基于安全性建模的民机ILS信号设计

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.04.14

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem that the current uniformly distributed instrument landing system (ILS) signals cannot reflect the real safety changes, a Gaussian quantization based ILS safety signal design method is proposed. Firstly, based on operational safety, the safety range is determined and reverse design is carried out to perform Gaussian quantization on flight safety. Then, starting from improving the situational awareness of pilots, a safety signal design method is proposed to maintain consistency between the instrument scale change rate and the safety change rate at different offset angles within the safe range. Finally, a pilot cognitive model is constructed, and simulation experiments are conducted on different initial angle offsets in the final approach and landing scenario of civil aircraft. Simulation experiment results show that the proposed method improves the safety of the approach and landing phase of civil aircraft.

Key words: quantification of dynamic safety, reverse design, situational awareness, signal design of instrument landing system (ILS)

CLC Number:

Xinyue YUAN, Hong CHEN, Lu DING, Lei SONG, Dan HUANG. ILS signal design based on modeling of safety for civil aircraft[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(4): 1255-1263.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Table 1

Fig.7

Table 2

Fig.8

Table 3

References 30

30	ZHAO C X , LI H , DONG L , et al. Safety analysis and evaluation of onboard flat panel display system based on STPA-Bayes Model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (5): 1083- 1092.
31	BERINGER D B, FERCHO K A. The use of enhanced flight vision systems (EFVS) for low-visibility takeoffs in Part 121 Operations[C]//Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2020, 64(1): 198-202.
32	Federal Aviation Administration . Revisions to operational requirements for the use of enhanced flight vision systems (EFVS) and to pilot compartment view requirements for vision systems; correcting amendment[J]. The Federal Register/FIND, 2018, 83 (7): 1186- 1188.
33	KRAMER L J , ETHERINGTON T J , SEVERANCE K , et al. Assessing dual-sensor enhanced flight vision systems to enable equivalent visual operations[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2017, 14 (10): 533- 550.
34	董磊, 荣灏, 金志威, 等. 增强视景系统形式化安全性分析方法研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2019, 36 (12): 41- 47.
	DONG L , RONG H , JIN Z W , et al. Research on formal security analysis method of enhanced vision system[J]. Computer Simulation, 2019, 36 (12): 41- 47.
35	毛忠明, 顾宏斌, 吴东苏. 基于ANFIS的进近阶段飞行员操纵模型设计[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2019, 37 (1): 168- 171.
	MAO Z M , GU H B , WU D S . Design of pilot control model in approach stage based on ANFIS[J]. Digital Technology and Application, 2019, 37 (1): 168- 171.
36	韩维, 赵振宇, 陈志刚. 舰载机着舰任务下的飞行员建模研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2016, (1): 14- 17.
	HAN W , ZHAO Z Y , CHEN Z G . Research on pilot modeling under carrier-based aircraft landing mission[J]. Flight Mechanics, 2016, (1): 14- 17.
37	梅芊, 黄丹, 卢艺. 基于MBSE的民用飞机功能架构设计方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45 (5): 1042- 1051.
1	LAPESA B D . ICAO and the aviation authorities: aircraft maintenance programs[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022.
2	BRISKORN D , STOLLETZ R . Aircraft landing problems with aircraft classes[J]. Journal of Scheduling, 2014, 17 (1): 31- 45. doi: 10.1007/s10951-013-0337-x
3	AC 121/135 FS 201245R1. 飞行品质监控(FOQA)实施与管理[S]. 北京: 中国民航局, 2015.
	AC 121/135 FS 201245R1. Implementation and management of flight quality monitoring (FOQA)[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2015.
4	马银才, 张兴媛. 航空机载电子设备[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2012.
	MA Y C , ZHANG X Y . Aircraft on-board electronic equipment[M]. Beijing: Press of Tsinghua University, 2012.
5	MOIR I , SEABRIDGE A , JUKES M . Civil avionics systems[M]. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013: 119- 157.
6	WICKENS C D, FADDEN S, MERWIN D, et al. Cognitive factors in aviation display design[C]//Proc. of the 17th AIAA/IEEE/SAE Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1998.
7	SALAS E , MAURINO D . Human factors in aviation[J]. Human Factors in Aviation, 2010, 21 (9): 3- 19.
8	WICKENS C D , HELTON W S , HOLLANDS J G , et al. Engineering psychology and human performance[M]. New York: Routledge, 2021.
9	SANDOM C . Situation awareness[M]. Wells: IET Digital Library, 2001.
10	ERICSSON K , HOFFMAN R , KOZBELT A , et al. Expertise and situation awareness: the Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
11	FU Y Q , XU B H . Effects of display format of air traffic information on situation awareness and cognitive performance in cockpit[J]. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2012, 18 (2): 13- 17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006－8309.2012.02.004
12	陆芝平, 郑德华. 全向信标和仪表着陆系统[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1990.
	LU Z P , ZHENG D H . Omnidirectional beacon and instrument landing system[M]. Beijing: Press of National Defense Industry, 1990.
13	杨安琪. 仪表着陆系统机载设备检测系统研制[J]. 电子技术与软件工程, 2018, 7 (12): 94- 95.
	YANG A Q . Development of on-board equipment detection system for instrument landing system[J]. Electronic Technology and Software Engineering, 2018, 7 (12): 94- 95.
14	WANG X L, JAVENSIUS S, PHILLIP K, et al. Modeling of the aircraft's low energy state during the final approach phase using operational flight data[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Scitech Forum, 2019.
15	樊智勇, 王飞, 刘涛, 等. 进近着陆阶段自动飞行工作模式设计与仿真[J]. 计算机仿真, 2021, 38 (3): 19- 25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2021.03.005
	FAN Z Y , WANG F , LIU T , et al. Design and simulation of automatic flight mode during approach and landing phase[J]. Computer Simulation, 2021, 38 (3): 19- 25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2021.03.005
16	王双, 姜春英, 康玉祥, 等. 仪表着陆系统的航道调整仿真系统研究[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2020, 34 (8): 174- 180.
	WANG S , JANG C Y , KANG Y X , et al. Simulation system research on course adjustment of instrument landing system[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2020, 34 (8): 174- 180.
17	美国联邦航空局. 飞机飞行手册[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2010.
	Federal Aviation Administration . Airplane flying handbook[M]. Shanghai: Press of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2010.
18	HART S G , LOOMIS L L . Evaluation of the potential format and content of a cockpit display of traffic information[J]. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 1980, 22 (5): 591- 604.
19	AIRBUS SAS . Getting to grips with required navigation performance with autorization required[M]. Toulouse: Flight Operations Support & Services, 2009.
20	Docket No. FAA-2013-0904 notice No. 25-13-14-SC. Airbus, Model A350-900 series airplane; electronic flight control system: lateral directional and longitudinal stability and low energy Awareness[S]. Washington: Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
21	International Civil Aviation Organization . Required navigation performance authorization required (RNP AR) procedure design manual[M]. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2009.
22	THIEL C, FRICKE H. Collision risk on final approach-a radar date based evaluation method to assess safety[C]//Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, 2010: 473-480.
23	李娜, 葛飞. 基于精密进近航段航迹偏差的航空器近地碰撞风险评估[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19 (6): 1903- 1908.
	LI N , GE F . Aircraft near-ground collision risk assessment based on precision approach segment track deviation[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019, 19 (6): 1903- 1908.
24	陈农田, 王帅, 高文韬, 等. 基于层次任务分析理论的飞行员进近着陆操纵任务分析[J]. 民航学报, 2018, 2 (6): 84- 87.
	CHEN N T , WANG S , GAO W T , et al. Analysis of pilot's approach and landing control tasks based on hierarchical task analysis theory[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation, 2018, 2 (6): 84- 87.
25	王晴昊, 胡剑波, 姚登凯. STPA在进近着陆飞行安全分析中的研究及应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38 (10): 2703- 2712. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2018)10-2703-10
	WANG Q H , HU J B , YAO D K . Research and application of STPA in flight safety analysis of approach and landing[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2018, 38 (10): 2703- 2712. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2018)10-2703-10
26	鲁志东, 张曙光, 戴闰志, 等. 大型民机进近着陆段异常能量风险判据[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42 (6): 102- 115.
	LU Z D , ZHANG S G , DAI R Z , et al. Criteria for abnormal energy risk assessment during approach and landing of large civil aircraft[J]. The Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 42 (6): 102- 115.
37	MEI Q , HUANG D , LU Y . Design method of civil aircraft functional architecture based on MBSE[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45 (5): 1042- 1051.
38	YANG C P , YIN T W , ZHAO W N , et al. Modeling the uncertain effects of human factors upon the safety of airport approaches via pilot modeling[J]. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Series A, 2013, 15 (4): 249- 258.
27	WISELY P. Digital twinning within a novel human-in-the-loop verification method for HUD safety-critical approach and landing[C]//Proc. of the SPIE 11759, Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality (XR) Technology for Multi-Domain Operations Ⅱ, 2021: 124-135.
28	MAAS J, WATINKS C. Aircraft HUD with curved tapes and flight mode annunciation boxes[P]. U. S: Patent 10876856, 2020-12-29.
29	Federal Aviation Administration . Special conditions: dassault aviation, model falcon 2000EX airplanes, head-up display (HUD) with vision-system video[J]. The Federal Register/FIND, 2016, 81 (17): 4577- 4579.
30	赵长啸, 李浩, 董磊, 等. 基于STPA-Bayes模型的机载平视显示系统安全性分析与评价[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (5): 1083- 1092.

实验设置	数值
实验1	以ILS偏差角0.1°进近PFD显示目前的ILS信号
实验2	以ILS偏差角0.1°进近PFD显示ILS安全性信号
实验3	以ILS偏差角0.3°进近PFD显示目前的ILS信号
实验4	以ILS偏差角0.3°进近PFD显示ILS安全性信号

要求	性能指标
1	纵向触底点距离跑道入口的距离小于60 m
2	纵向触底点距离跑道入口的距离大于823 m
3	飞机最外侧起落架距离跑道中心线的距离大于21 m

对照实验	Ⅰ级安全区域	Ⅱ级安全区域	不安全区域
实验1	85.98	11.27	2.75
实验2	89.27	8.91	1.82
实验3	70.32	18.64	11.04
实验4	77.25	14.52	8.23

[1]	Bin LIU, Jiacai YI, Li YAO, Yanjuan WANG, Zhaoyun DING, Xianqiang ZHU. Situational awareness ontology modeling for threat from space cyber operations [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(3): 745-754.
[2]	Jiacai YI, Bin LIU, Li YAO, Wentao ZHAO. Satellite cyber situational understanding based on knowledge reasoning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(5): 1562-1571.
[3]	Juqi YIN, Zhen YANG, Yazhong LUO, Jianyong ZHOU. Improved adaptive IMM algorithm for space maneuvering target tracking [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3658-3666.
[4]	Kai CHENG, Gang CHEN, Xiaohan YU, Man LIU, Tianhao SHAO. Knowledge traction and data-driven wargame AI design and key technologies [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2911-2917.

ILS signal design based on modeling of safety for civil aircraft

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 30

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments