过站航班地面保障流程效能评估

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.07.16

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to perceive the operation status of the ground support process for transit flights and optimize the airport collaborative decision-making information system, the effectiveness evaluation of the support process is studied under the single flight condition. By systematically analyzing the ground support process, the effectiveness evaluation indicators for each scenario are obtained. Combining the three dimensions of the value, importance and the state of convergence of the indicators, the process effectiveness evaluation indicator system is constructed. A dynamic effectiveness evaluation method is designed based on the perimeter-area of the radar chart for the ground support process of the transit flights, and the simulation verification is carried out based on the actual operation data. It is showed that the results of the process effectiveness evaluation intuitively describe the dynamic changes of support process effectiveness. Through the objective comparison and sensitivity analysis, it can be seen that the results reflect the departure attributes of the transit flights to a certain extent, and provide a basis for the flight launch control.

Key words: ground support process, dynamic effectiveness evaluation, dynamic prior weight, normal scaling function, sensitivity analysis

CLC Number:

Biao LI, Liwen WANG, Zhiwei XING, Qian LUO. Effectiveness evaluation of ground support process for transit flight[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1543-1549.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 22

1	CORRIGAN S , KAY A , OKWIR S , et al. Preparing for airport collaborative decision making (A-CDM) implementation: an evaluation and recommendations[J]. Cognition Technology & Work, 2015, 17 (2): 1- 12.
2	FAN L W , WU F , ZHOU P . Efficiency measurement of Chinese airports with flight delays by directional distance function[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2014, 34 (1): 140- 145.
3	VISMARI L F , JUNIOR J B C . A safety assessment methodology applied to CNS/ATM-based air traffic control system[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96 (7): 727- 738.
4	ZHANG H , HOU Y , ZHANG J , et al. A new method for nondestructive quality evaluation of the resistance spot welding based on the radar chart method and the decision tree classifier[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 78 (5/8): 841- 851.
5	XIE K , OZBAY K , YANG H , et al. A new methodology for before-after safety assessment using survival analysis and longitudinal data[J]. Risk Analysis, 2018, 39 (4): 1- 16.
6	高扬, 吴建多. 基于多级物元分析的机场安全评价[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5 (6): 151- 155.
	GAO Y , WU J D . Evaluation for civil airport operation safety and security based on multi-level matter-element analysis[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5 (6): 151- 155.
7	TIAN B L . Airport emergency capacity assessment model based on an interval-number analytic hierarchy process[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21 (3): 170- 176.
8	VAZE V L . An assessment of the impact of demand management strategies for efficient allocation of airport capacity[J]. International Journal of Revenue Management, 2013, 6 (1/2): 5- 27.
9	BHADRA D , KNORR D A , LEVY B . Benefits of virtual queuing at congested airports using ASDE-X: a case study of JFK airport[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2016, 20 (3): 225- 252.
10	KANG L , HANSEN M . Assessing the impact of tactical airport surface operations on airline schedule block time setting[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 89 (4): 133- 147.
11	RAMANUJAM V , BALAKRISHNAN H . Data-driven modeling of the airport configuration selection process[J]. IEEE Trans.on Human-Machine Systems, 2015, 45 (4): 490- 499.
12	BADRINATH S , LI M , BALAKRISHNAN H . An integrated surface-airspace model of airport departures[J]. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2018, 42 (5): 1049- 1063.
13	LI M Z , RYERSON M , BALAKRISHNAN H . Topological data analysis for aviation applications[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2019, 128 (2): 149- 174.
14	邢志伟, 李彪, 罗谦. 过站航班地面保障运行效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (5): 1071- 1078.
	XING Z W , LI B , LUO Q . Operational effectiveness evaluation of ground service for transit flight[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (5): 1071- 1078.
15	SHOJAEI P , HAERI S A S , MOHAMMADI S . Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2017, 68 (2): 1- 15.
16	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 项华春, 等. 装备体系贡献率评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1789- 1794.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , XIANG H C , et al. Review of the evaluation methods of equipment's contribution rate to system-of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1789- 1794.
17	CHEN D , AHN S . Capacity-drop at extended bottlenecks: merge, diverge and weave[J]. Transportation Research Part B Methodological, 2018, 108, 1- 20.
18	HOSSAIN M M , ALAM S , DELAHAYE D . An evolutionary computational framework for capacity-safety trade-off in an air transportation network[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32 (4): 233- 244.
19	ZHANG H , HOU Y , ZHANG J , et al. A new method for nondestructive quality evaluation of the resistance spot welding based on the radar chart method and the decision tree classifier[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 78 (5/8): 841- 851.
20	张才坤, 朱战霞, 冯琦, 等. 基于区间数雷达图的可视化空战威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38 (5): 1052- 1058.
	ZHANG C K , ZHU Z X , FENG Q , et al. Visualization threat assessment for air combat based on interval-radar chart[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (5): 1052- 1058.
21	林木, 李小波, 王彦锋, 等. 基于QFD和组合赋权TOPSIS的体系贡献率能效评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1802- 1809.
	LIN M , LI X B , WANG Y F , et al. Capability effectiveness evaluation of contribution ratio to system-of-systems based on QFD and combination weights TOPSIS[J]. Systems Engineer-ing and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1802- 1809.
22	LIN Y K , NGUYEN T P , YENG L C L . Reliability evaluation of a multi-state air transportation network meeting multiple travel demands[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 277 (2): 63- 82.

属性	上/撤轮挡	靠/撤廊桥	开/关客舱门	开/关货舱门	配餐开始/结束	下客开始/结束	添加燃油开始/结束	清洁开始/结束	上客开始/结束
开始时刻	10:08	10:09	10:09	10:09	10:08	10:12	10:11	10:13	10:36
结束时刻	10:52	10:50	10:50	10:42	10:27	10:17	10:33	10:23	10:46

属性	到达	处理垃圾结束	机务放行	允许上客	核对人数	上传配载	出港服务
时刻	10:03	10:30	10:31	10:34	10:49	10:39	10:16

保障流程/节点	变尺度参数		中心最佳点
保障流程/节点	期望	合理容限	中心最佳点
整体保障	52.85	15.61	(52.85, 1)
靠/撤廊桥	50.99	15.58	(50.99, 1)
开/关客舱门	49.97	15.56	(49.97, 1)
开/关货舱门	38.80	17.18	(38.80, 1)
下客开始/结束	7.56	1.70	(7.56, 1)
添加燃油开始/结束	18.63	8.53	(18.63, 1)
清洁	8.08	14.61	(8.08, 1)
处理垃圾结束	27.48	5.42	(27.48, 1)
配餐开始/结束	8.25	5.35	(8.25, 1)
出港服务	19.07	8.69	(19.07, 1)
机务放行	25.90	6.55	(25.90, 1)
上传配载	38.72	16.87	(38.72, 1)
允许上客	36.00	12.87	(36.00, 1)
上客开始/结束	17.48	6.97	(17.48, 1)
核对人数	56.43	15.35	(56.43, 1)

[1]	Jie ZHU, Ning HUANG, Liang CHENG. Multi-parameter sensitivity analysis of network function virtualization application availability [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(8): 2677-2687.
[2]	Xing PAN, Zhenyu ZHANG, Yanmei ZHANG, Ranran WANG. Equipment SoS support effectiveness evaluation based on Sobol sensitivity analysis [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 390-398.
[3]	ZHANG Zhuang, LI Linlin, WEI Zhenhua, YU Hongfeng. Dynamic effectiveness evaluation of command and control system based on variable weight projection gray target [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(4): 801-809.
[4]	BU Bing, WANG Zhuojian, PAN Hongsheng. Optimal allocation of multiaircraft universal support equipments based on Petri nets in grass roots level [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(2): 349-357.
[5]	YANG Yingjie1, YU Yongli1, ZHANG Liu1, ZHANG Wei2. Sensitivity analysis and parameters optimization for equipment maintenance support simulation system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(3): 575-581.
[6]	FANG Xin-peng，YAN Wei-sheng，ZHANG Fu-bin，LI Jun-bing. Formation geometry of underwater positioning based on multiple USV/AUV [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(5): 947-951.
[7]	WANG Yong-hua， JIANG Ke-yi， SUN Tao， YANG Xin-yi， ZHU Fei-xiang. Research on performance deterioration of aero-engine based on clone selection algorithm [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(6): 1236-1241.
[8]	MA Jian, SUN Xiu-xia. Sensitivity analysis on attribute weight ascertained by comparison method in multiple attribute decision making [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(3): 585-589.
[9]	LONG Teng，LIU Li. Parallel GSE method and its application in optimization for coupled systems [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(9): 1898-1902.
[10]	WANG Xian-yu 1，JU Xiao-feng 2. Evaluation of quality economic rules of large-scale and complex military products based on DEA [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(3): 552-556.
[11]	FAN Pei-lei, ZHANG Xiao-jin, YANG Tao. Method of Pareto improved solutions based on sensitivity analysis [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(12): 2977-2981.
[12]	SUN Shi-yan,WANG Hang-yu,SHI Zhang-song. null [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(11): 2645-2647 .

Effectiveness evaluation of ground support process for transit flight

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 22

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments