子母型航天器抵近观测任务流程规划方法研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.12.24

Abstract

Abstract:

To address the task planning problem of parent-child spacecraft in orbit service under complex constraint conditions, the flight mission process of the parent-child spacecraft is designed. Firstly. Secondly, a two-level hybrid optimization method is proposed considering constraints such as time, lighting, and distance. The upper level of this method adopts an improved adaptive genetic algorithm to optimize the time nodes in different stages of the mission process. The lower level uses the multi loop Lambert algorithm, dual pulse control algorithm, and target correction method to optimize the flight trajectories of different stages under fixed time nodes in the upper level, thereby solving the problem of planning the approach observation mission process of parent-child spacecraft in different scenarios and reducing fuel consumption. Finally, the method is applied to two typical mission scenarios, and the feasibility and effectiveness of the mission planning algorithm design are further verified through simulation.

Key words: parent-child spacecraft, mission planning, two-level hybrid optimization method, adaptive genetic algorithm

CLC Number:

V529

Qidi WEN, Zhiyu KANG, Guoning WEI, Yanbo HE, Bin WU, Ruiyi ZHOU. Research on the approach observation mission flow planning method of parent-child spacecraft[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(12): 3941-3948.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.11

Fig.12

References 18

1	BONNAL C , RUAULT J M , DESJEAN M C . Active debris removal: recent progress and current trends[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 85, 51- 60. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.11.009
2	LI W J , CHENG D Y , LIU X G , et al. On-orbit service (OOS) of spacecraft: a review of engineering developments[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 108, 32- 120. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.01.004
3	BLAKE J A , CHOTE P , POLLACCO D , et al. DebrisWatch Ⅰ: a survey of faint geosynchronous debris[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2021, 67 (1): 360- 370. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.08.008
4	余婧. 航天器在轨服务任务规划技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2016.
	YU J. Research on mission planning technology of spacecraft in orbit service[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2016.
5	欧阳琦, 姚雯, 陈小前. 地球同步轨道卫星群在轨加注任务规划[J]. 宇航学报, 2010, 31 (12): 2629- 2634. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2010.12.002
	OUYANG Q , YAO W , CHEN X Q . On-orbit annotation mission planning for geosynchronous orbiting satellite group[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2010, 31 (12): 2629- 2634. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2010.12.002
6	BANG J , AHN J Y . Multitarget rendezvous for active debris removal using multiple spacecraft[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2019, 56 (4): 1237- 1247. doi: 10.2514/1.A34344
7	杨胜, 王鑫哲, 李蒙. 基于有限状态机的交会对接飞行任务规划方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45 (9): 1741- 1746. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0008
	YANG S , WANG X Z , LI M . Rendezvous and docking flight mission planning method based on finite state machine[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45 (9): 1741- 1746. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0008
8	刘晓路, 许英杰, 贺仁杰, 等. 面向卫星的在轨服务任务规划方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2020, 42 (5): 143- 150.
	LIU X L , XU Y J , HE R J , et al. Satellite-oriented on-orbit service task planning method[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2020, 42 (5): 143- 150.
9	CHEN S Y , JIANG F H , LI H Y , et al. Optimization for multitarget, multispacecraft impulsive rendezvous considering J2 perturbation[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2021, 44 (10): 1811- 1822. doi: 10.2514/1.G005602
10	HAN P , GUO Y N , LI C J , et al. Multiple GEO satellites on-orbit repairing mission planning using large neighborhood search-adaptive genetic algorithm[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2022, 70 (2): 286- 302. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.034
11	孙雷翔. 低轨航天器近距离交会任务规划研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.
	SUN L X. Study on mission planning for low-orbit spacecraft close-range rendezvous[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Technology, 2021.
12	WEI Z , LONG T , SHI R H , et al. Scheduling optimization of multiple hybrid-propulsive spacecraft for geostationary space debris removal missions[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2022, 58 (3): 2304- 2326. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3131294
13	LI H Y , BAOYIN H X . Optimization of multiple debris removal missions using an evolving elitist club algorithm[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2019, 56 (1): 773- 784.
14	CHEN X Q , YU J . Optimal mission planning of GEO on-orbit refueling in mixed strategy[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 133, 63- 72. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.012
15	ZHOU Y , YAN Y , HUANG X , et al. Optimal scheduling of multiple geosynchronous satellites refueling based on a hybrid particle swarm optimizer[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 47, 125- 134. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.09.024
16	王生亮, 刘根友, 高铭, 等. 改进的自适应遗传算法在TDOA定位中的应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (2): 254- 258.
	WANG S L , LIU G Y , GAO M , et al. Application of improved adaptive genetic algorithm in TDOA location[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (2): 254- 258.
17	LI Y , WU H L , SUN Y C . Improved adaptive genetic algorithm based RFID positioning[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (2): 305- 311. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000031
18	韩潮, 谢华伟. 空间交会中多圈Lambert变轨算法研究[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2004, 24 (5): 11- 16.
	HAN C , XIE H W . Research on multi-loop Lambert trajectory transform algorithms in spatial intersection[J]. China Space Science and Technology, 2004, 24 (5): 11- 16.

参数	子母型航天器	目标卫星
初始时间	2021-12-06 12:20:00
模型约束	t≤T=12 000 s; γ≥γ₀=40°; d≤D=50 km
轨道半长轴/km	6 778	6 878
偏心率	0.001	0.001
升交点赤经/(°)	100	100
轨道倾角/(°)	42	42
近地点幅角/(°)	0	0
真近点角/(°)	15	20
测距测角能力/km	母星: ρ₂=50;子星: ρ₁=1
子星绕飞半径/km	R=0.1

飞行阶段	参数	结果
远程导引段	飞行等待时间x₁/s	1 600
	飞行转移时间/s	2 798
	飞行结束时间x₂/s	4 398
	多圈Lambert算法解算速度增量/(km·s^－1)	dv₁=[0.011 0, -0.018 3, -0.006 9], dv₂=[-0.011 1, 0.018 2, 0.007 0]
	结束时间	2021-12-06 13:33:18
近程导引段	飞行等待时间x₃/s	79
	飞行转移时间/s	2 731
	飞行结束时间x₄/s	2 810
	子星圆绕飞起点x₅/km (目标轨道坐标系下)	(-0.094 6, -0.032 6, 0)
	打靶修正后C-W方程解算速度增量/(km·s^－1)	dv₃=[0.000 7, 0.005 5, 0]
	结束时间	2021-12-06 14:20:08

参数	子母型航天器	目标卫星
初始时间	2022-08-06 19:40:00
真近点角/(°)	15	70

飞行阶段	参数	结果
远程导引段	飞行等待时间x₁/s	4 684
	飞行转移时间/s	5 310
	飞行结束时间x₂/s	9 994
	多圈Lambert算法解算速度增量/(km·s^－1)	dv₁=[0.356 7, 0.104 8, -0.332 7]， dv₂=[-0.291 5, 0.030 6, 0.253 7]
	结束时间	2022-08-06 22:26:34
近程导引段	飞行等待时间x₃/s	661
	飞行转移时间/s	686
	飞行结束时间x₄/s	1 347
	子星圆绕飞起点x₅/km (目标轨道坐标系下)	(-0.095 6, -0.029 2, 0)
	打靶修正后的C-W方程解算速度增量/(km·s^－1)	dv₃=[0.014 2, 0.022 9, 0]
	结束时间	2022-08-06 22:49:01

[1]	Jing YU, Enmi YONG, Hanyang CHEN, Dong HAO, Xiancai ZHANG. Bi-level mission planning method for multi-cooperative UAV air-to-ground attack [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(9): 2849-2857.
[2]	Peng JIN, Kang LI. Distributed satellite resource scheduling based on improved contract network protocol [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(10): 3164-3173.
[3]	Shengyu ZHANG, Yukun SUN, Zhencai ZHU, Haiying HU. Heuristic optimized forward-backward chains combination method for on-board multi-targets observation planning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(5): 1262-1269.
[4]	Kai CHENG, Gang CHEN, Xiaohan YU, Man LIU, Tianhao SHAO. Knowledge traction and data-driven wargame AI design and key technologies [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2911-2917.
[5]	Gaowei JIA, Jianfeng WANG. Research review of UAV swarm mission planning method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 99-111.
[6]	JIN Peng, WANG Chaochao, XIA Wei, YANG Bin, TANG Hang. Two phase emergency mission planning with satellite instruction release [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(4): 810-818.
[7]	ZHANG Chao, JIN Peng, CHEN Jinyong, LI Yanbin, MA Wanquan. Virtual constellation task planning technology for emergency observation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(4): 819-825.
[8]	WANG Shengliang, LIU Genyou, GAO Ming, WANG Jiachen, WANG Binbin. Application of improved adaptive genetic algorithm in TDOA location [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(2): 254-258.
[9]	SUN Peng, WU Junsheng, LIAO Mengchen, ZHANG Jieyong. Battlefield resource dynamic scheduling model and algorithm based on improved self-adaptive genetic algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(11): 2459-.
[10]	HE Yongming, CHEN Yingwu, XING Lining, YUAN Zang, LI Guoliang. Autonomous mission planning system design for novel imaging satellite [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(4): 806-813.
[11]	NI Peng1,2, LIU Jinmang1, FU Qiang1, GAO Jiale1. #br# Research on layered decisionmaking of multisensor planning based onheterogeneous MAS in antiTBM combat [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(8): 1816-1825.
[12]	HE Lei, LIU Xiao-lu, CHEN Ying-wu, XING Li-ning. Cloud modeling and processing method for agile observing satellite mission planning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(4): 852-858.
[13]	ZHANG Jia-ming, LIU Zhong, SHI Jian-mai, HE Yun-yue. Schedule of multiple satellite launch missions in multiple launch centers considering failures [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(8): 1803-1809.
[14]	HU Xiao-xuan， ZHU Wai-ming， MA Hua-wei. Method of satellite and aerostat cooperative reconnaissance mission planning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(7): 1562-1568.
[15]	WANG Hui-lin, HUANG Xiao-jun, MA Man-hao, QIU Di-shan. Mission scheduling technique for electronic reconnaissance satellites [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(8): 1695-1699.

Research on the approach observation mission flow planning method of parent-child spacecraft

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 18

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments