面向定性与定量指标的轻量化高空飞艇效能评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.03.14

Abstract

Abstract:

High altitude airships possess advantages such as long endurance in the air and low energy consumption, making them highly valuable for applications in information monitoring and long-term communication. Considering the coupling between the airship platform and payload in terms of performance indicators, a lightweight effectiveness evaluation method is proposed, integrating both qualitative and quantitative indicators. First, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is employed to transform qualitative indicators, which cannot be directly used for data analysis, into quantitative indicators, thereby achieving complete quantification of multiple types of indicators. Next, through maximum information coefficient correlation analysis based on fuzzy C-means clustering, select indicators related to the focus indicators and construct a scientific lightweight evaluation system. Then, a combined subjective and objective weighting method based on expert ranking evaluation is proposed, and the effectiveness evaluation results are obtained by calculating weights based on the lightweight evaluation system. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed effectiveness evaluation method is verified through a case study. This lightweight effectiveness evaluation method can support high altitude airship design and optimization, helping to shorten development cycles and reduce costs.

Key words: effectiveness evaluation, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, fuzzy C-means clustering, maximum information coefficient, combined weighting method

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Zhangqiu YUAN, Zhaoxu YANG, Haijun RONG. Lightweight effectiveness evaluation method for high altitude airships for both qualitative and quantitative indicators[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(3): 817-826.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

Table 2

Data on high altitude airships of various models"

效能评估指标		型号数据
准则层	指标层	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
飞艇平台性能	机动性能	49.4	51.3	112	55.3	109.8	109.9	133.8	73.4	109.7	127.5	72.1	88.9	63.2	105.5	129.1	85.3	147.9	48.7	88.7	144.1
	巡航速度/(km/h)	29.6	30.5	61.4	32	58.6	58.8	72.3	41	59.4	68	33	48.8	36	57	68	46	79	28.9	47.5	75
	最大航速/(km/h)	55	59	110	66	103	105.6	118	77	103	121	57	94	68	97	109	92	134	58.4	91	128
	抗摧毁能力	26	27.2	44.6	28	42.1	41.3	55.3	33	42.9	54.2	28.3	37.9	29.8	41.3	55.1	36.3	60	25.5	37.1	58.7
	发动机排气量/cc	86	121	173	87.4	176	153	167	62	76	93	124	80	129	153	200	118	195	61	67	187
	发动机功率/马力	7.3	12	15.3	8	16.5	12.3	13.6	5.4	7.8	8.4	12.3	6.7	11.2	15	18	10	14	5.2	6	19
	驻空高度/m	1 480.0	1 359.0	1 200.0	1 345.0	1 467.0	1 347.0	1 345.0	1 455.0	1 456.0	1 245.0	1 323.0	1 423.0	1 342.0	1 433.0	1 324.0	1 432.0	1 544.0	1 534.0	1 234.0	1 469.0
	驻空时长/h	180.0	220.0	367.0	165.0	330.0	278.0	365.0	238.0	278.0	347.0	220.0	275.0	277.0	318.0	418.0	270.0	440.0	216.0	312.0	345.0
飞艇可靠性	平均寿命/d	1876	1765	3242	1865	3214	2907	3366	2197	2854	3254	1987	2546	1967	3214	3324	2657	3765	1879	2376	3486
	平均无故障时间/d	176	167	330	183	301	321	356	187	314	368	165	219	187	319	371	222	401	181	231	389
	控制系统可靠性	69.4	69.6	132	75.2	130	131	154.9	94.2	131	151	92.2	109.2	83.1	123.2	149.2	105.3	167.2	68.4	109.4	164.2
	电系统环境适应性	70.2	69.4	56.2	68.1	57.4	57.1	49.2	64.5	56.4	52.9	67.2	63.9	67.5	53.5	51.6	67.6	46.5	73.4	62.5	47.2
	检修时长/min	97.0	142.0	146.0	67.0	231.0	123.0	186.0	137.0	138.0	148.0	143.0	145.0	175.0	185.0	232.0	131.0	245.0	121.0	128.0	156.0
	最大抗风能力	3.8	4.4	5.7	3.6	5.7	5.5	5.9	5.1	5.5	5.5	4.0	5.9	5.3	5.7	5.9	5.2	5.9	4.1	5.8	6.3
	被动防护响应效率	67.0	58.0	68.0	68.0	58.0	68.0	71.0	67.0	58.0	60.0	72.0	69.0	66.0	85.0	72.0	59.0	55.0	57.0	55.0	65.0
载荷稳定性	气体环境适应性	9.6	9.5	4.8	9.5	5.3	5.2	2.9	8.8	5.2	3.3	9.5	7.3	9.2	6.2	3.2	8.2	1.0	9.6	8.3	2.0
	抗干扰能力	18	18.2	24.3	18.5	23.4	23.8	26.8	21	23.7	25.7	19.2	21.7	19.1	23.7	25.8	22	28	17.8	21.5	27
	机载设备可靠性	88.2	88.4	94.3	88.8	93.4	93.6	96.3	90.3	93.5	95.3	89	91.7	89.5	93.6	95.6	91.5	97.8	87.8	91.7	97
	温度适应性	76.0	45.0	57.0	75.0	43.0	66.0	65.0	78.0	65.0	67.0	54.0	47.0	56.0	76.0	67.0	74.0	65.0	66.0	69.0	71.0
	抗辐射能力	95.0	89.0	77.0	80.0	94.0	92.0	85.0	94.0	84.0	89.0	93.0	92.0	92.0	81.0	92.0	91.0	85.0	83.0	92.0	83.0
载荷侦察能力	处理信息能力	7.0	6.9	5.6	6.9	5.7	5.8	4.8	6.5	5.4	5.3	7.0	6.4	6.8	5.6	5.2	6.8	4.7	7.3	6.3	4.8
	视野范围	190	192	221	196	224	230	253	201	227	260	198	212	199	221	265	210	280	197	216	276
	识别准确率/%	50.0	51.0	92.0	56.0	88.0	87.0	94.0	60.0	85.0	92.9	57.0	79.0	61.0	91.0	95.0	77.0	98.0	55.0	78.9	93.0
	信息融合能力	78.0	87.0	88.0	78.0	89.0	76.0	78.0	87.0	86.0	87.0	79.0	87.0	89.0	77.0	78.0	65.0	86.0	86.0	89.0	76.0
飞艇载荷能力	艇囊容积/m³	27	46.7	88.6	25.7	87.9	68	108	48	68	90	33	55	45	66	110	52	94	34	53	103
飞艇载荷能力	最大载重量/kg	3	10	25	3.6	22.4	20	30	11	20	26.4	5	9.8	12	21	33	12	24	7	15.8	31

Table 2

Fig.5

Table 3

Table 4

References 31

1	HU S X , ZHANG A W , CHAI S T . ASQ-MPHAAS: multi-payload observation system from high altitude airship[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2019, 19 (24): 12353- 12362. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2937804
2	YAN K , JIANG J , SUN M W , et al. Coordinated symmetrical altitude position and attitude control for stratospheric airship subject to strong aerodynamic uncertainties[J]. Symmetry, 2023, 15 (6): 1260. doi: 10.3390/sym15061260
3	JING Y H , YANG Z H , ZHOU P F , et al. Cooperative deployment multi-objective optimization approach for high-resolution multi-airship earth-observation coverage network[J]. IEEE Trans. on Network Science and Engineering, 2023, 10 (6): 3435- 3449.
4	CHEN Y L , SHEN S P , HU Z K , et al. Fixed-point control of airships based on a characteristic model: a data-driven approach[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11 (2): 310. doi: 10.3390/math11020310
5	HU S X , WANG B K , ZHANG A W , et al. Genetic algorithm and greedy strategy-based multi-mission-point route planning for heavy-duty semi-rigid airship[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22 (13): 4954. doi: 10.3390/s22134954
6	XU J P , MENG Z Y , XU L . ISHM-oriented hierarchical effectiveness evaluation approach for spacecraft avionics[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2014, 9 (2): 461- 473.
7	BOUZIAT T, CAMPS V, COMBETTES S. A cooperative SoS architecting approach based on adaptive multi-agent systems[C]// Proc. of the 6th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems, 2018: 8-16.
8	马骏, 杨镜宇, 吴曦. 基于预聚类主动半监督的作战体系效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44 (6): 1889- 1896. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.06.15
	MA J , YANG J Y , WU X . Evaluation of operational system of systems effectiveness based on pre-clustering active semi-supervised learning[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44 (6): 1889- 1896. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.06.15
9	SUN Y K , FANG Z G . Research on projection gray target model based on FANP-QFD for weapon system of systems capability evaluation[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 15 (3): 4126- 4136.
10	邱禄芸, 方志耕, 陶良彦, 等. 网络体系效能评估改进FDNA模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44 (12): 3728- 3737. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.12.17
	QIU L Y , FANG Z G , TAO L Y , et al. Effectiveness evaluation of network SoS based on improved FDNA model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44 (12): 3728- 3737. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.12.17
11	SONG L N , SHI D X , XIA J Q , et al. Spatial-aware dynamic lightweight self-supervised monocular depth estimation[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023, 9 (1): 883- 890.
12	LI G Z , ZHANG A N , ZHANG Q Z , et al. Pearson correlation coefficient-based performance enhancement of broad learning system for stock price prediction[J]. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems Ⅱ: Express Briefs, 2022, 69 (5): 2413- 2417.
13	ZHANG D H , YANG Y C , LIU Y M , et al. Hybrid HVDC line pilot protection method based on EMD and Spearman correlation coefficient[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49 (9): 1- 11.
14	SZEKELY G J , RIZZO M L , BAKIROV N K . Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances[J]. The Annals of Statistics, 2007, 35 (6): 2769- 2794.
15	RUAN S F , CHEN B Z , SONG K F , et al. Weighted naive Bayes text classification algorithm based on improved distance correlation coefficient[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 (4): 2729- 2738.
16	ASGHARIVASKASI A , ATANASOV N . Semantic OcTree map and Shannon mutual information computation for robot exploration[J]. IEEE Trans. on Robotics, 2023, 39 (3): 1910- 1928.
17	CHEN B , WANG J , LV Y Y , et al. Device-free wireless sensing with few labels through mutual information maximization[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11 (6): 10513- 10524.
18	RESHEF D , RESHEF Y , FINUCANE H K , et al. Detecting novel associations in large data sets[J]. Science, 2011, 334 (6062): 1518- 1524.
19	ZHANG Q Y, ZHANG W, LI Q Q, et al. Research on the flexibility of carrier-based aircraft equipment system based on complex network theory[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Automation and Systems, 2019: 253-257.
20	ZHANG D , JIA L M , NING J , et al. Power grid structure performance evaluation based on complex network cascade failure analysis[J]. Energies, 2023, 16 (2): 990.
21	LEI M , DONG Y F , LI Z , et al. Application of a modified BPS neural network based on three-way decision theory in an effectiveness evaluation for a remote sensing satellite cluster[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15 (13): 3305.
22	JIAO W H . Performance evaluation of state-owned enterprises based on fuzzy neural network combination model[J]. Soft Computing, 2022, 26 (20): 11105- 11113.
23	季玉琦, 谢欢, 史少彧, 等. 基于EWM-AHP-BP神经网络的地区电网电压无功组合评价[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35 (4): 843- 852.
	JI Y Q , XIE H , SHI S Y , et al. Voltage and reactive power combinational evaluation of regional power grid based on EWM-AHP-BP neural network[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35 (4): 843- 852.
24	HAN F , LIU Z L , WANG C X , et al. Research on optimization method of railway construction scheme based on multidimensional combination weighting and improved grey theory[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14 (1): 3023.
25	WANG J , HAO Y L , YANG C . A comprehensive prediction model for VHF radio wave propagation by integrating entropy weight theory and machine learning methods[J]. IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 2023, 97 (7): 6249- 6254.
26	周依希, 李晓明, 瞿合祚. 基于反熵-AHP二次规划组合赋权法的电网节点综合脆弱性评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2019, 39 (7): 133- 140.
	ZHOU Y X , LI X M , QU H Z . Comprehensive vulnerability assessment of power grid nodes based on the combination weighting method of anti entropy AHP quadratic programming[J]. Power Automation Equipment, 2019, 39 (7): 133- 140.
27	FAN L , SPIRKOVA J , MESIAR R , et al. Multi-criteria fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in interval environment with dual preferences[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 39 (1): 1361- 1369.
28	SHI Z G , ZUO Z Y , DONG R N . Low-altitude scaled similarity analysis and flight tests of near space airships with pressure resistance mechanism[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2023, 72 (6): 2324- 2335.
29	DU H F , LI J , ZHU W Y , et al. Thermal performance analysis and comparison of stratospheric airships with rotatable and fixed photovoltaic array[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 158, 373- 386.
30	JIAO J J , WANG X P , WEI T Y , et al. An adaptive fuzzy C-means noise image segmentation algorithm combining local and regional information[J]. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 2023, 31 (8): 2645- 2657.
31	Feiyu Aviation Science and Technology Ltd. Company product[EB/OL]. [2024-02-20]. http://fyft.com/products.shtml.

S	Sz	Sc	Sa	Sq	a_{2, 2}
Sz	1	1/2	4	3	0.288 4
Sc	2	1	7	5	0.532 9
Sa	1/4	1/7	1	1/2	0.067 4
Sq	1/3	1/5	2	1	0.111 3

型号	本文方法效能评估值	文献[23]效能评估值	文献[26]效能评估值
1	0.143 2	0.258 6	0.274 8
2	0.170 4	0.366 8	0.282 5
3	0.613 4	0.472 2	0.501 8
4	0.181 9	0.251 6	0.241 5
5	0.572 1	0.427 6	0.510 2
6	0.562 0	0.465 2	0.452 6
7	0.745 6	0.503 2	0.551 9
8	0.296 5	0.413 4	0.394 0
9	0.545 5	0.480 6	0.503 1
10	0.724 5	0.597 4	0.525 8
11	0.213 7	0.366 8	0.321 1
12	0.410 9	0.458 6	0.446 2
13	0.247 1	0.372 2	0.382 1
14	0.544 6	0.451 6	0.491 1
15	0.748 5	0.509 6	0.574 8
16	0.419 0	0.490 3	0.453 2
17	0.835 6	0.568 3	0.673 8
18	0.174 3	0.313 4	0.266 8
19	0.414 3	0.480 6	0.434 0
20	0.809 0	0.597 4	0.636 9

[1]	Lisha ZHENG, Dongliang YIN, Xuan WANG. Operational effectiveness evaluation of phased array radar based on improved D-S evidence theory [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(4): 1330-1336.
[2]	Li MA, Peng SHI, Yu CHEN, Wenlong LI. Discrete event simulation and effectiveness evaluation of space-based information support system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 906-913.
[3]	Tao HU, Liqun SHEN, Jingda ZHU, Chenghui SUN, Weifeng DONG. Sensitivity analysis of radar system effectiveness based on FAST and Sobol index method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 561-569.
[4]	Yu CHEN, Peng SHI, Li MA, Wenlong LI. Modeling and effectiveness evaluation method of space-based information support system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(10): 3407-3415.
[5]	Rui LI, Mengtao ZHU, Yunjie LI. Online evaluation method of radar jamming effect based on inverse filtering processing [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(9): 2706-2717.
[6]	Jiaping CAO, Mengxin OU, Yishan LI, Jiang JIANG, Jichao LI. Island air defense electronic countermeasure equipment system construction and effectiveness evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(9): 2784-2792.
[7]	Shunqi HUAN, Zhemei FAN, Jianbo WANG. System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2191-2200.
[8]	Xiangyang LIN, Qinghua XING, Fuxian LIU. Research on optimization of combat force for key air defense model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 921-928.
[9]	Luyun QIU, Zhigeng FANG, Liangyan TAO, Qiucheng TAO. Effectiveness evaluation of network SoS based on improved FDNA model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3728-3737.
[10]	Chenrui SHI, Lu TIAN, Zhan XU, Ruxin ZHI, Jinhui CHEN. Effectiveness evaluation method of emergency communication and sensing equipment based on PSO-BP [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3455-3462.
[11]	Xing PAN, Zhenyu ZHANG, Yanmei ZHANG, Ranran WANG. Equipment SoS support effectiveness evaluation based on Sobol sensitivity analysis [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 390-398.
[12]	Ang GAO, Qisheng GUO, Zhiming DONG, Shaoqing YANG. Research on efficiency evaluation method of multi unmanned ground vehicle system based on EAS+MADRL [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3643-3651.
[13]	Weisheng YANG, Yu WANG, Yang YANG, Liang TANG. Combat network effectiveness evaluation under different node attack strategies based on operation loop [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228.
[14]	Chi HAN, Wei XIONG. Operational effectiveness evaluation of space reconnaissance equipment based on SVR optimized by improved grey wolf optimizer [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2902-2910.
[15]	Biao LI, Liwen WANG, Zhiwei XING, Qian LUO. Effectiveness evaluation of ground support process for transit flight [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1543-1549.

Lightweight effectiveness evaluation method for high altitude airships for both qualitative and quantitative indicators

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments