面向系统性能最大化的装备经费结构SD优化

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.04.19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为通过在装备的各组成单元之间, 对装备的研制经费实施最优分配, 继而获得最大化的装备整体作战使用能力的现实需求, 选择由锅炉、主汽轮机、主冷凝器、汽轮给水泵等4个基本单元组成的船舶蒸汽动力系统为对象, 运用系统动力学(system dynamics, SD)方法, 建立各项费用与动力系统总体性能之间的关系模型, 并转化为SD仿真平台上的动力系统各设备经费结构优化模型。经过系统分析和对照仿真结果, 找出费用在动力系统中各个设备之间分配的特殊规律, 在功率既定情况下, 确定动力系统费用的最小值以及在各个设备之间的最优分配结构, 形成基于SD理论、面向系统性能最大化，在装备组成单元层面开展经费结构优化的方法。

关键词: 系统性能, 经费结构, 系统动力学优化, 装备组成单元

Abstract:

For acquiring the realistic demand of maximizing the integral operational ability of equipment, the optimal allocation of equipment develop cost is carried out among the equipment constituent units, the steam power system of ship including boiler, main steam turbine, main condenser, turbine driven feed pump is selected as study object. The relation model between the costs and the overall performance of power system is established utilizing system dynamics method, which is translated into the optimization model of each equipment cost structure for the power system on the system dynamics simulation platform. The special rules of cost allocation among the equipment constituent units of power system are found out by system analysis and contrasting the simulation results. The minimum cost of the power system and the optimal allocation structure among each equipment are determined under the condition of power invariability. And the cost structure optimization method based on the theory of system dynamics is formed, which can face the maximization system performance on the equipment constituent units.

Key words: system performance, cost structure, system dynamics optimization, equipment constituent unit

中图分类号:

陈国卫, 周雨菁, 任蕾. 面向系统性能最大化的装备经费结构SD优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 1022-1029.

Guowei CHEN, Yujing ZHOU, Lei REN. SD optimization of equipment cost structure facing system performance maximization[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1022-1029.

图/表 12

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

图2

图3

图4

图5

表7

参考文献 33

1	United States Department of Defense. DoDD5000.2-R Mandatory procedures for major defense acquisition programs and major automated information system acquisition programs[S]. Washington DC: United States Department of Defense, 2002.
2	MONDLI N. Development of a life cycle cost model as a decision support tool[D]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria, 2010.
3	耿俊豹, 金家善. 寿命周期费用技术的理论与实践[M]. 长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 2015.
	GENG J B , JIN J S . Life cycle costing—theory and practice[M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 2015.
4	王泽宇, 艾俊强. 航空装备全寿命周期费用多路径管控策略研究[J]. 航空工程进展, 2019, 10 (4): 569- 576.
	WANG Z Y , AI J Q . Study on the multi-path management and control strategy of total life cycle cost of the aviation equipment[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2019, 10 (4): 569- 576.
5	田军挺, 胡柳荫. 武器系统全寿命周期费用的控制和管理的研究[J]. 价值工程, 2014, 24, 158- 159.
	TIAN J T , HU L Y . On cost control and management of the life cycle of weapon system[J]. Value Engineering, 2014, 24, 158- 159.
6	钟永光, 贾晓菁, 钱颖. 系统动力学前沿与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
	ZHONG Y G , JIA X J , QIAN Y . Frontier and application of system dynamics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
7	马歆, 王文彬. 系统动力学建模与应用研究[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2019.
	MA X , WANG W B . Research on modeling and application of system dynamics[M]. Beijing: China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 2019.
8	齐小刚, 翟豆豆, 刘学星. 基于系统动力学的海上反舰兵力损耗分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (4): 836- 842.
	QI X G , ZHAI D D , LIU X X . Analysis of anti-ship force loss at sea based on system dynamics[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (4): 836- 842.
9	RICHARDSON G P . Introduction to the system dynamics review[J]. System Dynamics Review, 1985, 1 (1): 1- 3. doi: 10.1002/sdr.4260010102
10	魏汝祥, 张怀强, 刘宝平. 装备维修管理费结构动态分析方法研究[J]. 中国修船, 2005, 5, 39- 42.
	WEI R X , ZHANG H Q , LIU B P . Research on the dynamic analysis methods of equipment maintenance management cost[J]. China Ship-repair, 2005, 5, 39- 42.
11	罗飞, 罗小明, 张守玉. 系统动力学在武器装备全寿命费用控制中的应用[J]. 装备指挥技术学院学报, 2005, 16 (1): 16- 20. doi: 10.3783/j.issn.1673-0127.2005.01.004
	LUO F , LUO X M , ZHANG S Y . Application of system dynamics' model on control of life cycle cost of weapon and equipment[J]. Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, 2005, 16 (1): 16- 20. doi: 10.3783/j.issn.1673-0127.2005.01.004
12	张栋, 罗飞, 罗小明. 武器装备全寿命费用宏观控制的系统动力学模型[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2005, 27 (3): 110- 114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2005.03.024
	ZHANG D , LUO F , LUO X M . The macroscopical control of the life cycle cost of the equipments based on system dynamics' model[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2005, 27 (3): 110- 114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2005.03.024
13	张守玉, 管清波, 冯书兴. 基于系统动力学的装备LCC控制仿真研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2006, 23 (7): 11- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2006.07.004
	ZHANG S Y , GUAN Q B , FENG S X . Simulation of equipment LCC control based on SD[J]. Computer Simulation, 2006, 23 (7): 11- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2006.07.004
14	张怀强, 梁新, 黄栋. 装备科研、购置、维修经费比例的影响因素及内部关系[J]. 军事经济研究, 2009, 8, 29- 30.
	ZHANG H Q , LIANG X , HUANG D . The influence factors of equipment scientific research, purchase cost, maintenance cost and its interior relation[J]. Military Economic Research, 2009, 8, 29- 30.
15	ZHANG H Q, WEI R X. Optimizing equipment cost structure based on system dynamics[C]//Proc. of the Conference on Systems Science, Management Science and System Dynamics: Sustaina-ble Development and Complex Systems, 2007: 2813-2817.
16	陈国卫, 金家善, 耿俊豹. 装备经费结构动态分析方法初探[J]. 装备制造技术, 2012, 1, 106- 108, 130.
	CHEN G W , JIN J S , GENG J B . Dynamic analysis method for optimizing equipment cost structure[J]. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 1, 106- 108, 130.
17	CHEN G W, JIN J S, GENG J B, et al. Theoretical learning on the research of optimizing equipment cost structure[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering, 2012: 3687-3690.
18	CHEN G W, JIN J S, GENG J B, et al. Comparative analysis of equipment cost structure optimizing methods[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Computer and Information Science, Safety Engineering, 2012: 46-49.
19	刘鹏, 董振旗, 屈岩, 等. 武器装备系统寿命周期费用分析及优化模型[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2012, 33 (5): 57- 58, 69.
	LIU P , DONG Z Q , QU Y , et al. Life cycle cost analysis and optimization model of weapon equipment system[J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2012, 33 (5): 57- 58, 69.
20	姜晓峰, 王静静, 薛勇. 基于装备技术构成的装备费结构优化[J]. 军事经济研究, 2005, 8, 20- 22.
	JIANG X F , WANG J J , XUE Y . Law of diminishing mardin utility of equipments development[J]. Military Economic Research, 2005, 8, 20- 22.
21	张涛, 谢超. 战略驱动下的武器装备经费支出优化研究[J]. 军事经济学院学报, 2010, 17 (5): 17- 19.
	ZHANG T , XIE C . Research on expenditure optimization of weapon equipment under strategic drive[J]. Journal of Military Economics Academy, 2010, 17 (5): 17- 19.
22	张怀强, 王树宗, 柳成彬. 基于博弈论的装备科研、购置、维修经费比例关系优化分析[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2009, 21 (2): 74- 77, 106.
	ZHANG H Q , WANG S Z , LIU C B . Analysis of allocation of equipment cost based on game theory[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2009, 21 (2): 74- 77, 106.
23	陈国卫, 张志远. 浅析面向系统性能最大化的装备经费结构优化[C]//军民融合发展战略高端论坛暨国防大学国防经济研究中心年会, 2016: 282-285.
	CHEN G W, ZHANG Z Y. A brief analysis of equipment cost structure optimization facing system performance maximization[C]// Proc. of the Military and Civilian Integration Development Strategy High-end BBS and National Defense Economic Research Center, 2016: 282-285.
24	陈国卫, 金家善, 耿俊豹. 系统动力学应用研究综述[J]. 控制工程, 2012, 19 (6): 921- 928. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7848.2012.06.001
	CHEN G W , JIN J S , GENG J B . Application research overview of system dynamics[J]. Control Engineering of China, 2012, 19 (6): 921- 928. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7848.2012.06.001
25	ROBERT W Y . Department of the army cost analysis manual[M]. Washington: Army Cost and Economic Analysis Center, 2002.
26	JIA N P , YANG Z W , YANG KW . Operational effectiveness evaluation of the swarming UAVs combat system based on a system dynamics model[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 25209- 25224.
27	FAN C Y , FAN P S , CHANG P C . A system dynamics modeling approach for a military weapon maintenance supply system[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 128 (2): 457- 469.
28	PRINI R F , DOOLEY R B . The international association for the properties of water and steam[J]. Journal of School Health, 2004, 39 (10): 1- 48.
29	孙林凯. 基于主要因素筛选和SVM技术的LCC建模预测方法研究[D]. 武汉: 海军工程大学, 2012.
	SUN L K. Study on the prediction method of life cycle cost based on main factors analysis and support vector machine technique[D]. Wuhan: Naval University of Engineering, 2012.
30	WANG B , CHEN Z J , LI H . Modeling and simulation of equipment material inventory control based on system dynamics[J]. Journal of Donghua University, 2018, 35 (3): 256- 260.
31	朱泳. 基于热经济性的舰用汽力装置使用方案优选研究[D]. 武汉: 海军工程大学, 2009.
	ZHU Y. Application of thermoeconomic for operation plans optimization of marine steam power plant[D]. Wuhan: Naval University of Engineering, 2009.
32	徐明德, 黄振和, 汪俊良. 电子对抗装备规模优化的系统动力学仿真研究[J]. 装备指挥技术学院学报, 2007, 18 (2): 110- 114.
	XU M D , HUANG Z H , WANG J L . Research on scales optimization analysis of electronic countermeasures equipment based on SD simulation[J]. Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, 2007, 18 (2): 110- 114.
33	MU X Z , LI G H , HU G W . Modeling and scenario prediction of natural gas demand system based on system dynamics method[J]. Petroleum Science, 2018, 15, 912- 924.

参数类型	参数符号	单位	参数类型	参数符号	单位
状态变量	SJG_b	T/h	速率变量	R₁	万元
	η_ft	dmnl		R₂	万元
	Q_gs	m³/h		R₃	万元
	η_gs	dmnl		R₄	万元
	SJH_gs	mH₂O		R₅	mH₂O
	SJG_mt	T/h		R₆	MPa
	P_c	MPa		R₇	dmnl
	P_gr	MPa		R₈	MPa
	η_e	dmnl		R₉	MPa
	C_b	万元		R₁₀	m³/h
	C_mt	万元		R₁₁	T/h
	C_gs	万元		R₁₂	MPa
	C_c	万元		R₁₃	T/h
辅助变量	G_b	T/h	常量	η_hs	dmnl
	G_mt	T/h		MG_b	T/h
	G_at	T/h		T_gr	℃
	Ne	KW		MH_gs	mH₂O
	H_e0	KJ/Kg		CSC_b	万元
	Nx	KW		CSC_mt	万元
	CJ	KW		CSC_gs	万元
	H_gs	mH₂O		CSCc	万元
	K₁	dmnl		QWMB	KW
	K₂	dmnl		K₅	dmnl
	K₃	dmnl		MG_mt	T/h
	K₄	dmnl		-	-
	C_gsfp	万元		-	-

性能符号	数值/%	性能符号	数值/%
N_e	95.240	P_c	0
G_mt	60.000	Q_gs	0.700
H_e0	3.860	H_hs	0.004
η_e	0.003	T_gr	1.700
G_b	0.780	MG_b	0.470
G_at	0.020	MG_mt	0.680
P_gr	0.020	MH_gs	2.990
H_gs	2.170	C_总	41.170
η_gs	0.002	QWMB	100.000
η_ft	0.001	MG_mt	0.680

动力系统功率/kW	主机费用增加/万元	锅炉费用增加/万元	冷凝器费用增加/万元	给水泵费用增加/万元
0.710 0	0.119 7	0.108 3	0.003 3	0.000 0
0.745 4	0.123 0	0.115 2	0.006 6	0.002 8
0.886 8	0.164 0	0.172 3	0.032 1	0.022 8
1.000 0	0.282 8	0.300 4	0.085 9	0.067 3

动力系统功率提高率	主机费用比例	锅炉费用比例	冷凝器费用比例	给水泵费用比例
0.000 0	1.000 0	0.924 4	0.227 3	0.205 5
0.010 8	0.939 8	0.892 3	0.228 2	0.205 5
0.054 1	0.757 3	0.789 8	0.242 1	0.205 5
0.088 7	0.672 4	0.710 5	0.245 8	0.205 5

项目	数值1	数值2	数值3	数值4	数值5
动力系统功率/kW	0.181 9	0.222 8	0.263 6	0.426 8	0.557 3
动力系统总费用/万元	0.000 0	0.417 2	0.436 0	0.601 7	1.000 0