基于稀疏重构的海杂波抑制和目标提取算法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.03.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在杂波较强的环境下, 雷达目标回波往往淹没在杂波中难以被检测, 尤其在海杂波背景下, 目标的多普勒频率有可能会落在杂波频率范围中, 此时传统的杂波抑制方法就产生了一定的局限性。针对此问题, 依据杂波、目标信号的稀疏特性和二者在多普勒频率分布特性上的不同, 设计了对应的时频域过完备字典; 再通过形态成分分析算法求出目标和杂波分量的稀疏系数向量; 将对应字典和稀疏系数向量相乘，恢复出目标和杂波分量, 同时实现了杂波抑制和目标信息提取。最后, 通过实测数据验证了该算法的有效性。

关键词: 杂波抑制, 稀疏重构, 形态成分分析, 目标提取

Abstract:

In a strong clutter environment, radar target echoes are often submerged in clutter and difficult to detect. Especially under the background of sea clutter, the Doppler frequency of target may fall in clutter frequency range. At this time, traditional clutter suppression method has limitations. In response to this problem, corresponding time-frequency domain over-complete dictionaries are designed, which are based on the sparse characteristics and the differences in Doppler frequency range of target and clutter. Then use morphological component analysis algorithm to find the sparse coefficients of target and clutter components. The target and clutter components are recovered by multiplying the corresponding dictionary and sparse coefficients, achieving clutter suppression and target information extraction. Finally, the effectiveness of the algorithm is verified by measured data.

Key words: clutter suppression, sparse reconstruction, morphological component analysis, target extraction

中图分类号:

TN957

李文静, 李卓林, 袁振涛. 基于稀疏重构的海杂波抑制和目标提取算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 777-785.

Wenjing LI, Zhuolin LI, Zhentao YUAN. Sea clutter suppression and target extraction algorithm based on sparse reconstruction[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 777-785.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 30

1	LUO Q . Small moving target detection using sparse clutter mode- ling[J]. Modern Radar, 2016, 38 (2): 43- 46, 83.
2	DUK V , ROSENBERG L , NGB W . Target detection in sea-clutter using stationary wavelet transforms[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017, 53 (3): 1136- 1146. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2667558
3	PAN M X, XIE S, WANG S N, et al. Research on tunable Q-factor wavelet transform sea clutter suppression algorithm based on sparse representation[C]//Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), 2018: 2511-2515.
4	HU J , TUNG W W , GAO J B . Detection of lowobservable targets within sea clutter by structure functionbased multifractal analysis[J]. IEEE Trans.on Antennas and Propagation, 2006, 54 (1): 136- 143. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2005.861541
5	ZHAO Z Q , TAO R , LI G P , et al. Sparse fractional energy distribution and its application to radar detection of marine targets with micro-motion[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2019, 19 (24): 12165- 12174. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2937173
6	ZHANG X F, YANG D, GUO J Q, et al. Weak moving target detection based on short-time fourier transform in sea clutter[C]// Proc. of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP), 2019: 415-419.
7	CHEN X, YU X C, GUAN J M, et al. Detection and extraction of marine target with micromotion via short-time fractional Fourier transform in sparse domain[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, 2016.
8	CHEN X W, HUANG Y, GUAN J F, et al. Radar micro-Doppler signal detection and extraction via short-time sparse fractional fourier transform[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Radar Systems, 2017.
9	陈小龙, 关键, 于晓涵, 等. 基于短时稀疏时频分布的雷达目标微动特征提取及检测方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2017, 39 (5): 1017- 1023.
	CHEN X L , GUAN J , YU X H , et al. Radarmicro-Doppler signature extraction and detection viashort-time sparse time-frequency distribution[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2017, 39 (5): 1017- 1023.
10	LI Z H , CHEN J , SHEN M R , et al. Sea clutter suppression approach for target images at sea based on chaotic neural network[J]. Journal of Optoeletronics, 2014, 25 (3): 588- 594.
11	LI H , REN J F , FAN Y . Ground clutter suppression method based on FNN for dual-polarisaton weather radar[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 19 (10): 6043- 6047.
12	WEN L, ZHONG C C, HUANG X M, et al. Sea clutter suppression based on selective reconstruction of features[C]//Proc. of the 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar(APSAR), 2019.
13	BIONDI F . Low-rank pulse sparse decomposition and localized radon transform for ship-wake detection in synthetic aperture radar images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 15 (1): 117- 121. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2777264
14	DONG Z Z, SUN J, SUN J Q, et al. Research on sea clutter suppression using sparse dictionary learning[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 8th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference, 2019: 967-971.
15	NG B, ROSENBERG L. Sparse detection in sea-clutter using orthogonal matching pursuit[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Radar Conference, 2019.
16	STARCK J L , ELAD M , DONOHO D . Redundant multiscale transforms and their application for morphological component analysis[J]. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 2004, 132 (82): 287- 348.
17	李映, 张艳宁, 许星. 基于信号稀疏表示的形态成分分析: 进展和展望[J]. 电子学报, 2009, 37 (1): 146- 152.
	LI Y , ZHANG Y N , XU X . Advances and perspective on morphological component analysis based on sparse representation[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2009, 37 (1): 146- 152.
18	陈小龙, 关键, 董云龙, 等. 稀疏域海杂波抑制与微动目标检测方法[J]. 电子学报, 2016, 44 (4): 860- 867. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2016.04.015
	CHEN X L , GUAN J , DONG Y L , et al. Sea clutter suppression and micromotion target detection in sparse domain[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2016, 44 (4): 860- 867. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2016.04.015
19	FARSHCHIAN M . Target extraction and imaging of maritime targets in the sea clutter spectrum using sparse separation[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14 (2): 232- 236. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2636253
20	ROSENBERG L , DUK V . Detection in sea clutter using sparse signal separation[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020, 56 (6): 4384- 4394. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2020.2989093
21	HE H J , GENG M , NING X F . Weak target detection in sea clutter via signal decomposition[J]. Electronics Quality, 2020, (11): 148- 152.
22	YU X M, CHEN X, HU W, et al. An overview of marine moving target detection via high-resolution sparse representation[C]//Proc. of the CIE International Conference on Radar, 2017.
23	FARSHCHIAN M, SELESNICK I. Application of a sparse time-frequency technique for targets with oscillatory fluctuations[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Internet Waveform Diversity Design Conference, 2012: 191-196.
24	UYSAL F , SELESNICK I , PILLAI U , et al. Dynamic clutter mitigation using sparse optimization[J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 2014, 29 (7): 37- 49. doi: 10.1109/MAES.2014.130137
25	杨国铮, 禹晶, 肖创柏, 等. 基于形态成分分析的复杂背景SAR图像舰船尾迹检测[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学报, 2016, 28 (10): 1662- 1671.
	YANG G Z , YU J , XIAO C B , et al. Ship wake detection in SAR images with complex backgrounds using morphological omponent analysis[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2016, 28 (10): 1662- 1671.
26	NGUYEN S T N , AL-ASHWAL W A . Sea clutter mitigation using resonance-based signal decomposition[J]. IEEE Geo- science and Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, 12 (11): 2257- 2261. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2464807
27	BURNS J W, SUBOTIC N S, THELEN B J, et al. Decomposition approaches to separate clutter/background from buried object signature[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications, 2017: 1909-1912.
28	SELESNICK I W. Short-time Fourier transform and its inverse[EB/OL]. [2021-06-23]. http://eeweb.poly.edu/iselesni/EL713/STFT/stft_inverse.pdf.
29	STARCK J L , ELAD M , DONOHO D . Image decomposition via the combination of sparse representations and variational approach[J]. IEEE Trans.on Image Processing, 2005, 14 (10): 1570- 1582. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2005.852206
30	AFONSO M V , BIOUCAS-DIAS J M , FIGUEIREDO M A T . Fastimage recovery using variable splitting and constrained optimization[J]. IEEE Trans.on Image Processing, 2010, 19 (9): 2345- 2356. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2047910

[1]	陈诚, 刘涛, 曹来保, 何志华, 黄春琳, 粟毅. 全息穿透雷达非平整表面杂波抑制算法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2776-2782.
[2]	王宇卓, 朱圣棋, 李西敏, 兰岚. FDA MIMO双基雷达主瓣走动矫正距离模糊杂波抑制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(5): 1483-1494.
[3]	王明泽, 李蔚, 马俊伟, 李相平. 基于像素向量消除的穿墙雷达杂波抑制算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 827-833.
[4]	杜思予, 全英汇, 沙明辉, 方文, 邢孟道. 基于进化PSO算法的稀疏捷变频雷达波形优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 834-840.
[5]	时艳玲, 王磊, 李君豪. 基于投影空间下奇异值分解的海面小目标CFAR检测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 512-519.
[6]	董淑仙, 全英汇, 沙明辉, 方文, 邢孟道. 捷变频雷达联合脉内频率编码抗间歇采样干扰[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3371-3379.
[7]	庞晓娇, 赵永波, 曹成虎, 胡毅立, 陈胜. 基于协方差拟合准则的降维空时自适应处理方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 86-93.
[8]	张研, 王保平, 方阳, 宋祖勋. 基于正交频谱重构的微波三维成像方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2090-2098.
[9]	张瑞, 全英汇, 朱圣棋, 李亚超, 邢孟道. 基于改进OMP算法的稀疏目标微波关联成像方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1756-1765.
[10]	张彦, 叶春茂, 鲁耀兵, 陈学斌. 基于双曲调频波形稀疏重构的干扰抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1766-1774.
[11]	丁逊, 张劲东, 王娜, 王玉莹. 基于相参积累的捷变频雷达系统相位误差估计与稀疏场景重构算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(6): 1515-1523.
[12]	李槟槟, 陈辉, 刘维建, 张昭建, 周必雷. 低快拍下基于稀疏重构的大电磁矢量传感器阵列多维参数联合估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 868-874.
[13]	刘玉琪, 万显荣, 易建新, 柯亨玉. 基于信道多普勒特征的外辐射源雷达杂波抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 55-61.
[14]	董淑仙, 全英汇, 陈侠达, 高霞, 李亚超, 邢孟道. 基于捷变频联合数学形态学的干扰抑制算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(7): 1491-1498.
[15]	田明明, 廖桂生, 李云鹏, 朱圣棋. 超高速平台载雷达杂波特性与抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(2): 301-308.