capability based on conditional evidential network[C]//Proc.of the IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science, 2017: 459-463.
22	屈强, 何新华, 刘中晅. 系统涌现的要素和动力学机制[J]. 系统科学学报, 2017, 25 (3): 25- 29.
	QU Q , HE X H , LIU Z X . Essential factors and dynamic mechanism of the system emergence[J]. Chinese Journal of Systems Science, 2017, 25 (3): 25- 29.
23	王飞, 司光亚. 武器装备体系能力贡献度的解析与度量方法[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2016, 30 (3): 10- 15.
	WANG F , SI G Y . Analysis and measurement method of contribution of weapon system-of-systems capability[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2016, 30 (3): 10- 15.
24	罗小明, 朱延雷, 何榕. 基于SEM的武器装备作战体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 装备学院学报, 2015, 26 (5): 1- 6.
	LUO X M , ZHU Y L , HE R . SEM-based evaluation method of contribution to system warfighting for weapons and equipments[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 2015, 26 (5): 1- 6.
25	毛腾蛟, 张东戈, 梁雪峰, 等. 作战系统运用效能评估的线性系统响应分析法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (12): 2772- 2779.
	MAO T J , ZHANG D G , LIANG X F , et al. Linear system response analysis method for operational effectiveness evaluation of combat system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electro-nics, 2019, 41 (12): 2772- 2779.

装备指标	70	75	80	85	90
战斗时长/min	162	157	152	147	143

装备指标变化	70→75	75→80	80→85	85→90
贡献率/%	3.245	3.103	2.955	2.834
贡献度	5.251	4.859	4.484	4.172

[1]	Maohuan WANG, Zecong LIU, Haozhe LIANG, Yingchao ZHANG, Lei SUN. Research on comprehensive problem of evaluating multi-type contribution rate to system-of-systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(5): 1572-1580.
[2]	Depeng KONG, Yiqing MA, Baohua ZHENG, Qi WANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Zhenqiang ZHAO. Contribution rate assessment method of maritime joint operations equipment system of systems for uncertain multi-mission scenes [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3775-3782.
[3]	Min DU, Zhonghua CHENG, Enzhi DONG. Research on contribution rate evaluation theory of army air defense brigade equipment system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 209-217.
[4]	Chen ZHOU, Bifeng SONG, Bolin SHANG, Yaozu WANG, Erqin KE. System of systems contribution rate evaluation based on operational network reliability [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(7): 1875-1883.
[5]	Guowei CHEN, Yujing ZHOU, Lei REN. SD optimization of equipment cost structure facing system performance maximization [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1022-1029.
[6]	Guixiang FANG, Yuejin TAN, Mu ZHANG, Xiaodong BU, Jun ZHANG. Evaluation of relative contribution rate of missile weapon system-of-systems based on combat ring [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(8): 1734-1739.
[7]	Xuan ZHOU, Feng HE, Xiaoyan GU, Zirui JIA, Huagang XIONG. Dynamic comprehensive evaluation with weight evolution forsystem contribution rate of avionics systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(8): 1740-1750.
[8]	Junwen MA, An ZHANG, Fei GAO, Wenhao BI. Evaluation of weapon equipment contribution rate to system-of- systems based on belief rule-based system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1519-1526.
[9]	Xiaogang QI, Doudou ZHAI, Xuexing LIU. Analysis of anti-ship force loss at sea based on system dynamics [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(4): 836-842.
[10]	PAN Xing, ZHANG Zhenyu, ZHANG Manli, ZHANG Guozhong. Research on RMS demonstration method of equipment SoS Based on SoSE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(8): 1771-1779.
[11]	LUO Chengkun, CHEN Yunxiang, XIANG Huachun, WANG Lili. Review of the evaluation methods of equipment’s contribution rate to system-of-systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(8): 1789-1794.
[12]	CHEN Wenying, ZHANG Bingzhi, YANG Kewei. Contribution rate evaluation for requirement demonstration of a new weapon equipment system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(8): 1795-1801.
[13]	YANG Kewei, YANG Zhiwei, TAN Yuejin, ZHAO Qingsong. Review of the evaluation methods of equipment system of systems facing the contribution rate [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(2): 311-321.
[14]	LIU Yupeng, YANG Yutao, YAN Xiangbin, TIAN Yaoli, LI Yijun. System dynamics model of stakeholders in manned spaceflight space applications [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(12): 2807-2819.
[15]	ZHOU Zhongliang, CHENG Yue, KOU Tian, GUO Pengcheng. Air penetration combat forces plan evaluation method based on two stage DEA model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(4): 797-804.

Contribution rate evaluation method of equipment system-of-systems based on system dynamics

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 25

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments