组织战略匹配管理中的语义建模方法研究综述

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.10.16

Abstract

Abstract:

Strategic alignment is a sub-domain within the strategic planning process that ensures consistency between strategic planning and implementation. An organization's projects, programs, and individual plans align with its long-term business goals by achieving strategic alignment. This paper presents the latest developments in this field from the perspective of semantic modeling. To highlight the significance of this critical technical field to organizational strategic alignment, the fundamental concepts and evolution of strategic alignment is discussed. The characteristics of the strategic maching problem is analyzed in military organizations through core elements, which helps to understand the complexity of strategic alignment in large organizations. Moreover, the existing main semantic modeling methods are analyzed, which still have many defects and deficiencies due to the limitations in technical development at that time. As a solution to these remaining problems, a significant portion of current semantic technology applications has been developed. Finally, the application of semantic technology in strategic alignment management is summarized with the hope of providing valuable references for the subsequent development of technology in this area.

Key words: strategic alignment, organization, enterprise architecture, concept modeling, semantic modeling, ontology

CLC Number:

Tao WANG, Mu LIN, Xiaobo LI, Zhi ZHU, Yifan ZHU, Weiping WANG. Review of semantic modeling methods of enterprise strategic alignment management[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(10): 3383-3397.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 1

References 130

1	ROSS J W , WEILL P , ROBERTSON D . Enterprise architecture as strategy: creating a foundation for business execution[M]. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2006.
2	VENKATRAMAN N , HENDERSON J C , OLDACH S . Continuous strategic alignment: exploiting information technology capabilities for competitive success[J]. European Management Journal, 1993, 11 (2): 139- 149. doi: 10.1016/0263-2373(93)90037-I
3	CHAN Y E , HUFF S L , BARCLAY D W , et al. Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment[J]. Information Systems Research, 1997, 8 (2): 125- 150. doi: 10.1287/isre.8.2.125
4	CIBORRA C U . De profundis? Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 1997, 9 (1): 67- 82.
5	HENDERSON J C , VENKATRAMAN H . Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations[J]. IBM Systems Journal, 1993, 32 (1): 472- 484. doi: 10.1147/sj.382.0472
6	BROADBENT M, WEILL P, BRIEN T, et al. Firm context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Interaction Sciences, 1996.
7	BURN J M , SZETO C . A comparison of the views of business and IT management on success factors for strategic alignment[J]. Information & Management, 2000, 37 (4): 197- 216.
8	LUO Y , PARK S H . Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22 (2): 141- 155. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<141::AID-SMJ151>3.0.CO;2-O
9	BERGERON F , RAYMOND L , RIVARD S . Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance[J]. Information & Management, 2004, 41 (8): 1003- 1020.
10	AVISON D , JONES J , POWELL P , et al. Using and validating the strategic alignment model[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2004, 13 (3): 223- 246. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2004.08.002
11	CHENHALL R H . Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2005, 30 (5): 395- 422. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2004.08.001
12	CAMPBELL B , KAY R , AVISON D . Strategic alignment: a practitioner's perspective[J]. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2005, 18 (6): 653- 664. doi: 10.1108/17410390510628364
13	CUI T , YE H J , TEO H H , et al. Information technology and open innovation: a strategic alignment perspective[J]. Information & Management, 2015, 52 (3): 348- 358.
14	LI W , LIU K , BELITSKI M , et al. E-leadership through strategic alignment: an empirical study of small-and medium-sized enterprises in the digital age[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2016, 31 (2): 185- 206. doi: 10.1057/jit.2016.10
15	ILMUDEEN A , BAO Y , ALHARBI I M . How does business-IT strategic alignment dimension impact on organizational performance measures[J]. Journal of Enterprise Information Ma-nagement, 2019, 32 (3): 457- 476. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2018-0197
16	ULLAH A , LAI R . A systematic review of business and information technology alignment[J]. ACM Transactions on Ma-nagement Information Systems, 2013, 4 (1): 76- 105.
17	REICH B H , BENBASAT I . Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24 (1): 81- 113. doi: 10.2307/3250980
18	张萌萌. 面向体系架构的军事信息系统业务与技术匹配关键技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019.
	ZHANG M M. Research on key techniques of business-it alignment in military information system architecture[M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.
19	陈洪辉. 基于体系架构的指挥信息系统业务与技术匹配现状[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2019, 10 (2): 1- 7.
	CHEN H H . Current situation of business-IT alignment of command and information system based on architecture[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2019, 10 (2): 1- 7.
20	ZHANG M M, CHEN H H, LYYTINEN K. Principles of organizational co-evolution of business and IT: a complexity perspective[C]//Proc. of the European Conference on Information Systems, 2019.
21	ZHANG M M , CHEN H H , LUO A M . A systematic review of business-IT alignment research with enterprise architecture[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6, 18933- 18944. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2819185
