1 |
李力, 陈宏, 王进发. 基于模糊层次分析法的军品供应商选择体系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2007, 4 (1): 40- 47.
|
|
LI L , CHEN H , WANG J F . The research on military products supplier selection architecture based on supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2007, 4 (1): 40- 47.
|
2 |
李海林, 姜俊. 基于二元语意一致性的军品供应商绩效模糊评价方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32 (2): 373- 379.
|
|
LI H L , JIANG J . A fuzzy measuring method based on 2-tuple linguistic consistency for supply performance of military product suppliers[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2012, 32 (2): 373- 379.
|
3 |
张亮, 王坚浩, 郑东良, 等. 基于直觉模糊熵和VIKOR的装备器材供应商选优决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (7): 1568- 1575.
|
|
ZHANG L , WANG J H , ZHENG D L , et al. Equipment material supplier selection decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and VIKOR[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (7): 1568- 1575.
|
4 |
温斌. 精确式装备动员优化研究[D]. 北京: 中国人民解放军装备学院, 2011.
|
|
WEN B. Investigation of optimization for accurate equipment mobilization[D]. Beijing: Equipment Academy of PLA, 2011.
|
5 |
SAATY T L . A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15 (3): 234- 281.
doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
|
6 |
杨雷, 朱彦绮, 廖国江. 字典序偏好的军用物资供应商选择方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37 (4): 825- 831.
|
|
YANG L , ZHU Y Q , LIAO G J . Method based on lexicographic preferences to select military material suppliers[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37 (4): 825- 831.
|
7 |
林原, 战仁军, 吴虎胜. 基于犹豫度和相似度的专家权重确定方法及其应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36 (6): 1482- 1488.
|
|
LIN Y , ZHAN R J , WU H S . Expert weights determination method and application based on hesitancy degree and similarity measure[J]. Control and Decision, 2021, 36 (6): 1482- 1488.
|
8 |
林原, 战仁军, 吴虎胜. 基于混合改进TOPSIS的装备供应商选择方法[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2021, 1 (2): 75- 82.
|
|
LIN Y , ZHAN R J , WU H S . Research on equipment supplier selection method based on mixed information and improved TOPSIS[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2021, 1 (2): 75- 82.
|
9 |
HWANG C L , YOON K P . Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. A State-of-the-Art Survey[[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
|
10 |
TANG H M , SHI Y , DONG P W . Public blockchain evaluation using entropy and TOPSIS[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 117, 204- 210.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.048
|
11 |
BRUNO M S , LEONI P G , LUCILA M C . Performance evaluation of green suppliers using entropy-TOPSIS-F[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 207, 498- 509.
|
12 |
ZHENG P , LIU J , HAO F , et al. FLM-TOPSIS: the fuzzy linguistic multiset TOPSIS method and its application in linguistic decision making[J]. Information Fusion, 2019, 45, 266- 281.
|
13 |
DARIUSZ K . A doubly extended TOPSIS method for group decision making based on ordered fuzzy numbers[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 116, 243- 254.
|
14 |
WU Z B , XU J P , JIANG X L , et al. Two MAGDM models based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with possibility distributions: VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 473, 101- 120.
|
15 |
STEPHEN N L . Risk assessment techniques[J]. Quality Engineering, 2014, 26 (3): 379- 382.
|
16 |
安进, 徐廷学, 曾翔, 等. 组合赋权下的装备质量状态信息融合评估方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2018, 33 (9): 1693- 1698.
|
|
AN J , XU T X , ZENG X , et al. Equipment quality condition assessment under fusion information based on combination weighting[J]. Control and Decision, 2018, 33 (9): 1693- 1698.
|
17 |
罗绍伟. 黄金分割标度法在高校图书馆读者满意度定量评价中的应用[J]. 图书情报工作, 2009, 53 (15): 54- 57.
|
|
LUO S W . Application of the golden section scaling to the quantitative assessment of the reader's satisfaction degree in the academic libraries[J]. Library and Information Service, 2009, 53 (15): 54- 57.
|
18 |
王坚浩, 张亮, 史超, 等. 基于重要度评估和IMPGA的航空保障装备型谱规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (11): 2498- 2504.
|
|
WANG J H , ZHANG L , SHI C , et al. Aviation support equipment portfolio scheduling based on importance assessment and IMPGA[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (11): 2498- 2504.
|
19 |
DIAKOULAKI D , MAVROTAS G , PAPAYANNAKIS L . Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems, the critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22 (7): 763- 770.
|
20 |
胡涛, 王栋, 孙曜, 等. 基于改进CRITIC-LRA和灰色逼近理想解排序法的空战威胁评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41 (12): 2561- 2569.
|
|
HU T , WANG D , SUN Y , et al. Air combat threat assessment of improved CRITIC-LRA and grey TOPSIS[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41 (12): 2561- 2569.
|
21 |
FAN W L , HU P , LIU Z G . A multi-attribute node importance evaluation method based on Gni-cofficient in complex power grids[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2016, 10 (9): 2027- 2034.
|
22 |
王正位. 基于组合赋权的水利工程工期风险灰色综合评价[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2019.
|
|
WANG Z W. Grey comprehensive evaluation of water conservancy project duration risk based on combination weighting[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2019.
|
23 |
YANG W G , WU Y J . A new improvement method to avoid rank reversal in VIKOR[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 21261- 21271.
|
24 |
SOPHAN M K, MABAHIST F, SIRADJUDDIN I A. A combination of social media and geospatial data for waste mapping using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia, 2020: 222-228.
|
25 |
ALMULHIM T S , BARAHONA I . An integrated approach for fuzzy-dynamic multi-attribute group decision making with application in renewable energy[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 145092- 145106.
|
26 |
殷春武. 无人飞行器航迹方案的VIKOR择优评价[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35 (12): 2950- 2958.
|
|
YIN C W . Unmanned aerial vehicle path scheme optimal evaluation based-VIKOR[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35 (12): 2950- 2958.
|
27 |
YANG W , PANG Y F , SHI J R , et al. Linguistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making method based on VIKOR[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 29 (7): 613- 626.
|
28 |
ARMIN C , MOHAMMAD M P , MOSTAFA H K . Applying a hybrid BWM-VIKOR approach to supplier selection: a case study in the Iranian agricultural implements industry[J]. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2018, 11 (3): 274- 301.
|
29 |
LIU K , LIU Y W , QIN J D . An integrated ANP-VIKOR methodology for sustainable supplier selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J]. Granular Computing, 2018, 3 (3): 193- 208.
|
30 |
LIU J , LIANG Y Y . Multi-granularity unbalanced linguistic group decision-making with incomplete weight information based on VIKOR method[J]. Granular Computing, 2018, 3 (3): 219- 228.
|
31 |
FENG Y X , HONG Z X , TIAN G D , et al. Environmentally friendly MCDM of reliability-based product optimisation combining DEMATEL-based ANP, interval uncertainty and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)[J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 442/443, 128- 144.
|