基于M元循环移位的MIMO扩频深海水声通信方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.03.33

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 1010-1018.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.03.33

• 通信与网络 • 上一篇

基于M元循环移位的MIMO扩频深海水声通信方法

程琳¹^,²^,³, 葛威¹^,²^,³^,⁴^,*, 门伟⁵

1. 哈尔滨工程大学水声技术全国重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
2. 极地海洋声学与技术应用教育部重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
3. 哈尔滨工程大学水声工程学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
4. 中国科学院声学研究所声场声信息国家重点实验室, 北京 100190
5. 清华大学电子工程系, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2023-12-12 出版日期:2025-03-28 发布日期:2025-04-18
通讯作者: 葛威
作者简介:程琳 (2001—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为扩频水声通信
葛威 (1994—), 男, 讲师, 博士, 主要研究方向为水声通信、声呐信号处理、嵌入式系统开发
门伟 (1995—), 男, 博士后, 主要研究方向为水声通信和探测
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(62371154);国家自然科学基金(62301181)

MIMO spread spectrum deep-sea underwater acoustic communication method based on M-ary cyclic shift keying

Lin CHENG¹^,²^,³, Wei GE¹^,²^,³^,⁴^,*, Wei MEN⁵

1. National Key Laboratory of Underwater Acoustic Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2. Key Laboratory for Polar Acoustics and Application of Ministry of Education, Harbin 150001, China
3. College of Underwater Acoustic Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
4. State Key Laboratory of Acoustics Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
5. Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2023-12-12 Online:2025-03-28 Published:2025-04-18
Contact: Wei GE

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对传统扩频通信系统速率低, 难以广泛应用于水下通信组网的问题, 提出一种将M元循环移位键控(M-ary cyclic shift keying, MCSK)扩频与多输入多输出(multiple input multiple output, MIMO)通信系统相结合的高效水声通信方法, 一方面利用MIMO系统的空分复用增益及MCSK编码增加信息调制维度, 进而实现通信速率的显著提升; 另一方面, 接收端相应提出一种频域相位共轭能量检测算法抑制码间干扰和同信道干扰并进行低复杂度译码, 并通过仿真验证其优越性。2发8收MIMO深海试验中, 成功实现了通信距离为10 km和20 km处通信速率为257.8 bps的低误码水声通信, 验证了所提方法的有效性和稳健性。

关键词: 扩频水声通信, M元循环移位, 多输入多输出, 被动相位共轭, 频域能量检测

Abstract:

To address the problem of low data rate and limited applicability of traditional spread spectrum communication systems in underwater networking, an efficient underwater acoustic communication method called multiple input multiple output M-ary cyclic shift keying (MIMO-MCSK) is proposed, which combines MCSK spread spectrum with MIMO communication systems. On the one hand, the MIMO-MCSK exploits the spatial multiplexing gain of MIMO systems and the information modulation dimension increased by MCSK encoding to significantly enhance the communication data rate. On the other hand, a frequency-domain phase conjugate energy detection algorithm is proposed at the receiver end to suppress inter-symbol interference and co-channel interference, and perform low complexity decode, verifying its superiority through simulation. In a deep water MIMO trial with two transmitters and eight receivers, low bit-error-rate underwater acoustic communication is achieved at communication distance of 10 km and 20 km with a data rate of 257.8 bps, validating the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.

Key words: spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication, M-ary cyclic shift keying, multiple input multiple output (MIMO), passive phase conjugation, frequency-domain energy detection

中图分类号:

TN929.3

程琳, 葛威, 门伟. 基于M元循环移位的MIMO扩频深海水声通信方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(3): 1010-1018.

Lin CHENG, Wei GE, Wei MEN. MIMO spread spectrum deep-sea underwater acoustic communication method based on M-ary cyclic shift keying[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(3): 1010-1018.

图/表 16

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表1

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

表2

参考文献 15

16	LIU F , ZHENG Y F , FENG Y X . High performance bitactivation code index modulation method[J]. IET Signal Processing, 2023, 17 (4): 2202.
17	WU J Q , QIAO G , KANG P B . Emerging 5G multicarrier chaotic sequence spread spectrum technology for underwater acoustic communication[J]. Complexity, 2018, 2018, 3790529. doi: 10.1155/2018/3790529
18	景连友, 何成兵, 黄建国, 等. 正交频分复用循环移位扩频水声通信[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37 (1): 185- 190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2015.01.30
	JING L Y , HE C B , HUANG J G , et al. OFDM cyclic shift keying spread spectrumunderwater acoustic communication[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37 (1): 185- 190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2015.01.30
19	ZHOU S L , GIANNAKIS G B , SWAMI A . Digital multi-carrier spread spectrum versus direct sequence spread spectrum for resistance to jamming and multipath[J]. IEEE Trans.on Communications, 2002, 50 (4): 643- 655. doi: 10.1109/26.996079
20	高潭, 吕成财, 田川. 面向OFDM-MFSK水声通信的差错控制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44 (5): 1701- 1708. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.05.33
	GAO T , LYU C C , TIAN C . Error control method for OFDM-MFSK underwater acoustic communication[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44 (5): 1701- 1708. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.05.33
21	ZHOU Y H , TONG F , YANG X Y . Research on co-channel interference cancellation for underwater acoustic MIMO communications[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14 (19): 5049. doi: 10.3390/rs14195049
22	LI W Z , HAN X , ZHU G J , et al. Timedomain turbo equalization based on vector approximate message passing for multipleinput multipleoutput underwater acoustic communications[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024, 155 (2): 854- 866. doi: 10.1121/10.0024608
23	周锋. 水声扩频通信关键技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2012.
	ZHOU F. The study of the key technologies for underwater acoustic spreadspectrum communication[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016.
24	QIN X , QU F , ZHENG Y R . Circular superposition spreadspectrum transmission for multipleinput multipleoutput underwater acoustic communications[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2019, 23 (8): 1385- 1388. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2917192
25	YANG T C . Spatially multiplexed CDMA multiuser underwater acoustic communications[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2016, 41 (1): 217- 231. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2015.2412993
26	CHAHROUR H, RAJAN S, DANSEREAU R. Hybrid spread spectrum orthogonal waveforms for MIMO radar[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Radar Conference, 2018: 1010-1014.
27	DU P Y, WANG C, ZHU X H. Research on multiple input multiple output spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication[C]//Proc. of the 15th ACM International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems, 2021: 22.
28	SIDDIQUI S , DONG H . Time diversity passive time reversal for underwater acoustic communication[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 24258- 24266. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898983
29	杜鹏宇. 移动扩频水声通信及多址技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2016.
	DU P Y. Research on mobile spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication and multiple access technology[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016.
30	ZHAN J , WANG L , KATZ M , et al. A differential chaotic bitinterleaved coded modulation system over multipath Rayleigh channels[J]. IEEE Trans.on Communications, 2017, 65 (12): 5257- 5265. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2017.2719030
1	许肖梅. 水声通信与水声网络的发展与应用[J]. 声学技术, 2009, 28 (6): 811- 816.
	XU X M . Development and applications of underwater acoustic communication and networks[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2009, 28 (6): 811- 816.
2	EBIHARA T , OGASAWARA H , LEUS G . Underwater acoustic communication using multiple-input-multiple-output Doppler resilient orthogonal signal division multiplexing[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2020, 45 (4): 1594- 1610. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2019.2922094
3	KOCHANSKA I , SALAMON R , SCHMIDT J H , et al. Study of the performance of DSSS UAC system depending on the system bandwidth and the spreading sequence[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21 (7): 2484. doi: 10.3390/s21072484
4	SUN D J , WU J , HONG X P , et al. Iterative double-differential direct-sequence spread spectrum reception in underwater acoustic channel with time-varying Doppler shifts[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023, 153 (2): 1027- 1041. doi: 10.1121/10.0017116
5	SCHMIDT J H , KOCHANSKA I , SCHMIDT A M . Perfor-mance of the direct sequence spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication system with differential detection in strong multipath propagation conditions[J]. Archives of Acoustics, 2024, 49 (1): 129- 140.
6	HE C B , HUANG J G , YAN Z H , et al. M-ary CDMA multiuser underwater acoustic communication and its experimental results[J]. Science China-Information Sciences, 2011, 54 (8): 1747- 1755. doi: 10.1007/s11432-011-4202-2
7	HU Y H , HAN S P , LI H Q , et al. TCN-based M-ary mobile spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2023, 211 (2): 109457.
8	DU P Y , YIN J W , ZHOU H L , et al. Cyclic shift keying spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication using time reversal energy detector[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65 (1): 014302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.014302
9	WEI Y L , QUAN L M , XU W K , et al. An in-phase/quadrature index modulation aided spread spectrum communication system forunderwater acoustic communication[J]. Electronics, 2023, 12 (13): 2919. doi: 10.3390/electronics12132919
10	RA H , YOUN C , KIM K . High-reliability underwater acoustic communication using an M-ary cyclic spread spectrum[J]. Electronics, 2022, 11 (11): 1698. doi: 10.3390/electronics11111698
11	ZHOU F , LIU B , NIE D H , et al. M-ary cyclic shift keying spread spectrum underwater acoustic communications based on virtual timereversal mirror[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19 (16): 3577. doi: 10.3390/s19163577
12	于洋, 周锋, 乔钢, 等. 正交M元码元移位键控扩频水声通信[J]. 声学学报, 2014, 39 (1): 42- 48.
	YU Y , ZHOU F , QIAO G . Orthogonal M-ary code shift keying spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication[J]. Acta Acustica, 2014, 39 (1): 42- 48.
13	LI Y , JIA N , HUANG J C , et al. Improved parallel combinatory spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication based on gold codes[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2022, 44 (6): 1937- 1946.
14	KADDOUM G , AHMED M F A , NIJSURE Y . Code index modulation: a high data rate and energy efficient communication system[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2015, 19 (2): 175- 178. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2014.2385054
15	KADDOUM G , NIJSURE Y , TRAN H . Generalized code index modulation technique for high-data-rate communication systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Vehicular Technology, 2016, 65 (9): 7000- 7009. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2015.2498040

参数	阵列1	阵列2	阵列3
通信距离/km	10	10	20
布放深度/m	200	3 859	288
阵元间距/m	2	60	60

均衡处理方法	阵列1	阵列3
均衡前	0.107	0.18
单阵元均衡	0.086	0.135
8阵元均衡	3.6×10^-3	0

[1]	迟俊, 孙溶辰, 孙志国, 易振宇. 基于传播图论的6 GHz隧道信道建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(1): 316-323.
[2]	马露洁, 梁彦, 李飞. 基于级联角度的AIRS辅助大规模MIMO系统波束跟踪方案[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(7): 2515-2524.
[3]	谢前朋, 杜奕航, 孙兵, 闫华, 潘小义, 赵锋. 基于降维变换的低复杂度双基地EMVS-MIMO雷达高分辨多维参数估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(6): 1899-1907.
[4]	张弓, 田雨薇, 袁家雯, 张宇. 一种基于稀疏重构的多视角MIMO雷达关联成像算法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 470-477.
[5]	平嘉蓉, 李赛, 林云航. Alpha稳定分布噪声和多径干扰下的无人机集群MIMO信号调制识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(11): 3920-3929.
[6]	黄广佳, 程旭, 饶彬, 王伟. 基于广义Rao检验的单/多比特MIMO雷达运动目标检测方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(1): 105-112.
[7]	郝宇航, 蒋威, 王增福, 兰华, 雍婷, 潘泉. 分布式MIMO体制天波超视距雷达仿真系统[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(7): 1981-1989.
[8]	张育豪, 朱圣棋, 曾操, 崔森, 石琦剑. EPC-MIMO雷达主瓣距离欺骗式干扰抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(3): 690-698.
[9]	汪锐, 张天骐, 安泽亮, 王雪怡, 方竹. 基于联合特征参数和一维CNN的MIMO-OFDM系统调制识别算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(3): 902-912.
[10]	李志汇, 唐波, 周青松, 师俊朋, 张剑云. 新体制机载雷达波形优化设计研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(12): 3852-3865.
[11]	连红飞, 龙佳敏, 胡雪瑶, 蒋彦雯, 李东升, 范红旗. 汽车雷达多域联合调制波形[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(11): 3402-3410.
[12]	黄超, 黄中瑞, 周青松, 张剑云. 基于优化星座图的MIMO雷达-通信一体化发射波形设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(10): 3016-3023.
[13]	吕岩, 曹菲, 许剑锋, 冯晓伟. 基于FRFT的单基地MIMO雷达稳健波束形成算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 79-85.
[14]	张逸群, 兰岚, 廖桂生, 许京伟. 基于二次补偿的FDA-MIMO雷达抗主瓣欺骗式干扰方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2769-2775.
[15]	廖金玲, 廖桂生, 许京伟, 兰岚. 基于EPC-MIMO编码设计的解距离模糊性能分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(7): 2166-2174.

基于M元循环移位的MIMO扩频深海水声通信方法

MIMO spread spectrum deep-sea underwater acoustic communication method based on M-ary cyclic shift keying

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 15

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价