战斗机无人机编组协同系统需求捕获与验证

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.14

Abstract

Abstract:

Fighter-drone teaming (FDT) is a new form of combat operations with integrated personnel, information, physics and intelligence. Its system requirements elicitation and verification need to be explored and practiced with no engineering precedent nor experience to refer. On the basis of general model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodology, an elicitation and verification strategy is proposed, in which trans-system elements are included on the whole, analysis model and verification model are built separately, and logical behavior and spatial-temporal relation are synchronously taken into consideration. The approach suitable for teaming "mission scenario construction-system behavior analysis-requirements mapping definition-model-in-loop verification" is formed, and a typical "2-2" air-to-ground FDT system is used as the test for its application effectiveness. The results show that, the method met the needs of engineering multi-specialty joint work, by which system requirements along with elicitation rationale and verification evidence are formulated efficiently, and clear objectives and credible directions are built for succeeding system design and realization.

Key words: fighter, drone, teaming, model-based systems engineering (MBSE), requirement

CLC Number:

Wenqing SHI, Haifeng WANG, Haixin CHEN. Fighter-drone teaming system requirements elicitation and verification[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 108-118.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.7

Table 3

Fig.8

Fig.9

Table 4

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

References 32

1	GUNZINGER M, AUTENRIED L. Understanding the promise of skyborg and low-cost attritable unmanned aerial vehicles[R]. Arlington, Virginia: Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2020.
2	BIRKEY D, DUPTULA D, STUTZRIEM L. Manned-unmanned aircraft teaming: taking combat airpower to the next level[R]. Arlington, Virginia: Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2018.
3	GAYDOS S J , CURRY I P . Manned-unmanned teaming: expanding the envelope of uas operational employment[J]. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 2014, 85 (12): 1231- 1232. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.4164.2014
4	TAYLOR G S, TURPIN T. Army aviation manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T): past, present, and future[C]//Proc. of the 18th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 2015: 560-565.
5	Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, & Logistics. Unmanned systems integrated roadmap FY2011-2036[R]. Washington DC: United States Air Force Office of the Chief Scientist, 2011.
6	ENDSLEY M R. Autonomous horizons: system autonomy in the Air Force-a path to the future, Volume Ⅰ: human-autonomy teaming[R]. Washington DC: Office of the USAF Chief Scientist, 2015.
7	CRAWLEY E, CAMERON B, SELVA D. 系统架构: 复杂系统的产品设计与开发[M]. 爱飞翔, 译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017: 34-38.
	CRAWLEY E, CAMERON B, SELVA D. System architecture: strategy and product development for complex system[M]. AI F X, trans. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2017: 34-38.
8	DOUGLASS B P. 敏捷系统工程[M]. 张新国, 谷炼, 译. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018: 139-142.
	DOUGLASS B P. Agile systems engineering[M]. ZHANG X G, GU L, trans. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2018: 139-142.
9	HOBBS E S, CARGAL C, FERONX E. Early safety analysis of manned-unmanned team system[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, 2018.
10	ESTEFAN J A. Survey of model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodologies[R]. San Diego, California: International Council on Systems Engineering, 2008.
11	LUMMUS R. Mission battle management system fighter engagement manager concept[C]//Proc. of the AIAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition, 2003: AIAA 2003-2857.
12	HUMPHREYS C J, COBB R G, JACQUES DR, et al. Optimal mission paths for the uninhabited loyal wingman[C]//Proc. of the 16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 2015.
13	ESHEL T. Kratos demonstrates cooperation of 2 UCAVs with manned aircraft[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. https://defense-update.com/20151208_utap-22.html.
14	AIRBUS. Future combat air system (FCAS)[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. https://www.airbus.com/defence/fcas.html.
15	俄罗斯卫星通讯社. 俄罗斯"猎人"最新型无人机与苏-57战斗机联合飞行[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. https://sputniknews.cn/video/201909301029698731/.
	Sputnik News. Newest 'Okhotnik' UAV of Russia flight with Su-57 fighter[EB/ OL]. [2022-03-15]. https://sputniknews.cn/video/201909301029698731/.
16	BOEING. Airpower teaming system[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. http://www.boeing.com/defense/airpower-teaming-system/.
17	BALTIÉ J, BENSANA E, FABIANI P, et al. Mission mana-gement system for package of unmanned combat aerial vehicles[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. philippe.morignot.free.fr/Articles/MissionManagementTexteCAR.pdf.
18	WASSON C S . System analysis, design and development: concepts, principles, and practices[M]. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2006: 217- 228.
19	International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) . Systems engineering handbook: a guide for system life cycle processes and activities[M]. 4th ed Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2015: 57- 64.
20	付昭旺, 寇英信, 于雷, 等. 有人/无人战斗机协同空战模式及能力需求分析[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37 (1): 73- 77.
	FU Z W , KOU Y X , YU L , et al. Operational modes and capability requirements for cooperative air combat of manned vehicle and unmanned vehicle[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2012, 37 (1): 73- 77.
21	FREY M A, SCHULTE A. Tactical decision support for UAV deployment in MUM-T helicopter missions: problem analysis and system requirements[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management, 2018.
22	FRIEDENTHAL S , MOORE A , STEINER R . A practical guide to SysML: the systems modeling language[M]. 3rd ed California: Morgan Kaufmann, 2015.
23	HOFFMANN H P. System engineering best practices with the rational solution for systems and software engineering deskbook, release 4.1[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/rhapsody/8.3?topic=secsyscontroller-harmony-process.
24	MORKEVICIUS A, ALEKSANDRAVICIENE A, MAZEIKA D, et al. MBSE Grid: a simplified SysML-based approach for modeling complex systems[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00350.x.
25	MICHELSON S, DOMERCANT C. Concepts for manned unmanned teaming behaviors in model based systems engineering[C]// Proc. of the Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposium, 2019.
26	GE Aviation. U.S. Air Force Research Lab awards GE TEAMS program[EB/OL]. [2023-03-15]. suasnews.com/2019/01/u-s-air-force-research-lab-awards-ge-teams-program.
27	PLATTS J T . Autonomy in unmanned air vehicles[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2006, 110 (1104): 97- 105. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000001044
28	SCHAUB G J, KRISTOFFERSEN J W. In, on, or out of the loop: denmark and autonomous weapon systems[R]. Copenhagen: Centre for Military Studies at the University of Copenhagen, 2017.
29	SHERIDAN T B . Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1992.
30	Headquarters , Department of the Army . ADP 5-0: the operations process[M]. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 2012.
31	XIONG P S, LIU H, TIAN Y L. Mission effectiveness evaluation of manned/unmanned aerial team based on OODA and agent-based simulation[C]//Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality, 2019.
32	LEE J Y. Expanded kill chain analysis of manned-unmanned teaming for future strike operations[D]. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2014: 54-57.

分类	等级	特征
人在环外	Z9	机器决定一切, 自主行事, 忽略人
人在环外	Z8	机器只有在自己决定需要通知时才通知人
人在环上	Y7	机器只在人询问时告知人
	Y6	机器自动执行, 通知人
	Y5	机器自动执行, 通知人并允许在限时内否决
人在环内	X4	机器在人同意后执行所提供的最佳选项
	X3	机器只提供一个最佳选项
	X2	机器提供一系列决策或行动备选项
	X1	人承担所有的决策和行动操控

行为	标线	命名	前缀	含义
操作		前缀_动词<名词>	op	进行操作
交互		前缀_<定语>名词	inp	人向系统输入
			out	系统向人输出
			cmd	命令/计划
			rep	报告/通报
			sig	物理信号
			inf	数字信息
			req	请求
			ret	回复

指标项	时空要求
暴露风险	前位无人机被敌雷达跟踪时刻T_n，后位战斗机应在(T_n+15)s内(T_n+1时刻)不被敌雷达跟踪
编队时效	在(T_n+6)s内达到位置偏差不大于20 m、角度偏差不大于1.5°的队形精度，并保持到(T_n+15)s
定位效能	满足队形精度后9 s内收敛，定位偏差不大于无人机距目标距离的1%
	

编识号	分类	需求描述	属性
ABS-31	编队	系统必须能够接收编组内战斗机通过成员通信域发来的编队作业计划。	交互
ABS-32	编队	系统必须通过成员通信域向编组内战斗机实时发送本机飞行位置、速度、姿态数据。	交互
ABS-33	防撞	系统必须实时检测与编组内战斗机发生空中相撞的可能性, 检测半径不小于15 km。	操作
ABS-34	防撞	系统必须在检测到可能发生相撞时控制飞机实施避撞机动。	操作
			

[1]	Liwei QIAN, Xiangqian XU, Yajie DOU, Yuejin TAN. System capability requirements recommendation method based on RIMER method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3719-3727.
[2]	Wanbin LIAO, Yunfeng CAO, Xinyao WANG. DSL building for requirement analysis of complex system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3443-3454.
[3]	Qiucen FAN, Wenhao BI, An ZHANG, Wenhao WANG. MBSE modeling method of civil aircraft altitude control system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 164-171.
[4]	Hongchen JIAO, Yong LEI, Hongyu ZHANG, Guobin ZHANG, Yaodong WANG. Research on modeling and design method of spacecraft system based on MBSE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(9): 2516-2525.
[5]	Luda ZHAO, Bin WANG, Wei ZENG. Three-level programming model of electronic countermeasures force requirements in offensive combat [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1564-1571.
[6]	Yuyao ZHAI, Xianjun SHI, Jiapeng LYU, Lu HAN. Modeling and index evaluation of multi-level testability of missiles based on GSPN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 970-979.
[7]	Tao LIU, Guanghan BAI, Junyong TAO, Yunan ZHANG, Yining FANG. Mission-oriented resilience evaluation method for complex system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1003-1011.
[8]	Wenhao WANG, Wenhao BI, An ZHANG, Qiucen FAN. Function modeling method of civil aircraft system based on MBSE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2884-2892.
[9]	Zhiwei MAO, Zhanwen QU, Tong ZHANG, Yi LU, Shan FU, Dan HUANG. Design of civil aircraft certification test flight scenario based on MBSE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(8): 1768-1775.
[10]	Zhenyu ZHOU, Yuehong QIAN, Yi LIU. Systems engineering method in product maintainability design [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(5): 1197-1204.
[11]	REN Bingxuan, LU Yi, FU Shan, HUANG Dan. Identification and verification of civil aircraft functional requirements through MBSE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(9): 2016-2024.
[12]	CHEN Wenying, ZHANG Bingzhi, YANG Kewei. Contribution rate evaluation for requirement demonstration of a new weapon equipment system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(8): 1795-1801.
[13]	JIANG Liang, ZHANG Qingpu, HAN Song, LOU Yanfeng. Dual-polarized antenna space coding method based on micro drone [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(3): 651-658.
[14]	CHEN Wu, FAN Mingkai, LI Zehong, JIN Xin, HONG Liang. Design of network robustness for drone swarm system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(11): 2633-2640.
[15]	YANG Zhenglei, ZHONG Wendong, XI Tao, REN Meng, REN Denggao, XIE Xiajie. Imaging reconnaissance satellites single mission integrated scheduling for emergency requirements [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(9): 2000-2006.

Fighter-drone teaming system requirements elicitation and verification

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 32

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments