面向数智时代的新型无人飞行器开放式架构研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.07.23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对数智时代无人智能飞行器发展对开放式架构的迫切需求，提出分层解耦-面向服务-智能赋能（hierarchical-decoupling-service-oriented-intelligence-enabled，DSI）架构设计方法，设计了“1个系统架构、2个领域架构、1套标准体系”的参考架构和标准体系，指导无人智能飞行器由“外挂”智能向“原生”智能演进。同时，在实验室条件下开展了架构技术应用实践，结果验证了所提“1+2+1”架构和标准体系下智能能力开发周期由每月降至每周，赋能效果优于传统架构，核心系统成本降低50%以上。最后，对DSI架构设计方法进行了总结与展望，为未来无人智能飞行器落实开放式架构设计研发提供了方法和路径参考。

关键词: 无人智能飞行器, 开放式架构, 分层解耦, 标准体系

Abstract:

Addressing the urgent demand for open architectures in the development of unmanned intelligent vehicle in the digital intelligence era, a hierarchical-decoupling-service-oriented-intelligence-enabled （DSI） architectural design method is proposed. A reference architecture and standard system comprising “1 system architecture, 2 domain architectures, and 1 standard system” is designed to guide the evolution of unmanned intelligent vehicle from “add-on” intelligence to “native” intelligence. At the same time, practical application of the architectural technology is carried out under laboratory conditions. The results verify that under the proposed “1+2+1” architecture and standard system, the development cycle of intelligent capabilities is reduced from one month to one week, the enablement effect outperforms that of traditional architectures, and the cost of core systems is reduced by over 50%. Finally, the DSI architectural design method is summarized and future directions are discussed, providing methodological and path references for the future development of open-architecture-based unmanned intelligent vehicle.

Key words: unmanned intelligent vehicle, open architecture, hierarchical decoupling, standard system

中图分类号:

V 19

方学立, 周潇茜, 贺诚, 卢元杰. 面向数智时代的新型无人飞行器开放式架构研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(7): 2394-2403.

Xueli FANG, Xiaoqian ZHOU, Cheng HE, Yuanjie LU. Research on open architecture of new-generation unmanned aerial vehicles for the digital-intelligent era[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(7): 2394-2403.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

表2

图6

图7

参考文献 37

1	POMAR M, PARDO D, CARMONA P, et al. DeOTA-IoT: a techniques catalog for designing over-the-air（OTA） update systems for IoT[J]. Sensors, 2025, 26 (1): 193. doi: 10.3390/s26010193
2	ALIANE N. A survey of open-source UAV autopilots[J]. Electronics, 2024, 13 (23): 4785. doi: 10.3390/electronics13234785
3	ZIMMERMAN P, OFORI M, BARRETT D, et al. Considerations and examples of a modular open systems approach in defense systems[J]. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2019, 16 (4): 373- 388. doi: 10.1177/1548512917751281
4	TOKAR J L. A comparison of avionics open system architectures[C]//Proc. of the ACM SIGADA Annual Conference on High Integrity Language Technology, 2016: 21−30.
5	DAVENDRALINGAM N, GUARINIELLO C, TAMASKAR S, et al. Modularity research to guide MOSA implementation[J]. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2019, 16 (4): 389- 401. doi: 10.1177/1548512917749358
6	RODRIGUEZ G, PROENZA J, BARRANCO M, et al. On the Integration of DDS and AFDX standards[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation, 2014.
7	AZANI C, KHORRAMSHAHGOL R. Modular open systems approach: an effective business strategy for building affordable and adaptable architectures[J]. Journal of Management Systems, 2006, 18 (1): 66- 76.
8	GKIOULOS V, WOLTHUSEN S D. Security infrastructure for service oriented architectures at the tacticaledge[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Critical Information Infrastructures Security, 2017: 117−131.
9	BARRAZA A. Enhancing the utility of unmanned autonomous vehicles (UAVs) with model-based systems-engineering (MBSE) and modular open systems approach (MOSA)[D]. El Paso: University of Texas at El Paso, 2024.
10	STIRGWOLT B, ZHAO A, THOMPSON L. Using digital engineering to develop a modular drone and the needed skill sets for the next generation of engineers[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Aviation Forum and Ascend 2025: AIAA 2025-3317.
11	JANOWICZ K, HALLER A, COX S, et al. SOSA: a lightweight ontology for sensors, observations, samples, and actuators[J]. Journal of Web Semantics, 2019 (56): 1- 10.
12	AKTAS O, MILLI M, LAKESTANI S. Modelling sensor ontology with the SOSA/SSN frameworks: a case study for laboratory parameters[J]. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 2020, 28 (5): 2566- 2585. doi: 10.3906/elk-1912-160
13	MANZ B. Unlocking interoperability: the promise of the SOSA standard[J]. Journal of Electromagnetic Dominance, 2025, 48 (8): 29.
14	LUKIC B, FRIENDRICH S, DURAK U. A streamlined approach toward automated generation and validation of ARINC653-compliant avionics configurations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2024, 61 (6): 1927- 1940.
15	KIM S, CHOI H, LEE S, et al. A dynamic bridge architecture for efficient interoperability between AUTOSAR adaptive and ROS2[J]. Electronics, 2025, 14 (18): 3635. doi: 10.3390/electronics14183635
16	KIM H, KWAK J, CHO J. AUTOSAR-compatible level-4 virtual ECU for the verification of the target binary for cloud-native development[J]. Electronics, 2024, 13 (18): 3704. doi: 10.3390/electronics13183704
17	PAN F, RICKERT M, BETZ T, et al. Toward software-defined vehicles: from model-based engineering to virtualization-based deployment[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12, 192127- 192145. doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3512002
18	MERAKANAPALLI S, BODAPATI S J. Transitioning from AUTOSAR classic to adaptive for service-based architectures[J]. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 2025, 6 (4): 7- 17. doi: 10.63282/3050-922x.ijeret-v6i4p102
19	BELLASSAI G, CASINI D, NATALE M D, et al. Modeling the SLLET paradigm in AUTOSAR adaptive[C]//Proc. of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, 2025.
20	MANIKANDAN S, PADMA I, ELKE P. Software architecture modeling of AUTOSAR-based multi-core mixed-critical electric powertrain controller[J]. Modelling, 2021, 2 (4): 706- 727. doi: 10.3390/modelling2040038
21	CHEN J C, ZHAI Z J, HAN P J, et al. Model-based partition scheduling of integrated modular avionics systems using genetic algorithm[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15 (1): 31342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16745-4
22	RUSSO A, RAPONI E, SANTIS D. Model-based systems engineering and safety assessment: a workflow for mechatronic systems design[J]. Systems Engineering, 2024, 27 (6): 756- 782. doi: 10.1002/sys.21791
23	WANG H L, CHEN Z W, FANG X T. Multi-layer resource configuration and safety optimization for integrated modular avionics with resource sharing and isolation[J]. PLoS ONE, 2026, 21 (3): e0345130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345130
24	赵长啸, 孙亦轩. 面向适航要求的eVTOL航电系统安全调度模型[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(11): 456−473.
	ZHAO C X, SUN Y X. A safe scheduling model for eVTOL avionics systems for airworthiness requirements[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(11): 456−473.
25	FUMMI F, PRAVADELLI G, STEFANI A, et al. A design flow based on docker and kubernetes for ROS-based robotic software applications[J]. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 2024, 23 (5): 74. doi: 10.1145/3594539
26	ZHANG W Z, TENG Y X, GAO Y, et al. Reducing end-to-end latency of trigger-action IoT programs on containerized edge platforms[J]. IEEE Trans. on Mobile Computing, 2024, 23 (12): 13979- 13990. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2024.3439533
27	LI Z, SALDIAS N, SECO D, et al. Long live the image: on enabling resilient production database containers for microservice applications[J]. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 2024, 50 (9): 2363- 2378. doi: 10.1109/TSE.2024.3436623
28	LI B F, FENG B B, SONG W M, et al. Application of DDS middleware in joint simulation[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Optimization, 2024: 95−102.
29	XU B T, GAO F, WANG Y C, et al. Omni drones: an efficient and flexible platform for reinforcement learning in drone control[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024, 9 (3): 2838- 2844. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2024.3356168
30	MARTINEZ S, SANCHEZ F, RUIZ M, et al. AUSPEX: an integrated open-source decision-making framework for UAVs in rescue missions[J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2025, 12, 1583479. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1583479
31	MUGABE J, WISNIEWSKI M, PERRUSQUIA A, et al. Enhancing situational awareness of helicopter pilots in unmanned aerial vehicle-congested environments using an airborne visual artificial intelligence approach[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24 (23): 7762. doi: 10.3390/s24237762
32	FU J H, FENG Y. Intent-context synergy reinforcement learning for autonomous UAV decision-making in air combat[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2026, 176, 112580. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2026.112580
33	MOKHTAR B. AI-enabled collaborative distributed computing in networked UAVs[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12, 96517- 96530. doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3425523
34	YUAN Y Z, GAO S C, ZHANG Z T, et al. Edge-cloud collaborative UAV object detection: edge-embedded lightweight algorithm design and task offloading using fuzzy neural network[J]. IEEE Trans. on Cloud Computing, 2024, 12 (1): 306- 318. doi: 10.1109/TCC.2024.3361858
35	ZHU F F, HUANG F, YU Y T, et al. Task offloading with LLM-enhanced multi-agent reinforcement learning in UAV-assisted edge computing[J]. Sensors, 2025, 25 (1): 175.
36	YANG T C, GUO H J, ZHAO Z, et al. Orion: a collaborative edge inference framework for large language models processing multi-sensor data in UAV swarms[J]. Drones, 2026, 10 (6): 410. doi: 10.3390/drones10060410
37	TRIGUNE H M, GORIVALE A D, GAWANDE P. A review of edge AI for autonomous target detection in UAVs using NVIDIA jetson orin[J]. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 2025, 13 (11): 16742- 16749.

参数	取值	参数	取值
初始油量/L	5	最大高度/m	80
最大速度/(m/s)	28	风力风向	东北风2级
温度/℃	29	飞行时长/min	3

能力对比项	开放式架构	普通架构
处理资源/Kdmips	16	4
可靠性	单通道三余度	单通道主备
硬件适配性	软硬解耦、服务化封装	软硬分离、定制化开发

[1]	刘煊, 王肖霞, 杨风暴, 李菠, 陶映恺. 基于贝叶斯网络的空间群目标意图识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(5): 1635-1646.
[2]	洪芳宇, 叶青, 张利宁, 伍国华. 面向区域搜索的车载多无人机协同任务规划方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(1): 144-156.
[3]	李宏民, 荣双龙, 张生鹏, 黄硕, 赵朋飞, 唐宇彬. 基于性能与退化规律融合建模的导弹产品贮存寿命仿真方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(7): 2264-2276.
[4]	方嘉卉, 黎克波, 梁彦刚. 基于最优脉冲的空间抵近行为模式可达性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(2): 652-659.
[5]	袁健波, 杜永浩, 陈盈果, 何永明. 面向点群与大区域目标的成像卫星任务规划模型与算法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(9): 2939-2950.
[6]	蒋怡, 毛雨荷, 岳程斐, 吴云华. 面向巨星座态势感知的多约束任务规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(9): 3047-3057.
[7]	王雪松, 殷加鹏, 黄建开, 李健兵, 李永祯. 雷达风场反演下的空飘球轨迹预测与载荷判断[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(9): 2839-2852.
[8]	李志亮, 李小将, 张东来. 基于改进DE算法的敏捷成像卫星前摄式调度[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(2): 353-359.
[9]	郭肖亭, 孙长库, 王鹏. 矩阵对角化变换鲁棒QCKF在视觉和惯性融合姿态测量中的应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(2): 402-408.