基于FD-TODIM的混杂空战多目标动态威胁评估

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.18

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 148-154.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.18

• 系统工程 • 上一篇

基于FD-TODIM的混杂空战多目标动态威胁评估

张堃¹^,²^,*, 张振冲¹, 刘泽坤¹, 李珂¹, 刘培培¹

1. 西北工业大学电子信息学院, 陕西西安 710072
2. 光电控制技术重点实验室, 河南洛阳 471000

收稿日期:2021-12-02 出版日期:2023-01-01 发布日期:2023-01-03
通讯作者: 张堃
作者简介:张堃 (1982—), 男, 副教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为智能空战、空战威胁评估、态势信息处理、航空综合控制
张振冲 (1997—), 男, 助理工程师，硕士, 主要研究方向为智能空战决策、编队空战对抗、空战态势评估
刘泽坤 (1997—), 男, 助理工程师，硕士, 主要研究方向为路径规划、协同空战
李珂 (1996—), 男, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为智能空战对抗与决策、航空电子系统仿真与控制
刘培培 (1993—), 女, 硕士, 主要研究方向为多机威胁评估
基金资助:
国防科技基础加强计划;航空科学基金(20200051053001);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2020JM-147)

Multi-target dynamic threat assessment in mixed air combat based on FD-TODIM

Kun ZHANG¹^,²^,*, Zhenchong ZHANG¹, Zekun LIU¹, Ke LI¹, Peipei LIU¹

1. School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
2. Science and Technology on Electro-Optical Control Laboratory, Luoyang 471000, China

Received:2021-12-02 Online:2023-01-01 Published:2023-01-03
Contact: Kun ZHANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对传统空战态势威胁评估存在“状态失衡”以及难以体现决策者个体行为差异的问题, 首先针对空战过程中多时刻态势信息, 提出基于变权理论的态势权重解析方法, 并结合基于正态累积分布生成时间序列权重的算法, 解决属性参数与权值动态匹配的问题。其次, 基于混杂态势信息, 综合考虑飞行员有限理性和个体行为存在差异的特点, 提出基于模糊动态交互式多准则决策(fuzzy dynamic interactive multi-criteria decision-making, FD-TODIM)算法的混杂空战多目标威胁评估方法。最后, 进行了仿真验证和分析。仿真结果表明, 该模型可充分挖掘历史信息影响, 有效融合多个时刻混杂空战态势的混杂信息, 并根据不同飞行员个体差异, 生成具有实际意义的空战威胁态势评估结果。

关键词: 动态威胁评估, 混杂态势, 模糊动态交互式多准则决策, 个体行为

Abstract:

Aiming at the "state imbalance" in traditional air combat situation threat assessment and the difficulty in reflecting the differences in individual decision-makers' behaviors, a situation weight analysis method based on variable weight theory and a time series weight generation algorithm based on normal cumulative distribution are firstly proposed to process the situation information of air combat at multiple times and solve the problem of dynamic matching of attribute parameters and weights. Secondly, considering the characteristics of pilots' bounded rationality and individual behavior differences with the complicated situation information, a mixed air combat multi-target threat assessment method based on the fuzzy dynamic interactive multi-criteria decision-making (FD-TODIM) algorithm is proposed. Meanwhile, simulation verification and analysis are carried out. The simulation results show that the model can fully explore the influence of historical information, effectively integrate the complicated information of the mixed air combat situation at multiple times, and generate practical air combat threat situation assessment results according to the individual differences of different pilots.

Key words: dynamic threat assessment, mixed situation, fuzzy dynamic interactive multi-criteria decision-making (FD-TODIM), individual behavior

中图分类号:

V249.4

张堃, 张振冲, 刘泽坤, 李珂, 刘培培. 基于FD-TODIM的混杂空战多目标动态威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 148-154.

Kun ZHANG, Zhenchong ZHANG, Zekun LIU, Ke LI, Peipei LIU. Multi-target dynamic threat assessment in mixed air combat based on FD-TODIM[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 148-154.

图/表 4

表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 20

21	JIANG Y P , LIANG X , LIANG H M . An I-TODIM method for multi-attribute decision making with interval numbers[J]. Soft Computing, 2017, 21 (18): 5489- 5506.
22	SALOMON V A P , RANGEL L A D . Comparing rankings from using TODIM and a fuzzy expert system[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 55, 126- 138.
23	吴诗辉, 刘晓东, 贾月岭, 等. 一种调整AHP不一致判断矩阵的优化方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31 (11): 2106- 2112.
	WU S H , LIU X D , JIA Y L , et al. Optimization method to improve inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31 (11): 2106- 2112.
24	LI D Q , HAO F L . Weights transferring effect of state variable weight vector[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2009, 29 (6): 127- 131.
25	YAO R J , MA G W . Tendering evaluation method of hydraulic projects based on variable weight[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 31, 868- 873.
26	徐浩, 邢清华. 基于区间数变权法的目标威胁评估[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2017, (5): 105- 108.
	XU H , XING Q H . Threat assessment based on interval number variable weight method[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2017, (5): 105- 108.
27	张媛媛, 冯琦, 周德云, 等. 基于直觉模糊集的空战动态多属性威胁评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2015, 22 (2): 17- 21.
	ZHANG Y Y , FENG Q , ZHOU D Y , et al. Multi-attribute dynamic threat assessment in air combat based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2015, 22 (2): 17- 21.
28	陈德江, 王君, 张浩为. 基于直觉模糊多属性决策的动态威胁评估模型[J]. 计算机科学, 2019, 46 (4): 183- 188.
1	张堃, 王雪, 张才坤, 等. 基于IFE动态直觉模糊法的空战目标威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36 (4): 697- 700.
	ZHANG K , WANG X , ZHANG C K , et al. Evaluating and sequencing of air target threat based on IFE and dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36 (4): 697- 700.
2	杨军佳, 武翠霞, 肖健. 空袭目标威胁动态评估SPA法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2021, 46 (5): 6- 11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2021.05.002
	YANG J J , WU C X , XIAO J . A dynamic assessment method of air attack target threat based on SPA[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2021, 46 (5): 6- 11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2021.05.002
3	YU D, WANG H J, YUAN J Y. Method of unknown target risk analysis and threat assessment for UUVs[C]//Proc. of the 39th Chinese Control Conference, 2020: 594-599.
4	孟广磊, 龚光红. 基于混合贝叶斯网的空域目标威胁评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32 (11): 2398- 2401.
	MENG G L , GONG G H . Threat assessment of aerial targets based on hybrid Bayesian network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32 (11): 2398- 2401.
5	HONG F Y , HONG J W , YI M L , et al. Research on unmanned underwater vehicle threat assessment[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 11387- 11396. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891940
6	MA S D, YANG G Q, ZHANG H Z, et al. Target threat level assessment technology based on cloud model and Bayesian revision in air combat simulation[C]//Proc. of the 35th Chinese Control Conference, 2016: 9753-9757.
7	DI R , GAO X G , GUO Z G , et al. A threat assessment method for unmanned aerial vehicle based on Bayesian networks under the condition of small data sets[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018, 8484358.
8	靳崇, 孙娟, 蔡普申, 等. 基于直觉模糊TOPSIS和变权VIKOR的防空目标威胁综合评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44 (1): 172- 180.
	JIN C , SUN J , CAI P S , et al. Threat comprehensive assessment for air defense targets based on intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS and variable weight VIKOR[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44 (1): 172- 180.
9	SHEN H , HU L Y , LAI K K . A mathematical programming model to determine objective weights for the interval extension of TOPSIS[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018, 3783101.
10	胡涛, 王栋, 孙曜, 等. 基于改进CRITIC-LRA和灰色逼近理想解排序法的空战威胁评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41 (12): 2561- 2569. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.12.022
	HU T , WANG D , SUN Y , et al. Air combat threat assessment of improved CRITIC-LRA and grey TOPSIS[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41 (12): 2561- 2569. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.12.022
11	NIE X Q , YAN P , WANG B Q , et al. A target threat assessment method for low-altitude aircraft[J]. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2020, 1549, 052067. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1549/5/052067
12	JIANG W Q , SHANG J . Multi-criteria group decision making with fuzzy data: an extension of the VIKOR method[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26 (4): 764- 773.
13	ZENG S Z , CHEN S M , KUO L W . Multi-attribute decision making based on novel score function of intuitionistic fuzzy values and modified VIKOR method[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 488, 76- 92. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.018
14	ZHANG K, LIU P P, LI K, et al. Multi-target threat assessment in air combat based on AHP and FVIKOR[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems, 2017: 537-540.
15	张小芝, 朱传喜, 朱丽. 一种基于变权的动态多属性决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29 (3): 494- 498. doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2012.1670
	ZHANG X Z , ZHU C X , ZHU L . A method of dynamic multi-attribute decision making based on variable weight[J]. Control and Decision, 2014, 29 (3): 494- 498. doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2012.1670
16	ZHANG K, LIU P P, LI K, et al. Multi-target threat assessment in air combat based on AHP and FVIKOR[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems, 2017: 537-540.
17	王毅, 刘三阳, 张文, 等. 属性权重不确定的直觉模糊多属性决策的威胁评估方法[J]. 电子学报, 2014, 42 (12): 2509- 2514. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2014.12.025
	WANG Y , LIU S Y , ZHANG W , et al. Threat assessment method with uncertain attribute weight based on intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2014, 42 (12): 2509- 2514. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2014.12.025
28	CHEN D J , WANG J , ZHANG H W . Dynamic assessment model based on intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46 (4): 183- 188.
29	LIU T S , WANG M J . Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1992, 50 (3): 247- 255.
30	袁宇, 关涛, 闫相斌, 等. 基于混合VIKOR方法的供应商选择决策模型[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29 (3): 551- 560.
	YUAN Y , GUAN T , YAN X B , et al. Based on hybrid VIKOR method decision making model for supplier selection[J]. Control and Decision, 2014, 29 (3): 551- 560.
18	肖力铭, 齐海生, 屈济坤, 等. 基于直觉模糊层次分析法的空中目标威胁评估[J]. 探测与控制学报, 2019, 41 (3): 108- 111.
	XIAO L M , QI H S , QU J K , et al. Air target threat assess ment based on intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Detection & Control, 2019, 41 (3): 108- 111.
19	江文奇. 基于FVIKOR的三角模糊数型多准则决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31 (7): 1330- 1334.
	JIANG W Q . Multi-criteria decision method with triangular fuzzy numbers based on FVIKOR[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31 (7): 1330- 1334.
20	FAN Z P , ZHANG X , CHEN F D , et al. Extended TODIM method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 42 (4): 40- 48.

