

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1622-1634.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.05.19
李龙跃, 王文豪, 田野, 曹波
收稿日期:2025-01-02
出版日期:2026-05-27
发布日期:2026-05-27
通讯作者:
曹波
作者简介:李龙跃(1988—),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为智能作战指挥决策优化理论与方法基金资助:Longyue LI, Wenhao WANG, Ye TIAN, Bo CAO
Received:2025-01-02
Online:2026-05-27
Published:2026-05-27
Contact:
Bo CAO
摘要:
针对作战能力评估中指标筛选面临的多维关联、多重共线性,以及数据稀缺、不规律等挑战,提出一种定性定量结合、简便可靠的筛选方法。首先,利用主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA)和因子分析(factor analysis,FA)对指标进行降维处理,分别从协方差矩阵分解与潜在因子提取的视角消除冗余信息。其次,结合专家经验和相关分析对初步筛选结果进行定性优化,确保符合实战需求。最后,引入灰色关联分析(grey relational analysis,GRA)量化降维后指标与作战能力间的动态关联强度,增强方法对小样本及非规律数据的适应性。PCA/FA解决数据冗余问题,GRA弥补小样本适应性不足的缺陷,三者形成“降维-重构-关联”的筛选框架。通过仿真案例验证表明,所提方法可有效消除指标多重共线性、精简指标体系,在小样本、非规律数据场景下仍能稳定筛选出与作战能力高度关联的核心指标,验证了所提方法的可行性与合理性。
中图分类号:
李龙跃, 王文豪, 田野, 曹波. 基于PCA-FA-GRA的作战能力评估多维关联指标筛选方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(5): 1622-1634.
Longyue LI, Wenhao WANG, Ye TIAN, Bo CAO. Multi-dimensional correlation indicators selection method for combat capability assessment based on PCA-FA-GRA[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(5): 1622-1634.
表1
(续)"
| 一级指标 | 二级指标 | 三级指标 | 指标取值 |
| A3 | B11 | C43 | 0.7 |
| C44 | 0.5 | ||
| C45 | 0.5 | ||
| C46 | 0.5 | ||
| C47 | 0.9 | ||
| B12 | C48 | 0.3 | |
| C49 | 0.3 | ||
| C50 | 0.3 | ||
| A4 | B13 | C51 | 0.1 |
| C52 | 0.3 | ||
| C53 | 0.3 | ||
| B14 | C54 | 0.3 | |
| C55 | 0.3 | ||
| C56 | 0.5 | ||
| B15 | C57 | 0 | |
| C58 | 0 | ||
| B16 | C59 | 0.5 | |
| C60 | 0.7 | ||
| B17 | C61 | 0.7 | |
| C62 | 0.7 | ||
| B18 | C63 | 0.5 | |
| C64 | 0.3 | ||
| C65 | 0 | ||
| C66 | 0.7 | ||
| B19 | C67 | 0.3 | |
| C68 | 0 | ||
| C69 | 0 | ||
| A5 | B20 | C70 | 0.5 |
| C71 | 0 | ||
| C72 | 0.5 | ||
| B21 | C73 | 0.5 | |
| C74 | 0.5 | ||
| B22 | C75 | 0.3 | |
| C76 | 0.3 | ||
| A6 | B23 | C77 | 0.5 |
| C78 | 0.5 | ||
| C79 | 0.5 | ||
| C80 | 0.5 | ||
| B24 | C81 | 0 | |
| C82 | 0.3 | ||
| C83 | 0.7 | ||
| C84 | 0.5 | ||
| C85 | 0.5 |
表3
前4个主成分在原始数据上的特征向量"
| 指标 | 第1主成分的 特征向量 | 第2主成分的 特征向量 | 第3主成分的 特征向量 | 第4主成分的 特征向量 |
| C1 | − | |||
| C2 | − | − | ||
| C3 | − | − | ||
| C4 | − | − | − | |
| C5 | − | − | ||
| C6 | − | |||
| C7 | − | |||
| C8 | − | |||
| C9 | − | |||
| C10 | − | − | ||
| C11 | − | |||
| C12 | − | |||
| C13 |
表4
第1、2批次指标相关系数"
| 指标 | C1 | C2 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C10 | C11 | C13 |
| C1 | 1 | − | − | − | |||||
| C2 | 1 | − | − | − | − | − | |||
| C5 | 1 | − | − | ||||||
| C6 | 1 | − | − | ||||||
| C7 | 1 | − | − | ||||||
| C8 | 1 | − | − | ||||||
| C10 | 1 | ||||||||
| C11 | 1 | ||||||||
| C13 | 1 |
表11
前5个主成分在原始数据上的特征向量"
| 指标 | 第1主成分的特征向量 | 第2主成分的特征向量 | 第3主成分的特征向量 | 第4主成分的特征向量 | 第5主成分的特征向量 |
| C1 | − | − | |||
| C2 | − | ||||
| C3 | − | − | − | ||
| C4 | − | − | |||
| C5 | − | − | |||
| C6 | − | − | |||
| C7 | − | − | − | ||
| C8 | − | − | |||
| C9 | − | − | |||
| C10 | − | − | − | ||
| C11 | − | − | |||
| C12 | − | − | − | ||
| C13 | − | ||||
| C14 | - | − | − |
表12
第1~3批次的各5、2、2个指标间的相关系数"
| 指标 | C1 | C2 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C10 | C12 | C13 |
| C1 | 1 | − | − | − | ||||||
| C2 | 1 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | ||
