对抗势能的原理及计算方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.12.13

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

势能是一种广泛存在于物理系统中的物理量,在军事对抗系统中也存在类似的物理量,它能够反映对抗双方态势的优劣,并通过作战行动转化为作战效能,称之为对抗势能。借鉴物理学中势能的概念,将对抗势能定义为“现有的攻击机会转化为毁伤的潜力”,在分析攻击机会生成过程的基础上,提出对抗势场和能级等概念用于攻击机会的量化,给出了一对一格斗中对抗势能的计算公式,并将其推广到多对多的情况下,针对两种典型的势能高估情况给出了公式修正方法

关键词: 对抗势能, 攻击机会, 对抗势场, 能级

Abstract:

Potential energy is a physical quantity that exists widely in physical system. There is also a similar physical quantity in the military confrontation system. It can reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the confrontational situation and can be transformed into operational effectiveness by combat operations. Learning from the concept of potential energy in physics, the confrontational potential energy is defined as the potential of the existing attack opportunities being transformd into damage. Based on the analysis of the attack opportunities generation process, the concepts of the confrontation potential field and the energy level are proposed for quantifying attack opportunities. A formula for calculating the potential energy in one-to-one combat is suggested, and is extended to a many-to-many case. Also, a correction method for two typical potential energy overestimation cases is proposed.

Key words: confrontational potential energy, attack opportunity, confrontation potential field, energy level

中图分类号:

TP391.9

王飞, 司光亚, 贺宗平, 王强. 对抗势能的原理及计算方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(12): 2771-2778.

Fei WANG, Guangya SI, Zongping HE, Qiang WANG. Theory and calculation method of confrontational potential energy[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(12): 2771-2778.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

表2

图7

表3

参考文献 27

1	全军军事术语管理委员会. 中国人民解放军军语[M]. 北京: 军事科学出版社, 2011.
	Military Terminology Management Committee of the People's Liberation Army . Dictionary of military terminology of the people's liberation army of China[M]. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2011.
2	ENDSLEY M R . Measurement of situation awareness in dyna-mic systems[J]. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995, 37 (1): 65- 84.
3	ENDSLEY M R . Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings[J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2015, 9 (1): 4- 32.
4	GUTZWILLER R S, HUNT S M, LANGE D S. A task analysis toward characterizing cyber-cognitive situation awareness (CCSA) in cyber defense analysts[C]//Proc.of the IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, 2016: 14-20.
5	LI X Y, ZHAO H. Network security situation assessment based on HMM-MPGA[C]//Proc.of the 2nd International Conference on Information Management, 2016: 57-63.
6	YU Y, WANG J, LIU J Q, et al. Multi-dimension threat situation assessment based on network security attributes[C]//Proc.of the 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks, 2018: 1-2.
7	ZHANG R Z, CHENG J R, TANG X Y, et al. DDoS attack security situation assessment model using fusion feature based on fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Cloud Computing and Security, 2018: 654-669.
8	ALBUQUERQUE D J P , HERFORT B , BRENNING A , et al. A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2015, 29 (4): 667- 689. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2014.996567
9	YIN J , LAMPERT A , CAMERON M , et al. Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2012, 27 (6): 52- 59. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2012.6
10	SANCHES M F, JUNIOR V A P, SOUZA J O, et al. Objects assessment approach using natural language processing and data quality to support emergency situation assessment[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2016: 238-244.
11	PANTELI M , KIRSCHEN D S . Situation awareness in power systems: theory, challenges and applications[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2015, 122, 140- 151. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.01.008
12	ENDSLEY M R . Designing for situation awareness: an approach to user-centered design[M]. Florida: CRC press, 2016.
13	ENDSLEY M R . Autonomous driving systems: a preliminary naturalistic study of the Tesla model S[J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2017, 11 (3): 225- 238.
14	NOH S, AN K, HAN W. High-level data fusion based probabilistic situation assessment for highly automated driving[C]//Proc.of the IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, 2015: 1587-1594.
15	LI W N , ZHANG W G , SHI J P , et al. A battlefield target grouping method based on M-CFSFDP algorithm[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36 (6): 1121- 1128. doi: 10.1051/jnwpu/20183661121
16	ZHAO K X, HUANG C Q. Air combat situation assessment for UAV based on improved decision tree[C]//Proc.of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2018: 1772-1776.
17	YANG H Y , ZHANG S W , LI X Y . Modeling of situation assessment in regional air defense combat[J]. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 2019, 16 (2): 91- 101. doi: 10.1177/1548512918809514
18	MCANALLY K , DAVEY C , WHITE D , et al. Inference in the wild: a framework for human situation assessment and a case study of air combat[J]. Cognitive Science, 2018, 42 (7): 2181- 2204. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12636
19	MISLEVY R J , HAERTEL G , RICONSCENTE M , et al. Evidence-centered assessment design[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2017.
20	D'ANIELLO G , GAETA A , LOIA V , et al. A granular computing framework for approximate reasoning in situation awareness[J]. Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (3): 141- 158. doi: 10.1007/s41066-016-0035-0
21	GARCIA J, REIN K, BIERMANNN J, et al. Considerations for enhancing situation assessment through multi-level fusion of hard and soft data[C]//Proc.of the 19th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2016: 2133-2138.
22	BRELGER R , CARLEY K , PATTISON P . Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: workshop summary and papers[M]. Washington: National Academy Press, 2003.
23	MOON I C , CARLEY K M . Modeling and simulating terrorist networks in social and geospatial dimensions[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2007, 22 (5): 40- 49. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2007.4338493
24	MOON I, KIM E J, CARLEY K M. Automated influence network generation and the node parameter sensitivity analysis[C]//Proc.of the ICCRTS, 2008: 972-980.
25	李志强, 胡晓峰, 司光亚, 等. 一种基于人工势场的战场态势分析模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2006, 18 (12): 3604- 3605.
	LI Z Q , HU X F , SI G Y , et al. New battlefield situation analysis model based on artificial potential field[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2006, 18 (12): 3603- 3607.
26	CARES J R.网络中心战的效能度量[M].费爱国,王新辉,译.北京:军事科学出版社, 2005.
	CARES J R. Effectiveness measurement of network-centric warfare[M]. FEI A G, WANG X H, trans. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2005.
27	司光亚, 王飞, 李聪, 等. 基于交互网测量的武器装备体系鲁棒性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (7): 1506- 1512.
	SI G Y , WANG F , LI C , et al. Robustness assessment method for armament system of systems based on measuring of interaction network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (7): 1506- 1512.

变量	说明
红方传感器(S, S=1为加入实验, S=0为不加入实验)	①天波超视距雷达距交战区域500 km左右部署,接入情报网络; ②反隐形雷达的部署密度可以基本控制空战区域; ③先进空基侦察手段为电子、图像、合成孔径卫星组成的星座
红方4代机(F)	规模为20,占机群总数的一半,与普通战机混合编组
红方驱逐舰(D)	4艘装备相控阵雷达的防空驱逐舰
蓝方4代机加入	规模为25,占机群总数的一半,与普通战机混合编组

红方装备组合	蓝方部署
红方装备组合	基本	升级
(S, F, D)=(0, 0, 0)	①	②
(1, 0, 0)		③
(0, 1, 0)		④
(0, 0, 1)		⑤
(1, 1, 1)	⑥	⑦

红方装备	蓝方部署
红方装备	基本	升级
传感器		35.6%
4代机		82.9%
传感器+4代机	75.9%	105.3%¹⁾
传感器+4代机	75.9%	20.6%²⁾

[1]	张伟, 何晶, 谢晓伟, 赵国强, 陈真. 联合战场导航对抗仿真评估系统设计与实现[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3182-3189.
[2]	马骏, 杨镜宇, 吴曦. 基于预聚类主动半监督的作战体系效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1889-1896.
[3]	任璐英, 王庆国, 马倩, 张海峰, 徐卫卫. 基于元模型的复杂产品虚拟样机建模方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(5): 1609-1614.
[4]	张源原, 高阳, 朱鹏, 刘锦涛, 谷树山. 基于着色Petri网的无人机侦察战术规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 900-907.
[5]	鲁统亮, 陈文豪, 葛冰峰, 邓祁零. 信息支援下的作战体系多层网络建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 520-528.
[6]	冯克涛, 李晓毅, 曲晨, 王申涛, 陈谋. 基于DEM的民航地空VHF通信有效覆盖仿真研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 684-695.
[7]	马骏, 杨镜宇, 邹立岩. 基于Stacking集成元模型的作战体系能力图谱生成方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 154-163.
[8]	刘紫燕, 马珊珊, 梁静, 朱明成, 袁磊. 注意力机制CNN的毫米波大规模MIMO系统信道估计算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 307-312.
[9]	曾广迅, 龚光红, 李妮. 基于语义匹配的作战体系仿真想定生成方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2154-2162.
[10]	谢春思, 刘志赢, 桑雨. 基于特征匹配的舰载对陆导弹目标识别模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2244-2253.
[11]	雷永林, 王言, 于芹章, 朱智, 董微, 朱一凡. 面向复杂仿真元建模的序贯近邻探索实验设计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(5): 1232-1239.
[12]	陈国卫, 周雨菁, 任蕾. 面向系统性能最大化的装备经费结构SD优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 1022-1029.
[13]	高泽海, 马存宝, 牛浩田. 综合模块化航电系统性能退化Lévy模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 1144-1152.
[14]	刘志赢, 谢春思, 李进军, 桑雨. 基于改进Deeplabv3+的烟雾区域分割识别算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(2): 328-335.
[15]	田相轩, 石志强. 基于改进型生成对抗网络的指挥信息系统模拟数据生成算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 163-170.