基于加权处理的无人机群数传性能综合评价方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.12.34

Abstract

Abstract:

Efficient returning of different types of intelligence information to the command center is one of the main tasks of reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Different types of information should adopt different transmission systems. Therefore, establishing a data transmission performance evaluation method with the features of objective, accurate and comprehensive is the key to ensure the efficient returning of airborne information. In view of the fact that the existing evaluation methods pay more attention to the improvement of indicators and lack of comprehensive evaluation of the transmission system, a method for evaluating the performance of UAV group data transmission based on weighted processing is proposed. According to the type and characteristics of UAV information, the emphasis index, balance index and secondary index of information transmission are obtained. The weight distribution of different indicators is carried out, and the performance scores and comprehensive scores are finally obtained. For several typical schemes of data transmission technology, the weighted processing method is used for comprehensive evaluation, and the advantages and disadvantages of different transmission schemes are presented more intuitively. As a general evaluation method, the proposed method can quantitatively analyze different indicators for a single scene. The weights of the indicators can be flexibly adjusted according to the actual needs. The comprehensive score results are more intuitive and more evaluable. The evaluation type of the proposed method can be promoted to multi-scenes. It can adapt to the evaluation needs of different scenarios and different information types by changing the weight size, which provides a basis for the selection and optimization of data transmission schemes for UAV group in multi-scenes.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) group, data transmission scheme, performance evaluation, weighted processing

CLC Number:

TN929.53

Mingfei ZHAO, Rui XUE. Comprehensive evaluation method based on weighted processing for data transmission performance of UAV group[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(12): 4248-4258.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.3

Table 4

Fig.4

Table 5

Fig.5

References 20

1	GERACI G , GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ A , AZARI M M , et al. What will the future of UAV cellular communications be? A flight from 5G to 6G[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2022, 24 (3): 1304- 1335.
2	JAVAID S , SAEED N , QADIR Z , et al. Communication and control in collaborative UAVs: recent advances and future trends[J]. IEEE Trans.on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 24 (6): 5719- 5739. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3248841
3	PREECE A, GOMEZ M, G DE MEL, et al. An ontology-based approach to sensor-mission assignment[C]//Proc. of the Annual Conference of the International Technology Alliance, 2007: 30-40.
4	CIOLPONEA C A , BARSAN G . NATO corps HQ-land component-integration of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)[J]. Land Forces Academy Review, 2022, 27 (4): 323- 332. doi: 10.2478/raft-2022-0041
5	MUSTAFA C U , MARINA M . Losing a war while defeating the enemy: the vitality of the "Strategy Bridge"[J]. Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova, 2022, 20 (40): 988- 1023.
6	ZHANG J X , GAO W D , CHUAI G , et al. An energy-effective and QoS-guaranteed transmission scheme in UAV-assisted heterogeneous network[J]. Drones, 2023, 7 (2): 141- 163. doi: 10.3390/drones7020141
7	JAWHAR I , MOHAMED N , AL-JAROODI J , et al. Communication and networking of UAV-based systems: classification and associated architectures[J]. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2017, 84, 93- 108. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2017.02.008
8	HOU Z F , CHEN J , HUANG Y Z , et al. Joint trajectory and passive beamforming optimization in IRS-UAV enhanced anti-jamming communication networks[J]. China Communications, 2021, 19 (5): 191- 205.
9	赵毅, 王璐, 刘崇华. 一种加权式的导航信号性能评估方法[C]// 第三届中国卫星导航学术年会, 2012.
	ZHAO Y, WANG L, LIU C H. A weighted evaluation method for navigation signal performance[C]//Proc. of the 3rd China Satellite Navigation Academic Annual Conference, 2012.
10	GAO S , WU J Z , AI J L . Multi-UAV reconnaissance task allocation for heterogeneous targets using grouping ant colony optimization algorithm[J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25, 7155- 7167. doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-05675-8
11	ZHAO Z Z, SU Z, ZHUANG Z, et al. Evaluation for warship satellite communication system[C]//Proc. of the 2nd International Signal Processing, Communications and Engineering Management Conference, 2022: 73-76.
12	YIN J, HAN L, MA L B, et al. Evaluation of terminal signal quality based on entropy weight method[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Control, Measurement and Signal Processing, 2022: 855-858.
13	郭厚峰. 雷达设备的受扰仿真与评估方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2022.
	GUO H F. Research on disturbed simulation and evaluation method of radar equipment[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2022.
14	MEN Y B, ZHENG J Y. Research on stratospheric communication effectiveness evaluation[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing, 2021: 504-509.
15	DONG Y L, WANG C T, SUN C H, et al. Performance evaluation for satellite communication networks based on AHP-BP algorithm[C]//Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, 2018: 311-316.
16	WANG Y J , HU X X , WANG L D . Effectiveness evaluation method of constellation satellite communication system with acceptable consistency and consensus under probability hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy preference relationship[J]. Soft Computing, 2022, 26 (22): 12559- 12581. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07220-7
17	郝亮亮, 张金生, 李婷, 等. 导弹武器模拟训练考评系统设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (4): 843- 850. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.04.15
	HAO L L , ZHANG J S , LI T , et al. Design of evaluation system for missile simulation training[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (4): 843- 850. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.04.15
18	XUE R , ZHAO M F , TANG H Y . Information transmission schemes based on adaptive coded modulation for UAV surveillance systems with satellite relays[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 191355- 191364. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027737
19	ZHAO M F , XUE R , JIANG H . Precoding-based complex field network coding strategy for multi-source UAV cooperative system[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2023, 2023 (1): 1- 20. doi: 10.1186/s13634-022-00961-5
20	XUE R , ZHAO M F . Cognitive-based robustness frequency hopping strategy for UAV swarms in complex electromagnetic environment[J]. Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing, 2022, 2022, 4139345.

性能指标	权重
可靠性	p₁
有效性	p₂
抗干扰性	p₃

性能指标	衡量指标	参考方案	传输方案	测定结果	权重	总得分
可靠性	平均(E_b/N₀)/dB	11.0	15.40	-0.40	0.6	0.33
有效性	平均归一化频谱效率	0.5	1.45	1.90	0.3	0.33

性能指标	衡量指标	参考方案	传输方案	测定结果	权重	总得分
可靠性	平均(E_b/N₀)/dB	11.0	16.30	-0.48	0.6	0.57
有效性	平均归一化频谱效率	0.5	1.93	2.86	0.3	0.57

性能指标	衡量指标	拓扑结构	参考方案	传输方案	评估分数	评估分数平均值	权重	总得分
可靠性	平均(E_b/N₀)/dB	6－6－1	24	17.5	0.27	0.26	0.3	-0.12
		6－4－1	27	20	0.26
		6－8－1	23	16	0.30
		4－6－1	18	14	0.22
		8－6－1	27.5	21	0.24
有效性	每时隙传输信息量	-	1/2	1/3	-0.33	-0.33	0.6

性能指标	衡量指标	干扰类型	参考方案	传输方案	评估分数	评估分数平均值	权重	总得分
可靠性	平均(E_b/N₀)/dB	BNJ	-3.58	-4.5	0.26	0.92	0.1	0.347
		NNJ	-2.1	-1.68	0.25
		STJ	-3.7	-5.5	0.49
		MTJ	-1.8	-5.6	2.1
		LFM	-1.25	-3.1	1.48
有效性	信息量/时隙	-	1/93	1/94	-0.01	-0.01	0.1
抗干扰性	平均干信比/dB	BNJ	9.58	10.5	0.1	0.32	0.8
		NNJ	7.8	8.1	0.04
		STJ	6.7	11.5	0.72
		MTJ	7.8	11.63	0.49
		LFM	7.3	9.1	0.25

Comprehensive evaluation method based on weighted processing for data transmission performance of UAV group

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 20

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Fei GAO, Jiang WU, Jun MA, Jia LIU, Xuanmin ZHANG, Bin LI, Jidong MENG, Wenbo NIU, Hongxing DANG. Research on the overall technology of space-based distributed radar sea surface target tracking application [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(8): 2667-2675.
[2]	Changxiao ZHAO, Ershuai LI, Feng HE, Peng WANG. Bandwidth allocation and optimization of time-sensitive traffic in TSN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 2027-2034.
[3]	Ling GUAN, Chenxi ZHU, Chunzhu DONG, Hongcheng YIN. Fast analysis of electromagnetic characteristics for UAV groups based on mode and domain decomposition [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2697-2705.
[4]	Yuting ZHANG, Miao XIAO, Liang ZHANG, Huaian ZHOU, Zheng LYU. EMC performance evaluation of mobile communication satellites based on near-field scanning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(9): 1897-1902.
[5]	Leiyu CHEN, Zhijie ZHOU, Shuaiwen TANG, You CAO. Weapon equipment performance evaluation method with multi-information fusion [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1527-1533.
[6]	Dangfei PAN, Wenxue LIU, Jian GE, Hong YUAN, Chao YUAN. Phase noise estimation method for RF front-end circuit of GNSS receiver [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(3): 536-543.
[7]	HE Huafeng, HE Yaomin, XU Yongzhuang. High performance evaluation of seeker measurement based on improved BP neural network [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(7): 1544-1550.
[8]	ZHANG Denghui, MA Ping, CHAO Tao, WANG Songyan. Performance evaluation of guidance and control system for hypersonic vehicle [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(8): 1811-1816.
[9]	QIN Maosen, ZHAO Danling, YANG Kewei. Effectiveness evaluation of anti-submarine activities based on combat network [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(7): 1513-1520.
[10]	HE Weikun, GAO Li, WANG Xiaoliang, WU Renbiao. Wind farm clutters suppression for weather radar based on improved MAP method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(5): 1018-1025.
[11]	HE Zhaoyang, WANG Qianzhe, SONG Bowen, PENG Weidong, WANG Jinjiang. RF stealth performance evaluation method for radar signal waveform [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(10): 2234-2238.
[12]	TAN Wei-kai，GUO Ai-huang， QIAN Ye-qing. Performance evaluation method for small cells based on FAHP [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(8): 1651-1655.
[13]	JING Pei-liang， XU Shi-you， LI Xian， CHEN Zeng-ping. Performance evaluation of multiple target tracking:a survey [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(11): 2127-2132.
[14]	YANG Wei，FU Yao-wen， LI Xiang. Performance evaluation of multi-object filter system based on the optimal assignment [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(9): 1809-1814.
[15]	ZHOU Pu-cheng, WANG Feng, CUI Xunxue, XUE Mo-gen. Performance evaluation approach to image fusion based on ordering approximate to ideal solution [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(3): 681-684.