基于作战环的反无人机作战体系贡献率评估

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.07.20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对当前反无人机作战体系下武器装备缺少有效的能力评估手段问题, 提出基于作战环的装备体系贡献率评估方法。将反无人机作战涉及的多功能装备间关系抽象为环、节点与边的关系, 构建作战网络模型。提出模糊综合评价法计算边的权值方法, 得出综合影响指数, 评估反无人机作战体系下的装备作战能力, 通过体系贡献率评估模型计算得出装备在反无人机作战体系中的贡献率。最后, 以典型作战想定为例, 开展反无人机的多功能装备体系贡献率评估, 验证方法的可行性。为研发设计反无人机装备, 有效实施作战提供决策依据。

关键词: 作战环, 反无人机, 装备, 体系贡献率, 评估

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of lack of effective capability evaluation methods for weapons and equipment in the current anti drone combat system, a contribution rate evaluation method for equipment system based on the combat loop is proposed. Abstracting the relationships among multifunctional equipment involved in anti drone operations as the relationships among rings, nodes, and edges, and constructing a combat network model. This paper proposes a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to calculate the weight of edges, obtains a comprehensive impact index, evaluates the combat capability of equipment in the anti drone combat system, and calculates the contribution rate of equipment in the anti drone combat system through the system contribution evaluation model. Finally, taking a typical combat scenario as an example, the contribution rate evaluation of the multifunctional equipment system for anti drones is carried out to verify the feasibility of the method. This provides decision-making basis for the development and design of anti drone equipment and effective implementation of combat.

Key words: combat loop, anti drone, equipment, system contribution rate, evalution

中图分类号:

TN975

吴北苹, 何晶, 党慧莹, 岳地久. 基于作战环的反无人机作战体系贡献率评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(7): 2267-2274.

Beiping WU, Jing HE, Huiying DANG, Dijiu YUE. Evaluation of contribution rate of anti drone combat system based on combat loop[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(7): 2267-2274.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

表2

表3

图8

表4

图9

图10

参考文献 37

1	AMMAR M , HARTWIG H . Analyzing the violation of drone regulations in three VGI drone portals across the US, the UK, and France[J]. Geo-spatial Information Science, 2024, 27 (2): 364- 383.
2	ANONYMOUS . TRD brings next-generation anti-drone capability to the arab world[J]. Armada International, 2024, 48 (1): 13.
3	KNOWLES J . Air mobility command ponders "on aircraft" counter-drone capability[J]. Journal of Electromagnetic Dominance, 2024, 47 (8): 17.
4	KANU J N , GUPTA E , PENDKAR M S , et al. A few suggestions to improve anti-drone measures for combating against the drone menace[J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2024, 105 (3): 761- 787.
5	李际超, 徐雪明, 姜江, 等. 装备体系贡献率评估方法研究综述[J]. 军事运筹与评估, 2024, 39 (2): 70- 74.
	LI J C , XU X M , JIANG J , et al. A review of research on eva-luation methods for equipment system contribution rate[J]. Mi-litary Operations and Evaluation, 2024, 39 (2): 70- 74.
6	孙逸钧, 李修和, 张逸. 装备体系贡献率评估方法综述[C]//第12届中国指挥控制大会, 2024: 512-517.
	SUN Y J, LI X H, ZHANG Y. Review of evaluation methods for equipment system contribution rate[C]//Proc. of the 12th China Command and Control Conference, 2024: 512-517.
7	杜敏, 程中华, 董恩志, 等. 装备体系贡献率评估综述[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50 (1): 7- 18.
	DU M , CHENG Z H , DONG E Z , et al. Overview of equipment system contribution rate evaluation[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50 (1): 7- 18.
8	赵丹玲. 基于异质网络的武器装备体系贡献率评估方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019.
	ZHAO D L. Research on the contribution rate evaluation method of weapon and equipment systems based on heterogeneous networks[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.
9	李际超, 杨克巍, 张小可, 等. 基于武器装备体系作战网络模型的装备贡献度评估[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
	LI J C , YANG K W , ZHANG X K , et al. Evaluation of equipment contribution based on the combat network model of weapon and equipment systems[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
10	李小波, 王维平, 林木, 等. 体系贡献率评估的研究框架、进展与重点方向[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
	LI X B , WANG W P , LIN M , et al. Research framework, progress, and key directions of system contribution rate evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
11	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 何桢, 等. 基于故障树分析的航空装备体系结构贡献度评估方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2021, 43 (1): 155- 162.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , HE Z , et al. Evaluation method for contribution of aviation equipment architecture based on fault tree analysis[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43 (1): 155- 162.
12	王涛, 李小波, 张杰, 等. 基于"项目-能力"关联的战略规划项目体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (8): 2295- 2304. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.08.01
	WANG T , LI X B , ZHANG J , et al. Evaluation method for contribution rate of strategic planning project system based on "project capability" correlation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (8): 2295- 2304. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.08.01
13	姜晓辉, 黄炎焱, 朱江, 等. 基于MMF-OODA框架的体系赋能指标生成方法研究[J]. 军事运筹与评估, 2023, 38 (3): 35- 39.
	JIANG X H , HUANG Y Y , ZHU J , et al. Research on the method of generating system empowerment indicators based on the MMF-OODA framework[J]. Military Operations Research and Evaluation, 2023, 38 (3): 35- 39.
14	沈枫炜, 徐享忠. 基于作战环的合成营装备体系效能分析[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2022, 44 (5): 61- 67.
	SHEN F W , XU X Z . Efficiency analysis of composite battalion equipment system based on combat environment[J]. Command and Control and Simulation, 2022, 44 (5): 61- 67.
15	安庆杰, 张伟, 张义, 等. 基于任务边界的武器装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2023, 14 (2): 17- 22.
	AN Q J , ZHANG W , ZHANG Y , et al. Evaluation method for contribution rate of weapon and equipment systems based on task boundaries[J]. Command Information Systems and Technology, 2023, 14 (2): 17- 22.
16	张琦, 葛玉雪, 李攀, 等. 基于ABMS的全光化无人机集群体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44 (11): 3422- 3435.
	ZHANG Q , GE Y X , LI P , et al. Evaluation method for contribution rate of fully optical unmanned aerial vehicle cluster system based on ABMS[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44 (11): 3422- 3435.
17	王晓军, 管宇锋. 基于TOPSIS法和仿真法的反集群无人机装备体系贡献率研究[J]. 空天防御, 2021, 4 (1): 33- 40.
	WANG X J , GUAN Y F . Research on the contribution rate of anti cluster unmanned aerial vehicle equipment system based on TOPSIS method and simulation method[J]. Aerospace Defense, 2021, 4 (1): 33- 40.
18	LAI C G , CHEN X H , CHEN X Y , et al. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 77 (2): 1243- 1259.
19	DUNKEL D . Getting ahead of the new normal: counter-drone security[J]. Security, 2023, 60 (12): 31- 32.
20	周琛, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 等. 基于作战环的航空武器装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43 (2): 314- 325.
	ZHOU C , SHANG B L , SONG B F , et al. Evaluation of contri bution rate of aviation weapon equipment system based on combat environment[J]. Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 43 (2): 314- 325.
21	PETER J M . Missile defense equation: factors for decision making[M]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics Incorporated, 2004.
22	JEFFREY R C . An information age combat model[M]. Newport: Alidade, 2004.
23	张国强, 刘小荷, 蒋方婷, 等. 基于"作战环"的区域反导装备体系效能评估[J]. 系统工程, 2016, 34 (5): 154- 158.
	ZHANG G Q , LIU X H , JIANG F T , et al. Efficiency evaluation of regional anti missile equipment system based on "combat environment"[J]. Systems Engineering, 2016, 34 (5): 154- 158.
24	雷梓烽. 基于OODA环的作战体系对抗博弈建模研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020.
	LEI Z F. Research on the modeling of adversarial games in combat systems based on OODA loop[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2020.
25	岳地久, 何晶, 邹晓浩, 等. 反巡作战GPS干扰装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2021, 28 (7): 21- 25.
	YUE D J , HE J , ZOU X H , et al. Evaluation of contribution rate of GPS interference equipment system in anti patrol operations[J]. Electro Optics and Control, 2021, 28 (7): 21- 25.
26	马超, 刘宗敏, 杨俊, 等. 反无人机导航欺骗技术发展与应用[J]. 国防科技, 2023, 44 (3): 59- 67.
	MA C , LIU Z M , YANG J , et al. Development and application of anti drone navigation deception technology[J]. National Defense Technology, 2023, 44 (3): 59- 67.
27	梁家林, 熊伟. 武器装备体系贡献度评估方法综述[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39 (4): 67- 71.
	LIANG J L , XIONG W . Review of contribution evaluation methods for weapon equipment systems[J]. Journal of Weapon Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39 (4): 67- 71.
28	HOU J, WANG R H, WANG J J, et al. Research on evaluation index system of information system equipment system contribution rate[C]//Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Compute Science Communication and Network Security, 2021.
29	SONG J H, LI L, GUO Q, et al. System contribution rate assessment methods[C]//Proc. of the 2nd Conference on Computer Mechatron and Electron, 2017.
30	WANG J J, HU H B, HOU J, et al. Evaluation method of equipment system contribution rate based on machine learning[C]// Proc. of the International Conference on Applied Statistics, Computational Mathematics, and Software Engineering, 2022.
31	卜晓东. 战术导弹武器系统体系贡献度评估方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2021.
	BU X D. Research on the contribution evaluation method of tactical missile weapon system system[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021.
32	刘鹏. 基于体系贡献率的武器装备组合选择方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2021.
	LIU P. Research on weapon and equipment combination selection method based on system contribution rate[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2021.
33	李际超. 异质信息网络数据挖掘关键技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019.
	LI J C. Research on key technologies of heterogeneous information network data mining[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.
34	吴沛霆. 面向防化装备论证的体系贡献率评估方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2021.
	WU P T. Research on the evaluation method of system contribution rate for defense equipment demonstration[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Technology, 2021.
35	唐召胜. 基于DoDAF的反无人机装备体系结构建模[J]. 兵工自动化, 2024, 43 (8): 55- 59.
	TANG Z S . Modeling of anti UAV equipment architecture based on DoDAF[J]. Ordnance Automation, 2024, 43 (8): 55- 59.
36	CHENG E W L , LI H . Analytic hierarchy process: an approach to determine measures for business performance[J]. Measuring Business Excellence, 2001, 5 (3): 30- 37.
37	WANG J S , DENG X C . Comprehensive economic benefit eva-luation method of coastal enterprises based on AHP[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 103 (1): 24- 28.

序号	功能节点	名称
1	S₁	低空探测雷达
2	S₂	光电雷达
3	S₃	IR/EO探测系统
4	S₄、D₁	地导防空指控系统
5	S₅、D₂	预警机
6	S₆、D₃、A₁	近程防空导弹武器系统
7	A₂	导航信号干扰器
8	A₃	高功率微波拦截器
9	T₁	大型无人机
10	T₂	中小型无人机

作用功能	包含边	连接概率
侦察监视边	T₁→S₁、T₂→S₂、T₂→S₃、T₂→S₄、T₁→S₄、T₁→S₅、T₂→S₆	0.760 5
决策控制边	S₁→D₁、S₂→D₁、S₃→D₁、S₄→D₁、S₅→D₂、S₆→D₃、D₁→A₁、D₁→A₂、D₁→A₃、D₃→A₁	0.856 3
打击或干扰边	A₁→T₁、A₁→T₂ A₂→T₁、A₂→T₂ A₃→T₁、A₃→T₂	0.732 4 0.824 3 0.652 3
侦察情况共享边	S₁→S₂	0.821 3
指令决策下达边	D₂→D₁	0.849 1

符号	作战环	影响能力度量
OL₁^T₁	T₁→S₁→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.408 4
OL₂^T₁	T₁→S₁→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.459 7
OL₃^T₁	T₁→S₁→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.363 7
OL₄^T₁	T₁→S₁→S₂→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.335 4
OL₅^T₁	T₁→S₁→S₂→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.377 5
OL₆^T₁	T₁→S₁→S₂→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.298 7
OL₇^T₁	T₁→S₄→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.408 4
OL₈^T₁	T₁→S₄→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.459 7
OL₉^T₁	T₁→S₄→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.363 7
OL₁₀^T₁	T₁→S₅→D₂→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.346 8
OL₁₁^T₁	T₁→S₅→D₂→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.390 3
OL₁₂^T₁	T₁→S₅→D₂→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.308 9
OL₁₃^T2	T₂→S₂→D₁→A₁→T₂	0.408 4
OL₁₄^T2	T₂→S₂→D₁→A₂→T₂	0.459 7
OL₁₅^T2	T₂→S₂→D₁→A₃→T₂	0.363 7
OL₁₆^T2	T₂→S₃→D₁→A₁→T₂	0.408 4
OL₁₇^T2	T₂→S₃→D₁→A₂→T₂	0.459 7
OL₁₈^T2	T₂→S₃→D₁→A₃→T₂	0.363 7
OL₁₉^T2	T₂→S₄→D₁→A₁→T₂	0.408 4
OL₂₀^T2	T₂→S₄→D₁→A₂→T₂	0.459 7
OL₂₁^T2	T₂→S₄→D₁→A₃→T₂	0.363 7
OL₂₂^T2	T₂→S₆→D₃→A₁→T₂	0.408 4

序号	功能节点	名称	体系贡献率/%
1	S₁	低空探测雷达	35.72
2	S₂	光电雷达	24.52
3	S₃	IR/EO探测系统	8.41
4	S₄、D₁	地导防空指控系统	97.21
5	S₅、D₂	预警机	16.66
6	S₆、D₃、A₁	近程防空导弹武器系统	35.02
7	A₂	导航信号干扰器	36.28
8	A₃	高功率微波拦截器	28.71

[1]	柳佳豪, 徐任杰, 孙茂桐, 姜九瑶, 李际超, 杨克巍. 基于强化学习的装备体系韧性优化方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(7): 2216-2223.
[2]	胡崇爽, 王纪凯, 李明浩, 豆亚杰, 姜江. 基于IVSFS的作战威胁人机协同评估框架[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(6): 1855-1866.
[3]	杨华果, 陈全, 杨磊, 尹政龙, 赵勇. 低轨巨型星座网络抗毁性研究进展与展望[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(6): 2025-2035.
[4]	阎潇, 王青平, 胡卫东, 朱虹宇, 王超. 基于椋鸟迁徙的干扰资源动态分配方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1385-1394.
[5]	孙文, 程娟, 王一豪, 曹开臣, 葛萌萌, 黄刘, 张耿. 高光谱卫星舰船目标检测效能分析与建模研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1432-1442.
[6]	崔瑞靖, 孙建彬, 杨克巍, 李明浩. 基于UAF的装备作战试验指标体系构建方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1536-1550.
[7]	陈顶, 方志耕, 杨保华, 叶丰, 张娜, 张靖如. 考虑指标协同效应重构的联合作战体系效能评估灰色主成分模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1561-1574.
[8]	尚晓凡, 薛奇, 高欣, 刘同. 面向能力需求的装备组合配置分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1575-1581.
[9]	燕笑寒, 柴华, 许强强. 基于杀伤网评估的美导弹防御体系效能分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(4): 1235-1245.
[10]	杨天建, 王星, 程嗣怡, 陈游, 张曦, 张志恒. 基于IAHP-CRITIC-MARCOS的多种类目标威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(4): 1246-1254.
[11]	董磊, 张元珊, 陈曦, 刘嘉琛, 彭新麒. 考虑多元耦合交互作用的飞机硬着陆风险综合评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(4): 1265-1274.
[12]	袁彰求, 杨朝旭, 荣海军. 面向定性与定量指标的轻量化高空飞艇效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 817-826.
[13]	陈夏瑢, 李际超, 陈刚, 刘鹏, 姜江. 基于异质网络的装备体系组合发展规划问题[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 855-861.
[14]	韩维, 郭放, 刘玉杰, 苏析超, 刘洁. 基于三角模糊数作战环的航母编队作战效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 893-903.
[15]	冯蕴雯, 宋祉岑, 路成, 陈晓宇. 基于跨尺度等效弹性的航空装备损修性能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(2): 508-517.