基于复杂组织理论的军队体系能力概念建模

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.01.22

Abstract

Abstract:

To address the problems of inconsistent description and non-standard classification in the development of capabilities of military system-of-systems, based on the theory of complex organizational system-of-systems, the evolution process of capability development paradigms is analyzed, distinguishes basic concepts, and elaborates on the basic connotations from the perspectives of black and white box. It designs a conceptual model and formal description formula for capabilities of military system-of-systems, establishes attribute evaluation dimensions for quality, effectiveness, and maturity, proposes classification and layering principles, clarifies key issues of concern, and supports the framework construction of the capabilities of military system-of-systems.

Key words: system-of-systems capability, conceptual model, attribute, classification framework

CLC Number:

E 917

Chuwan XIAO, Jiajun YUAN, DAN WANG. Conceptual modeling of military system-of-systems capabilities based on complex organizational theory[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(1): 249-256.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

References 30

1	SEBOK. Guide to the systems engineering body of knowledge (SEBoK) [EB/OL]. [2024-07-02]. https://sebokwiki.org/wiki/Guide_to_the_Systems_Engineering_Body_of_Knowledge_(SEBoK).
2	MARTIN J N. Transforming the enterprise using a systems approach[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2011, 21 (1): 1336- 1355. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2011.tb01289.x
3	王剑飞, 郭嘉诚, 周云富. 联合作战能力需求分析方法研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2009, 23 (2): 30- 34.
	WANG J F, GUO J C, ZHOU Y F. Research on the method of analysis of joint combat capability requirements[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2009, 23 (2): 30- 34.
4	孙严, 戴浩. 基于能力的军事需求方法简介[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2007, 7 (9): 2170- 2176.
	SUN Y, DAI H. Brief introduction of military requirement method based on capability[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2007, 7 (9): 2170- 2176.
5	张萌萌. 面向体系架构的军事信息系统业务与技术匹配关键技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019.
	ZHANG M M. Research on key techniques of business-IT alignment in military information system architecture[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.
6	THE OPEN GROUP. The TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition [EB/OL]. [2024-07-02]. https://publications.opengroup.org.
7	MOHAMMADREZA T, ALI K R. Model-based systems engineering （MBSE） methodology for integrating autonomy into a system of systems using the unified architecture framework[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2024, 34 (1): 1051- 1070. doi: 10.1002/iis2.13195
8	TORKJAZI M, DAVILA-ANDINO A J, ALGHAMDI A, et al. UAF strategic planning for enterprises[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10, 123549- 123559. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3224456
9	HAUSE M, BLEAKLEY G, MORKEVICIUS A. Technology update on the unified architecture framework （UAF）[J]. Insight, 2017, 20 (2): 71- 78. doi: 10.1002/inst.12153
10	YANG Y L, SONG W X, CHANG C Y, et al. MissionML: a mission architecture modeling language based on unified architecture framework[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2024, 34 (1): 479- 502. doi: 10.1002/iis2.13158
11	ISO/IEC 19540. Information technology-object management group unified architecture framework (OMG UAF)[S]. London: British Standards Institution Standards Limited, 2022.
12	AGHAMOHAMMADPOUR A, MAHDIPOUR E, ATTARZADEH I. Architecting threat hunting system based on the DoDAF framework[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2022, 79 (4): 4215- 4242.
13	NOBUAKI T, SHUICHIRO Y, BUYANJARGAL S. Unicage architecture development method[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2024, 239, 364- 371. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.183
14	卫旭芳, 潘辉, 詹晨光. 美军体系工程发展及启示[J]. 航空兵器, 2022, 29 (2): 52- 54.
	WEI X F, PAN H, ZHAN C G. Development of American military system engineering and enlightenment[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2022, 29 (2): 52- 54.
15	陈至立. 《辞海》[M]. 7版. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 2019.
	CHEN Z L. CiHai [M]. 7th ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, 2019.
16	ARP R, SMITH B, SPEAR A D. Building ontologies with basic formal ontology[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.
17	GASEVIC D, DJURIC D, DEVEDžIC V. Model driven engineering and ontology development[M]. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
18	OBJECT MANAGEMENT GROUP. Unified architecture framework (UAF) domain metamodel[M]. Washington D.C.: Object Management Group, 2021.
19	ABHAYA L. UAF （unified architecture framework） based MBSE （UBM） method to build a system of systems model[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2021, 31 (1): 227- 241. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2021.00835.x
20	HEATHER D. Dispossession: photography, migration, and object ontology at the border[J]. Photographies, 2024, 17 (1-2): 43- 61. doi: 10.1080/17540763.2023.2271028
21	FRANCESCO O, MICHELE P P. An experimental study on the ontology of relations[J]. Synthese, 2024, 203 (3): 67- 83.
22	OBJECT MANAGEMENT GROUP. Enterprise architecture guide for UAF[M]. Washington D.C.: Object Management Group, 2021.
23	HAUSE M, WILSON M. Integrated human factors views in the unified architecture framework[J]. INCOSE international symposium, 2017, 27 (1): 1054- 1069. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00412.x
24	DEPARTMET OF DEFENSE. Manual for the operation of the joint capabilities integration and development system[M]. Washington: Department of Defense, 2018.
25	军事科学院. 中国人民解放军军语[M]. 北京: 军事科学出版社, 2011.
	ACADEMY OF MILITARY SCIENCES. Military language of the People’s Liberation Army of Chinese[M]. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2011.
26	何清成. 基于系统理论的体系作战能力生成模式研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2012.
	HE Q C. Research on the generation mode of system combat capability based on system theory[D]. Beijing: Graduate school of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012.
27	IBM. Component business modeling, a new perspective on cutting risk and compliance costs[R]. New York: International Business Machines Corporation Institute for Business Value, 2018.
28	刘婧婷, 郭继坤. 基于 UAF 元模型的战区联合作战精确保障体系构建方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (6): 1324- 1331.
	LIU J T, GUO J K. Establishment of efficient support system for joint operations in theater command based on DMM of UAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (6): 1324- 1331.
29	DAS A. Capability requirements portfolio management in large organizations using semantic data lake as a decision support system: proof-of-concept experiments[D]. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Systems Engineering and Electronics Institute of Technology, 2018.
30	KLINGBIE P H. Machine-aided indexing of technical literature[J]. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1973, 9 (2): 79- 84. doi: 10.1016/0020-0271(73)90020-X

定义	要点
顺利完成某种活动并直接影响活动效率所必需的个性心理特征^[15]	①面向活动②针对个体
做某件事所拥有的力量或本领	面向事件
一种他在常体，描述一个自在常体的属性	常体，描述自在常体属性
一个组织、个人或系统所拥有的一种本领。通常需要结合组织、人员、流程和技术来实现	①个体、组织或系统具有②多因素实现
在规定标准和条件下，通过方法和资源组织执行一系列任务，达到预期目标的本领	①规定条件②方法和资源组合③预期目标
执行一个特殊作战过程的本领	内在属性
武装力量遂行作战任务的本领，由人员和武器装备的数量、质量、编制体制的科学化程度、组织指挥和管理水平、各种保障勤务的能力等因素综合决定^[25]	①面向任务②内在属性③多因素实现

序号	名称	定义	条件	属性	资源	关系
NAV 1.1.1	肃清空域任务能力	保持某一空域无威胁	海况	空域肃清时间	飞机	支撑打击任务
			高度	出动时间	飞机	支撑打击任务
						

成熟度等级	等级名称	等级定义
L1	初始级	缺乏完整的能力基础
L2	可重复级	流程可重复
L3	已定义级	形成了完整的文档，对能力进行了充分定义
L4	已管理级	可以控制能力实施过程，保证能力不偏离目标
L5	优化级	能力可以持续改进

[1]	Chenhao YU, Leilei CHANG, Yu ZHOU, Jianbin SUN. Performance evaluation method for autonomous intelligent system using feedback-based attribute extraction and anti-causality [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(1): 209-217.
[2]	Zhiqiang CUI, Hongli JIA, Lili GAO, Bing HAO. Decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy rough set for the variety of equipment stored on behalf of the factory [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(1): 235-248.
[3]	Jiali WANG, Wenqi JIANG. Multi-attribute group decision-making model integrating internal uncertainty and external interaction of attribute [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(6): 1909-1916.
[4]	Meixian JIANG, Juntao GAO, Tao PEI. Efficient and revocable ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption scheme on lattice [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(4): 1364-1373.
[5]	Zhiqiang CUI, Hongli JIA, Bing HAO, Lili GAO. Research on selection of equipment substitute storage plant based on combination weighting VIKOR [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(10): 3353-3366.
[6]	Tianqi XU, Wenqi JIANG, Li ZHU, Shanshan YANG, Jiali WANG. DPC-ELECTRE multi-attribute decision-making methods and applications based on integration attribute correlation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(1): 202-209.
[7]	Lisha PENG, Yuxiang SUN, Yufan XUE, Xianzhong ZHOU. Intelligent decision-making technology for wargame by integrating three-way multiple attribute decision-making and SAC [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2310-2322.
[8]	Xin GUAN, Ying LIU. Research on multi-attribute decision-making for Pythagorean hesitation fuzzy sets [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 982-991.
[9]	Jiayi CAI, Ping CHU, Luntao ZHUANG, Zhaocheng YANG. Millimeter-wave radar body interference recognition based on spatial attribute features [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(10): 3365-3374.
[10]	Tao WANG, Xiaobo LI, Jie ZHANG, Hua HE, Weiping WANG. Evaluation method for the system-of-systems contribution ratio of strategic planning project based on "project-capability" association [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(8): 2295-2304.
[11]	Xiaojie YU, Song WEI, Jialian SHENG, Lei ZHANG. Threat identification for low-altitude target track based on HMM [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(5): 1399-1408.
[12]	Jianhao WANG, Long WANG, Liang ZHANG, Lijie CUI. Supplier selection VIKOR multi-attribute decision making of grey group clustering and improved CRITIC weighting [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 155-164.
[13]	Nuoxi ZHENG, Wu LI, Xiaoqiang ZHOU, Gang LIU. Projection decision method for consistency of multiple attribute similarity [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(9): 2869-2877.
[14]	Wenqi WANG, Dengying JIANG. Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE multi-attribute group decision-making based on the probability degree [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(8): 2581-2592.
[15]	Dongliang YIN, Guoheng CUI, Xiaoying HUANG, Huan ZHANG. Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making based on improved score function and prospect theory [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3463-3469.

Conceptual modeling of military system-of-systems capabilities based on complex organizational theory

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments