作战方案智能推荐方法综述

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.03.15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了更好地推进作战方案智能推荐技术的研究，整理了近年作战方案智能推荐的主要研究文献，并进行了系统综述。主要从传统方法与人工智能方法两个角度，分析当前主流的智能推荐方法。在传统方法方面，对涉及的主要定性定量方法进行了介绍；在人工智能方法方面，重点围绕基于搜索、基于推理和基于学习的智能推荐方法进行了梳理。此外，对4种方法的特点进行了阐述，并总结了各方法的优缺点以及适用场景。最后，分析总结了作战方案智能推荐方法的发展趋势。

关键词: 作战方案, 智能推荐, 人工智能方法

Abstract:

To better promote the research of the operational scheme intelligent recommendation techniques, the main literature on this topic in recent years is reviewed, and a systematic review is conducted. The current mainstream intelligent recommendation methods from the two aspects of the traditional and artificial intelligence methods are analyzed. In terms of the traditional method, the main qualitative and quantitative methods involved are introduced. In terms of the artificial intelligence method, search-based, reasoning-based and learning-based intelligence recommendation methods are reviewed. In addition, the characteristics of the four methods are elaborated, the advantages, disadvantages and applicable scenarios of each method are summarized. Finally, the development trends of intelligent recommendation methods for operational schemes are analyzed and summarized.

Key words: operational scheme, intelligent recommendation, artificial intelligence method

中图分类号:

E 919
TJ 01

焦鹏博, 罗志浩, 范长俊, 石建迈. 作战方案智能推荐方法综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 883-893.

Pengbo JIAO, Zhihao LUO, Changjun FAN, Jianmai SHI. Review of intelligent recommendation methods for operational scheme[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(3): 883-893.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表1

参考文献 96

1	宋有法. 一体化联合作战司令部工作[M]. 北京: 军事科学出版社, 2005.
	SONG Y F. Integrated joint operations command work[M]. Beijing: Military Science Publishing House, 2005.
2	赵国宏, 罗雪山. 作战任务规划系统研究[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2015, 1 (4): 391- 394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2024.02.013
	ZHAO G H, LUO X S. On operation mission planning system[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2015, 1 (4): 391- 394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2024.02.013
3	牛鹏飞, 孙硕. 对作战任务规划的理解与思考[C]//第6届中国指挥控制大会, 2018: 215−220.
	NIU P F, SUN S. Understanding and thinking on operation mission planning[C]//Proc. of the 6th China Conference on Command and Control, 2018: 215−220.
4	张仲伟, 曹雷, 陈希亮. 智能推荐在指挥控制系统中的应用思考[C]//第6届中国指挥控制大会, 2018: 23−26.
	ZHANG Z W, CAO L, CHEN X L. Application of intelligent recommendation in command and control system[C]//Proc. of the 6th China Conference on Command and Control, 2018: 23−26.
5	石鑫. 联合作战方案智能推荐系统关键技术研究与实现[D]. 北京: 中国电子科技集团公司电子科学研究院, 2020.
	SHI X. Research and implementation of key technologies of intelligent recommendation system for joint operations[D]. Beijing: China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, 2020.
6	LEE C E, BAEK J, SON J, et al. Deep AI military staff: cooperative battlefield situation awareness for commander’s decision making[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79 (6): 6040- 6069. doi: 10.1007/s11227-022-04882-w
7	ADOMAVICIUS G, TUZHILIN A. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions[J]. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2005, 17 (6): 734- 749. doi: 10.1109/tkde.2005.99
8	刘翔宇, 赵洪利, 杨海涛. 作战方案评估方法综述[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39 (8): 79- 84. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2018.08.017
	LIU X Y, ZHAO H L, YANG H Y. Overview of operational plan evaluation method[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39 (8): 79- 84. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2018.08.017
9	马悦, 吴琳, 薄其蒙, 等. 作战任务规划模型与求解方法综述[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47 (9): 1- 8，14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.09.001
	MA Y, WU L, BO Q M, et al. Overview of operation task planning models and solution methods[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47 (9): 1- 8，14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.09.001
10	杜伟伟, 陈小伟. 战术级任务规划方法研究综述[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45 (10): 3341- 3355.
	DU W W, CHEN X W. Review of tactical level task planning method[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45 (10): 3341- 3355.
11	RUSSELL S, NORVIG P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach[M]. 4th ed. London: Pearson, 2020.
12	张道延, 吴俊, 曹勇. 炮兵作战决策方案优选的方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2009, 34 (1): 112- 114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2009.01.031
	ZHANG D Y, WU J, CAO Y. An optimum seeking method of decision for artillery operation[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2009, 34 (1): 112- 114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2009.01.031
13	HENG Y, XU G, FAN X. A qualitative comprehensive assessment method of system safety based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy transform[J]. Sensors & Transducers, 2014, 167 (3): 142- 150.
14	张高峰, 吴亮. 复杂电磁环境下水面舰艇防空反导作战效能评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34 (3): 640- 650. doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0844
	ZHANG G F, WU L. Effectiveness evaluation of surface ship air defense and antimissile combat in complex electromagnetic environment[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34 (3): 640- 650. doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0844
15	田福平, 汶博, 熊志纲. 基于模糊综合评判与作战模拟的作战方案评估[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2016, 38 (3): 28- 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3819.2016.03.005
	TIAN F P, WEN B, XIONG Z G. Operation scheme evaluation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and battle simulation[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2016, 38 (3): 28- 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3819.2016.03.005
16	蔡志勇, 吕惠, 周睿, 等. 森林航空消防风险与作战方案的综合模糊评估[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2022, 18 (7): 201- 206. doi: 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.029
	CAI Z Y, LV H, ZHOU R, et al. Comprehensive fuzzy assessment on risk and combat plan of forest aviation fire fighting[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2022, 18 (7): 201- 206. doi: 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.029
17	DU Q F, SUN Z B, DUAN Z Y. The performance evaluation model of troops logistics construction based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[C]//Proc. of the IFAC Conference on Management and Control of Production and Logistics, 2013: 224−228.
18	HARJU M, LIESIO J, VIRTANEN K. Spatial multi-attribute decision analysis: axiomatic foundations and incomplete preference information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 275 (1): 167- 181. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.013
19	XU Z S, ZHOU W. Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2017, 16, 481- 503. doi: 10.1007/s10700-016-9257-5
20	SENNAROGLU B, CELEBI G V. A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2018, 59, 160- 173. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.022
21	方冰, 韩冰, 闻传花. 基于新型距离测度的概率犹豫模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37 (3): 729- 736. doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2020.1118
	FANG B, HAN B, WEN C H. Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making based on new distance measure[J]. Control and Decision, 2022, 37 (3): 729- 736. doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2020.1118
22	刘蜀. 联合对海打击兵力配备方案优选方法研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2022, 42 (3): 44- 48，147.
	LIU S. An optimization method of the consist of strike arm in joint anti-ship strike operation[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2022, 42 (3): 44- 48，147.
23	TIAN C X, TU J G, ZHANG N. Evaluation model of barrier breaking scheme based on intuitionistic fuzzy set and TOPSIS method[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Advanced Electronic Materials, Computers and Software Engineering, 2020: 111−115.
24	QU S, ZHENG Y, YAN H, et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation of antimissile early warning based on combination weighted TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1927 (1): 012007. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1927/1/012007
25	王宝成, 郑保华, 姜青山, 等. 基于群决策的作战方案优选模型研究[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2008, 23 (3): 321- 323，328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1522.2008.03.021
	WANG B C, ZHENG B H, JIANG Q S, et al. Research on operational project seeking model based on group decision-making method[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 2008, 23 (3): 321- 323，328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1522.2008.03.021
26	CHEN J C, ZHANG Y, WU L W, et al. An adaptive clustering-based algorithm for automatic path planning of heterogeneous UAVs[J]. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 23 (9): 16842- 16853. doi: 10.1109/tits.2021.3131473
27	佟海鹏, 徐海刚, 刘兆平. 基于熵权灰关联法的基地防空作战方案优选[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37 (1): 113- 115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2012.01.027
	TONG H P, XU H G, LIU Z P. The model of selecting naval base antiaircraft battle scheme based on the analysis of grey relevancy and entropy weight[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2012, 37 (1): 113- 115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2012.01.027
28	周中良, 程越, 寇添, 等. 基于两阶段DEA的空中突防兵力方案评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (4): 797- 804. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2018.04.13
	ZHOU Z L, CHENG Y, KOU T, et al. Air penetration combat forces plan evaluation method based on two-stage DEA model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (4): 797- 804. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2018.04.13
29	QU S, LIU J X, LIU J. A method for evaluating the effectiveness of antimissile early warning operations based on SEA[C]// Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Sensors, Electronics and Computer Engineering. , 2023: 1300−1303.
30	陈宇寒, 张宏. 基于PSO和扩展TOPSIS方法的COA优选方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35 (8): 2144- 2151.
	CHEN Y H, ZHANG H. Approach to COA selection based on PSO and extend TOPSIS[J]. System Engineering−Theory and Practice, 2015, 35 (8): 2144- 2151.
31	WAN L J, ZHONG Y, LI W. COA optimized selection method of aviation swarm based on DINs and DABC[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 65116- 65126. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982784
32	JUSTESEN N, RISI S. Continual online evolutionary planning for in-game build order adaptation in StarCraft[C]//Proc. of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2017: 187−194.
33	ZHANG K, ZHOU D Y, YANG Z, et al. A novel heterogeneous sensor-weapon-target cooperative assignment for ground-to-air defense by efficient evolutionary approaches[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 227373- 227398. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043667
34	杨震. 面向有人-无人平台协同决策的策略智能推荐技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018.
	YANG Z. Intelligent strategy recommendation technology research for manned-unmanned platform cooperative decision-making[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018.
35	GAJUREL A, LOUIS S J. Multiobjective multi unit-type neuroevolution for micro in RTS games[C]//Proc. of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, 2019: 169−170.
36	XU W Q, CHEN C, DING S X, et al. A bi-objective dynamic collaborative task assignment under uncertainty using modified MOEA/D with heuristic initialization[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 140, 112844. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112844
37	SILAV A, KARASAKAL E, KARASAKAL O. Bi-objective dynamic weapon-target assignment problem with stability measure[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 311, 1229- 1247. doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03919-8
38	JIANG T T, SU X C, HAN W. Optimization of support scheduling on deck of carrier aircraft based on improved differential evolution algorithm[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Control Science and Systems Engineering, 2017: 136−140.
39	马悦, 吴琳, 刘昀, 等. 作战任务优选建模及求解方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35 (3): 470- 483. doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-0989
	MA Y, WU L, LIU Y, et al. Research on modeling and solution method of operational tasks optimization[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35 (3): 470- 483. doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-0989
40	刘志超, 石章松, 姜涛, 等. 基于最小资源损耗的火力分配研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43 (6): 167- 170.
	LIU Z C, SHI Z S, JIANG T, et al. Research on method of weapon-target assignment based on the minimal resource loss[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43 (6): 167- 170.
41	SONUC E, SEN B, BAYIR S. A parallel simulated annealing algorithm for weapon-target assignment problem[J]. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2017, 8 (4): 87- 92. doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080412
42	CHANG X N, SHI J M, LUO Z H, et al. Adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm for multi-stage weapon target assignment problem[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 181, 109303. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109303
43	HE S, YUE S H, WANG G, et al. Target assignment algorithm for joint air defense operation based on spatial crowdsourcing mode[J]. Electronics, 2022, 11 (11): 1779. doi: 10.3390/electronics11111779
44	陈兴乐, 黄炎焱, 陈天德. 近海威胁目标威胁度评估与无人艇兵力分配[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47 (3): 73- 81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.03.013
	CHEN X L, HUANG Y Y, CHEN T D. Evaluation of threat degree of offshore threat targets and unmanned vessel force distribution[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47 (3): 73- 81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.03.013
45	PENG G, FANG Y W, CHEN S C, et al. A hybrid multi-objective discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for cooperative air combat DWTA[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications, 2017: 114−119.
46	WANG Y, LI J, HUANG W L, et al. Dynamic weapon target assignment based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy of discrete particle swarm[J]. China Communications, 2017, 14 (1): 169- 179. doi: 10.1109/cc.2017.7839767
47	常一哲, 李战武, 江洋溢, 等. 联合作战中航空兵作战规划研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2023, 48 (1): 135- 141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2023.01.021
	CHANG Y Z, LI Z W, JIANG Y Y, et al. Air arm operational planning during joint operations[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2023, 48 (1): 135- 141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2023.01.021
48	LIU X L, LIANG J C, LIU D Y, et al. Weapon-target assignment in unreliable peer-to-peer architecture based on adapted artificial bee colony algorithm[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2022, 16 (1): 161103. doi: 10.1007/s11704-021-0395-8
49	GAO Y, MA R, CAO H Y, et al. Research on task allocation of ground-air collaborative cluster based on two improved firefly algorithms[C]//Proc. of the 40th Chinese Control Conference, 2021: 1709−1714.
50	SMITH R G. The contract net protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver[J]. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 1980, 29 (12): 1104- 1113. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-934613-63-7.50039-5
51	姚亚宁, 杨风暴, 吉琳娜, 等. 基于迭代寻优策略合同网协议的任务分配算法[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2020, 42 (4): 51- 56.
	YAO Y N, YANG F B, JI L N, et al. Task allocation algorithm for battlefield situation reconstruction[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2020, 42 (4): 51- 56.
52	ZHEN Z Y, WEN L D, WANG B L, et al. Improved contract network protocol algorithm based cooperative target allocation of heterogeneous UAV swarm[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 119, 107054. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107054
53	BAI X, FIELBAUM A, KRONMULLER M, et al. Group-based distributed auction algorithms for multi-robot task assignment[J]. IEEE Trans. on Automation Science and Engineering, 2022, 20 (2): 1292- 1303. doi: 10.1109/iccect60629.2024.10545932
54	黎子芬, 李相民, 代进进, 等. 编队对地动态联合火力分配建模与仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2013, 25 (12): 2900- 2905. doi: 10.16182/j.cnki.joss.2013.12.012
	LI Z F, LI X M, DAI J J, et al. Research of modeling and simulation on formation attack to ground dynamic joint fire distribution[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2013, 25 (12): 2900- 2905. doi: 10.16182/j.cnki.joss.2013.12.012
55	陈向勇, 公茂水, 井元伟. 基于D-S证据理论的不完全信息作战方案优选[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 33 (8): 1069- 1073.
	CHEN X Y, GONG M S, JING Y W. Selection of operation schemes with incomplete information based on D-S evidence theory[J]. Journal of Northeastern University （Natural Science）, 2012, 33 (8): 1069- 1073.
56	梁汝鹏, 邓克波, 毛泽湘, 等. 基于军事知识图谱的作战预案语义匹配方法研究[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2019, 5 (2): 115- 120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-0204.2019.02.0115
	LIANG R P, DENG K B, MAO Z X, et al. A semantic matching method of combat plan based on military knowledge graph[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2019, 5 (2): 115- 120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-0204.2019.02.0115
57	CHEN X J, JIA S B, XIANG Y. A review: knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 141, 112948. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948
58	WANG Z K, LI L J, ZENG D. SRGCN: graph-based multi-hop reasoning on knowledge graphs[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 454, 280- 290. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.05.016
59	CHEN D, XIANG P C, JIA F Y. Performance measurement of operation and maintenance for infrastructure mega-project based on entropy method and DS evidence theory[J]. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2022, 13 (2): 101591. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.09.018
60	公茂水. 基于D-S证据理论的不完全信息作战方案优选方法研究[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2011.
	GONG M S. Optimization operation schemes with incomplete information based on D-S theory[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2011.
61	YAO Z X, LI M, CHEN Z J, et al. Mission decision-making method of multi-aircraft cooperatively attacking multi-target based on game theoretic framework[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29 (6): 1685- 1694. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.09.006
62	CHEN J, TENG Z. Study on operational plan by case-based-reasoning[C]//Proc. of 2016 International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System, 2016: 409−413.
63	韩靖, 陆惠丰. 大型综合交通枢纽应急预案匹配技术研究[J]. 交通与运输, 2018, (2): 23- 26，41.
	HAN J, LU H F. Research on matching technology of emergency plan for large-scale comprehensive transportation hub[J]. Traffic & Transportation, 2018, (2): 23- 26，41.
64	闻爽爽. W煤矿水灾事故应急预案智能推荐研究[D]. 阜新: 辽宁工程技术大学, 2022.
	WEN S S. Research on intelligent recommendation of emergency plan for flood accident in W coal mine[D]. Fuxin: Liaoning Technical University, 2022.
65	XIE L L, WU S S, CHEN Y, et al. A case-based reasoning approach for solving schedule delay problems in prefabricated construction projects[J]. Automation in Construction, 2023, 154, 105028. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105028
66	ZHAI C G, KANG Y, LUO M. On the application of computer war chess technology in the support of military supplies[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies, 2020: 103−108.
67	YUKSK B, GUNER G, KARALI H, et al. Intelligent wargaming approach to increase course of action effectiveness in military operations[C]/Proc. of the AIAA SCITECH Forum, 2023: 2531.
68	LI J Q, TAN C L, ZHOU Q H, et al. Research on intelligent recommendation of maintenance scheme based on multi-modal data learning[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2637, 012012. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2637/1/012012
69	罗俊仁, 张万鹏, 陈璟. 博弈对抗视角下联合全域指控行动方案推荐初探[C]//第10届中国指挥控制大会, 2022: 189−197.
	LUO J R, ZHANG W P, CHEN J. Preliminary research on COA recommendation in joint all-domain command and control from the perspective of game confrontation[C]//Proc. of the 10th China Conference on Command and Control, 2022: 189−197.
70	杨新民, 付建苏. 基于神经网络的作战方案快速生成方法[C]//第6届中国指挥控制大会, 2018: 355−358.
	YANG X M, FU J S. Fast generation method of combat plan based on neural network[C]//Proc. of the 6th China Conference on Command and Control, 2018: 355−358.
71	AFSAR M M, CRUMP T, FAR B. Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: a survey[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2022, 55 (7): 145.
72	江萧君, 李为民, 肖金科. 基于参数优化的SVM联合作战战场建设方案优选[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2017, 42 (7): 110- 113，123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2017.07.024
	JIANG X J, LI W M, XIAO J K. Parameter-optimized SVM based battlefield building plan optimization selection in joint operations[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2017, 42 (7): 110- 113，123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2017.07.024
73	DAI Y Z, GUO J, WANG Y S, et al. Combat effectiveness evaluation of real combat exercise based on data-driven[C]//Proc. of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2018: 2433−2438.
74	ZHAO L H, WANG B, HE J, et al. SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method of ECM operational disposition scheme[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (3): 600- 611. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000058
75	张天鹏, 刘铁林, 高萍. 基于PDPC-决策树的装备编配方案优选方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47 (2): 72- 76，81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.02.012
	ZHANG T P, LIU T L, GAO P. Optimal selection method of equipment allocation scheme based on PDPC-decision tree[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47 (2): 72- 76，81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.02.012
76	LI J, WANG R, NANROGMA S, et al. Genetic fuzzy tree based learning algorithm toward the weapon-target assignment problem[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems, 2022: 1677−1686.
77	BARALDI P, PODOFILLINI L, MKRTCHYAN L, et al. Comparing the treatment of uncertainty in bayesian networks and fuzzy expert systems used for a human reliability analysis application[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 138, 176- 193. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.016
78	黄敏敏. 高速公路交通应急救援预案智能匹配方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015.
	HUANG M M. Research on intelligent matching method of traffic emergency preplan on free way[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2015.
79	BIDYUK P, GOZHYJ A, KALININA I. Probabilistic inference based on LS-method modifications in decision making problems[C]//Proc. of the 15th International Scientific Conference, 2020: 422−433.
80	李聪, 李俊杰, 关爱杰. 基于潜在权重自适应分配的作战方案评估模型[J]. 电光与控制, 2022, 29 (2): 49- 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2022.02.011
	LI C, LI J J, GUAN A J. An evaluation model of operation scheme based on adaptive allocation of latent weights[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2022, 29 (2): 49- 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2022.02.011
81	WANG Y H, WANG J G, FAN S P, et al. Quick intention identification of an enemy aerial target through information classification processing[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023, 132, 108005. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.108005
82	刘祖煌, 程启月. 径向基神经网络的联合作战方案评估仿真[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2013, 38 (1): 14- 17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2013.01.004
	LIU Z H, CHENG Q Y. Research on evaluation model of joint operation scheme based on RBF neural network[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2013, 38 (1): 14- 17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2013.01.004
83	孔衍, 刘学, 杨建. 基于遗传神经网络的联合作战方案评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2019, 44 (5): 22- 25，30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2019.05.005
	KONG Y, LIU X, YANG J. Research on evaluation of joint operation scheme based on genetic neural network[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2019, 44 (5): 22- 25，30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2019.05.005
84	WANG T, FU L Y, WEI Z X, et al. Unmanned ground weapon target assignment based on deep Q-learning network with an improved multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 117, 105612. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105612
85	SETHY H, PATEL A, PADMANABHAN V. Real time strategy games: a reinforcement learning approach[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 54, 257- 264. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.030
86	SON S B, KIM D H. Searching for scalable networks in unmanned aerial vehicle infrastructure using spatio-attack course-of-action[J]. Drones, 2023, 7 (4): 249. doi: 10.3390/drones7040249
87	STANESCU M, BARRIGA N A, HESS A, et al. Evaluating real-time strategy game states using convolutional neural networks[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, 2016.
88	陈东林, 赵利佳, 赵岳, 等. 基于深度神经网络的作战方案辅助生成研究[C]//第10届中国指挥控制大会, 2022: 249−253.
	CHEN D L, ZHAO L J, ZHAO Y, et al. Assistant generation of combat plan based on deep neural networks[C]// Proc. of the 10th China Conference on command and Control, 2022: 249−253.
89	BARRIGA N A, STANESCU M, BURO M. Combining strategic learning and tactical search in real-time strategy games[C]//Proc. of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 2017: 9−15.
90	马也, 范文慧, 常天庆. 基于智能算法的无人集群防御作战方案优化方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43 (6): 1415- 1425. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0339
	MA Y, FAN W H, CHANG T Q. Optimization method of unmanned swarm defensive combat scheme based on intelligent algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43 (6): 1415- 1425. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0339
91	何兆一, 刘海颖, 黄魁华, 等. 面向联合全域作战的海上无人集群协同防御行动策略设计[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2022, 8 (1): 44- 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-0204.2022.01.0044
	HE Z Y, LIU H Y, HUANG K H, et al. Strategy design of maritime unmanned cluster cooperative defense for joint all-domain operations[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2022, 8 (1): 44- 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-0204.2022.01.0044
92	USUNIER N, SYNNAEVE G, LIN Z M, et al. Episodic exploration for deep deterministic policies: an application to starcraft micromanagement tasks[EB/OL]. [2023-09-25]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02993.
93	FOERSTER J, NARDELLI N, FARQUHAR G. Stabilising experience replay for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017: 1146−1155.
94	PENG P, WEN Y, YANG Y, et al. Multiagent bidirectionally-coordinated nets: emergence of human-level coordination in learning to play starCraft combat games[EB/OL]. [2023-09-25]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.10069.
95	金欣, 王新年, 蔡飞, 等. 基于情境感知和偏好学习的作战方案智能推荐方法[C]//第9届中国指挥控制大会, 2021: 18−23.
	JIN X, WANG X N, CAI F, et al. Plan recommendation method based on context awareness and preference learning[C]//Proc. of the 9th China Conference on command and Control, 2021: 18−23.
96	FAZEKAS F. AI and military operations’ planning[M]//Artificial intelligence and its contexts: security, business and governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021: 79−91.

方法	优点	缺点	适用场景
传统方法	原理与结构简单，便于理解和使用；理论性与客观性较强，推导过程明确可见	过于依赖假设条件和专家判断因素，难以揭示作战方案内部关联关系；数学公式的建立与推导需通过人工完成，复杂的关系会导致公式难以建立	评估指标体系完备，对人为判断因素不敏感，具有确定备选方案；对象间的关系较为明确，易于使用公式描述，静态环境下的问题
基于搜索的方法	具有较强的通用性且速度快，易于理解和实现，可对带有约束限制的潜在方案进行搜索优化	难以将不确定性因素与动态场景考虑在内，效率与问题复杂程度相关，求解结果质量不稳定，只能逼近到全局最优解	考虑作战约束与目标，具有潜在可搜索作战方案，静态环境下的确定性问题
基于推理的方法	灵活性强且执行效率高，能够处理不确定性因素的影响	规则制定需要大量人力与领域知识，且规则合理性影响到结果质量，样本数据不足难以发挥其优势	考虑多属性、多目标的方案特征，规则较为完备且具有足够的样本数量
基于学习的方法	具有灵活的结构以及良好的非线性表达能力，改善了人为假设和主观因素对结果的影响，推荐过程可自动化完成	模型构建与训练过程需要大量时间，对训练样本数据的完备性和充足性要求较高，算法的性能高度依赖算力	作战规则明确、样本数据充足且完备，对时效性要求高的动态问题

[1]	徐任杰, 宫琳, 朱明仁, 谢剑, 俞景嘉. 不确定信息下考虑相关性与多样性的作战方案推荐方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3115-3123.
[2]	汪民乐. 导弹力量作战行动规划综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(12): 2825-2832.
[3]	李皓, 常国岑, 孙鹏. 基于Agent的作战方案自动生成系统研究[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(1): 134-136.
[4]	李皓, 常国岑, 孙鹏. 基于Agent的作战方案自动生成系统研究[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(01): 134-136.