基于多无人机协同的航迹欺骗误差分析

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.07.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在雷达对抗中，多无人机协同航迹欺骗对消耗对方雷达资源、掩护真实目标作用显著，但受到定位精度、无人机位置及调制参数等误差影响。对此，构建航迹欺骗基础模型后，重点分析雷达先验位置误差与无人机位置误差对虚假航迹的影响，推导空间理论模型，明确误差与假目标偏移关系及量测关联条件，推导调制参数和雷达散射截面积一致性、速度一致性检测条件。针对空间耦合误差进行综合分析并提出补偿方案。仿真实验证明，理论分析可有效估测航迹欺骗效果，补偿方案具有一定的可行性与有效性。

关键词: 航迹欺骗, 误差分析, 组网雷达, 无人机

Abstract:

In radar countermeasures, multi-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) cooperative trajectory deception plays a significant role in consuming enemy radar resources and masking real targets. However, it is affected by errors in positioning accuracy, UAV positions, and modulation parameters. In regard to this, after constructing a basic model for trajectory deception, this paper focuses on analyzing the impacts of radar priori position errors and UAV position errors on false trajectories. It derives a spatial theoretical model to clarify the relationship between errors and false target deviations, as well as the measurement association conditions. This paper deduces the detection conditions for velocity consistency and the consistency between modulation parameters and radar cross-section （RCS）. A comprehensive analysis of spatial coupling errors is conducted, and corresponding compensation schemes are proposed. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the theoretical analysis can effectively estimate the effect of trajectory deception, and the compensation schemes exhibit feasibility and effectiveness.

Key words: trajectory deception, error analysis, networked radar, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

中图分类号:

TN 972

班宏辉, 潘继飞, 王正, 崔瑞. 基于多无人机协同的航迹欺骗误差分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(7): 2195-2205.

Honghui BAN, Jifei PAN, Zheng WANG, Rui CUI. Trajectory deception error analysis based on multi-UAV collaboration[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(7): 2195-2205.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表1

表2

图11

参考文献 27

28	RAO B, XIAO S P, WANG X S, et al. Maximum likelihood approach to the estimation and discrimination of exoatmospheric active phantom tracks using motion features[J]. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2012, 48 (1): 794- 819. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2012.6129671
29	HAN X F, HE H F, ZHANG Q, et al. Suppression of deception-false-target jamming for active/passive netted radar based on position error[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, 22 (8): 7902- 7912. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3149057
30	LIU X, LI D S. A three-dimensional phantom track generation for radar network deception[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 27288- 27301. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894409
1	MEIR P, PHILLIP C, REID L, et al. Concepts for generating coherent radar phantom tracks using cooperating vehicles[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2004.
2	DIYOGU H A, MAITHRIPAL A. Radar deception through phantom track generation[C]//Proc. of the American Control Conference, 2005: 4102−4106.
3	PURVIS K B, CHANDLER P R, PACHTER M. Feasible flight paths for cooperative generation of a phantom radar track[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2006, 29 (3): 653- 661. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-5335
4	KEITH B P, KARL J A, MUSTAFA K, et al. Online control strategies for highly coupled cooperative UAVs[C]//Proc. of the American Control Conference, 2007.
5	IL-HYOUNG L, HYOCHOONG B. Cooperative control of multiple electronic combat air vehicles for electronic attack[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Information Technology, 2008.
6	GARETH B, XU Y J. Virtual motion camouflage based phantom track generation through cooperative electronic combat air vehicles[J]. Automatica, 2010, 46 (9): 1454- 1461. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2010.05.027
7	OUYANG Z P, XU C, FENG J Q, et al. Research on method of phantom track generation based on cooperative control of UAVs in uniform linear motion[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 685 (1): 012018. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/685/1/012018
8	FAN Z, GAO X J, JIN Y, et al. Research on route planning of group UAV cooperation for deception jamming to radar network[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, 2020.
9	RATNOO A, SHIMA T. Formation-flying guidance for cooperative radar deception[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35 (6): 1730- 1739. doi: 10.2514/1.57112
10	ZHANG Y R, GAO M G, LI Y J, et al. Phantom track generation using coherent dual moving sources for monopulse radar[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2014.
11	RAO B, GU Z Y, NIE Y P. Deception approach to track-to-track radar fusion using noncoherent dual-source jamming[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 50843- 50858. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980010
12	LI Q, ZHANG L R, ZHOU Y, et al. Discrimination of active false targets based on hermitian distance for distributed multiple-radar architectures[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 71872- 71883. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920365
13	YANG C Q, FENG L, ZHANG H, et al. A novel data fusion algorithm to combat false data injection attacks in networked radar systems[J]. IEEE Trans. on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 2018, 4 (1): 125- 136. doi: 10.1109/TSIPN.2018.2790361
14	ZHOU H P, DONG C C, WU R W, et al. Feature fusion based on Bayesian decision theory for radar deception jamming recognition[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, 16296- 16304. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052506
15	ZHANG S Y, ZHOU Y, ZHANG L R, et al. Target detection for multistatic radar in the presence of deception jamming[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2021, 21 (6): 8130- 8141. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3050008
16	YANG Y, DA K, ZHU Y F, et al. Consensus based target tracking against deception jamming in distributed radar networks[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2023, 17 (4): 683- 700. doi: 10.1049/rsn2.12371
17	ZHANG L, LUO Y, WANG H, et al. Detection of false targets in a full polarization radar network under deception jamming[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 24 (3): 3368- 3379. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2023.3341961
18	LI J T, LIU K, ZHANG T X. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for dynamic motion control allocation in UAV swarm cooperative jamming to netted radar[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems, 2023.
19	GUO X Y, TIAN T, TAN H Y, et al. A deceptive jamming technology against SAR based on optical-to-SAR template translation[J]. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2024, 60 (5): 5715- 5729. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2024.3399195
20	SUN J, YUAN Y, GRECO M S, et al. Anti-deception jamming resource scheduling for multi-target tracking in distributed radar networks[J]. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2024, 60 (6): 9111- 9128. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2024.3438097
21	ZHANG Z H, ZHU J H, LIU N, et al. Signal fusion method for networked radar motivated by data fusion[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2025, 25 (1): 951- 961. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3492137
22	TAN H Y, ZHANG Z X, LI Y, et al. PASS-Net: a pseudo classes and stochastic classifiers based network for few-shot class-incremental automatic modulation classification[J]. IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communications, 2024, 23 (12): 17987- 18003. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2024.3458980
23	李小波, 孙琳, 周青松, 等. 多机协同的组网雷达欺骗干扰航迹优化[J]. 现代防御技术, 2016, 44 (6): 43- 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2016.06.008
	LI X B, SUN L, ZHOU Q S, et al. Optimization of spoofing and jamming track for multi-aircraft cooperative networked radar[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2016, 44 (6): 43- 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2016.06.008
24	DHANANJAY N, KUDUVALLI A, GHOSE D. Realistic coherent phantom track generation by a group of electronic combat aerial vehicles[C]//Proc. of the American Control Conference, 2013.
25	LIU X, LI D X. The technology of deviation compensation for radar phantom tracks[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 17th International Conference on Communication Technology, 2017.
26	柏鹏, 王玉冰, 梁晓龙, 等. 无人机对雷达组网航迹欺骗综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41 (10): 23912.
	BAI P, WANG Y B, LIANG X L, et al. Review on track spoofing of radar network by UAV[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41 (10): 23912.
27	ZHAO S S, ZHANG L R, ZHOU Y, et al. Signal fusion-based algorithms to discriminate between radar targets and deception jamming in distributed multiple-radar architectures[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2015, 11, 6697- 6706. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2440769

分图	参数
分图	$ \Delta {R_r} $	$ \Delta {R_u} $	$ \Delta {R_\tau } $	$ \Delta {r_{\max }} $
图10（a）	100	0	0	250
图10（b）	0	100	0	349.8
图10（c）	100	100	3	612.1

名称	坐标或数值
雷达R₁/km	（0, 0, 0）
雷达R₂/km	（30, 6, 0 ）
雷达R₃/km	（70, 3, 0）
$ \Delta {R_r} $/m	100
$ \Delta {R_u} $/m	100
$ \Delta {R_\tau } $/m	$ N(0,\;3) $
$ \lambda $/m	0.1
$ {P_t} $/kW	500
$ {G_t} $	40 dBi
$ {G_j} $	30 dBi
$ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{theory}}}} $/m²	10
$ \sigma $/（m/s）	10

[1]	刘瑞航, 刘海颖, 刘宇辰, 陈晨, 李铁香. 基于多特征正交约束的无人机跨视角地理定位方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(6): 2072-2080.
[2]	张国庆, 姚桂鹏, 李纪强. 无人机/船协同降落的鲁棒自适应模糊控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(6): 2081-2088.
[3]	林文斌, 时晨光, 严牧, 汪飞, 周建江. 面向欺骗干扰组网雷达的无人机集群稳健航迹规划算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(5): 1551-1563.
[4]	杨秀霞, 姚文强, 张毅, 于浩. 通信约束下多无人机协同搜索航迹优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(5): 1715-1727.
[5]	胡杰, 褚瑞峰, 朱倚娴, 陈平, 鲍帆. 基于VPPSO算法的无人机三维航迹规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(5): 1738-1751.
[6]	武愈涵, 吴晓莉, 张欣悦, 晏彪, 王名珺. 面向认知增强的MUM-T态势图视觉调控方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(4): 1292-1302.
[7]	杨志, 郁丰, 林思颖, 周紫君. 基于视觉协同的蜂群自主导航技术[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(4): 1396-1403.
[8]	谷旭平, 史贤俊. 基于结构分析与树种优化算法的无人机可重构性分析与设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 932-945.
[9]	杨跃能, 孔希, 张士峰, 邓少永. 低空小型旋翼无人机近距拦截捕获方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 1010-1017.
[10]	魏建林, 林彦超, 唐慧龙, 张旺, 王伟. 基于改进MCTS的多无人机多任务联合决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 556-568.
[11]	晏彪, 吴晓莉, 张蓝, 刘潇, 方泽茜, 韩炜毅, 李琦桉. 有人/无人机协同指挥员的事件相关电位特征[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 578-587.
[12]	张森, 庞岩, 周福亮. 基于改进Informed-RRT^*算法的无人机三维路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 660-668.
[13]	乔毅涛, 李爽. 空地异构无人系统固定时间事件触发编队包含控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 669-683.
[14]	李淑凤, 韩璐羽. 面向飞机表面巡检的多无人机覆盖路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 684-693.
[15]	杨许鑫, 季薇. 无人机辅助的安全MEC系统中的能耗优化策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 719-726.