Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 1331-1339.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.04.21
• Systems Engineering • Previous Articles
Hao LIU(
), Zipeng HE, Guangde XU
Received:2024-12-04
Revised:2025-02-06
Online:2025-05-20
Published:2025-05-20
Contact:
Hao LIU
E-mail:liuh188@qq.com
CLC Number:
Hao LIU, Zipeng HE, Guangde XU. Fast planning method for space multi-target rendezvous sequence based on CUDA texture interpolation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(4): 1331-1339.
Table 1
Orbital parameter settings for satellites and targets in simulation scenarios"
| 名称 | 倾角/( | 定点经度/(°E) | 真近点角/( |
| 卫星 | 5.0 | −1.96 | 0 |
| 目标1 | 7.1 | 0.22 | 155.31 |
| 目标2 | 2.8 | 1.75 | 327.83 |
| 目标3 | 13.2 | 3.83 | 65.46 |
| 目标4 | 4.2 | 4.44 | 94.97 |
| 目标5 | 8.9 | 6.53 | 52.39 |
| 目标6 | 14.6 | 8.21 | 48.98 |
| 目标7 | 5.1 | 9.38 | 312.95 |
| 目标8 | 9.3 | 10.30 | 208.69 |
| 目标9 | 2.7 | 12.17 | 197.95 |
| 目标10 | 5.3 | 14.70 | 52.18 |
Table 3
Comparison of multi-target rendezvous time and velocity increment calculation results for optimal rendezvous sequence"
| 序号 | 交会目标 | 交会时间 | 本文速度增量/(m/s) | Lambert速度增量/(m/s) | 误差/% |
| 1 | 目标5 | 2027年3月21日 18:14:25.080 | 41.23 | 42.98 | 4.07 |
| 2 | 目标4 | 2027年3月22日 02:12:13.283 | 18.35 | 18.52 | 0.92 |
| 3 | 目标7 | 2027年3月22日 19:00:50.072 | 28.24 | 27.90 | 1.22 |
| 4 | 目标8 | 2027年3月22日 22:20:54.968 | 93.05 | 92.27 | 0.85 |
| 5 | 目标6 | 2027年3月23日 07:31:46.070 | 55.67 | 55.58 | 0.16 |
| 6 | 目标2 | 2027年3月23日 21:43:02.576 | 99.87 | 101.94 | 2.03 |
| 7 | 目标3 | 2027年3月24日 05:57:01.641 | 9.72 | 9.88 | 1.62 |
| 8 | 目标1 | 2027年3月24日 12:41:03.313 | 84.11 | 86.51 | 2.77 |
| 9 | 目标10 | 2027年3月25日 03:33:10.517 | 20.57 | 21.85 | 5.86 |
| 10 | 目标9 | 2027年3月25日 10:40:54.521 | 36.30 | 35.61 | 1.94 |
| 交会序列总速度增量/(m/s) | 487.11 | 493.04 | 1.20 | ||
| 19 | RAKHIMOV M, ZARIPOVA D, JAVLIEV S. Deep learning parallel approach using CUDA technology[C]// Proc. of the Internative Scientific Conference on Modern Problems of Applied Science and Engineering, 2024. |
| 20 | ABDULKADIR G, OKAN O, CENK G. CNN-LSTM based deep learning application on Jetson Nano: estimating electrical energy consumption for future smart homes[J]. Internet of Things, 2024, 26, 101- 148. |
| 21 |
DIPTARUP S, KARAN D, NARENDRA P, et al. Implementation of image enhancement algorithms and recursive ray tracing using CUDA[J]. Procedia Computer Science., 2016, 79, 516- 524.
doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.03.066 |
| 22 |
ZHAO S W, LAI Z S, ZHAO J D. Leveraging ray tracing cores for particle-based simulations on GPUs[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2023, 124 (3): 696- 713.
doi: 10.1002/nme.7139 |
| 23 | TAN H, XIAO H, LIU Y, et al. LASSO approximation and application to image super-resolution with CUDA acceleration [C]// Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing, 2017: 483−488. |
| 24 |
DAWA C L, BHAWNA G, AYUSH D, et al. Image super-resolution: a comprehensive review, recent trends, challenges and applications[J]. Information Fusion, 2023, 91, 230- 260.
doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.007 |
| 25 | LIU H, HE J R, MAO H X, et al. A CUDA based infrared image simulation method of rocket plumes observed by satellite [C]// Proc. of the 7th Asia Pacific Conference on Optics Manufacture and 2021 International Forum of Young Scientists on Advanced Optical Manufacturing, 2022: 487−492. |
| 26 |
ALESSANDRO M, CAMILLA C, ARNAUD B. GPU-based high-precision orbital propagation of large sets of initial conditions through Picard–Chebyshev augmentation[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2023, 204, 239- 252.
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.12.037 |
| 27 | NITIN A, RYAN P R, VIVEK V. Parallel computation of multiple space trajectories using GPUs and interpolated gravity models[J]. Journal of Guidance Control, and Dynamic, 2015, 38 (8): 1457- 1470. |
| 28 |
UEDA S, OGAWA H. Multi-fidelity approach for global trajectory optimization using GPU-based highly parallel architecture[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 116, 106829.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106829 |
| 29 | GIACOMO A, ATILIM G B, DARIO I. Closing the gap between SGP4 and high-precision propagation via differentiable programming[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2025, 226 (1): 694- 701. |
| 30 | KIM Y, SHRIVASTAVA A. Memory performance estimation of CUDA programs[J]. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 2013, 13 (2): 21. |
| 31 |
LUCAS P, MARK P, WOUTER E, et al. A fast three-dimensional gamma evaluation using a GPU utilizing texture memory for on-the-fly interpolations[J]. Medical Physics., 2011, 38 (7): 4032- 4035.
doi: 10.1118/1.3595114 |
| 32 | JOSHUA H, USMAN A. FastSpline: automatic generation of interpolants for lattice samplings[J]. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2023, 49 (2): 12. |
| 1 |
XU Y J, LIU X L, HE R J, et al. Active debris removal mission planning method based on machine learning[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11 (6): 1419.
doi: 10.3390/math11061419 |
| 2 |
DANESHJOU K, MOHAMMADI -DEHABADI A A, BAKHTIARI M. Mission planning for on-orbit servicing through multiple servicing satellites: a new approach[J]. Advances in Space Research., 2017, 60 (6): 1148- 1162.
doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.037 |
| 3 |
ANDREY A B, DMITRIY A G. Review of path planning in prospective multi-target active debris removal missions in low earth orbits[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2024, 145, 100982.
doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.100982 |
| 4 |
SARAH J M, CIARA N M, OLIVIER L D. Optimization of multispacecraft maneuvers for mobile target tracking from low earth orbit[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2023, 60 (2): 581- 590.
doi: 10.2514/1.A35457 |
| 5 | HAO Y T, LIU Z Y, XU S H. Minimal delta-v-based orbital rendezvous for approaching a non-cooperative target on GEO[C]// Proc. of the Chinese Conference on Swarm Intelligence and Cooperative Control, 2023: 567–579. |
| 6 |
BAI S Z, WANG Y, LIU H Y, et al. Finite-thrust Lambert transfer based on multistage constant-vector thrust control[J]. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59 (5): 4947- 4967.
doi: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3249148 |
| 7 | AVANZINI G, PALMAS A, VELLUTINI E. Solution of low-thrust Lambert problem with perturbative expansions of equinoctial elements[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 38 (9): 1585- 1601. |
| 8 | AVANZINI G. A simple Lambert algorithm[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics., 2008, 31 (6): 1587- 1594. |
| 9 | DAVIS J, AVENDANO M, MORTARI D. A closed-form solution to the minimum Δv2TOT Lambert’s problem[J]. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2010, 135, 1037- 1052. |
| 10 | 徐利民, 张涛, 陶佳伟. 能量最优与燃料最优Lambert交会问题[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44 (9): 1888- 1893. |
| XU L M, ZHANG T, TAO J W. Energy-optimal and fuel-optimal problems for Lambert rendezvous[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44 (9): 1888- 1893. | |
| 11 | 黄勇, 李小将, 张东来, 等. 混合遗传算法在最优Lambert轨道转移设计中的应用[J]. 飞行力学, 2013, 31 (3): 269- 272. |
| HUANG Y, LI X J, ZHANG D L, et al. Application of hybrid genetic algorithm in optimal Lambert orbital transfer design[J]. Flighgt Dynamics, 2013, 31 (3): 269- 272. | |
| 12 | JACKSON B. Minimum energy maneuvering strategies for multiple satellite inspection missions[C]// Proc. of the 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2005: 4306−4313. |
| 13 |
PENG C Y, ZHANG J, YAN B, et al. Multisatellite flyby inspection trajectory optimization based on constraint repairing[J]. Aerospace, 2021, 8 (9): 274.
doi: 10.3390/aerospace8090274 |
| 14 | GATTO G, CASALINO L. Fast evaluation and optimization of low-thrust transfers to multiple targets[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 38 (8): 1525- 1530. |
| 15 | ZHU Y H, LUO Y Z. Fast evaluation of low-thrust transfers via multilayer perceptions[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2019, 42 (12): 2627- 2637. |
| 16 | BANDO M, YAMAKAWA H. Orbital design for multiple flyby missions[J]. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Aerospace Technology Japan, 2010, 8 (27): 9- 13. |
| 17 |
KONG L J, ZHOU Y. Optimal planning of multiple geosynchronous spacecraft flyby inspection mission with multiple servicing space robots[J]. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2024, 25, 1178- 1193.
doi: 10.1007/s42405-024-00718-4 |
| 18 |
ZHOU Y, YAN Y, HUANG X, et al. Mission planning optimization for multiple geosynchronous satellites refueling[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2015, 56 (11): 2612- 2625.
doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.09.033 |
| [1] | Jianbo YUAN, Yonghao DU, Yingguo CHEN, Yongming HE. Research on imaging satellite mission planning model and algorithm for point-cluster and large-region targets [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(9): 2939-2950. |
| [2] | Xuejian LI, Yongqiang CHEN, Hong MA, Yang LIU, Yuxin WANG, Yiwen JIAO. Design of PCAL signal phase real-time extraction system based on parallel computing [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(2): 376-389. |
| [3] | Dali WANG, Lei DONG, Huawang LI, Zhenzhen ZHENG, Haiying HU. Multi-satellite task scheduling method for repeated observation of space debris [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(11): 3685-3698. |
| [4] | Jianguo XU, Zhimou YANG, Qing YANG, Yu HE, Jiang JIANG. Research on electronic countermeasures mission planning under the background of joint sea attack [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(11): 3736-3743. |
| [5] | Hongbo TAO, Dongsheng ZHANG, Yong HUANG. Three-dimensional fast factorized back projection SAS imaging algorithm accelerated by GPU [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(10): 3247-3256. |
| [6] | Jianfeng WANG, Gaowei JIA, Zheng GUO, Zhongxi HOU. Review of research on multi-UAV collaborative mission planning method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(10): 3437-3450. |
| [7] | Feilong MAO, Yiwen JIAO, Hong MA, Jiujiang HAN, Zefu GAO, Chao LI, Dong LI. Time delay compensation method of antenna array signal based on GPU [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(8): 2383-2394. |
| [8] | Qidi WEN, Zhiyu KANG, Guoning WEI, Yanbo HE, Bin WU, Ruiyi ZHOU. Research on the approach observation mission flow planning method of parent-child spacecraft [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(12): 3941-3948. |
| [9] | Zenan ZHONG, Shenming QUAN, Tao CHAO, Songyan WANG, Ming YANG. An active space debris removal mission planning method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(12): 3958-3966. |
| [10] | Jing YU, Enmi YONG, Hanyang CHEN, Dong HAO, Xiancai ZHANG. Bi-level mission planning method for multi-cooperative UAV air-to-ground attack [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(9): 2849-2857. |
| [11] | Man LIU, Hongjun ZHANG, Youwei XU, Xinliang FENG, Yufang FENG. Research on behavior decision-making of multi entities in group-level wargame [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(8): 2562-2569. |
| [12] | Dong LI, Yiwen JIAO, Zefu GAO, Wenge YANG, Feilong MAO, Fei TENG. FX phase identification algorithm for GPU-based phase interferometer [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3320-3329. |
| [13] | Peng JIN, Kang LI. Distributed satellite resource scheduling based on improved contract network protocol [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(10): 3164-3173. |
| [14] | Shengyu ZHANG, Yukun SUN, Zhencai ZHU, Haiying HU. Heuristic optimized forward-backward chains combination method for on-board multi-targets observation planning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(5): 1262-1269. |
| [15] | Kai CHENG, Gang CHEN, Xiaohan YU, Man LIU, Tianhao SHAO. Knowledge traction and data-driven wargame AI design and key technologies [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2911-2917. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||