22	张延林, 肖静华, 谢康. 信息系统与业务战略匹配研究述评[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26 (4): 154- 165.
	ZHANG Y L , XIAO J H , XIE K . An overall review of the research on the business and information system[J]. Management Review, 2014, 26 (4): 154- 165.
23	宋立夫, 张健, 陈萍. 企业管理系统与信息系统匹配原理及方法研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 7 (2): 51- 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9107.2007.02.012
	SONG L F , ZHANG J , CHEN P . Matching theory and methods between management system and information system of enterprise[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition), 2007, 7 (2): 51- 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9107.2007.02.012
24	GLAISTER A J , KARACAY G , DEMIRBAG M , et al. HRM and performance-the role of talent management as a transmission mechanism in an emerging market context[J]. Human Resource Management Journal, 2018, 28 (1): 148- 166. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12170
25	GURBAXANI V , DUNKLE D . Gearing up for successful digital transformation[J]. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2019, 18 (3): 209- 220. doi: 10.17705/2msqe.00017
26	MCADAM R , MILLER K , MCSORLEY C . Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 207, 195- 209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003
27	AUDRETSCH D B , BELITSKI M . A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2022, 29 (2): 285- 309. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1941799
28	HANIFF A P , GALLOWAY L . Modeling strategic alignment in project networks[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2022, 40 (5): 517- 530. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.05.001
29	BASTIDAS V , REYCHAV I , HELFERT M . Design principles for strategic alignment in smart city enterprise architectures (SCEA)[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2023, 219, 848- 855. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.359
30	GHONIM M A , KHASHABA N M , AL-NAJAAR H M , et al. Strategic alignment and its impact on decision effectiveness: a comprehensive model[J]. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2022, 17 (1): 198- 218. doi: 10.1108/IJOEM-04-2020-0364
31	ARAUJO M , STOROPOLI J , RABECHINI R . Project portfolio management and information technology strategic alignment[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2021, 18 (8): 2150042. doi: 10.1142/S0219877021500425
32	SAINT-ONGE H . Tacit knowledge the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital[J]. Planning Review, 1996, 24 (2): 10- 16. doi: 10.1108/eb054547
33	KEARNS G S , SABHERWAL R . Strategic alignment between business and information technology: a knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2006, 23 (3): 129- 162. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230306
34	PRESTON D S , KARAHANNA E . Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: a nomological network[J]. Information Systems Research, 2009, 20 (2): 159- 179. doi: 10.1287/isre.1070.0159
35	ZACHMAN J A . A framework for information systems architecture[J]. IBM Systems Journal, 1987, 26 (3): 276- 292. doi: 10.1147/sj.263.0276
36	BHATTACHARYA P . Modelling strategic alignment of business and IT through enterprise architecture: augmenting archimate with BMM[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2017, 121, 80- 88. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.012
37	BHATTACHARYA P . Aligning enterprise systems capabilities with business strategy: an extension of the strategic alignment model (SAM) using enterprise architecture[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2018, 138, 655- 662. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.087
38	HINKELMANN K, PASQUINI A. Supporting business and IT alignment by modeling business and IT strategy and its relations to enterprise architecture[C]//Proc. of the Enterprise Systems Conference, 2014: 149-154.
39	BUCKL S, ERNST A M, LANKES J, et al. State of the art in enterprise architecture management[R]. Munich: Software Engineering for Business Information Systems, 2009.
40	KOTUSEV S . Enterprise architecture: a reconceptualization is needed[J]. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2018, 10 (4): 1- 36.
41	KOTUSEV S . TOGAF-based enterprise architecture practice: an exploratory case study[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2018, 43 (1): 321- 359.
42	BERNERS-LEE T , HENDLER J , LASSILA O . The semantic web[J]. Scientific American, 2001, 284 (5): 34- 43. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
43	HINKELMANN K , GERBER A , KARAGIANNIS D , et al. A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and IT: combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology[J]. Computers in Industry, 2016, 79, 77- 86. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.009
44	ROACH T. CAPSICUM-a semantic framework for strategically aligned business architecture[D]. Sydney: The University of New South Wales, 2011.
45	FUCHS-KITTOWSKI F, FAUST D. The semantic architecture tool (SemAT) for collaborative enterprise architecture development[C]//Proc. the of 14th International Workshop on Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, 2008: 151-163.
46	HOYLAND C A . RQ-Tech, a strategic-level approach for conceptualizing enterprise architectures[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2012, 12, 37- 42. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2012.09.026
47	DAS A. Capability requirements portfolio management in large organizations using semantic data lake as a decision support system: proof-of-concept experiments[D]. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018.
48	王文荣. 战略学[M]. 北京: 国防大学出版社, 1999.
	WANG W R . Science of strategy[M]. Beijing: China People's Liberation Army National Defence University Press, 1999.
49	SRIVANNABOON S , MILOSEVIC D Z . A two-way influence between business strategy and project management[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, 24 (6): 493- 505. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.006
50	MESKENDAHL S . The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success-a conceptual framework[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, 28 (8): 807- 817. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.007
51	BUYS A J , STANDER M J . Linking projects to business stra-tegy through project portfolio management[J]. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2010, 21 (1): 59- 68.
52	KAISER M G , EL-ARBI F , AHLEMANN F . Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: understanding the role of structural alignment[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2015, 33 (1): 126- 139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.002
53	SOLTANI E . Business and project strategy alignment: ICT project success in Iran[J]. Technology in Society, 2020, 63, 101404. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101404
54	DANESH M H, YU E. Analyzing IT flexibility to enable dynamic capabilities[C]//Proc. of the Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, 2015: 53-65.
55	COMBS J G , KETCHEN D J , IRELAND R D , et al. The role of resource flexibility in leveraging strategic resources[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48 (5): 1098- 1125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00912.x
56	STIRNA J, GRABIS J, HENKEL M, et al. Capability driven development-an approach to support evolving organizations[C]//Proc. of the IFIP Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling, 2012: 117-131.
57	MIKLOS J . A meta-model for the spatial capability architecture[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2012, 43 (2): 301- 305.
58	ALDEA A. Enterprise strategic alignment method: a cross-disciplinary capability-driven approach[D]. Enschede: University of Twente, 2017.
59	GOROD A , WHITE B E , IRELAND V , et al. Case studies in system of systems, enterprise systems, and complex systems engineering[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014.
60	KAPURCH S J . NASA systems engineering handbook[M]. Philadelphia: Diane Publishing, 2010.
61	齐嘉兴, 杨继坤. 美军作战概念发展及其逻辑[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2022, (1): 97- 105.
	QI J X , YANG J K . The development and logic of US military operation concepts[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2022, (1): 97- 105.
62	RATIU A . The relevance of the operating concepts in the defense planning process[J]. Defense Resources Management in the 21st Century, 2017, 12 (12): 416- 426.
63	Joint Chiesf of Staff. Joint vision 2020 "America's military: preparing for tomorrow"[EB/OL]. [2023-10-11]. http://pentagonus.ru/doc/JV2020.pdf.
64	SHANNAK R O . Intermediary effects of knowledge management strategy and learning orientation on strategic alignment and firm performance[J]. Research Journal of International Studies, 2012, 24 (24): 112- 128.
65	CHOE J . The product and process innovations through the strategic alignment of knowledge management[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2014, 22 (1): 1- 15. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2014.905227
66	AL-AMMARY J . The strategic alignment between knowledge management and information systems strategy: the impact of contextual and cultural factors[J]. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 2014, 13 (1): 1450006.
67	OBEIDAT B Y , AL-DMOUR R H , TARHINI A . Knowledge management strategies as intermediary variables between IT business strategic alignment and firm performance[J]. European Scientific Journal, 2015, 11 (7): 344- 368.
68	COSTA R G G , REZENDE J F C . Strategic alignment of knowledge management and value creation: implications on to an oil and gas corporation[J]. RAUSP Management Journal, 2018, 53 (2): 241- 252. doi: 10.1016/j.rauspm.2017.11.001
69	DABIC M , KIESSLING T . The performance implications of knowledge management and strategic alignment of MNC subsidiaries[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2019, 23 (8): 1477- 1501. doi: 10.1108/JKM-03-2019-0129
70	YOSHIKUNI A C , ALBERTIN A L . Leveraging firm performance through information technology strategic alignment and knowledge management strategy: an empirical study of IT business value[J]. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH, 2020, 8 (10): 304- 318. doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i10.2020.2088
71	ABUEZHAYEH S W , RUDDOCK L , SHEHABAT I . Integration between knowledge management and business process management and its impact on the decision making process in the construction sector: a case study of Jordan[J]. Construction Innovation, 2022, 22 (4): 987- 1010. doi: 10.1108/CI-02-2020-0021
72	ADCOCK R , COLLIER D . Measurement validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research[J]. American Political Science Review, 2001, 95 (3): 529- 546. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401003100
73	BOCAST A, MCDANIEL D. The DoD architecture framework, volume 1: overview and concepts, version 2.02, change 1[M]. BOCAST A. Arlington County: United States Department of Defense, 2015.
74	ABHAYA L . UAF (unified architecture framework) based MBSE (UBM) method to build a system of systems model[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2021, 31 (1): 227- 241. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2021.00835.x
75	EICHMANN O C, MELZER S, GOD R. Model-based deve-lopment of a system of systems using unified architecture framework (UAF): a case study[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Systems Conference, 2019.
76	刘婧婷, 郭继坤. 基于UAF元模型的战区联合作战精确保障体系构建方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (6): 1324- 1331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.06.16
	LIU J T , GUO J K . Establishment of efficient support system for joint operations in theater command based on DMM of UAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (6): 1324- 1331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.06.16
77	TIRONE L , GUIDOLOTTI E , FORNARO L . A tailoring of the unified architecture framework's meta-model for the modeling of systems-of-systems[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2018, 28 (1): 1691- 1705. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2018.00577.x
78	BANKAUSKAITE J. Unified architecture framework-based trade study method for system architectures in model-based system of systems engineering[D]. Kaunas: Kauno Technologijos Universitetas, 2023.
79	CARLSON O, HOHENSTEIN S, BUI J, et al. Human factors in the unified architecture framework applied to space situational awareness[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Systems Conference, 2019.
80	HAUSE M , WILSON M . Integrated human factors views in the unified architecture framework[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2017, 27 (1): 1054- 1069. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00412.x
81	GARCÍA J J L , PEREIRA D P . Analyzing system security architecture in concept phase using UAF domains[J]. INSIGHT, 2022, 25 (2): 56- 60. doi: 10.1002/inst.12388
82	TORKJAZI M , DAVILA-ANDINO A J , ALGHAMDI A , et al. UAF strategic planning for enterprises[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10, 123549- 123559. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3224456
83	MARTIN J N . Extending UAF for model-based capability planning and enterprise portfolio management[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2022, 32 (1): 15- 35. doi: 10.1002/iis2.12915
84	RIWANTO R E , ANDRY J F . Enterprise architectures enable of business strategy and IS/IT alignment in manufacturing using TOGAF ADM framework[J]. International Journal of Information Technology and Business, 2019, 1 (2) doi: 10.2426/ijiteb.122019
85	JØRGENSEN H D, LILAND T, SKOGVOLD S. Aligning TOGAF and NAF-experiences from the Norwegian armed forces[C]//Proc. of the 4th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling, 2011: 131-146.
86	CLOUTIER R , MULLER G , VERMA D , et al. The concept of reference architectures[J]. Systems Engineering, 2010, 13 (1): 14- 27. doi: 10.1002/sys.20129
87	LEE M N. Information capture during early front end analysis in the joint capabilities integration and development system (JCIDS): a formative study of the capabilities of the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF)[D]. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2016.
88	AHMED L N. Improving trade visibility and fidelity in defense requirements portfolio management[D]. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014.
89	VERES C, SAMPSON J, BLEISTEIN S J, et al. Using semantic technologies to enhance a requirements engineering approach for alignment of it with business strategy[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, 2009: 469-474.
90	GASEVIC D , DJURIC D , DEVEDZIC V . Model driven architecture and ontology development[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2006.
91	SHEEHAN J H, DEITZ P H, BRAY B E, et al. The military missions and means framework[C]//Proc. of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, 2003: 655-663.
92	叶国青, 舒宇, 葛冰峰, 等. 基于使命和方法框架的武器装备体系结构建模[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37 (7): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2012.07.001
	YE G Q , SHU Y , GE B F , et al. Stracture modeling of weapon equipment system of systems based on missions and means framework[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2012, 37 (7): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2012.07.001
93	金丛镇. 基于MMF-OODA的海军装备体系贡献度评估方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2017.
	JIN C Z. Research on evaluation method of naval equipment's contribution degree to system warfighting based on MMF-OODA[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2017.
94	DEITZ P H, MICHAELIS J R, BRAY B E, et al. The missions & means framework (MMF) ontology: matching military assets to mission objectives[C]//Proc. of the 21st International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2016.
95	DEITZ P H, BRAY B E, MICHAELIS J R. The missions and means framework as an ontology[C]//Proc. of the Conference on Ground/Air Multisensor Interoperability, Integration, and Networking for Persistent ISR Ⅶ, 2016: 45-56.
96	MAHER M, ORLANDO R. Reduce the warfighters' cognitive burden[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Cognitive Computing, 2019: 143-152.
97	LEE J, PARK Y. A study on the abstracted meta model of DoDAF 2.0 for CBA methodology execution[C]//Proc. of the 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2009: 364-369.
98	POGGI A, LEMBO D, CALVANESE D, et al. Linking data to ontologies[EB/OL]. [2023-10-11]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220461267_Linking_Data_to_Ontologies.
99	XIAO G, CALVANESE D, KONTCHAKOV R, et al. Onto-logy-based data access: a survey[C]//Proc. of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.
100	XIAO G H , DING L F , COGREL B , et al. Virtual know-ledge graphs: an overview of systems and use cases[J]. Data Intelligence, 2019, 1 (3): 201- 223. doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00011
101	张宇轩. 一种基于本体的数据访问与集成系统的设计与实现[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
	ZHANG Y X. Design and implementation of an ontology-based data access and integrated system[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018.
102	CARDOSO E, MONTALI M. A preliminary framework for strategic and compliance monitoring[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, 2019: 75-84.
103	POMP A, LIPP J, MEISEN T. You are missing a concept! enhancing ontology-based data access with evolving ontologies[C]// Proc. of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Semantic Computing, 2019: 98-105.
104	李小波. 基于DSM的效能仿真多范式组合建模方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2013.
	LI X B. A DSM-based multi-paradigm composable modeling method for effectiveness simulation[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013.
105	朱智. 模型驱动的装备仿真模型语义工程化建模技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018.
	ZHU Z. Model-driven semantic engineering techniques for equipment simulation modeling[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018.
106	LIAO Y , LEZOCHE M , PANETTO H , et al. Semantic annotation for knowledge explicitation in a product life cycle management context: a survey[J]. Computers in Industry, 2015, 71, 24- 34. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.03.005
107	TALANTIKITE H N , AISSANI D , BOUDJLIDA N . Semantic annotations for web services discovery and composition[J]. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2009, 31 (6): 1108- 1117.
108	LIN Y. Semantic annotation for process models: facilitating process knowledge management via semantic interoperability[D]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2008.
109	KIRYAKOV A , POPOV B , TERZIEV I , et al. Semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval[J]. Journal of Web Semantics, 2004, 2 (1): 49- 79. doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2004.07.005
110	OREN E, MOLLER K, SCERRI S, et al. What are semantic annotations?[EB/OL]. [2023-10-11]. http://www.siegfried-handschuh.net/pub/2006/whatissemannot2006.pdf.
111	REEVE L, HAN H. Survey of semantic annotation platforms[C]// Proc. of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2005: 1634-1638.
112	DASIOPOULOU S, GIANNAKIDOU E, LITOS G, et al. A survey of semantic image and video annotation tools[M]// Knowledge-Driven Multimedia Information Extraction and Ontology Evolution: Bridging the Semantic Gap. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011: 196-239.
113	牛丽慧, 欧石燕. 科学论文语义标注框架的设计与应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43 (3): 120- 132.
	NIU L H , OU S Y . Design and application of semantic annotation framework for scientific articles[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2020, 43 (3): 120- 132.
114	郭少友, 窦畅, 常桢. 网页语义标注研究综述[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34 (4): 169- 175.
	GUO S Y , DOU C , CHANG Z . Review on semantic annotations of web pages[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34 (4): 169- 175.
115	KOLOVOS D S, ROSE L M, DRIVALOS M N, et al. Constructing and navigating non-invasive model decorations[C]//Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Model Transformations, 2010: 138-152.
116	FILL H G . Semantic annotations of enterprise models for supporting the evolution of model-driven organizations[J]. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, 2018, 13 (5) doi: 10.18417/emisa.13.5
117	FILL H G. On the conceptualization of a modeling language for semantic model annotations[C]//Proc. of the Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshop, 2011: 134-148.
118	FILL H G. An approach for analyzing the effects of risks on business processes using semantic annotations[C]//Proc. of the European Conference on Information Systems, 2012.
119	FILL H G, REISCHL I. Stepwise semantic enrichment in health-related public management by using semantic information models[M]//Semantic Technologies for Business and Information Systems Engineering: Concepts and Applications. SMOLNIK S, TEUTEBERG F, THOMAS O, ed. Hershey: IGI Global, 2012: 195-212.
120	AHMAD M, ODEH M, GREEN S. Derivation of a semantic cancer care information architecture from RIVA-based business process architecture using the bpaontoeia framework[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Cancer Care Informatics, 2018: 152-164.
121	MALIK S K , PRAKASH N , RIZVI S A M . Semantic annotation framework for intelligent information retrieval using KIM architecture[J]. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 2010, 1 (4): 12- 26.
122	BUCHER T , FISCHER R , KURPJUWEIT S , et al. Enterprise architecture analysis and application-an exploratory study[J]. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 2007, 3 (3): 33- 43.
123	JOHNSON P , LAGERSTROM R , NARMAN P , et al. Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2007, 9 (2): 163- 180.
124	NIEMANN K D . From enterprise architecture to IT governance[M]. Heidelberg: Springer Fachmedien, 2006.
125	ANTUNES G, BORBINHA J, CAETANO A. An application of semantic techniques to the analysis of enterprise architecture models[C]///Proc. of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016: 4536-4545.
126	OSENBERG M, LANGERMEIER M, BAUER B. Using semantic web technologies for enterprise architecture analysis[C]// Proc. of the 12th European Semantic Web Conference on the Semantic Web. Latest Advances and New Domains, 2015, 9088: 668-682.
127	SOSA-SÁNCHEZ E , CLEMENTE P J , PRIETO Á E , et al. Aligning business processes with the services layer using a semantic approach[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 7, 2904- 2927.
128	VALIYEV G , PIRAINO M , KOK A , et al. Initial exploitation of natural language processing techniques on nato strategy and policies[J]. Information & Security, 2020, 47 (2): 187- 202.
129	KANG Y , CAI Z , TAN C W , et al. Natural language processing (NLP) in management research: a literature review[J]. Journal of Management Analytics, 2020, 7 (2): 139- 172. doi: 10.1080/23270012.2020.1756939
130	HUANG L, REN G J, JIANG S, et al. Toward dynamic model association through semantic analytics: approach and evaluation[C]// Proc. of the IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics, 2019: 130-137.

文献	研究问题	建模方法	年份	主要贡献
[97]	基于能力的评估	DoDAF	2009	针对联合能力与集成开发系统中的能力评估问题, 选取DoDAF中的16个概念组作为基础, 开发一个概念化的建模框架
[82]	战略分析与评估	UAF	2022	扩展UAF的战略视图, 使其将SWOT分析融入到建模过程
[83]	能力规划与组合管理	UAF	2022	针对能力规划和投资组合管理问题, 为UAF框架添加了有关驱动力、挑战、机遇、效果和产出5个方面的相关语义建模模块
[87]	需求工程与能力规划	DoDAF/CML	2016	分析规划论证早期使用DoDAF提供对能力需求建模的充分性, 指出DoDAF缺少有关能力要求的7个方面关键信息要素
[88]	需求工程与组合管理	CML/本体	2014	提出一种使用本体技术将CML概念化的方法, 使其能够通过挖掘规划论证早期文档识别能力的差距
[47]	需求工程与组合管理	CML/本体	2018	提出一种使用本体技术将规划论证早期文档转化为具有语义的数据湖, 并为规划论证提供知识
[95]	作战概念建模	本体	2016	提出以使命方法框架作为研究作战过程决策的分析工具, 并为该框架赋予了明确的本体定义
[96]	作战概念建模	本体	2019	提出结合语义数据模型、认知架构和知识图谱, 为使命工程方法提供知识基础

[1]	Xiaoyan NING, Yifei YANG, Kaifeng GUO, Zhenduo WANG. Design and performance analysis of LPD communication waveform based on FrFT-FH structure [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(8): 2857-2866.
[2]	Nuanchen WANG, Xiaolong WANG, Ge MU, Xinjin LI. Construction of equipment system knowledge graph based on meta-model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2374-2382.
[3]	Ruipeng LUAN, Jing ZHANG, Likun LIU. Knowledge graph ontology construction for data governance in equipment testing and indentification field [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 1013-1020.
[4]	Lan MA, Shijun MENG, Zhijun WU. Intention mining for civil aviation radiotelephony communication based on BERT and generative adversarial [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 740-750.
[5]	Jianting FENG, Tong WANG, Jun DING, Tong LU. Data reorganization space-time adaptive processing method for airborne broadband radar [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(6): 1675-1683.
[6]	Yun ZHONG, Lujun WAN, Peiyang YAO, Jieyong ZHANG. Measurement and optimization of generation and evolution of agile C2 organization [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(4): 1090-1097.
[7]	Bin LIU, Jiacai YI, Li YAO, Yanjuan WANG, Zhaoyun DING, Xianqiang ZHU. Situational awareness ontology modeling for threat from space cyber operations [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(3): 745-754.
[8]	Wenqi WANG, Dengying JIANG. Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE multi-attribute group decision-making based on the probability degree [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(8): 2581-2592.
[9]	Ruilin XU, Boying GENG, Shukan LIU. Research on structural knowledge extraction and organization for multi-modal governmental documents [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2241-2250.
[10]	Yiyang LUO, Qingsong ZHAO, Huachao LI, Yong LI, Jianbin SUN. Framework and modeling method of weaponry utilization knowledge [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 841-849.
[11]	Weijian PANG, Hui LI, Qian HUANG, Peng LI, Xianming MA. Review on ontology-based task planning for unmanned systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 908-920.
[12]	Shuting WANG, Xiaobing LIU, Junhua ZHOU, Zhaoyang BAI, Xiang ZHAI. Ontology based knowledge representation and reuse method for complex product maintenance engineering cases [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 557-568.
[13]	Xue SUN, Zhiqiu HUANG, Guohua SHEN, Jinyong WANG, Heng XU. Behavior decision method of autonomous vehicle based on ontology and BN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 452-465.
[14]	Wenqi JIANG, Xiaolu JIANG. Interval hesitant fuzzy PROMETHEE decision method forattribute association [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3250-3258.
[15]	GONG Jun, HU Tao, SUN Leiqiang. Dynamic selection for organization structure of warship quality supervision [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(9): 2058-2064.

Review of semantic modeling methods of enterprise strategic alignment management

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 130

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments