基于快速能力生成的装备研发管理方法研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.12.22

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 3981-3992.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.12.22

• “基于模型的系统架构设计与验证技术”专栏 • 上一篇

基于快速能力生成的装备研发管理方法研究

李淼¹^,²^,*, 杨水锋³, 周庆⁴, 黄兆东²

1. 西北工业大学航空学院，陕西西安 710072
2. 中国航空工业集团有限公司，北京 100028
3. 成都飞机设计研究所，四川成都 610091
4. 航空电子综合与体系集成全国重点实验室，上海 200240

收稿日期:2025-03-04 修回日期:2025-04-13 出版日期:2025-11-28 发布日期:2025-11-28
通讯作者: 李淼
作者简介:杨水锋（1983—），男，正高级工程师，博士，主要研究方向为航空武器装备体系作战、系统总体技术与应用
周　庆（1983—），男，正高级工程师，博士，主要研究方向为航空装备系统架构设计
黄兆东（1982—），男，高级工程师，博士，主要研究方向为系统工程、航空装备经济学

Equipment research and development management method research based on rapid capability generation

Miao LI¹^,²^,*, Shuifeng YANG³, Qing ZHOU⁴, Zhaodong HUANG²

1. School of Aeronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China
2. Aviation Industry Corporation of China，LTD., Beijing 100028，China
3. Chengdu Aircraft Design and Research Institute，Chengdu 610091，China
4. National Key Laboratory of Avionics Integration and Aviation System-of-Systems Synthesis，Shanghai 200240，China

Received:2025-03-04 Revised:2025-04-13 Online:2025-11-28 Published:2025-11-28
Contact: Miao LI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研发管理是航空装备建设的重要维度，对装备建设的工程推进具有方向性和决策性作用。未来空战模式正在向体系化和智能化发展，航空装备的作战能力需要适应性地快速生成，装备研发管理需要全寿命周期集成、穿透式敏捷管理、体系化多域协同等。本文从装备快速能力生成、研发管理新要求等方面出发，借鉴空战“观察-定位-决策-行动”循环的逻辑方法，在工程实践的基础上提炼航空装备“策划-权衡-清理-实现”研发管理方法。重点明确策划是研发管理的总体设计、权衡是关键性取舍、清理是关键过程管理、实现是产品实现的优化等工程理论，研究总结每个要素具体的研发逻辑和管理方法，可为快速生成具备特定作战能力的航空装备产品提供指导。

关键词: 快速能力生成, 航空装备, 策划, 权衡, 清理, 实现

Abstract:

Research and development management is a crucial dimension in the construction of aviation equipment, playing a directional and decision-making role in the engineering advancement of equipment development. Future air combat modes are evolving toward systematization and intelligence, requiring the operational capabilities of aviation equipment to be adaptively and rapidly generated. Equipment research and development management necessitates lifecycle integration, penetrative agile management, and systematized multi-domain coordination. This paper starts from the aspects of equipment rapid capability generation and new requirements for research and development management, and draws on the logical method of the “observation-orientation-determination-action” cycle in air combat. Based on engineering practice, it extracts the “design-balance-clear-implement” research and development management method for aviation equipment. The key is to clarify that planning is the overall design of research and development management, weighing is the key trade-off, cleaning is the key process management, and implementation is the optimization of product realization. By studying and summarizing the specific research and development logic and management methods of each element, guidance can be provided for the rapid generation of aviation equipment products with specific combat capabilities.

Key words: rapid capability generation, aviation equipment, design, balance, clear, actualize

中图分类号:

李淼, 杨水锋, 周庆, 黄兆东. 基于快速能力生成的装备研发管理方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(12): 3981-3992.

Miao LI, Shuifeng YANG, Qing ZHOU, Zhaodong HUANG. Equipment research and development management method research based on rapid capability generation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(12): 3981-3992.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 30

1	杨伟. 关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41 (6): 524377.
	YANG W. Development of future fighters[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41 (6): 524377.
2	KAREEM K, NAIK N, JENKINS P, et al. Understanding the defense of operational technology(OT) systems: a comparison of Lockheed Martin’s cyber kill chain, MITRE ATT&CK framework, and diamond model[C]// Proc. of the Contributions Presented at the International Conference on Computing, Communication, Cybersecurity and AI, 2024: 605−624.
3	BILL G, DAN P. Beyond documents: accelerating joint advantage through direct resourcing and experimentation[R]. Washington D. C. : Hudson Institute, 2025.
4	MARCELLO B, FRANCESCO D P. Quick changeover design: a new lean methodology to support the design of machines in terms of rapid changeover capability[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2023, 34 (9): 84- 114. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2022-0430
5	ACOSTA R A, MARTINEZ F H. Validation of sliding mode and passivity control in high-power quadratic buck converter through rapid prototyping[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12, 8668- 8699. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3340313
6	FRAIRE U. Modeling & simulation of the rapid rigging & de-rigging airdrop system (RRDAS)[EB/OL]. [2025-02-17]. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-4516.
7	HU S, LI Y X. Design of a foldable multirotor for rapid deployment in complex environments[C]//Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems, 2024: 237−248.
8	GERARDO C, JAYANTH K, WALKER B. Development of a software framework for rapid optimized design of morphing small UAVs[EB/OL]. [2025-02-04]. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-0908.
9	CYNTHIA R C, ÉDER M S. Ensuring mission assurance while conducting rapid space acquisition, RRA998-1[R]. Santa Monica: RAND, 2022: 2−3.
10	ROBERTA M E. Edwards of space: devising in-space developmental test capabilities for rapid acquisition[EB/OL]. [2025-02-15]. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5216.
11	白思俊. 现代项目管理[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2020: 38−40.
	BAI S J. Introduction to project management[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2020: 38−40.
12	NASA/SP-2016-6105. NASA system engineering handbook[S]. Washington D. C. : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2017.
13	乐云, 崇丹, 蒋卫平. 大型复杂群体项目分解结构（PBS）概念与方法研究[J]. 项目管理技术, 2010, 8 (2): 39- 40.
	LE Y, CHONG D, JIANG W P. Research on large and complicated programs’ project breakdown structure[J]. Project Management Technology, 2010, 8 (2): 39- 40.
14	WOZNIAK M. Role-based structuring of systems engineering teams[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2024, 34 (1): 1008- 1020. doi: 10.1002/iis2.13192
15	杨保民. SM公司研发管理优化研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2023.
	YANG B M. SM company R&D management innovation research[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2023.
16	NASA/SP-20210023927. NASA work breakdown structure (WBS) handbook[S]. Washington D. C. : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2021.
17	RAJANI D, SHOBHA R. Work breakdown structure of the project[J]. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2012, 2 (2): 683- 686.
18	GARCIA J M, FAN I S. A work breakdown structure that integrates different views in aircraft modification projects[J]. Concurrent Engineering, 2003, 11 (1): 47- 54. doi: 10.1177/1063293X03011001005
19	Project Management Institute. Practice standard for work breakdown structures[M]. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Project Management Institute, 2019.
20	MIL-STD-881F. Work breakdown structures for defense materiel items[S]. Washington D. C. : USA Department of Defense, 2022.
21	MARK W M, ROBERT J H. Development of hybrid product breakdown structure for NASA ground systems[EB/OL]. [2025-02-10]. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-5404.
22	耿汝光. 大型复杂航空产品项目管理[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2011: 61−63.
	GENG R G. Project management for new aircraft research & development program[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2011: 61−63.
23	USA Department of Defense. Systems engineering guidebook[R]. Washington D. C. : Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, 2022: 12−13.
24	LI J C, ZHAO D L, JIANG J, et al. Capability oriented equipment contribution analysis in temporal combat networks[J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2021, 51 (2): 696- 704. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2914869
25	MIHIR B, ADITYA C, CHEN X L, et al. The OODA loop of cloudlet-based autonomous drones[C]//Proc. of the IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing, 2024: 178−190.
26	BRANDON M, SCOTT H, BOGDAN U, et al. Development of human-machine collaborative systems through use of observe-orient-decide-act (OODA) loop[EB/OL]. [2025-02-03]. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-4092.
27	SPERANZON A, DEBRUNNER H, ROSENBLUTH D, et al. Challenge problems in developing a neuro symbolic OODA loop[C]// Proc. of the 17th International Workshop on Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning, 2023: 241−247.
28	JEFFREY M N. A framework for applying the OODA loop to mission control room execution[EB/OL]. [2025-02-18]. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-3223.
29	GRANT T H. A discourse on winning and losing[M]. Montgomery: Air University Press, 2018: 383−384.
30	CHET R. Boyd’s OODA loop: it’s not what you think[M]. Atlanta: J. Addams & Partners Inc, 2018: 7−8.

[1]	彭海源, 王巍, 李德瑞, 刘彦君, 李宇, 迟骋, 田亚男. 基于GPU的OMCSS水声通信M元解扩算法并行实现[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 978-986.
[2]	冯蕴雯, 宋祉岑, 路成, 陈晓宇. 基于跨尺度等效弹性的航空装备损修性能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(2): 508-517.
[3]	苗学问, 董骁雄, 钱征文, 胡杨, 李牧东. 基于DoDAF的航空装备智能保障系统体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 640-648.
[4]	丁刚, 张琳, 崔利杰, 张亮, 李新春. 航空装备单元维修保障仿真评估方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1246-1255.
[5]	卢元杰, 刘志敏, 孙智孝, 阚东. 基于模型的无人机系统架构综合评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1239-1245.
[6]	张伟, 何晶, 谢晓伟, 赵国强, 陈真. 联合战场导航对抗仿真评估系统设计与实现[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3182-3189.
[7]	袁刘鹏程, 方哲梅, 王剑波, 秦肖臻. 基于CRC-MATE的体系架构方案选择[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2146-2153.
[8]	王秋滢, 周璐瑶, 郭铮, 满志彬. 基于MEMS/超声波双足足绑式定位系统的实现[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(4): 919-925.
[9]	雷杰, 徐晓滨, 徐晓健, 常雷雷. 基于置信规则库的并发故障诊断方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(2): 497-505.
[10]	韩欣珉, 徐浩军, 尚柏林. 基于支持向量机的轰炸机敏感性权衡优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2488-2495.
[11]	王霖郁, 郭昊, 项建弘, 戚连刚. 基于遗传矩阵伴随求逆算法的抗干扰技术[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(8): 1677-1683.
[12]	韩威华1, 甘庆波2, 陈险峰1, 朱政帆2. 激光清理地球静止轨道碎片的天基平台控制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(10): 2352-2351.
[13]	李晓波, 关欣, 仲利华, 胡东辉, 丁赤飚. 基于GPU的外辐射源雷达信号处理实时实现方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(11): 2192-2198.
[14]	杨哲，李曙林，周莉，王怀威，石晓朋. 考虑作战能力的飞机生存力权衡设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(1): 90-94.
[15]	张旺勋，侯洪涛，王维平. 基于MATE 的卫星导航系统安全防护设计[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(6): 1231-1235.

基于快速能力生成的装备研发管理方法研究

Equipment research and development management method research based on rapid capability generation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价