有人/无人机协同指挥员的事件相关电位特征

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.02.19

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 578-587.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.02.19

• 系统工程 • 上一篇

有人/无人机协同指挥员的事件相关电位特征

晏彪¹^,², 吴晓莉¹^,²^,*, 张蓝¹^,², 刘潇¹^,², 方泽茜¹^,², 韩炜毅¹^,², 李琦桉¹^,²

1. 南京理工大学设计艺术与传媒学院，江苏南京 210094
2. 语言信息智能处理及应用工信部重点实验室，江苏南京 210094

收稿日期:2023-12-22 修回日期:2024-07-13 出版日期:2025-02-24 发布日期:2025-02-24
通讯作者: 吴晓莉
作者简介:晏　彪（1996—），男，博士研究生，主要研究方向为人机交互、设计工效学
张　蓝（1995—），女，博士研究生，主要研究方向为人机交互、人因与设计工效学
刘　潇（1998—），女，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为人机交互、界面测评
方泽茜（1998—），女，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为人因与信息系统交互
韩炜毅（2000—），男，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为智能制造系统
李琦桉（2000—），女，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为复杂信息系统人机交互
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金（BK20221490）；国家自然科学基金（52175469）资助课题

Event-related potential characteristics of human/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative commanders

Biao YAN¹^,², Xiaoli WU¹^,²^,*, Lan ZHANG¹^,², Xiao LIU¹^,², Zexi FANG¹^,², Weiyi HAN¹^,², Qi’an LI¹^,²

1. School of Design Art & Media，Nanjing University of Science and Technology，Nanjing 210094，China
2. Key Laboratory of Ministry Industry and Information Technology for Language Information Processing and Application，Nanjing 210094，China

Received:2023-12-22 Revised:2024-07-13 Online:2025-02-24 Published:2025-02-24
Contact: Xiaoli WU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

有人/无人机协同任务信息愈加复杂，长时间的任务执行会导致指挥员的工作负荷过载。为了研究不同条件下的协同任务对指挥员生理反应的影响，比较了在不同负荷条件下的行为反应，并利用事件相关电位技术研究了不同条件下的脑电信号。结果表明，在高工作负荷条件下表现出较长的反应时和较低的准确率，同时诱发了显著的P200振幅和P300振幅。在有人/无人机协同任务过程中，相较于低工作负荷的协同任务，高工作负荷状态下协同任务所需的认知资源超出指挥员的认知能力，导致工作负荷过载，需要调动更多的注意资源和认知资源。

关键词: 有人/无人机协同, 工作负荷, 事件相关电位, P200, P300

Abstract:

In collaborative tasks involving human/unmanned aerial vehicles, the increasing complexity of information can lead to commander’s cognitive overload during prolonged task execution. To investigate the impact of collaborative tasks under different conditions on commander’s physiological responses, behavioral reactions are compared between different workload conditions. Event-related potential technology is employed to study electroencephalographic signals under both conditions. The results reveal that, participants exhibit longer reaction time and lower accuracy under high workload conditions, accompanied by significant increase in P200 and P300 amplitudes. During human/unmanned aerial vehicle collaborative tasks, compared to low workload tasks, the high workload state demands cognitive resources that exceed the commander’s cognitive capacity, leading to cognitive overload and requiring additional attention and cognitive resources.

Key words: human/unmanned aerial vehicle collaboration, workload, event-related potential, P200, P300

中图分类号:

晏彪, 吴晓莉, 张蓝, 刘潇, 方泽茜, 韩炜毅, 李琦桉. 有人/无人机协同指挥员的事件相关电位特征[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 578-587.

Biao YAN, Xiaoli WU, Lan ZHANG, Xiao LIU, Zexi FANG, Weiyi HAN, Qi’an LI. Event-related potential characteristics of human/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative commanders[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(2): 578-587.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

表2

表3

表4

图7

表5

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 34

1	RICHARD C M, LEILA H, ARMIN M, et al. Integrating unmanned and manned UAVs data network based on combined Bayesian belief network and multi-objective reinforcement learning algorithm[J]. Drone Systems and Applications, 2023, 11 (1): 1- 17. doi: 10.1139/dsa-2022-0043
2	王凯. 智能化背景下美军无人机作战发展研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2022, 42 (4): 14- 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2022.04.005
	WANG K. Research on U. S. army UAV combat development under the background of intelligentization[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2022, 42 (4): 14- 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2022.04.005
3	张宏宏, 李文华, 郑家毅, 等. 有人/无人机协同作战: 概念、技术与挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45 (15): 168- 194. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29653
	ZHANG H H, LI W H, ZHENG J Y, et al. Coordinated manned/unmanned aerial warfare: concepts, technologies, and challenges[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45 (15): 168- 194. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29653
4	王建峰, 贾高伟, 郭正, 等. 多无人机协同任务规划方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46 (10): 3437- 3450. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.10.21
	WANG J F, JIA G W, GUO Z, et al. Research status and development of multi-UAV system mission planning[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46 (10): 3437- 3450. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.10.21
5	李望西, 王勇, 吴文超, 等. 面向空空作战的有人/无人机协同作战模式研究[J]. 无人系统技术, 2023, 6 (4): 76- 84. doi: 10.19942/j.issn.2096-5915.2023.04.40
	LI W X, WANG Y, WU W C, et al. Research on manned/unmanned air vehicle cooperative combat model for air-to-air combat[J]. Unmanned Systems Technology, 2023, 6 (4): 76- 84. doi: 10.19942/j.issn.2096-5915.2023.04.40
6	VAN R W F. Information processing and decision making cognitive aspects of economic behaviour [M]//RAAIJ W F V, VELDHOVEN G M V, WARNERYD K E, ed. Handbook of economic psychology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.
7	YOUNG M S, STANTON N A. Attention and automation: new perspectives on mental underload and performance[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2002, 3 (2): 178- 194.
8	KELLY D, EFTHYMIOU M. An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 2017[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2019, 69 (1): 155- 165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.009
9	VILLAFAINA S, FUENTES-GARCLA J P, GUSI N, et al. Psychophysiological response of military pilots in different combat flight maneuvers in a flight simulator[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2021, 238 (1): 113483. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113483
10	ALAIMO A, ESPOSITO A, ORLANDO C, et al. Aircraft pilots workload analysis: heart rate variability objective measures and NASA-task load index subjective evaluation[J]. Aerospace, 2020, 7 (9): 137. doi: 10.3390/aerospace7090137
11	HERNANDEZ-SABATE A, YAURI J, FOLCH P, et al. Recognition of the mental workloads of pilots in the cockpit using EEG signals[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12 (5): 2298. doi: 10.3390/app12052298
12	SABETI M, BOOSTANI R, MORADI E. Event related potential （ERP） as a reliable biometric indicator: a comparative approach[J]. Array, 2020, 6 (1): 100026.
13	CHEN Y Y, FANG W N, GUO B Y, et al. Effects of interruption on work performance and the moderating effects of mental fatigue[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55 (1): 22- 35. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2023.00022
14	GAJEWSKI P D, FERDINAND N K, KRAY J, et al. Understanding sources of adult age differences in task switching: evidence from behavioral and ERP studies[J]. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2018, 92 (1): 255- 275.
15	SUR S, SINHA V K. Event-related potential: an overview[J]. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 2009, 18 (1): 70- 73.
16	SCHINDLER S, KISSLER J. Selective visual attention to emotional words: early parallel frontal and visual activations followed by interactive effects in visual cortex[J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2016, 37 (10): 3575- 3587. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23261
17	CONLEY E M, MICHALEWSKI H J, STARR A. The N100 auditory cortical evoked potential indexes scanning of auditory short-term memory[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 1999, 110 (12): 2086- 2093. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00183-2
18	JIN J, ZHANG W K, CHEN M L. How consumers are affected by product descriptions in online shop: event-related potentials evidence of the attribute framing effect[J]. Neuroscience Research, 2017, 125 (1): 21- 28. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.07.006
19	MILLER M W, RIETSCHEL J C, MCDONALD C G, et al. A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2011, 80 (1): 75- 78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.003
20	VAREKA L, LADOUCE S. Prediction of navigational decisions in the real-world: a visual P300 event-related potentials brain-computer interface[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, 37 (14): 1375- 1389. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2021.1888510
21	ALLISON B Z, POLICH J. Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm[J]. Biological Psychology, 2008, 77 (3): 277- 283. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.10.014
22	KATHNER I, WRIESSNEGGER S C, MULLER-PUTZ G R, et al. Effects of mental workload and fatigue on the P300, alpha and theta band power during operation of an ERP （P300） brain–computer interface[J]. Biological Psychology, 2014, 102 (1): 118- 129.
23	丁达理, 谢磊, 王渊. 有人机/无人机协同作战运用及对战争形态影响[J]. 无人系统技术, 2020, 3 (4): 1- 9. doi: 10.19942/j.issn.2096-5915.2020.04.001
	DING D L, XIE L, WANG Y. The application of manned/mnmanned aerial vehicle cooperative combat and its influence on war form[J]. Unmanned Systems Technology, 2020, 3 (4): 1- 9. doi: 10.19942/j.issn.2096-5915.2020.04.001
24	WICKENS C D. Multiple resources and mental workload[J]. Human Factors, 2008, 50 (3): 449- 455. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288394
25	GENTILI R J, RIETSCHEL J C, JAQUESS K J, et al. Brain biomarkers based assessment of cognitive workload in pilots under various task demands [C]// Proc. of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2014: 5860−5863.
26	SOKHADZE E M, CASANOVA M F, CASANOVA E L, et al. Event-related potentials （ERP） in cognitive neuroscience research and applications[J]. Neuro Regulation, 2017, 4 (1): 14- 27.
27	HORAT S K, HERRMANN F R, FAVRE G, et al. Assessment of mental workload: a new electrophysiological method based on intra-block averaging of ERP amplitudes[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2016, 82 (1): 11- 17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.013
28	POLICH J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2007, 118 (10): 2128- 2148.
29	DEENY S, CHICOINE C, HARGROVE L, et al. A simple ERP method for quantitative analysis of cognitive workload in myoelectric prosthesis control and human-machine interaction[J]. PloS One, 2014, 9 (11): e112091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112091
30	SCHARINGER C, KAMMERER Y, GERJETS P. Pupil dilation and EEG alpha frequency band power reveal load on executive functions for link-selection processes during text reading[J]. PloS One, 2015, 10 (6): e0130608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130608
31	COMBS L A, POLICH J. P3a from auditory white noise stimuli[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2006, 117 (5): 1106- 1112. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.023
32	MULLER-GASS A, SCHROGER E. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction[J]. Brain Research, 2007, 1136 (1): 169- 177. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.020
33	CAUSSE M, FABRE E, GIRAUDET L, et al. EEG/ERP as a measure of mental workload in a simple piloting task[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2015, 3 (1): 5230- 5236. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.594
34	FRANK D W, YEE R B, POLICH J. P3a from white noise[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2012, 85 (2): 236- 241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.04.005

统计检验	高工作负荷正确率-低工作负荷正确率
Z	−2.009^b
渐近显著性（双尾）	0.045

反应时配对比较	配对差值					t	自由度	Sig （双尾）
	平均值	标准偏差	标准误差平均值	差值 95%置信区间
	平均值	标准偏差	标准误差平均值	下限	上限
高工作负荷反应时- 低工作负荷反应时	1222.118	487.962	118.348	971.231	1473.004	10.326	16	0.000

P200配对比较	配对差值					t	自由度	Sig （双尾）
	平均值	标准偏差	标准误差平均值	差值 95% 置信区间
	平均值	标准偏差	标准误差平均值	下限	上限
Cz-低工作负荷- Cz-高工作负荷	−0.49371	2.33322	0.56589	−1.69333	0.70592	−0.872	16	0.396
C4-低工作负荷- C4-高工作负荷	0.46318	2.12281	0.51486	−0.62827	1.55463	0.900	16	0.382
F4-低工作负荷- F4-高工作负荷	0.59771	3.53089	0.85637	−1.21771	2.41312	0.698	16	0.495
Fz-低工作负荷- Fz-高工作负荷	−1.20006	2.81065	0.68168	−2.64516	.24505	−1.760	16	0.097

统计检验	F3高工作负荷-F3低工作负荷	C3高工作负荷-C3低工作负荷
Z	−2.249^b	−1.160^b
渐近显著性（双尾）	0.025	0.246

P300配对比较	配对差值					t	自由度	Sig （双尾）
	平均值	标准偏差	标准误差平均值	差值 95% 置信区间
	平均值	标准偏差	标准误差平均值	下限	上限
F3-低工作负荷- F3-高工作负荷	−2.78447	4.92782	1.19517	−5.31812	−0.25082	−2.330	16	0.033
C3-低工作负荷- C3-高工作负荷	−1.54994	4.15227	1.00707	−3.68484	0.58496	−1.539	16	0.143
Cz-低工作负荷- Cz-高工作负荷	−0.40153	3.36015	0.81496	−2.12916	1.32610	−0.493	16	0.629
C4-低工作负荷- C4-高工作负荷	1.24918	3.36829	0.81693	−0.48264	2.98099	1.529	16	0.146
F4-低工作负荷- F4-高工作负荷	2.53971	4.26399	1.03417	0.34736	4.73205	2.456	16	0.026
Fz-低工作负荷- Fz-高工作负荷	−0.89571	4.09549	0.99330	−3.00141	1.21000	−0.902	16	0.381

有人/无人机协同指挥员的事件相关电位特征

Event-related potential characteristics of human/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative commanders

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 34

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊威, 张栋, 任智, 杨书恒. 面向有人/无人机协同打击的智能决策方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(4): 1285-1299.
[2]	张进富, 曹云峰, 郭邦君, 王浩宇. 面向有人/无人机协同作战的体系架构正向建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(12): 3935-3951.