基于动态规划的阵地伪装方案优化方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.11.20

Abstract

Abstract:

To address the problems of significant exposure symptoms and easy detection of combat intentions caused by the threat of all-round and multi spectral reconnaissance and comprehensive damage from opponents during the construction of position fortifications, a solution based on dynamic programming to optimize camouflage schemes is proposed. A camouflage system is formed through multi spectral camouflage nets, vegetation laying, and other schemes to quantitatively evaluate the consumption of resources such as manpower, material resources, time, and funds. A dynamic programming model is constructed to maximize the reliability of position fortifications camouflage through multi-stage decision-making optimization in the constraint of limited available resources. Comparative analysis shows that this method outperforms traditional empirical decision-making in balancing resource utilization efficiency and camouflage effect. The research results indicate that applying dynamic programming methods to optimize camouflage schemes for position fortifications can effectively solve the problem of maximizing camouflage effectiveness in limited resource constraints, and provide reference for position fortifications camouflage decision-making in complex environments.

Key words: position camouflage, dynamic programming, normalization, camouflage effect

CLC Number:

E 95

Haibao YU, Weidong XU, Yumou XIE, Hong WEI, Yujia YE, Longhua ZHENG. Optimization method of position camouflage scheme based on dynamic programming[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(11): 3721-3728.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 32

1	冯海潮, 张健, 赵志勇, 等. 伪装遮障及其技术发展综述[J]. 科技与创新, 2022, (23): 159- 161.
	FENG H C, ZHANG J, ZHAO Z Y, et al. Anoverview of camouflage masking and itste-chnological development[J]. Science, Technology and Innovation, 2022, (23): 159- 161.
2	MIKKELSEN A, SELJ K G. Spectral reflectance and transmission properties of a multi-layered camouflage net: comparison with natural birch leaves and mathematical models[C]//Proc. of the Conference on Target and Background Signatures, 2020: 1153609.
3	MIKKELSEN A, SELJ K G. Spectral properties of multilayered oak leaves and a camouflage net: experimental measurements and mathematical modelling[C]//Proc. of the International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2021: 1186505.
4	DENNING R J. SAAB to provide camouflage net systems to U.S. Defense Department[J]. Defense Daily International, 2009, 11 (22): 33- 34.
5	SINGH J, SINGH D. An analytical approach to design camouflage net for microwave absorption[J]. Defence Science Journal, 2019, 69 (5): 469- 473. doi: 10.14429/dsj.69.14953
6	LYNCH J. Reliability, maintainability and supportability: a probabilistic approach[J]. Technometrics, 2012, 37 (1): 122.
7	CHEN L, SHU P Z, FENG J H, et al. Reliability and maintainability model of support object system for equipment combat unit[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2011, 1244 (474/476): 816- 821.
8	PECHT M. Product reliability, maintainability, and supportability handbook[M]. Maryland: CRC Press, 2009.
9	OUBOTI D B, RAUL O. Discrete-time, normalized recursive least squares based concurrent learning for online function approximation[J]. Automatica, 2025, 177, 112273. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112273
10	NICHOLAS G, GOME Z, JULIA A, et al. The effect of amplitude normalization technique, walking speed, and reporting metric on whole-body angular momentum and its interpretation during normal gait[J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2024, 168, 112075. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112075
11	HONG J C, LIANG F W, CHEN Y J, et al. A novel battery abnormality diagnosis method using multi-scale normalized coefficient of variation in real-world vehicles[J]. Energy, 2024, 299, 131475. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131475
12	LIMA F T. A large comparison of normalization methods on time series[J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 34, 232- 235.
13	ZHANG B B, SUI W X, HUANG Z W, et al. Normalizing flow based uncertainty estimation for deep regression analysis[J]. Neurocomputing, 2024, 585, 127645. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127645
14	王新志, 陈伟, 祝明坤. 样本数据归一化方式对GPS高程转换的影响[J]. 测绘科学, 2013, 38 (6): 162- 165.
	WANG X Z, CHEN W, ZHU M K. Effect of sample data normalization method on GPS elevation conversion[J]. Surveying and Mapping Science, 2013, 38 (6): 162- 165.
15	胡江华, 贾其, 李凌, 等. 伪装技术[M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2020.
	HU J G, JIA Q, LI L, et al. Camouflage technology[M]. Beijing: Ordnance Industry Press, 2020.
16	SELLAMI R, SIVIGNON M. QoL data in CAR-T cost-effectiveness analysis （CEA） in France: what to use?[J]. Value in Health, 2024, 27 (12): S2.
17	MELANIE D, JOSHUA T, COHEN P J, et al. Campbell, identifying the influential dynamic inputs in cost-effectiveness analyses[J]. Value in Health, 2025, 28 (7): 1062- 1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.03.016
18	BUTER R, SCHUPPEN V H, STIEGLIS R, et al. Increasing cost-effectiveness of AEDs using algorithms to optimise location[J]. Resuscitation, 2024, 201, 110300. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110300
19	SU B C, MIN Y J, SUN J K. Integrated topology and power distribution optimization for the shipboard hybrid energy storage system via genetic algorithms and dynamic programming[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2025, 339 (1): 33- 55.
20	FENG X H, CHEN Y, ZHANG D D. A dynamic programming-based computational intelligence method for optimal pickup and delivery in inter-terminal logistics[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2025, 206, 11150.
21	MA L Y, WEN X J, ZHANG J, et al. Multi-stage decision-making and optimisation model based on dynamic programming[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2025, 262, 523- 532. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2025.05.082
22	LAHMAR H, DAHANE M, MOUSS K N, et al. Multi-objective sustainable production planning for a hybrid multi-stage manufacturing remanufacturing system with grade-based classification of recovered and remanufactured products[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2024, 36 (2): 21- 23.
23	ZHANG H Q, ZHAO J, WANG W, et al. Multi-stage dynamic optimisation method for long-term planning of the concentrate ingredient in copper industry[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 605, 333- 350. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.013
24	TRZASKALIK T. Multiobjective dynamic programming in bipolar multistage method[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 311 (2): 1259- 1279. doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03911-2
25	李新其, 叶喜发. 阵地伪装改造方案的动态规划优化方法[J]. 装备理论与装备技术, 2018, 39 (9): 26- 28.
	LI X Q, YE X F. A dynamic planning optimisation method for position camouflage modification scheme[J]. Equipment Theory and Equipment Technology, 2018, 39 (9): 26- 28.
26	LI Y Z, JIA C Y, LV J N, et al. Evaluation method of camouflage effect based on image feature similarity/fusion degree[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2025, 189, 113152.
27	TOET A, HOGERVORST M A. Review of camouflage assessment techniques[C]//Proc. of the Conference on Target and Background Signatures, 2020: 1153604.
28	LI N, LI L, JIAO J C, et al. Research status and development trend of image camouflage effect evaluation[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2022, 81 (21): 29939- 29953. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-12287-3
29	LU J Y. A method for detection and evaluation on pattern painting camouflage effect[J]. China Meas-Test, 2007, 33 (2): 67- 69.
30	AHMAD Z, HAMID D, JABAR A R. Evaluation of camouflage effectiveness using hyper spectral images[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2017, 11 (4): 045008.
31	CHENG X P, ZHAO D P, YU Z J. Effectiveness evaluation of infrared camouflage using image saliency[J]. Infrared Physics and Technology, 2018, 95, 213- 221. doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2018.11.001
32	汪克亮, 刘志刚, 王艺婷, 等. 基于图像显著性的伪装效果评估[M]//国家安全地球物理丛书(十七)——生态环境与地球物理. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.
	WANG K L, LIU Z G, WANG Y T, et al. Evaluation of camouflage effect based on image saliency[M]//National Security Geophysics Series (XVII)—Ecological Environment and Geophysics. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.

符号	意义
p	伪装可靠度
i	阵地工事伪装工程第i个设施
n	阵地工事伪装工程设施的个数
x_i	第i个设施采用伪装等级x进行伪装
P（i,x_i）	第i个设施采用伪装等级x伪装后伪装可靠度
S_i	第1至第i个工程伪装所用费效比之和
f_i	第i个阶段伪装后的伪装可靠度
c	伪装设施使用费用
C	整体伪装方案所需经费
P	整体阵地工事伪装方案伪装可靠度
P*	伪装方案优化后的伪装可靠度
A	战斗行动前需达到最低伪装可靠度
F	伪装方案优化费效比控制值
H	采用光学伪装网
I	采用多谱伪装网
J	采用植被铺设在光学伪装网
K	采用植被铺设在多谱伪装网
B	采用就便材料进行伪装
Z	采用植被与就便材料结合的方式进行伪装
T	伪装设施耗费时间
T^*	对T进行归一化后数值
W	伪装设施消耗人力
W^*	对W进行归一化后数值
D	伪装设施消耗经费
D^*	对D进行归一化后数值
E	伪装设施消耗物力
E^*	对E进行归一化后数值
U	该点效能与费用相等
V	该点效能与费用相等
O	Max（P-C）时对应的最优方案
g	伪装设施费效比
G	整体阵地工事伪装方案费效比
G*	整体阵地工事伪装方案优化后费效比

项目名称	伪装方案	伪装可靠度	费效比
掩蔽（盖）部	H	0.82	0.22
	I	0.96	0.32
	J	0.89	0.33
	K	0.99	0.42
交通（堑）壕	B	0.79	0.23
交通（堑）壕	Z	0.96	0.45
单人掩体	H	0.81	0.21
	I	0.96	0.32
	J	0.89	0.35
	K	0.99	0.40
火箭筒掩体	H	0.80	0.23
	I	0.95	0.36
	J	0.88	0.37
	K	0.97	0.48
机枪掩体	H	0.80	0.24
	I	0.95	0.34
	J	0.88	0.37
	K	0.98	0.40
火炮掩体	H	0.78	0.21
	I	0.92	0.32
	J	0.84	0.35
	K	0.95	0.46
道路	B	0.77	0.24
道路	Z	0.89	0.48

$ X_1 $	H	I	J	K
$ f_1 $	0.82	0.96	0.89	0.99
$ S_1 $	0.22	0.32	0.33	0.42

$ {X_2} $		$ {X_1} $
		H	I	J	K
		0.82	0.96	0.89	0.99
B	0.79	0.65	0.76	0.70	0.78
Z	0.96	0.79	0.92	0.85	0.95

$ {X_{{3}}} $		$ {f_{2}^*} $
$ {X_{{3}}} $		0.76	0.78	0.79	0.92	0.85	0.95
H	0.81	0.61	0.63	0.64	0.75	0.69	0.77
I	0.96	0.73	0.75	0.76	0.88	0.81	0.91
J	0.89	0.67	0.69	0.70	0.82	0.75	0.85
K	0.99	0.75	0.77	0.72	0.91	0.84	0.94

Optimization method of position camouflage scheme based on dynamic programming

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 32

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Xin GUAN, Ying LIU. Research on multi-attribute decision-making for Pythagorean hesitation fuzzy sets [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 982-991.
[2]	Ming SHI, Yuhui GAO, Gong ZHANG. Dynamic planning method based HTN for rover [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 631-639.
[3]	Renle ZHENG, Dongyang LI, Wenxue LIU, Jintao WAN, Xueyong LIU, Jinha LI. Hierarchical adaptive minimum sum decoding algorithm for LDPC code [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(12): 4231-4237.
[4]	Qitian WAN, Baogang LU, Yaxin ZHAO, Qiuqiu WEN. Autopilot parameter rapid tuning method based on deep reinforcement learning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(10): 3190-3199.
[5]	Jianguo GUO, Yalu SU. Control system design of adaptive dynamic programming for hypersonic vehicle [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1628-1635.
[6]	Shiyang GAO, Huixu DONG, Runlan TIAN, Xindong ZHANG. Radar emitter signal recognition method based on SRNN+Attention+CNN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3502-3509.
[7]	Xin ZHOU, Weiping WANG, Yifan ZHU, Tao WANG, Tian JING. Unmanned equipment SoS architecture scheme space searchingmethod based on the sequential allocated mechanism [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3211-3219.
[8]	ZHANG Yuanpeng, ZHENG Daikun, LI Xinzhe, SUN Yongjian. Dynamic programming track-Before-detect algorithm based on hidden Markov model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(11): 2479-2487.
[9]	ZHONG Lei, LI Yong, MOU Zhiying, CHENG Wei, LI Haobin. Detection method for weak target under unknown strong clutter based on DP-TBD [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(1): 43-49.
[10]	XIANG Yunwu, ZHANG Wenyi, TIAN Miaomiao. Satellite data transmission integrated scheduling and optimization [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(6): 1288-1293.
[11]	CHEN Jianyong, CHEN Changkang, SUN Mingjun. Optimization calculation of continuous search path [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(5): 1155-1159.
[12]	YAN Peiyuan, LIU Shu, WANG Jun. Optimization model of air defense disposition based on dynamic programming and genetic algorithm#br# [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(10): 2249-2255.
[13]	HAO Zhen-xing, LUO Ji-xun, HU Zhao-hui. Track control of air double detection distributed positioning system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(8): 1886-1891.
[14]	WANG Shuo, ZHANG Yi-qun. Improved dynamic programming algorithm for low signal-to-noise ratio moving target detection [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(10): 2244-2251.
[15]	ZHUO Zhen-fu, YANG Yong-jian, FAN Xiao-guang, WANG Sheng-da,NAN Jian-guo, WANG Jiu-chong. Array antennas pattern synthesis based on improved dichotomy particle swarm optimization [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(11): 2460-2466.