基于灰色关联-模糊综合评判的雷达抗干扰性能评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.06.13

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对雷达抗干扰性能评估的问题, 提出一种基于灰色关联-模糊综合评判的雷达抗干扰性能评估方法。该方法以模糊数学和关联函数理论为基础, 首先借鉴已建立评价指标的模糊综合评判因素集, 采用区间数打分, 基于灰色关联方法确定评价指标权重。然后, 通过隶属函数建立评判矩阵，计算模糊综合评断结果, 并按照隶属度的大小确定雷达抗干扰能力级别。最后, 建立模糊值线性序评价模型, 确定雷达抗干扰性能的优劣顺序。经实例验证, 所提方法既可以确定雷达抗干扰性能的评价等级, 又能进一步确定雷达抗干扰性能的优劣顺序, 且较为客观可靠。

关键词: 雷达抗干扰, 模糊综合评估, 灰色关联, 线性序法

Abstract:

In view of the problem of radar anti-jamming performance evaluation, a method of radar anti-jamming performance evaluation based on grey correlation fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is proposed. Based on the theory of fuzzy mathematics and correlation function, the set of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation factors of the evaluation index for reference is used firstly. Through scoring by the interval number, the weight of the evaluation index is determined based on the grey correlation method. Then, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results are calculated by establishing the evaluation matrix by the membership function, and the anti-jamming capability level of radar is determined according to the membership degree. Finally, the fuzzy value linear order evaluation model is established to determine the order of radar anti-jamming performance. The example shows that the proposed method can not only determine the evaluation level of radar anti-jamming performance, but also further determine the order of radar anti-jamming performance, which is more objective and reliable.

Key words: radar anti-jamming, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, grey correlation, linear order method

中图分类号:

TN973

张军涛, 李尚生, 王旭坤. 基于灰色关联-模糊综合评判的雷达抗干扰性能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(6): 1557-1563.

Juntao ZHANG, Shangsheng LI, Xukun WANG. Method of radar anti-jamming performance evaluation based on grey correlation-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1557-1563.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 30

