基于DM2和OODA的装备体系DoDAF模型验证方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.08.17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对装备体系架构模型验证工作中存在的人工验证效率低、动态适应性评估不足等问题，提出了基于观察-判断-决策-行动（observation-orientation-decision-action, OODA）环的美国国防部架构框架（Department of Defense Architecture Framework, DoDAF）模型与DoDAF元模型（DoDAF meta-model, DM2）双维度验证方法。通过解析DM2的结构化数据关联规则，构建完备性验证矩阵，系统性检验了模型元素逻辑关系的完整性；结合OODA环的动态闭环特性，设计内容完备性矩阵，确保作战活动的资源流转与功能闭环。进一步，引入数据驱动仿真，定量评估模型在实际动态作战场景中的合理性。在实例中对构建的航空装备作战体系架构模型进行了验证，发现了模型中资源流定义缺失的问题，验证了所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 美国国防部架构框架, 模型验证, 美国国防部架构框架元模型, 观察-判断-决策-行动, 装备体系架构

Abstract:

Aiming at the issues of low efficiency of manual verification and insufficient dynamic adaptability evaluation in the verification of equipment system architecture models, a dual-dimensional verification method based on the observation-orientation-decision-action (OODA) loop and the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) model, along with the DoDAF meta-model (DM2), is proposed. By parsing the structured data association rules of DM2, a completeness verification matrix is constructed to systematically examine the integrity of the logical relationships among model elements. Incorporating the dynamic closed-loop characteristics of the OODA loop, a content completeness matrix is designed to ensure the resource flow and functional closed-loop of combat activities. Furthermore, data-driven simulation is introduced to quantitatively evaluate the rationality of the model in actual dynamic combat scenarios. The constructed aviation equipment combat system architecture model is verified in a practical example, revealing issues with the lack of resource flow definition in the model and validating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF), model validation, DoDAF meta-model (DM2), observation-orientation-decision-action (OODA), architecture of equipment system of systems

中图分类号:

V 37

刘文政, 李鹏飞, 尚柏林, 王耀祖, 林仁翔. 基于DM2和OODA的装备体系DoDAF模型验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(8): 2701-2712.

Wenzheng LIU, Pengfei LI, Bolin SHANG, Yaozu WANG, Renxiang LIN. Equipment system verification method based on DM2 and OODA in DoDAF model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(8): 2701-2712.

图/表 17

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

图7

图8

图9

图10

表2

表3

图11

表4

图12

图13

参考文献 30

1	ZHANG Y, JIANG J, YANG K W, et al. Intelligent modeling method for OV models in DoDAF2.0 based on knowledge graph[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 36(1): 139−154.
2	ZHANG M M, CHEN H H, MAO Y, et al. Anapproach to measuring business-IT alignment maturity via DoDAF2.0[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31 (1): 95- 108. doi: 10.21629/jsee.2020.01.11
3	EUNGSU K, KIYEOL R. Data model implementation of weapon live test support asset based on DoDAF meta model[J]. Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2025, 28 (1): 60- 71. doi: 10.9766/KIMST.2025.28.1.060
4	CHEN J, ZHA D S, GAO K, et al. Model-based approach for civil aviation material support system modeling[J]. Systems Engineering, 2025, 28 (4): 557- 571. doi: 10.1002/sys.21808
5	AGHAMOHAMMADPOUR A, MAHDIPOUR E, ATTARZADEH I. Architecting threat hunting system based on the DODAF framework[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79 (4): 4215- 4242. doi: 10.1007/s11227-022-04808-6
6	ZOU Z H, WU Y Q, PENG L, et al. MultiUAV maritime collaborative behavior modeling based on hierarchical deep reinforcement learning and DoDAF process mining[J]. Aerospace Systems, 2025, 8 (2): 447- 466. doi: 10.1007/s42401-025-00358-w
7	CHAHARSOOGHI K, ACHACHLOUEI M A. Developing life-cycle phases for the DoDAF using ISO15704 Annex A （GERAM）[J]. Computers in Industry, 2011, 62 (3): 253- 259. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2010.07.002
8	ZHENG H X, LIU X, WU J H, et al. The onorbit mission analysis of OTV based on DoDAF[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2021, 93 (6): 937- 945. doi: 10.1108/AEAT-03-2020-0062
9	陈岩, 李志淮, 谭贤四, 等. 基于xUML的DoDAF可执行体系结构开发与验证[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2014, 26 (1): 152- 158.
	CHEN Y, LI Z H, TAN X S, et al. Design and validation for DoDAF executable architecture based on XUML[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2014, 26 (1): 152- 158.
10	黄冉, 彭祺擘, 武新峰, 等. 基于DoDAF的载人登月体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (7): 2131- 2137.
	HUANG R, PENG Q B, WU X F, et al. Architecture modeling for manned lunar landing based on DoDAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (7): 2131- 2137.
11	李志淮, 谭贤四, 王红, 等. 基于DM2的体系结构数据一致性验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35 (2): 357- 361. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.02.20
	LI Z H, TAN X S, WANG H, et al. Data consistency verification of architecture based on DM2[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35 (2): 357- 361. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.02.20
12	TAO Z G, LUO Y F, CHENC X, et al. Enterprise application architecture development based on DoDAF and TOGAF[J]. Enterprise Information Systems, 2017, 11 (5): 627- 651. doi: 10.1080/17517575.2015.1068374
13	MITTAL S. Extending DoDAF to allow integrated DEVS-based modeling and simulation[J]. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 2006, 3 (2): 95- 123. doi: 10.1177/875647930600300204
14	COURETAS J M. System architectures: legacy tools/methods, DoDAF descriptions and design through system alternative enumeration[J]. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation-Applications Methodology Technology-JDMS, 2006, 3 (4): 227- 237. doi: 10.1177/875647930600300404
15	DONG D N, JIANG Q X. Research on aircraft overhaul task flow and technical requirements analysis based on DoDAF[J]. IET Conference Proceedings, 2022, 2022 (21): 1943- 1947. doi: 10.1049/icp.2022.3153
16	JIANG Z P, ZHOU G X, DONG Q C, et al. Research on the method of C4ISR capability requirements logic validation based on DODAF2.0[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, 2011: 899−903.
17	隋先辉, 韦定江, 王晗秋, 等. 基于DoDAF的无人潜航器作战效能静态评估研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2023, 43 (4): 121- 125，135. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2023.04.026
	SUI X H, WEI D J, WANG H Q, et al. Research on cooperative combat effectiveness evaluation of unmanned underwater vehicle based on DoDAF[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2023, 43 (4): 121- 125，135. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2023.04.026
18	GUO Z J, WANG Y, SUN Y, et al. Modeling on RMS of UAV swarm based on multi agent simulation[J]. IET Conference Proceedings, 2023, 2022 (21): 1937- 1942. doi: 10.1049/icp.2022.3152
19	HANDLEY H A H. Incorporating the NATO human view in the DoDAF 2.0 meta model[J]. Systems Engineering, 2012, 15 (1): 108- 117. doi: 10.1002/sys.20206
20	RONALD E G. Evaluation of the DoDAF meta-model’s support of systems engineering[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 61, 254- 260. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.208
21	WANG J, WU C H, XU R, et al. Research on operational architecture modeling and validation method based on DoDAF[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Information Science and Computer Applications, 2013: 232−237.
22	WANG S K, LI J Z, ZHAO J T, et al. Research on architecture design and description methods based on DoDAF[C]//Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Signal and Information Processing, Network and Computers, 2024: 366−372.
23	RYDER C M. The “Big Navy” meta-model as a framework for major defense development projects[C]//Proc. of the INCOSE International Symposium, 2006: 1407−1422.
24	陈聪, 沈届时, 任洁, 等. 基于DM2的航空电子系统架构任务元模型设计方法[J]. 航空电子技术, 2024, 55 (1): 15- 22. doi: 10.12175/j.issn.1006-141X.2024.01.03
	CHEN C, SHEN J S, REN J, et al. Design method of task meta-model of avionics system architecture based on DM2[J]. Avionics Technology, 2024, 55 (1): 15- 22. doi: 10.12175/j.issn.1006-141X.2024.01.03
25	WANG Q Q, TIAN H T, XIAO Z L, et al. Research on operational architecture against UAV swarm based on DoDAF[C]//Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems, 2025: 58−67.
26	HU B Y, XIAO J, HU X G, et al. DoDAF and STK based modeling and simulation of MAV/UAV cooperative detection architecture[C]//Proc. of the 17th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2022: 755−759.
27	LI M H, XU J G, YANG K W, et al. An interactive model-driven simulation approach for dynamic behavior analysis in armed conflicts[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6, 36744- 36756. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2852803
28	CHEN Z W, ZHAO T D, JIAO J, et al. System of systems architecture modeling and mission reliability analysis based on DoDAF and Petri net[C]//Proc. of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)-R and M in the 2nd Machine Age—the Challenge of Cyber Physical Systems, 2019.
29	AMISSAH M, HANDLEY H A H. A process for DoDAF based systems architecting[C]//Proc. of the 10th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, 2016: 881−887.
30	CHEN C, MA X L. Research on testability work planning technology for aviation equipment based on DoDAF[C]//Proc. of the 20th Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference, 2024: 207−219.

序号	名称	规则定义	规则类型	应用对象
1	规则1	加油手册	动作声明	空中加油1
			—	空中受油1
				空中加油2
				空中受油2
2	规则2	编队飞行手册	协议	编队巡航1
			—	编队巡航2
			—	编队巡航3
3	规则3	攻击手册	安全策略	发射武器
4	规则4	巡逻手册	约束	警戒搜索
4	规则4	巡逻手册	—	侦察判断
5	规则5	决策手册	指导	信息决策

执行者	作战活动	作战能力	信息与数据	规则	资源流
轰炸机	发射武器	地面打击能力	飞行状态信息	规则1	资源线1
加油机	编队巡航1	空中受油能力1	燃油	规则2	资源线5
战斗机	空中受油1	通信能力1	加油请求信息	规则3	资源线6
	空中受油2	空中受油能力2	决策信息	规则4	资源线7
	空中加油1	空中加油能力	态势感知信息	规则5	—
	空中加油2	巡航飞行能力1	—	—	—
	信息决策	巡航飞行能力2	—	—	—
	警戒搜索	巡航飞行能力3	—	—	—
	侦察判断	通信能力2	—	—	—
	编队巡航2	通信能力3	—	—	—
	编队巡航3	探测与目标识别能力	—	—	—
	返航1	信息决策能力	—	—	—
	返航2	—	—	—	—
	返航3	—	—	—	—

序号	初始油量/t	架数	耗油率/ （km/t）	飞行速度/（km/h）
加油机	96	1	127	987
轰炸机	31	4	146	960
战斗机	10	8	353	1500

[1]	张兰, 张彪, 梁天一, 朱辉杰. 面向电磁信息智能控制的生成对抗网络研究进展[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 730-744.
[2]	赖康, 陆中, 程大炜, 缪炜润. 基于SysML2NuSMV的民用飞机电传飞控系统安全性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(11): 3802-3815.
[3]	苗学问, 董骁雄, 钱征文, 胡杨, 李牧东. 基于DoDAF的航空装备智能保障系统体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 640-648.
[4]	黄冉, 彭祺擘, 武新峰, 倪庆. 基于DoDAF的载人登月体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(7): 2131-2137.
[5]	周玉臣, 方可, 马萍, 杨明. 基于集成学习的复杂仿真模型验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(9): 2124-2130.
[6]	方可, 周玉臣, 赵开斌. 含有迭代运算的仿真模型验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(2): 445-450.
[7]	方可, 周玉臣, 赵恩娇. 关于仿真模型验证指标体系的探讨[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(11): 2592-2602.
[8]	杨明, 钱晓超, 李伟. 基于数据特征的仿真动态输出验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(2): 457-463.
[9]	何红悦，王智学，王庆龙，朱卫星. 基于fUML的C4ISR体系结构可执行[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(9): 1874-1881.
[10]	何红悦，王智学，朱卫星，董庆超，王庆龙. 复杂系统的可执行模型仿真方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(10): 1966-1972.
[11]	焦松，李伟，杨明. 基于经验模态分解和灰色关联度分析的仿真模型验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35(12): 2613-2618.
[12]	何红悦, 王智学, 董庆超, 徐景, 张兆巍. C⁴ISR系统能力需求行为建模及验证[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(6): 1153-1160.
[13]	吴静，吴晓燕，陈永兴，滕江川. 基于改进灰色关联分析的仿真模型验证方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(8): 1677-1679.