面向能力的体系架构开发与建模方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.10.20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

体系能力的需求捕获与方案设计验证是复杂体系正向设计中的重要内容。基于统一架构框架，提出一种以能力为主线的体系架构开发和建模方法，并通过森林救火示例模型说明其应用过程。该方法包括定义体系任务问题、分析能力需求、识别能力差距、设计并验证能力的解决方案等步骤，通过体系架构建模从多个视角综合描述体系能力与其他体系要素的定性和定量关系，建立追溯线索，以辅助提高体系工程中方案设计的效率和管理复杂性的能力。

关键词: 统一架构框架, 体系能力, 能力需求, 体系工程

Abstract:

System of systems capability requirement capture and capability solution design verification are important in complex system of systems forward design. A system of systems architecture development and modeling approach with capability as the main thread based on unified architecture framework is proposed, with a forest fire fighting example model to illustrate its application process. The approach includes steps to define system of systems mission problems, analyze capability requirements, identify capability gaps, and design and verify capability solutions. Through system of systems architecture modeling, it describes the qualitative and quantitative relationships between capabilities and other architecture elements from multiple viewpoints, and form the traceability thread, assisting in improving the efficiency of solution development and enhancing the capability to manage complexity in system of systems engineering.

Key words: unified architecture framework, system of systems capability, capability requirements, system of systems engineering

中图分类号:

TP14

袁家骏, 刘森, 王乾, 肖楚琬. 面向能力的体系架构开发与建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(10): 3485-3502.

Jiajun Yuan, Sen Liu, Qian Wang, Chuwan Xiao. Approach for capability-oriented system of systems architecture development and modeling[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(10): 3485-3502.

图/表 25

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图10

图9

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

图18

图19

图20

图21

图22

图23

图24

图25

参考文献 31

1	Jamshidi M. Systems of systems engineering: principles and applications[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017.
2	Walden D D, Roedler G J, Forsberg K, et al. Systems engineering handbook: a guide for system life cycle processes and activities[M]. San Diego: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
3	Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Systems and Software Engineering. Systems engineering guide for systems of systems[R]. Washington, D. C. : Pentagon, 2008.
4	李德林, 张雨晨, 王俊, 等. 基于统一架构框架（UAF）的体系协同作战架构建模研究[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2024, 46 (4): 8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3819.2024.04.002
5	张崇峰, 闫雪娇, 卜勋华, 等. 基于模型的月面活动体系跨层级设计与集成验证方法[J]. 宇航学报, 2025, 46 (9): 1786. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2025.09.006
6	崔瑞靖, 孙建彬, 杨克巍, 等. 基于UAF的装备作战试验指标体系构建方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47 (5): 1536. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.05.16
7	陆志洋, 何舒, 杜君南, 等. 基于UAF的航母编队防空反导作战体系结构建模[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2023, 43 (11): 96.
8	Li S, Tao L, Fu T, et al. Research on new power standard system planning method based on UAF modeling[C]// 4th International Signal Processing, Communications and Engineering Management Conference, 2024: 698.
9	Hause M, Kihlstrom L O. Modeling enterprise software with UAF[C]//INCOSE International Symposium, 2024: 2452.
10	Adejokun A P, Hause M, System M B, et al. Preserving and sharing knowledge – extending the UAF security views with libraries, patterns and profiles[C]// INCOSE International Symposium, 2023: 98.
11	Hause M. The unified profile for DoDAF/MODAF (UPDM) enabling systems of systems on many levels[C]// IEEE International Systems Conference, 2010: 426.
12	OMG. Unified architecture framework (UAF) domain metamodel version 1.2 [EB/OL]. [2025-06-11]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.2.
13	OMG. Unified architecture framework modeling language (UAFML) version 1.2 [EB/OL]. [2025-06-11]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.2.
14	OMG. Enterprise architecture guide for UAF version 1.2 [EB/OL]. [2025-06-11]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.2.
15	Cherfa I, Belloir N, Sadou S, et al. Systems of systems: from mission definition to architecture description[J]. Systems Engineering, 2019, 22 (6): 437. doi: 10.1002/sys.21523
16	US DOD. Mission engineering guide [EB/OL]. [2025-06-11]. https://ac.cto.mil/engineering.
17	US DOD. Department of defense mission engineering guide version 2.0 [EB/OL]. [2025-06-11]. https://ac.cto.mil/mission-engineering.
18	US DOD. Mission architecture style guide version 1.0 [EB/OL]. [2025-06-11]. https://ac.cto.mil/mission-engineering.
19	Martin J N, Alvarez K E. Using the unified architecture framework in support of mission engineering activities[C]// INCOSE International Symposium, 2023: 1156.
20	Gagliardi M, Hause M C, Martin J N, et al. Darth Vader's secret weapon: implementing mission engineering with UAF[C]// INCOSE International Symposium, 2024: 1719.
21	Martin J, Axelsson J, Carlson J, et al. The capability concept in the context of systems of systems: a systematic literature review[C]// IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering, 2022.
22	Axelsson J, Svenson P. On the concepts of capability and constituent system independence in systems-of-systems[C]// 17th Annual System of Systems Engineering Conference, 2022: 247.
23	肖楚琬, 袁家骏, 王丹. 基于复杂组织理论的军队体系能力概念建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48 (1): 249. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.01.22
24	Martin J N. Extending UAF for model-based capability planning and enterprise portfolio management[C]//INCOSE International Symposium, 2022: 15.
25	Torkjazi M, Davila-andino A J, Alghamdi A, et al. UAF strategic planning for enterprises[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10, 123549. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3224456
26	ISO/IEC 19514. OMG systems modeling language version 1.6[S]. Nedham: Object Management Group, 2019.
27	Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R. A practical guide to SysML: the systems modeling language[M]. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann, 2014.
28	Bankauskaite J, Morkevicius A. An approach: sysml-based automated completeness evaluation of the system requirements specification[C]// SYSTEM, 2018: 66.
29	Morkevicius A, Aleksandraviciene A, Strolia Z. System verification and validation approach using the magicgrid framework[J]. INSIGHT, 2023, 26 (1): 51. doi: 10.1002/inst.12429
30	Bankauskaite J, Strolia Z, Morkevicius A. Automated trade study analysis based on dynamic requirements verification in the model-based system engineering[C]//INCOSE International Symposium, 2021: 1256.
31	Alghamdi A, Torkjazi M, Davila-Andino A J, et al. Employing UAF inter-domain traceability for performance and effectiveness evaluation[C]// IEEE International Systems Conference, 2023.

[1]	陈志伟. 体系工程驱动的装备体系可靠性设计流程与技术框架[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(9): 3038-3048.
[2]	王林尧, 蒙涛, 孙书剑, 李任飞. 基于MBSE的使命线程设计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(4): 1230-1242.
[3]	吴蕊, 潘积远, 李富强. 基于能力的数据链体系建模与仿真[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(3): 986-999.
[4]	肖楚琬, 袁家骏, 王丹. 基于复杂组织理论的军队体系能力概念建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(1): 249-256.
[5]	王纪凯, 豆亚杰, 李婧, 董奕君, 姜江, 谭跃进. 智能决策在军事体系工程的研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(8): 2581-2599.
[6]	李明华, 潘星, 张耐民, 胡彭炜, 党宇恒. 装备体系可靠性理论及航天工程实践[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(7): 2304-2313.
[7]	崔瑞靖, 孙建彬, 杨克巍, 李明浩. 基于UAF的装备作战试验指标体系构建方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1536-1550.
[8]	尚晓凡, 薛奇, 高欣, 刘同. 面向能力需求的装备组合配置分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(5): 1575-1581.
[9]	张玉婷, 杨镜宇. 基于XGboost和线性回归的军队体系建设“成本-能力”组合优化模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(2): 486-495.
[10]	张玉婷, 杨镜宇. 基于能力的国防资源分配方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 599-604.
[11]	卫继承, 张娟, 杨文雅, 马岚岭, 张航. 基于DoDAF的低慢小飞行器综合处置体系架构设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(1): 162-172.
[12]	王涛, 李小波, 张杰, 何华, 王维平. 基于“项目-能力”关联的战略规划项目体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(8): 2295-2304.
[13]	徐向前, 豆亚杰, 钱立炜, 姜江, 杨克巍, 谭跃进. 作战体系能力需求敏捷开发方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(10): 3139-3148.
[14]	姜江, 金前程, 徐雪明, 侯帅, 李际超. 智能化时代国防科技体系工程初探[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1880-1888.
[15]	钱立炜, 徐向前, 豆亚杰, 谭跃进. 基于RIMER方法的体系能力需求推荐方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3719-3727.