| C4 | 1 | − | − | − | − | − | − | |||
| C5 | 1 | − | − | − | − | − | ||||
| C6 | 1 | − | ||||||||
| C7 | 1 | − | ||||||||
| C8 | 1 | − | − | |||||||
| C10 | 1 | − | ||||||||
| C12 | 1 | − | ||||||||
| C13 | 1 |
表14
旋转后的载荷矩阵"
| 指标 | 因子1 | 因子2 | 因子3 | 因子4 | 因子5 |
| C1 | |||||
| C2 | − | ||||
| C3 | − | − | − | ||
| C4 | − | − | − | ||
| C5 | − | − | |||
| C6 | − | ||||
| C7 | − | − | |||
| C8 | − | ||||
| C9 | − | − | − | ||
| C10 | − | − | − | − | |
| C11 | − | − | |||
| C12 | − | ||||
| C13 | − | ||||
| C14 | − | − | − |
| 1 |
CHEN W Y, LI W M, ZHANG T. Complex network-based resilience capability assessment for a combat system of systems[J]. Systems, 2024, 12 (1): 31- 40.
doi: 10.3390/systems12010031 |
| 2 | 李龙跃, 刘付显. 多射击模式多目标类型下防御效率分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37 (8): 2200- 2208. |
| LI L Y, LIU F X. Defense effectiveness analysis of multi-mode shooting to multi-type targets[J]. Systems Engineering–Theory & Practice, 2017, 37 (8): 2200- 2208. | |
| 3 |
李龙跃, 刘付显, 史向峰, 等. 导弹攻防对抗中追逃对策模型与配点求解法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38 (5): 1067- 1073.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2016.05.15 |
|
LI L Y, LIU F X, SHI X F, et al. Differential modeling and collocation solving method of missiles pursuit-evasion game[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (5): 1067- 1073.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2016.05.15 |
|
| 4 |
李龙跃, 刘付显, 杨国哲, 等. 多准则下反导作战单、多遭遇点预测模型[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2015, 37 (4): 179- 187.
doi: 10.11887/j.cn.201504029 |
|
LI L Y, LIU F X, YANG G Z, et al. Multi-criteria forecast models of antimissile single/multiple impact points[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2015, 37 (4): 179- 187.
doi: 10.11887/j.cn.201504029 |
|
| 5 |
KHALID K N, MURAT G, MANSOUR M M. Development of an integrated hybrid risk assessment system for construction disputes during the preconstruction phase using the Delphi method[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2024, 150 (7): 04024068.
doi: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14492 |
| 6 |
MUTAZ M D A. The era of business analytics: identifying and ranking the differences between business intelligence and data science from practitioners’ perspective using the Delphi method[J]. Journal of Business Analytics, 2024, 7 (2): 94- 119.
doi: 10.1080/2573234X.2023.2285483 |
| 7 |
FAN L, HU C L, XING L W, et al. Evaluating Internet hospitals by a linguistic Z-number-based gained and lost dominance score method considering different risk preferences of experts[J]. Information Sciences, 2023, 630, 647- 668.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.061 |
| 8 |
GUO D W, ZHU Y M, CHEN Y L, et al. Optimization model for fair judging of large-scale innovation contests based on experts’ neutral weights[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 257, 124981.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124981 |
| 9 |
GONG D X, ZHI W Z, ZHI W L, et al. Multi-objective discrete brainstorming optimizer to solve the stochastic multiple-product robotic disassembly line balancing problem subject to disassembly failures[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11 (6): 1557- 1557.
doi: 10.3390/math11061557 |
| 10 |
HWA W W, NENG H H. Assessing the non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm trial with unknown coefficient of variation[J]. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 2024, 53 (3): 1576- 1593.
doi: 10.1080/03610918.2022.2051716 |
| 11 | 郝启凯, 荀盼盼, 鄂超然, 等. 基于变异系数法和改进TOPSIS法的空战威胁评估[J]. 火炮发射与控制学报, 2024, 45(5): 56−63. |
| HAO Q K, XUN P P, E C R, et al. Air combat threat assessment based on the coefficient of variation method and improved topsis method[J]. Journal of Gun Launch & Control, 2024, 45(5): 56−53. | |
| 12 | 童小华, 叶真, 刘世杰, 等. 高分辨率遥感卫星颤振探测的相位相关分析法[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47 (10): 1346- 1352. |
| TONG X H, YE Z, LIU S J, et al. Jitter detection for high resolution satellites based on phase correlation with local frequency analysis[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47 (10): 1346- 1352. | |
| 13 | 李峥, 刘云霞. 面板数据多指标聚类和变系数模型的方法与实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2014, (7): 11- 14. |
| LI Z, LIU Y X. Method and empirical study of multi index clustering and variable coefficient model for panel data[J]. Statistics and Decision Making, 2014, (7): 11- 14. | |
| 14 |
LIANG Y, FU G L. Multi-view clustering indicator learning with scaled similarity[J]. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 2023, 26 (3): 1395- 1406.
doi: 10.1007/s10044-023-01167-7 |
| 15 |
AYESHA T, RIZWAN M J, IRFAN M M, et al. Characterization of aspergillus niger DNA by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) with principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) with application for the production of cellulase[J]. Analytical Letters, 2024, 57 (7): 1123- 1136.
doi: 10.1080/00032719.2023.2241938 |
| 16 |
DORABIALA O, ARAVKIN A Y, KUTZ J N. Ensemble principal component analysis[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12, 6663- 6671.
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3350984 |
| 17 |
GAO Y L, LIN T T, PAN J Y, et al. Fuzzy sparse deviation regularized robust principal component analysis[J]. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 2022, 31, 5645- 5660.
doi: 10.1109/TIP.2022.3199086 |
| 18 |
LIANG Z, WANG C M, HAN S L, et al. Classification and susceptibility assessment of debris flow based on a semi-quantitative method combination of the fuzzy C-means algorithm, factor analysis and efficacy coefficient[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, 20 (5): 1287- 1304.
doi: 10.5194/nhess-20-1287-2020 |
| 19 | TANTON G, RAMIREZ D, SANTAMARIA I, et al. Multi-channel factor analysis: identifiability and asymptotics[J]. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2024, 72, 3562- 3577. |
| 20 |
VICHI M. Disjoint factor analysis with cross-loadings[J]. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 2017, 11 (3): 563- 591.
doi: 10.1007/s11634-016-0263-9 |
| 21 |
SI F L, NING N L, ZHONG S, et al. A new grey relational analysis model of cross-sequences[J]. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 2024, 14 (2): 299- 317.
doi: 10.1108/GS-10-2023-0098 |
| 22 |
OKON B S, MALACHY S, BASHAR A D. Multi-objective optimization and modeling of a natural fiber hybrid reinforced composite (P; x;G;y;E;z;) for wind turbine blade development using grey relational analysis and regression analysis[J]. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2024, 31 (3): 640- 658.
doi: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2118404 |
| 23 |
曹林, 陈亮, 卢天鸣, 等. 基于自编码神经网络的阵地工程评估指标筛选研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2021, 35 (4): 55- 61.
doi: 10.19949/j.ams.mora.20210323.01 |
|
CAO L, CHEN L, LU T M, et al. Research on selection of evaluation indicators for field engineering based on self coded neural networks[J]. Military Operations Research and System Engineering, 2021, 35 (4): 55- 61.
doi: 10.19949/j.ams.mora.20210323.01 |
|
| 24 |
赵德银, 张菁, 王爽, 等. 基于相关系数指标筛选法的油田集输泵机组用能评价体系研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2021, 51 (2): 137- 144.
doi: 10.20266/j.math.2021.02.016 |
|
ZHAO D Y, ZHANG J, WANG S, et al. Study on energy consumption evaluation system of oil field gathering pump unit based on correlation coefficient index screening method[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2021, 51 (2): 137- 144.
doi: 10.20266/j.math.2021.02.016 |
|
| 25 |
DENG Q L, HUANG X, ZOU J, et al. Screening of sustainable supply chain performance evaluation indicators based on the ill-conditioned index cycle method[J]. PloS One, 2024, 19 (3): e0293038.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293038 |
| 26 |
ZHAN J L, QIN J Z. Credit index screening model of family farms and family ranches based on fuzzy Bayesian theory of depth weighting[J]. Complexity, 2022, 2022 (1): 5381208.
doi: 10.1155/2022/5381208 |
| 27 |
BOSSEK J, KERSCHKE P, TRAUTMANN H. A multi-objective perspective on performance assessment and automated selection of single-objective optimization algorithms[J]. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2020, 88, 105901.
doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105901 |
| 28 |
TANG B W, TANG J, LIU Y L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and application of GIS insulation condition Part 1: selection and optimization of insulation condition comprehensive evaluation index based on multi-source information fusion[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 88254- 88263.
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925804 |
| 29 |
ZHOU H, MAO Y S, GUO X. An improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization-based hybrid intelligent algorithm for index screening of underwater manned/unmanned cooperative system of systems architecture evaluation[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11 (20): 4389- 4395.
doi: 10.3390/math11204389 |
| 30 |
VIEIRA S A V D, SILVA J L D, NOGUEIRA T R C. Multiobjective optimization to assess dengue control costs using a climate-dependent epidemiological model[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13 (1): 10271.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36903-w |
| [1] | 吴巍屹, 贾云献, 姜相争, 史宪铭, 刘洁, 刘彬, 董恩志, 朱曦. 面向阶段任务的携行器材品种确定方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(6): 2054-2064. |
| [2] | 赵潞, 方志耕, 于亮, 张亚东, 邱玺睿, 华晨晨. 基于灰色关联协同效应权重配置的费用预测模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1309-1319. |
| [3] | 高山, 智永锋, 张普, 左轩. 基于改进灰色关联分析的航天产品性能样机仿真结果一致性验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2777-2783. |
| [4] | 田鹤, 董纯柱, 殷红成. 基于频域稀疏压缩感知的雷达目标三维散射中心反演方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2783-2790. |
| [5] | 闫世瑛, 颜克斐, 方伟, 陆恒杨. 基于差分进化邻域自适应的大规模多目标算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(7): 2112-2124. |
| [6] | 石宸睿, 田露, 徐湛, 职如昕, 陈晋辉. 基于PSO-BP的应急通信感知装备效能评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3455-3462. |
| [7] | 郭璐, 刘晓东, 魏东涛, 朱璞. 基于改进PCA的导弹装备健康表征参数提取方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3275-3281. |
| [8] | 孙云柯, 方志耕, 陈顶. 基于动态灰色主成分分析的多时刻威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(3): 740-746. |
| [9] | 傅东宁, 廖桂生, 黄岩, 刘军. 基于多通道SAR系统的ATI-RPCA地面动目标指示方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 48-54. |
| [10] | 杨真真, 乐俊, 杨永鹏, 范露. 非凸运动辅助低秩稀疏分解目标检测算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(6): 1218-1225. |
| [11] | 马愈昭, 陈楠, 熊兴隆. 基于PCA和相位差校正法的风切变预警算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(1): 52-60. |
| [12] | 林圣琳, 李伟, 马萍, 杨明. 基于Hilbert-Huang变换的仿真模型排序评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(9): 2137-2142. |
| [13] | 李彬, 李辉. 基于混合概率主成分分析的HRRP特征提取[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(1): 1-7. |
| [14] | 焦松, 李伟, 楚威, 毛少杰. 情报数据驱动的在线仿真系统动态修正方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(5): 1201-. |
| [15] | 田中大, 高宪文, 李琨. 基于KPCA与LSSVM的网络控制系统时延预测方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(6): 1281-1285. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||