可重复使用运载器多约束鲁棒预测校正制导

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.05.20

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1316-1325.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.05.20

可重复使用运载器多约束鲁棒预测校正制导

都延丽^1,*(), 刘武¹(), 唐明明¹(), 王玉惠²()

1. 南京航空航天大学航天学院, 江苏南京 211106
2. 南京航空航天大学自动化学院, 江苏南京 211106

收稿日期:2020-07-14 出版日期:2021-05-01 发布日期:2021-04-27
通讯作者: 都延丽 E-mail:duyanli@nuaa.edu.cn;liuwu@nuaa.edu.cn;1906423583@qq.com;wangyh@nuaa.edu.cn
作者简介:都延丽(1977—), 女, 副教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为可重复使用运载器先进制导与控制方法、飞行器系统辨识。E-mail: duyanli@nuaa.edu.cn|刘武(1997—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为飞行器鲁棒制导与控制。E-mail: liuwu@nuaa.edu.cn|唐明明(1997—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为飞行器多约束制导与控制。E-mail: 1906423583@qq.com|王玉惠(1980—), 女, 副教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为飞行控制、火力控制和非线性控制。E-mail: wangyh@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61773204);南京航空航天大学研究生创新基地(实验室)开放基金(kfjj20191504)

Robust predictor-corrector guidance with multiple constraints for reusable launch vehicles

Yanli DU^1,*(), Wu LIU¹(), Mingming TANG¹(), Yuhui WANG²()

1. College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
2. College of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China

Received:2020-07-14 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-04-27
Contact: Yanli DU E-mail:duyanli@nuaa.edu.cn;liuwu@nuaa.edu.cn;1906423583@qq.com;wangyh@nuaa.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对可重复使用运载器(reusable launch vehicle, RLV)再入段常规约束、航路点约束、倾侧角速率约束和参数不确定问题, 提出一种多约束鲁棒预测校正制导方法。首先, 利用改进准平衡滑翔条件将常规约束转化为倾侧角幅值约束。其次, 提出基于二分法快速迭代确定倾侧角翻转位置的航路点制导律, 并将翻转速率约束转化为关于能量的约束, 引入预测校正的计算中。然后, 对于参数不确定鲁棒制导问题, 提出基于标称升阻比和能量剖面对迎角及横程误差走廊在线调整的策略。仿真实验表明, 在参数不确定情况下, RLV能够满足多约束条件和终端制导精度要求, 验证了方法的有效性和鲁棒性。

关键词: 可重复使用运载器, 再入制导, 多约束条件, 预测校正制导, 鲁棒制导

Abstract:

Aiming at general constraints, waypoint constraint, reverse rate constraint of bank angle and parameter uncertainties for reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) during re-entry, a kind of robust predictor-corrector guidance method meeting multiple constraints is proposed. Firstly, the modified quasi-equilibrium glide condition is exploited to transform general constraints into the amplitude constraint of bank angle. Secondly, a dichotomy-based waypoint guidance law is presented to speedily determine the reverse position of bank angle, and the reverse rate constraint is converted to that of energy which can be calculated during the prediction correction process. Next, an online adjustment strategy of angle of attack and cross-range error corridor based on the nominal lift-drag-ratio and residual energy is proposed to deal with the parameter uncertainty robust guidance issue. Simulation tests show that the RLV can satisfy multiple constraints and terminal guidance requirement in the presence of parameter uncertainties, which verifies the effectiveness and robustness of the presented method.

Key words: reusable launch vehicle (RLV), re-entry guidance, multiple constraints, predictor-corrector guidance, robust guidance

中图分类号:

V448.2

都延丽, 刘武, 唐明明, 王玉惠. 可重复使用运载器多约束鲁棒预测校正制导[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(5): 1316-1325.

Yanli DU, Wu LIU, Mingming TANG, Yuhui WANG. Robust predictor-corrector guidance with multiple constraints for reusable launch vehicles[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(5): 1316-1325.

图/表 18

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

表2

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

参考文献 30

1	SIVAN K , PANDIAN S . An overview of reusable launch vehicle technology demonstrator[J]. Current Science, 2018, 114 (1): 38- 47. doi: 10.18520/cs/v114/i01/38-47
2	NAIR P G, JOSHI A. Effect of maximum angle of attack on path constraints and flyability for winged re-entry vehicles[C]//Proc. of the AIAA SciTech Forum, 2019: 0263.
3	LU P . Entry guidance: a unified method[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37 (3): 713- 728. doi: 10.2514/1.62605
4	XUE S B , LU P . Constrained predictor-corrector entry guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33 (4): 1273- 1281. doi: 10.2514/1.49557
5	SAGLIANO M, MOOIJ E. Optimal drag-energy entry guidance via pseudo spectral convex optimization[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2018: 1315.
6	WEBB K, LU P. Entry guidance by onboard trajectory planning and tracking[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechamics Conference, 2016.
7	HE R Z , LIU L H , TANG G J , et al. Rapid generation of entry trajectory with multiple no-fly zone constraints[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2017, 60, 1430- 1442. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.046
8	ZHAO D J , SONG Z Y . Reentry trajectory optimization with waypoint and no-fly zone constraints using multi-phase convex programming[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 137, 60- 69. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.013
9	LU Q , ZHOU J . Re-entry guidance for hypersonic vehicle satisfying no-fly zone constraints[J]. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2018, 40 (13): 3899- 3908. doi: 10.1177/0142331217735050
10	JORRIS T R , COBB R G . Three-dimensional trajectory optimization satisfying waypoint and no-fly zone constraints[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32 (2): 551- 572. doi: 10.2514/1.37030
11	ZHANG H P , WANG H L , LI N , et al. Time-optimal memetic whale optimization algorithm for hypersonic vehicle reentry trajectory optimization with no-fly zones[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 32, 2735- 2749. doi: 10.1007/s00521-018-3764-y
12	YONG E M , QIAN W Q , HE K F . An adaptive predictor corrector reentry guidance based on self-definition waypoints[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2014, 39, 211- 221. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2014.08.004
13	LI Z H , YANG X J , SUN X D , et al. Improved artificial potential field based lateral entry guidance for waypoints passage and no-fly zones avoidance[J]. Aerospace Science and Techno-logy, 2019, 86, 119- 131. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.015
14	LIN H B, DU Y L, MOOIJ E, et al. Improved predictor-corrector guidance with hybrid lateral logic for no-fly zone avoidance[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences, 2019.
15	GAO Y , CAI G B , YANG X G , et al. Improved tentacle-based guidance for reentry gliding hypersonic vehicle with no-fly zone constraint[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 119246- 119258. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936974
16	LIANG Z X , REN Z . Tentacle-based guidance for entry flight with no-fly zone constraint[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamic, 2018, 41 (4): 991- 1000.
17	WANG T , ZHANG H B , TANG G J . Predictor-corrector entry guidance with waypoint and no-fly zone constraints[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 138, 10- 18. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.05.009
18	LIANG Z X , LI Q D , REN Z . Waypoint constrained guidance for entry vehicles[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 52, 52- 61. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.02.023
19	LIANG Z X , LONG J T , ZHU S Y , et al. Entry guidance with terminal approach angle constraint[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 102, 1058- 1076.
20	LI S , JIANG X Q . RBF neural network based second-order sliding mode guidance for Mars entry uncertainties[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 43, 226- 235. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.03.006
21	景亮, 张忠阳, 崔乃刚, 等. 固定时间收敛扰动观测终端滑模制导律设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1820- 1826.
	JING L , ZHANG Z Y , CUI N G , et al. Fixed-time disturbance observer based terminal sliding mode guidance law[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1820- 1826.
22	XU J W , QIAO J Z , GUO L , et al. Enhanced predictor-corrector mars entry guidance approach with atmospheric uncertainties[J]. IET Control Theory and Applications, 2019, 13 (11): 1612- 1618. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5782
23	XI Y H , PENG H , MO H . Parameter estimation of RBF-AR model based on the EM-EKF algorithm[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43 (9): 1636- 1643.
24	LU P , BRUNNER C W , STACHOWIAK S J , et al. Verification of a fully numerical entry guidance algorithm[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40 (2): 230- 248. doi: 10.2514/1.G000327
25	江振宇, 孙乐园, 王晋璘, 等. 环境参数在线辨识及其在滑翔段制导中的应用[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2018, 40 (2): 48- 54.
	JIANG Z Y , SUN L Y , WANG J L , et al. Environmental parameter online identification and its application in gliding guidance[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2018, 40 (2): 48- 54.
26	MOOIJ E. The Horus-2B reference vehicle, Memorandum M-692[R]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 1995.
27	张鹏, 都延丽, 项凯. 高升阻比RLV的约束预测校正再入制导[J]. 飞行力学, 2018, 36 (3): 70- 74.
	ZHANG P , DU Y L , XIANG K . Constrained predictive-corrector reentry guidance for high lift-to-drag RLV[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2018, 36 (3): 70- 74.
28	朱凯, 齐乃明, 秦昌茂. 动态航向角误差走廊的侧向制导策略[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2011, 43 (1): 31- 35.
	ZHU K , QI N M , QIN C M . A lateral guidance method with dynamic heading error corridor[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011, 43 (1): 31- 35.
29	MOOIJ E, MEASE K D, BENITO J. Robust re-entry guidance and control system design and analysis[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2007: 6779.
30	SAUNDERS B R. Optimal trajectory design under uncertainty[D]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012.

状态	h/km	θ/(°)	φ/(°)	V/(m/s)	γ/(°)	Ψ/(°)
初始	122	-106.7	-22.3	7435.5	-1.43	70.75
终端	25	-53	5.1	738	-	-

参数	取值	参数	取值
h/km	±1	Ψ/(°)	±0.05
θ/(°)	±0.5	m/kg	±100
φ/(°)	±0.5	C_D	±15%
V/(m/s)	±15	C_L	15%
γ/(°)	±0.05	-	-

[1]	孙国鑫, 夏群利, 张道驰, 徐文博. 可重复使用运载器自动着陆分段制导策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(4): 856-862.
[2]	程仙垒，彭双春，郑伟，汤国建. 多约束条件下非连续助推弹道方案设计与优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(4): 888-894.
[3]	曾宪法，王洁瑶，王小虎. 基于能量和解析预测校正的滑翔制导[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35(12): 2582-2588.
[4]	贺成龙，陈欣，杨一栋. 一种动态逆解算的RLV混合规划控制分配研究[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(9): 1973-1976.
[5]	郑总准,王永骥,谢富强,李传锋. 基于H_∞鲁棒动态逆的飞行器轨迹跟踪方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(6): 1309-1313.
[6]	贺成龙，陈欣，杨一栋. 可重复使用运载器的上升段轨迹线设计[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 1034-1037.

可重复使用运载器多约束鲁棒预测校正制导

Robust predictor-corrector guidance with multiple constraints for reusable launch vehicles

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 18

参考文献 30

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价