基于眼动指标和熵权-TOPSIS空战控制能力评估

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.06.18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了更加科学、精准地评估指挥控制人员的空战控制能力, 采用眼动追踪技术, 基于眼动、时间、准确率等指标建立了量化评估模型, 并利用熵权-逼近理想解排序(technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution, TOPSIS)法对空战控制能力进行了综合评估。该模型以眼动指标作为重要评估依据, 将客观赋权的熵权法与多属性决策TOPSIS法相结合, 解决了传统评估方式受主观影响较大的问题, 并结合实例分析验证了其有效性和可行性, 为今后指挥控制人员的训练评估提供了合理的手段。

关键词: 空战控制, 眼动, 熵权, 逼近理想解排序法, 评估

Abstract:

To evaluate the air combat control ability of the command and control personnel more scientifically and accurately, eye tracking technology is used to establish a quantitative evaluation model based on eye movement, time and accuracy indexes, and the entropy weight-technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is used to comprehensively evaluate the air combat control ability. The model takes eye movement indexes as an important evaluation basis, combining the entropy weight method of objective weighting with the TOPSIS method of multi-attribute decision-making, and solves the problem that the traditional evaluation method is greatly influenced by subjectivity, and verifies its effectiveness and feasibility with case analysis, providing a reasonable way for training and evaluating of the command and control personnel in the future.

Key words: air combat control, eye movement, entropy weight, technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), evaluation

中图分类号:

田晨智, 宋敏, 薛瑞君, 田继伟. 基于眼动指标和熵权-TOPSIS空战控制能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(6): 1743-1754.

Chenzhi TIAN, Min SONG, Ruijun XUE, Jiwei TIAN. Air combat control capability evaluation based on eye movement index and entropy weighted-TOPSIS[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(6): 1743-1754.

图/表 19

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

图2

表5

图3

图4

表6

图5

图6

表7

表8

表9

图7

表10

图8

图9

参考文献 36

1	刘彦茂, 高茂林, 贺中敏, 等. 指挥引导学[M]. 西安: 西北工业出版社, 2021.
	LIU Y M , GAO M L , HE Z M , et al. Command and guidance[M]. Xi'an: Press of Northwest Industry, 2021.
2	FOWLEY J W. Undergraduate air battle manager training: prepared to achieve combat mission ready[R]. Montgomery: Air Command and Staff College, 2016.
3	LUPPO A , RUDNENKO V . Competence assessment of air tra-ffic control personnel[J]. Proсeedings of the National Aviation University, 2012, 51 (2): 47- 50.
4	PICANO J J, ROLAND R R, WILLIAMS T J, et al. Assessment of elite operational personnel[M]//STEPHEN V B, PAUL T B. Handbook of military psychology. Cham: Springer, 2017: 277-289.
5	邱玮, 张增磊, 田文祥, 等. 基于层次分析法和模糊综合评判的装备保障人员能力评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39 (4): 108- 113.
	QIU W , ZHANG Z L , TIAN W X , et al. Ability evaluation of equipment support staff based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy synthentic[J]. Journal of Weapon Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39 (4): 108- 113.
6	宋宜平, 董健, 董振旗, 等. 基于灰色熵权法的装备保障人员能力评估模型研究[J]. 价值工程, 2013, 32 (31): 110- 112.
	SONG Y P , DONG J , DONG Z Q , et al. Study on the capability assessment model for equipment support personnel based on grey entropy weight method[J]. Value Engineering, 2013, 32 (31): 110- 112.
7	柴志君, 欧阳中辉. 着舰回收引导任务指挥人员能力评估[J]. 兵工自动化, 2020, 39 (12): 1- 4.1-4, 11
	CHAI Z J , OUYANG Z H . Capability assessment of aircraft landing command personnel[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2020, 39 (12): 1- 4.1-4, 11
8	MODI N , SINGH J . Role of eye tracking inhuman computer interaction[J]. ECS Transactions, 2022, 107 (1): 8211- 8218. doi: 10.1149/10701.8211ecst
9	HAREZLAK K , KASPROWSKI P . Application of eye tracking in medicine: a survey, researchissues and challenges[J]. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2018, 65, 176- 190. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.04.006
10	FRIEDL K E . Military applications of soldier physiological monitoring[J]. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2018, 21 (11): 1147- 1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.06.004
11	WETZEL P A, ANDERSON K, GRETCHEN M, et al. Instructor use of eye position based feedback for pilot training[C]//Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1998, 42(20): 1388-1392.
12	LI W C, JAKUBOWSKI J, BRAITHWAITE G, et al. Did you see what your trainee pilot is seeing? Integrated eye tracker in the simulator to improve instructors' monitoring performance[C]//Proc. of the International Workshop on Eye-Tracking in Avi-ation, 2020: 39-46.
13	牛四芳, 娄振山, 卢天娇. Su-30飞行员在模拟飞行任务中的眼动指标分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2013, 13 (34): 6776- 6780.
	NIU S F , LOU Z S , LU T J . Analysis on eye movement indices based on simulated flight task of fighter pilots[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2013, 13 (34): 6776- 6780.
14	YOUNG L R , SHEENA D . Survey of eye movement recording methods[J]. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1975, 7 (5): 397- 429.
15	JANA C , PAL M . A dynamical hybrid method to design decision making process based on GRA approach for multiple attributes problem[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 100 (82): 104203.
16	ZHANG H , HE X Q , MITRI H . Fuzzy comprehensive evalu-ation of virtual reality mine safety training system[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 120, 341- 351.
17	LINSTONE H A. The delphi technique[M]//VINCENT T C, JERYL L M, PIETER J M S, et al. Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis. Berlin: Springer, 1985: 621-649.
18	BEHZADIAN M , OTAGHSARA S K , YAZDANI M , et al. A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39 (17): 13051- 13069.
19	VAVREK R . Evaluation of the impact of selected weighting methods on the results of the TOPSIS technique[J]. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 2019, 18 (6): 1821- 1843.
20	LI Z , LUO Z J , WANG Y , et al. Suitability evaluation system for the shallow geothermal energy implementation in region by entropy weight method and TOPSIS method[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 184, 564- 576.
21	宋敏, 李全胜, 李昉, 等. 空中作战指挥控制[M]. 西安: 西北工业出版社, 2021.
	SONG M , LI Q S , LI F , et al. Air combat command and control[M]. Xi'an: Press of Northwest Industry, 2021.
22	李全胜, 唐佳, 宋敏, 等. 空中作战指挥控制模拟训练手册[M]. 西安: 西北工业出版社, 2021.
	LI Q S , TANG J , SONG M , et al. Air combat command and control simulation training manual[M]. Xi'an: Press of Nor-thwest Industry, 2021.
23	SWELLER J . Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning[J]. Cognitive Science, 1988, 12 (2): 257- 285.
24	PRIVITERA C M , STARK L W . Algorithms for defining visual regions-of-interest: comparison with eye fixations[J]. IEEE Trans.on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000, 22 (9): 970- 982.
25	HENDERSON J M , FERREIRA F . Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attentionand eye movement control[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990, 16 (3): 417- 429.
26	HESS E H , POLT J M . Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem solving[J]. Science, 1964, 143 (3611): 1190- 1192.
27	薛耀锋, 李卓玮. 基于眼动追踪技术的在线学习认知负荷量化模型研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2019, 29 (7): 59- 65.
	XUE Y F , LI Z W . Research on online learning cognitive load quantitative model based on eye tracking technology[J]. Mo-dern Educational Technology, 2019, 29 (7): 59- 65.
28	LIU X F , ZHOU X X , ZHU B Z , et al. Measuring the maturity of carbon market in China: an entropy-based TOPSIS approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 229, 94- 103.
29	CHEN P Y . Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 168, 114186.
30	WU H W , LI E , SUN Y , et al. Research on the operation safety evaluation of urban rail stations based on the improved TOPSIS method and entropy weight method[J]. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 2021, 20, 100262.
31	NASRABADI H R, ALONSO J M. Modular streaming pipeline of eye/head tracking data using tobii pro glasses 3[EB/OL]. [2022-09-10]. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.02.506255v1.
32	NIEHORSTER D C , ANDERSSON R , NYSTRÖM M . Titta: a toolbox for creating psych toolbox and psychopy experiments with Tobii eye trackers[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2020, 52 (5): 1970- 1979.
33	STEINDORF L , RUMMEL J . Do your eyes giveyou away? A validation study of eye-movement measures used as indicators for mindless reading[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2020, 52 (1): 162- 176.
34	POMPLUN M, SUNKARA S. Pupil dilation as an indicator of cognitive workload in human-computer interaction[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on HCI, 2003: 542-546.
35	POOLE A, BALL L J. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: current status and future prospects, 2005[D]. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2005.
36	NOUDOOST B , CHANG M H , STEINMETZ N A , et al. Top-down control of visual attention[J]. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2010, 20 (2): 183- 190.

子阶段	指标	含义
感知子阶段S_1r	V_1rguide/(件/秒)	ABMs感知关键态势的敏捷度
	m₁/件	“ABMs感知关键态势”这一事件
	t_1rtotal/s	ABMs空战控制的感知总时间
	t_1ra, t_1rb, t_1rc/s	ABMs对关键态势的发现时间、反应时间、感知时间
	T_1r1, T_1r2, T_1r3, T_1r4/s	关键态势的出现时刻, ABMs对关键态势的首次注视时刻、感知起始时刻、感知完成时刻
	w_1ra, w_1rb, w_1rc/%	各时段所占权重
分配子阶段S_2k	V_2kguide/(件/秒)	ABMs给我机分配目标的敏捷度
	m₂/件	“ABMs给我机分配目标”这一事件
	t_2ktotal/s	ABMs给我机分配目标的总时间
	t_2ka, t_2kb, t_2kc/s	ABMs对目标的发现时间、反应时间、分配时间
	T_2k1, T_2k2, T_2k3, T_2k4/s	目标的出现时刻, ABMs对目标的首次注视时刻、分配起始时刻、完成时刻
	w_2ka, w_2kb, w_2kc/%	各时段所占权重
通报子阶段S_3u	V_3uguide/(件/秒)	ABMs对威胁目标进行通报的敏捷度
	m₃/件	“ABMs对威胁目标进行通报”这一事件
	t_3utotal/s	ABMs对威胁目标进行通报的总时间
	t_3ua, t_3ub, t_3uc/s	ABMs对威胁目标的发现时间、反应时间、通报时间
	T_3u1, T_3u2, T_3u3, T_3u4/s	威胁目标的出现时刻, ABMs对威胁目标的首次注视时刻、通报起始时刻、通报完成时刻
	w_3ua, w_3ub, w_3uc/%	各时段所占权重
处置子阶段S_4g	V_4gguide/(件/秒)	ABMs处置特情的敏捷度
	m₄/件	“ABMs处置特情”这一事件
	t_4gtotal/s	ABMs处置特情的总时间
	t_4ga, t_4gb, t_4gc/s	ABMs对特情的发现时间、反应时间、处置时间
	T_4g1, T_4g2, T_4g3, T_4g4/s	特情的出现时刻, ABMs对特情的首次注视时刻、处置起始时刻、处置完成时刻
	w_4ga, w_4gb, w_4gc/%	各时段所占权重

子阶段	指标/%	含义
感知子阶段S_1r	R_1raccuracy	ABMs感知关键态势的准确性
	q_1r1, q_1r2, …, q_1rn	ABMs感知关键态势时各信息要素的正确率
	w_1r1, w_1r2, …, w_1rn	各信息要素所占权重
分配子阶段S_2k	R_2kaccuracy	ABMs给我机分配敌机的准确性
	q_2k1, q_2k2, …, q_2kn	ABMs给我机分配敌机时每种分配方案的正确率
	w_2k1, w_2k2, …, w_2kn	每种分配方案所占权重
通报子阶段S_3u	R_3uaccuracy	ABMs通报威胁目标的准确性
	q_3u1, q_3u2, …, q_3un	ABMs通报威胁目标时各信息要素的正确率
	w_3u1, w_3u2, …, w_3un	各信息要素所占权重
处置子阶段S_4g	R_4gaccuracy	ABMs处置特情的准确性
	q_4g1, q_4g2, …, q_4gn	ABMs处置特情时各信息要素的正确率
	w_4g1, w_4g2, …, w_4gn	各信息要素所占权重

子阶段	指标	含义
感知子阶段S_1r	E_1rattention/%	ABMs对关键态势的关注度
	t_1rfixation, t_1rsum/s	ABMs对关键态势的注视时间, 关键态势出现的总时间
	T_1r5, T_1r6/s	关键态势的出现时刻、结束时刻
分配子阶段S_2k	E_2kattention/%	ABMs给我机分配敌机的关注度
	t_2kfixation, t_2ksum/s	ABMs对敌机的注视时间、分配总时间
	T_2k5, T_2k6/s	ABMs给我机分配敌机的首次注视时刻、完成时刻
通报子阶段S_3u	E_3uattention/%	ABMs对威胁目标进行通报的关注度
	t_3ufixation, t_3usum/s	ABMs对威胁目标的注视时间、通报总时间
	T_3u5, T_3u6/s	ABMs对威胁目标进行通报的起始时刻、完成时刻
处置子阶段S_4g	E_4gattention/%	ABMs处置特情的关注度
	t_4gfixation, t_4gsum/s	ABMs对特情的注视时间、处置总时间
	T_4g5, T_4g6/s	特情的出现时刻, ABMs处置特情的完成时刻

子阶段	指标	含义
感知子阶段S_1r	L_1rload/(个/秒·毫米)	关键态势给ABMs带来的认知负荷
	t_1rfixation, t_1rsum/s	ABMs对关键态势的注视时间, 关键态势出现的总时间
	C_1r/(个/秒)	单位时间注视点数
	D_1rpupil-work, D_pupil-relax/mm	ABMs在工作状态和放松状态下的左眼瞳孔直径
分配子阶段S_2k	L_2kload/(个/秒·毫米)	ABMs给我机分配敌机产生的认知负荷
	t_2kfixation, t_2ksum/s	ABMs对敌机的注视时间、分配总时间
	C_2k/(个/秒)	单位时间注视点数
	D_2kpupil-work, D_pupil-relax/mm	ABMs在工作状态和放松状态下的左眼瞳孔直径
通报子阶段S_3u	L_3uload/(个/秒·毫米)	ABMs对威胁目标进行通报产生的认知负荷
	t_3ufixation, t_3usum/s	ABMs对威胁目标的注视时间、通报总时间
	C_3u/(个/秒)	单位时间注视点数
	D_3upupil-work, D_pupil-relax/mm	ABMs在工作状态和放松状态下的左眼瞳孔直径
处置子阶段S_4g	L_4gload/(个/秒·毫米)	ABMs处置特情产生的认知负荷
	t_4gfixation, t_4gsum/s	ABMs对特情的注视时间、处置总时间
	C_4g/(个/秒)	单位时间注视点数
	D_4gpupil-work, D_pupil-relax/mm	ABMs在工作状态和放松状态下的左眼瞳孔直径

人员	年龄	学历	工作年限/年	执行任务量
X₁	33	本科	10	19
X₂	35	本科	12	10
X₃	28	本科	5	7
X₄	30	硕士	7	13
X₅	29	本科	6	7
X₆	30	本科	7	9
X₇	31	本科	8	11
X₈	34	硕士	11	21
X₉	29	硕士	6	17
X₁₀	26	本科	3	8