动态对抗场景中的打击链在线重构方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.06.19

Abstract

Abstract:

To address the problem of strike chain interruption caused by node damage in dynamic confrontation scenarios, an online reconstruction method based on breakpoint reuse and local search is proposed. A three-layer “physical–functional–state” abstract network model is constructed to achieve unified modeling of nodes, links, and semantic constraints. An improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm （NSGA）-II is introduced to retain usable front-end links and compress the search space, and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution （TOPSIS） is combined to enable millisecond-level Pareto-optimal decision-making. Simulation results show that the proposed method reduces link reconstruction latency by 62% compared with traditional strategies, and maintains a very high mission completion rate even when equipment resources are reduced by 20%. Moreover, the algorithm complexity increases linearly with node scale, meeting the real-time and scalability requirements of mainstream distributed combat systems.

Key words: dynamic confrontation, strike chain, online reconstruction, multi-objective optimization, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA)-II, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)

CLC Number:

TP 301.6

Yuyang XUE, Tao WANG, Xin LIAO, Yuannan XU, Minghao LIN, Anqi WU. Online reconstruction method for strike chain in dynamic confrontation scenarios[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(6): 1980-1990.

Figures/Tables 20

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

Fig.6

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 7

Fig.9

Table 8

Table 9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 31

1	ZHANG J L, HAN K, ZHANG P, et al. A survey on joint-operation application for unmanned swarm formations under a complex confrontation environment[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34 (6): 1432- 1446. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000162
2	JIA Z Y, YOU J H, DONG C, et al. Cooperative cognitive dynamic system in UAV swarms: reconfigurable mechanism and framework[J]. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2024, 19 (3): 90- 101. doi: 10.1109/MVT.2024.3404391
3	CHEN H, DOU Y J, CHEN Z Y, et al. A hybrid genetic algorithm to the program optimization model based on a heterogeneous network[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 36 (4): 994- 1005. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2025.000063
4	DESTA H, DANDA B R. Neuro-symbolic AI for military applications[J]. IEEE Trans. on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 5 (12): 6012- 6026. doi: 10.1109/TAI.2024.3444746
5	WANG Y, TAO J Y, ZHANG X K, et al. Mission-oriented capability evaluation for combat network based on operation loops[J]. Defence Technology, 2024, 42, 156- 175. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2024.07.002
6	GUO J H, ZHANG J D, WANG Z H, et al. Formation cooperative intelligent tactical decision making based on Bayesian network model[J]. Drones, 2024, 8 (9): 427. doi: 10.3390/drones8090427
7	CHEN Z W, ZHOU Z M, ZHANG L G, et al. Mission reliability modeling and evaluation for reconfigurable unmanned weapon system-of-systems based on effective operation loop[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34 (3): 588- 597. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000082
8	XU R J, LIU J H, LI J C, et al. Link-centric research on the capability resilience of heterogeneous information combat networks[J]. IEEE Trans. on Network Science and Engineering, 2025, 12 (4): 2921- 2931. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2025.3555384
9	丁冬, 何兵, 陈明, 等. 美国导弹预警系统作战效能评估指标体系设计研究[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2022, 17 (9): 883- 891.
	DING D, HE B, CHEN M, et al. Research on design of operational effectiveness evaluation index system for american missile early warning system[J]. Journal of China Electronics Science Research Institute, 2022, 17 (9): 883- 891.
10	QI H, BO P, SEN L, et al. Evaluation method and optimization strategies of resilience for air & space defense system of systems based on kill network theory and improved self-information quantity[J]. Defence Technology, 2023, 21, 219- 239. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2023.01.005
11	DANG Y H, WANG H X, YIN Z M, et al. Resilience analysis of coupling combat network: considering multiple destruction-recovery processes[J]. IEEE Access, 2025, 13, 100261- 100270. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3577347
12	YE H J, GAO W. A method of kill chains fusion based on granulated rules and matrix computation[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12, 198224- 198236. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3518435
13	LI B, WANG J M, SONG C, et al. Multi-UAV roundup strategy method based on deep reinforcement learning CEL-MADDPG algorithm[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 245, 123018. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123018
14	LI Y Y, CHEN W Y, FU B, et al. A distributed cooperative dynamic target search method for multi-UAV systems in complex adversarial environments[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025, 12 (18): 38155- 38171. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2025.3585158
15	PEIYANG Z, GUODONG L. A cooperative dynamic target search approach for multi-UAV systems utilizing the MAPPO algorithm[J]. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 5, 153. doi: 10.1007/s44163-025-00411-9
16	李小波, 王蒙一, 廖咏一, 等. 智能化空天防御作战体系架构设计方法研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2024, 52 (2): 1- 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2024.02.001
	LI X B, WANG M Y, LIAO Y Y, et al. Research on architecture design method of intelligent air-space defense combat system[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2024, 52 (2): 1- 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2024.02.001
17	LYU T Q, LIU Y, WANG C, et al. Construction of an intelligent kill web operational effectiveness model considering uncertainty factors[C]//Proc. of the International Symposium on AI and Cybersecurity, 2025: 71−75.
18	ZHONG Y F, LI H X, SUN Q, et al. A kill chain optimization method for improving the resilience of unmanned combat system-of-systems [J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2024, 181: 114685.
19	ZHANG H H, LI B, HUANG J Y, et al. A parallel multi-demonstrations generative adversarial imitation learning approach on UAV target tracking decision[J]. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2025, 34 (4): 1185- 1198. doi: 10.23919/cje.2024.00.082
20	LIU W L, PAN Z S, HAN W, et al. Construction of kill webs with heterogeneous UAV swarms in dynamic contested environments[J]. Complex Intelligent Systems, 2025, 11, 8. doi: 10.1007/s40747-024-01644-4
21	YANG K W, XIA B Y, CHEN G, et al. Multi-objective optimization of operation loop recommendation for kill web[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (4): 969- 985. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000094
22	YOU Y Q, ZHANG X, HE H F, et al. Kill chain search and evaluation of weapon system of systems based on GAT-DFS[J]. Systems, 2025, 13 (8): 703. doi: 10.3390/systems13080703
23	雷洪涛, 孙立健, 朱先强, 等. 杀伤链分析构建与韧性优化方法[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2024, 10 (6): 720- 731. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-0204.2024.06.0720
	LEI H T, SUN L J, ZHU X Q, et al. Kill chain analysis construction and resilience optimization method[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2024, 10 (6): 720- 731. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-0204.2024.06.0720
24	孙利娜, 陈永禄, 陈志伟. 基于杀伤链的动态重构作战网络抗毁性分析[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2023, 48 (2): 12- 18.
	SUN L N, CHEN Y L, CHEN Z W. Resilience analysis of dynamically reconfigured combat networks based on the kill chain[J]. Firepower & Command Control, 2023, 48 (2): 12- 18.
25	KOUR R, KARIM R, DERSIN P. Game theory and cyber kill chain: a strategic approach to cybersecurity[C]//Proc. of the International Congress and Workshop on Industrial AI and eMaintenance , 2024: 451−463.
26	KIKONG K. DAESUNG M, JUNHO H, et al. Attack graph generation with machine learning for network security[J]. Electronics, 2022, 11 (9): 1332. doi: 10.3390/electronics11091332
27	NADIA A, THIAGO V, ALI A. Integrated genetic algorithm and deep learning approach for effective cyber-attack detection and classification in industrial internet of things (IIoT) environments [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024, 49.
28	WU S Y, KANG P Q, LI J R, et al. A research on kill net generation technology of cooperative combat system based on SG-DPSO algorithm[C]//Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems , 2025: 128−138.
29	NATHAN G, W. Explainable AI in the military domain[J]. AI & Society, 2024, 26, 29.
30	LI R Z, YUAN H, REN B B, et al. Optimal unmanned combat system-of-systems reconstruction strategy with heterogeneous cost via deep reinforcement learning[J]. Mathematics, 2024, 12 (10): 1476. doi: 10.3390/math12101476
31	PENG Z, LU Z F, MAO X, et al. Multi-ship dynamic weapon-target assignment via cooperative distributional reinforcement learning with dynamic reward[J]. IEEE Trans. on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2025, 9 (2): 1843- 1859.

名称	配置/型号
CPU	Intel i7 12700H（16 G）
显卡	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060（12 GB）
系统	Windows 11
软件环境	Python 3.10

名称	伪装能力	拦截能力	防护能力
航母1	0.2	0.3	0.5
航母2	0.2	0.3	0.5
驱逐舰1	0.2	0.3	0.5
驱逐舰2	0.2	0.3	0.5
轰炸机1	0.2	0.3	0.5
轰炸机2	0.2	0.3	0.5
舰载战斗机1	0.2	0.3	0.5
舰载战斗机2	0.2	0.3	0.5
补给舰	0.2	0.3	0.5

名称	探测半径/units	精度/%	扫描速率/（°/s）	雷达数量
驱逐舰1	400	99.5	12	1
驱逐舰2	800	95	12	1
预警机1	600	80	10	1
预警机2	600	80	10	1
无人机1	200	88	6	1
无人机2	200	88	6	1
无人机3	200	88	6	1
侦察机1	300	88	6	1
侦察机2	300	88	6	1
侦察机3	300	88	6	1
陆基雷达1	800	99.5	20	4
陆基雷达2	800	99.5	20	4
陆基雷达3	800	99.5	20	4
陆基雷达4	800	99.5	20	4

名称	处理速度	分析水平	分析级别
驱逐舰1	0.8	0.5	2
驱逐舰2	0.8	0.5	2
预警机1	0.3	0.6	2
预警机2	0.3	0.6	2
战役情报中心1	0.8	0.5	1
战役情报中心2	0.8	0.5	1
战术情报中心1	0.8	0.5	2
战术情报中心2	0.8	0.5	2
战术情报中心3	0.8	0.5	2
战术情报中心4	0.8	0.5	2

名称	响应系数	知识库水平	自动化程度	指挥级别
驱逐舰1	0.8	0.6	0.5	3
驱逐舰2	0.8	0.6	0.5	3
预警机1	0.85	0.7	0.4	2
预警机2	0.85	0.7	0.4	1
联合作战中心	0.85	0.7	0.4	2
战术指挥站1	0.85	0.7	0.4	2
战术指挥站2	0.85	0.7	0.4	3

Online reconstruction method for strike chain in dynamic confrontation scenarios

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 20

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

名称	覆盖半径/units	弹药类型	单发成本
驱逐舰1	800	反舰、防空	1000
驱逐舰2	750	反舰、防空	500
发射车1	1000	反舰	2000
发射车2	600	反舰	2000
发射车3	1000	反舰	2000
发射车4	1000	防空	2000
发射车5	600	反舰	2000
发射车6	600	防空	2000
发射车7	600	防空	2000
发射车8	1200	防空	2000

节点类型	实际装备
侦察节点	驱逐舰1
情报分析节点	战术情报中心2
1级指挥节点	联合作战中心
2级指挥节点	预警机1
影响节点	发射车3
保障节点	仓库2
目标节点	蓝方补给舰

指标	改进NSGA-II	BF	提升率/%
f₁/ms	87±5	230±12	62
f₂	0.83±0.02	0.79±0.03	5.1
f₃/千美元	2.7±0.1	3.2±0.2	16
RT/ms	87±4	215±10	60

[1]	Luyao LIU, Xiao JIN, Jinliang CAI, Wucai ZHANG. Multi-objective optimization of antenna placement using integrated ANN and improved MOPSO [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(5): 1607-1614.
[2]	Wenqi JIANG, Rui TAO. Improved TOPSIS method based on hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute association [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(5): 1615-1621.
[3]	Yusi XIE, Qin LEI, Zhibin WU. Multi-objective pickup and delivery routing planning with consideration of workload balance [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(4): 1254-1263.
[4]	Qi SONG, Zhenyu HUANG, Huanyu LI, Anxin GUO, Rennong YANG. Modeling and simulation study of “agile combat employment” base construction [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(1): 218-234.
[5]	Tao HONG, Fan WANG, Zhi LI, Zhiwei ZHONG, Xiaojin DING, Ziwei LIU, Gengxin ZHANG. Business-driven terminal mode switching method for low Earth orbit satellite-based Internet of Things [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(8): 2867-2876.
[6]	Qiangqiang XU, Hua CHAI. Optimization of task dispatch plan for vehicular optical observation equipment based on NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2393-2400.
[7]	Hao CHEN, Gang SUN, Shuang PENG, Jiangjiang WU. Dynamic rescheduling method for TT&C and data transmission resources based on multi-objective optimization [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(11): 3744-3753.
[8]	Zelun GAO, Shaoqiu ZHENG, Rupeng LIANG, Yanyan HUANG. Model of strike target preference under super-network system operation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(1): 182-189.
[9]	Liyao WANG, Jin ZHANG, Hongxi ZHOU, Kemao WANG. Planning of multi-station accessing multi-satellite based on physical planning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(8): 2514-2520.
[10]	Qian SU, Yuanfu ZHONG, Zhiqin CAO, Yingchao ZHANG. Target threat assessment model based on operational situation and improved CRITIC-TOPSIS [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(8): 2343-2352.
[11]	Hongzhou ZHAI, Hua ZHANG, Linna WU, Hequn BU, Kaixiang GONG. Optimization algorithm for reliability redundancy design based on collaborative balance [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(12): 4084-4089.
[12]	Shiying YAN, Kefei YAN, Wei FANG, Hengyang LU. Large-scale multi-objective algorithm based on neighborhood adaptive of differential evolution [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2112-2124.
[13]	Qian LIU, Yunjun LU, Kebin CHEN, Mengyao HAN, Liang GUO. Combat task decomposition EVA method based on binary constraints of task subject [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2201-2210.
[14]	Rongwei CUI, Wei HAN, Xichao SU, Liguo WANG, Yujie LIU. Integrated optimization of carrier-based aircraft flight deck operations scheduling and resource configuration for pre-flight preparation stage [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(7): 1884-1893.
[15]	Boyuan XIA, Kewei YANG, Zhiwei YANG, Xiaoke ZHANG, Danling ZHAO. Multi-objective optimization of equipment portfolio based on kill-web evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 399-409.