威胁属性	直觉模糊数
很高	(0.90, 0.05)
高	(0.75, 0.10)
一般	(0.55, 0.25)
低	(0.50, 0.25)
很低	(0.50, 0.20)

目标	ν_i/(m·s^-1)	r_i/km	φ_k/(°)	θ_k/(°)	空战能力
1	300.0	58.75	－45	45.0	较高
2	320.0	70.00	－49	45.0	很高
3	326.4	95.80	68	55.0	很低
4	294.4	58.75	80	－53.2	很低
5	330.0	60.00	15	－39.0	很高
6	335.0	56.25	45	－45.0	较高

目标	ν_i/(m·s^-1)	r_i/km	φ_{_k}/(°)	θ_k/(°)	空战能力
1	315.0	56.25	－46	80.0	较高
2	325.0	70.00	－45	49.0	很高
3	300.0	55.00	45	45.0	很低
4	327.0	57.50	80	－60.4	很低
5	319.4	60.00	15	－45.0	很高
6	329.6	55.00	48	－60.0	较高

目标	ν_i/(m·s^-1)	r_i/km	φ_{_k}/(°)	θ_k/(°)	空战能力
1	300	57.00	－45	80.0	较高
2	325	70.00	－45	45.0	很高
3	315	55.00	30	60.0	很低
4	320	60.00	80	－60.0	很低
5	330	58.75	15	64.2	很高
6	335	55.00	45	－60.0	较高

基于FD-TODIM的混杂空战多目标动态威胁评估

Multi-target dynamic threat assessment in mixed air combat based on FD-TODIM

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 20

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价