1	郭新民, 王旭, 魏国华. 岸基警戒雷达抗干扰性能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (4): 768- 775.
	GUO X M , WANG X , WEI G H . Evaluation method of anti-jamming performance of shore-based warning radar[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (4): 768- 775.
2	周颖, 王雪松, 徐振海, 等. 雷达电子战效果及效能评估的一般性思考[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2004, 26 (5): 617- 620. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.05.020
	ZHOU Y , WANG X S , XU Z H , et al. A general consideration of radar electronic warfare effect and effectiveness evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26 (5): 617- 620. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.05.020
3	BAI S, HONG J, NIU Z Y. Research on evaluation method of radar anti-jamming effectiveness based on experimental big data[C]//Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics, 2020: 392-395.
4	NOVILLO F, ROMERO-ARGUELLO J, GUERRERO E, et al. Performance evaluation of radar systems in noise jamming environments[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting, 2016.
5	MINNA V, JUHA J, HENA P. Performance evaluation of radar NCTR using the target aspect and signature[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Radar Conference, 2014: 623-628.
6	刘晓东. 雷达抗干扰效能评估指标体系及方法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2008.
	LIU X D. Research on evaluation index system and method of radar anti-jamming efficiency[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2008.
7	CAO F , WU F , LI J . Radar ECCM performance assessment model[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 344, 121- 124. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.344.121
8	孟晋丽, 傅有光, 陈翼, 等. 雷达抗干扰效能指标体系与评估方法[J]. 现代雷达, 2014, 36 (11): 80- 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.11.018
	MENG J L , FU Y G , CHEN Y , et al. Index system and evaluation method of radar anti-jamming efficiency[J]. Modern Radar, 2014, 36 (11): 80- 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.11.018
9	周万幸. 雷达抗干扰效能评估模型与指标体系研究[J]. 现代雷达, 2013, 35 (11): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2013.11.001
	ZHOU W X . Research on evaluation model and index system of radar anti-jamming efficiency[J]. Modern Radar, 2013, 35 (11): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2013.11.001
10	肖振民, 代培龙, 沈伟, 等. 基于AHP的分布式雷达抗干扰效能评估方法[J]. 现代雷达, 2017, 39 (1): 77- 83.
	XIAO Z M , DAI P L , SHEN W , et al. Distributed radar anti-jamming effectiveness evaluation method based on AHP[J]. Modern Radar, 2017, 39 (1): 77- 83.
11	赵智剑, 余科, 马跃华, 等. 基于AHP-云模型的雷达抗干扰性能评估[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3 (1): 65- 72.
	ZHAO Z J , YU K , MA Y H , et al. Evaluation of radar anti-jamming performance based on AHP-cloud model[J]. Aerospace Defense, 2020, 3 (1): 65- 72.
12	徐斐, 谢洲烨, 沈伟, 等. 基于神经网络的分布式雷达抗干扰效能评估方法[J]. 现代雷达, 2015, 37 (7): 4- 7, 11.
	XU F , XIE Z Y , SHEN W , et al. Distributed radar anti-jamming effectiveness evaluation method based on neural network[J]. Mo-dern radar, 2015, 37 (7): 4- 7, 11.
13	陈小龙, 陈宝欣, 黄勇, 等. 频控阵雷达空距频聚焦信号处理方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2018, 7 (2): 183- 193.
	CHEN X L , CHEN B X , HUANG Y , et al. Frequency diverse array radar signal processing via space-range-doppler focus (SRDF) method[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7 (2): 183- 193.
14	张建军, 曲宏宇, 赵栋华. 基于神经网络的雷达抗干扰效能评估方法[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2015, 30 (1): 28- 32.
	ZHANG J J , QU H Y , ZHAO D H . Evaluation method of radar anti-jamming effectiveness based on neural network[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical Engineering Academy, 2015, 30 (1): 28- 32.
15	孔亚盟, 冯德军, 杨勇, 等. 基于物元模型的被动雷达导引头抗干扰性能评估[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2014, 9 (1): 64- 69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5692.2014.01.012
	KONG Y M , FENG D J , YANG Y , et al. Evaluation of anti-jamming performance of passive radar seeker based on matter-element model[J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Electronic Sciences, 2014, 9 (1): 64- 69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5692.2014.01.012
16	孔亚盟. 雷达导引头面临的复杂战场环境及其适应能力的综合评估研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2014.
	KONG Y M. Study on comprehensive evaluation of radar seeker in complex battlefield environment and its adaptability[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014.
17	ZADEH L A . A note on prototype theory and fuzzy sets[J]. Cognition, 1982, 12 (3): 291- 297. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90036-1
18	QI Z F , HAN S , LI J X . Applications of generalized rough set theory in evaluation index system of radar anti-jamming performance[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University(Science), 2016, 21 (2): 151- 158. doi: 10.1007/s12204-016-1706-3
19	李月琴, 闫晓鹏, 杭和平, 等. 基于模糊综合评判的无线电引信抗干扰性能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37 (5): 791- 797. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.05.004
	LI Y Q , YAN X P , HANG H P , et al. Evaluation of anti-jamming performance of radio fuze based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37 (5): 791- 797. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.05.004
20	张仲敏, 李俊山, 宋凭, 等. 一种基于模糊层次分析的多Agent电子对抗装备状态智能评判方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35 (4): 516- 522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.04.013
	ZHANG Z M , LI J S , SONG P , et al. An intelligent evaluation method of multi-agent electronic countermeasures equipment state based on fuzzy hierarchical analysis[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35 (4): 516- 522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.04.013
21	耿涛, 卢广山, 张安. 基于Vague集的空中目标威胁评估群决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2011, 33 (12): 2686- 2690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2011.12.21
	GENG T , LU G S , ZHANG A . Group decision making method for air target threat assessment based on vague set[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33 (12): 2686- 2690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2011.12.21
22	要瑞璞, 沈惠璋. Vague集多指标决策的模糊值线性序法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45 (28): 39- 40, 95. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009.28.011
	YAO R P , SHEN H Z . Fuzzy value linear order method for multi-index decision making based on Vague set[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2009, 45 (28): 39- 40, 95. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009.28.011
23	YA N L , ZHUANG Z H . Index and evaluation of radar anti-jamming ability based on improved grey correlation[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 926-930, 3629- 3632. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.926-930.3629
24	BU F K, HE J, LI H R, et al. Radar seeker anti-jamming performance prediction and evaluation method based on the improved grey wolf optimizer algorithm and support vector machine[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronics Technology, 2020: 704-710.
25	何俊, 李淑华, 周之平, 等. 基于博弈论和灰色关联分析的雷达抗干扰评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39 (12): 119- 122.
	HE J , LI S H , ZHOU Z P , et al. Evaluation of radar anti-jamming ability based on game theory and grey relation analysis[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2014, 39 (12): 119- 122.
26	杜栋. 现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2015: 245- 250.
	DU D . Modern comprehensive evaluation method and case selection[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2015: 245- 250.
27	郭亚军. 综合评价理论方法及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 25- 36.
	GUO Y J . Theory and method of comprehensive evaluation and its application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 25- 36.
28	臧翰林, 李艳玲. 基于群层次分析法的雷达导引头抗干扰性能评估[J]. 探测与控制学报, 2018, 40 (6): 110- 114, 120.
	ZANG H L , LI Y L . Evaluation of anti-jamming performance of radar seeker based on group AHP[J]. Journal of Detection and Control, 2008, 40 (6): 110- 114, 120.
29	宋宝军, 张秦, 姜军. 基于Vague集模糊值线性序法的雷达抗干扰效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41 (2): 124- 127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.02.031
	SONG B J , ZHANG Q , JIANG J . Evaluation of radar anti-jamming effectiveness based on Vague set fuzzy linear sequence method[J]. Fire Gontrol & Command Control, 2016, 41 (2): 124- 127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.02.031
30	刘俊娟, 王炜, 程琳. 基于梯形隶属函数的区间数模糊评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2009, 31 (2): 390- 392. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2009.02.032
	LIU J J , WANG W , CHENG L . Interval number fuzzy evaluation method based on trapezoidal membership function[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31 (2): 390- 392. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2009.02.032

评估指标	等级
评估指标	1	2	3	4	5
抗干扰效果	差	较差	一般	较好	好
数值特征	0~0.2	0.2~0.4	0.4~0.6	0.6~0.8	0.8~1.0

序号	信号功率	工作频段	抗干扰措施	电磁环境	对抗时机
雷达X₁	0.85	1.00	0.82	0.80	0.65
雷达X₂	0.79	0.80	0.71	0.85	0.78
雷达X₃	0.56	0.83	0.29	0.84	0.79

序号	信号功率	工作频段	抗干扰措施	电磁环境	对抗时机
1	雷达X₁	雷达X₁	雷达X₁	雷达X₂	雷达X₃
2	雷达X₂	雷达X₃	雷达X₂	雷达X₃	雷达X₂
3	雷达X₃	雷达X₂	雷达X₃	雷达X₁	雷达X₁

数据来源	信号功率	工作频段	抗干扰措施	电磁环境	对抗时机
本文	0.18	0.23	0.27	0.18	0.15
文献[29]	0.20	0.15	0.45	0.10	0.10

[1]	衣晓, 曾睿, 曹昕莹. 利用k近邻区间距离的异步抗差航迹关联算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(5): 1475-1482.
[2]	衣晓, 曾睿. 基于k近邻平均距离的异步航迹关联算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3515-3521.
[3]	奚之飞, 徐安, 寇英信, 李战武, 杨爱武. 基于灰主成分的空战目标威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 147-155.
[4]	赵琳, 周俊峰, 刘源, 郝勇. 三维空间“追逃防”三方微分对策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(2): 322-335.
[5]	林圣琳, 李伟, 马萍, 杨明. 基于Hilbert-Huang变换的仿真模型排序评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(9): 2137-2142.
[6]	许丹, 陈志军, 王前程, 陈云霞, 康锐. 基于空间相似性和波动阈值的退化模型一致性检验方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(2): 455-459.
[7]	刘楠1，张林让1，赵永红1，张宏伟2. 双基地MIMO雷达抗分布式干扰方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(7): 1298-1304.
[8]	伍文，孟相如，马志强，梁霄. 基于组合赋权的网络可生存性模糊综合评估[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(4): 786-790.
[9]	胡玉伟，马萍，杨明，王子才. 一种时频结合分析的仿真结果动态一致性检验方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(3): 643-649.
[10]	焦松，李伟，杨明. 基于经验模态分解和灰色关联度分析的仿真模型验证方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35(12): 2613-2618.
[11]	付雅芳, 杨任农, 刘晓东, 王琳. 基于灰色关联分析的软件工作量估算方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(11): 2384-2389.
[12]	付肖燕, 沈继红, 赵玉新. 潜艇水下航行的安全性评估[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(11): 2407-2412.
[13]	蒋英杰, 孙志强, 宫二玲, 谢红卫. 情景环境与人为差错的对应关系分析方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(12): 2782-2787.
[14]	吴静，吴晓燕，陈永兴，滕江川. 基于改进灰色关联分析的仿真模型验证方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(8): 1677-1679.
[15]	王建玲1，刘思峰1，邱广华1,2，米传民1. 基于信息集结的新型灰色关联度构建及应用[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(1): 77-81.