复杂软件系统双向耦合论证设计方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.10.22

Abstract

Abstract:

The characteristics of complex software systems determine that it can not follow the traditional top-down and plan-driven software development methods to implement and construct. The design of complex software system is more similar to planning design, aiming at providing high-level decision-making of adaptive evolution for the system to adapt to the changes of environment and requirements at the software process level. In view of the shortcomings of existing model-based system engineering methods and tools in adapting to evolution analysis, this paper puts forward a bidirectional coupling demonstration and design method and its key technologies for complex software systems, which provides a clear realization path and technical method for comprehensive top-down and bottom-up demonstration and design, and provides useful reference for equipment strategic management such as development roadmap and five-year development plan with similar work nature.

Key words: complex software system, model-based system engineering, development roadmap, equipment strategic management

CLC Number:

N
94-0
N
945

Rui LUO, Jinhui HUANG, Shuangshuang WANG, Dezhao KONG. Bidirectional coupling analysis and design method for complex software system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(10): 3451-3461.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Table 1

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

References 47

1	王维平,朱一凡,王涛,等.体系视野下的MBSE[J].科技导报,2019,37(7):12-21.
	WANGW P,ZHUY F,WANGT,et al.MBSE from a system of systems point of view[J].Science & Technology Review,2019,37(7):12-21.
2	张鹏翼,黄百乔,鞠鸿彬.MBSE: 系统工程的发展方向[J].科技导报,2020,38(21):21-26. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.21.002
	ZHANGP Y,HUANGB Q,JUH B.MBSE: future direction of system engineering[J].Science & Technology Review,2020,38(21):21-26. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.21.002
3	邓昱晨,毛寅轩,卢志昂,等.基于模型的系统工程的应用及发展[J].科技导报,2019,37(7):49-54.
	DENGY C,MAOY X,LUZ A,et al.Analysis of the development of model-based systems engineering application[J].Science & Technology Review,2019,37(7):49-54.
4	鲁金直,王国新,郑新华,等.基于模型系统工程中国应用调查[J].科技导报,2018,36(20):57-66.
	LUJ Z,WANGG X,ZHENGX H,et al.Model-based systems engineering application investigation in China[J].Science & Technology Review,2018,36(20):57-66.
5	DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 2.0 volume 1: introduction, overview, and concepts[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2009.
6	DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 2.0 volume 2: architectural data and models architect's guide[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2009.
7	DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 2.0 volume 3: DoDAF meta-model physical exchange specification developer's guide[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2009.
8	IBM Corporation Software Group. Harmony a MBSE deskbook version 1.00-agile model-based systems engineering best practices with IBM rhapsody[R]. Somers: IBM Corporation, 2017.
9	No Magic Incorporated MagicGrid_® book of knowledge-a practical guide to systems modeling using magic grid from dassault systems[R]. Kaunas: Dassault Systems, 2021.
10	曹江,陈彬,高岚岚,等.体系工程"钻石"模型与数智孪生[J].科技导报,2020,38(21):6-20. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.21.001
	CAOJ,CHENB,GAOL L,et al.Diamond model and digital-intelligent twin for system of systems engineering[J].Science & Technology Review,2020,38(21):6-20. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.21.001
11	樊志强,曹江,牛婵,等.一种基于Inf-ProA框架的能力满足度计算方法[J].计算机与现代化,2021,(6):12-17.
	FANZ Q,CAOJ,NIUC,et al.A capacity satisfaction calculating method based on Inf-ProA architecture framework[J].Computer and Modernization,2021,(6):12-17.
12	The Open Group. The TOGAF standard, 10th edition[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://publications.opengroup.org/c220.
13	The Open Group. TOGAF series guide: business capabilities, version 2[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. www.opengroup.org/library/g211.
14	The Open Group. TOGAF series guide: business models[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://publications.opengroup.org/g18a.
15	The Open Group. TOGAF series guide: enabling enterprise agility[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://publications.opengroup.org/g20f.
16	The Open Group. TOGAF series guide: using the TOGAF standard in the digital enterprise[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://publications.opengroup.org/g217.
17	The Open Group. TOGAF series guide: value streams[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://publications.opengroup.org/g178.
18	Architecture Capability Team, Consultation, Command & Control Board. Modeling guidelines for use of the UAF DMM[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2019_04/20190404_AC_322-N-201-0046_ENG-UAF-Guide.pdf.
19	Architecture Capability Team, Consultation, Command & Control Board. NATO architecture framework version 4[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2021/1/pdf/NAFv4_2020.09.pdf.
20	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework profile version1.0[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. http://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.0.
21	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework profile version1.1[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.1/UAFP/PDF.
22	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework domain metamodel version 1.1[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.1/DMM/PDF.
23	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework modeling language (UAFML) version 1.2[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.2.
24	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework traceability (informative) appendix a version 1.2[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.2.
25	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework (UAF) sample problem (informative) appendix B version 1.2[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.2.
26	Object Management Group. Enterprise architecture guide for UAF (informative) appendix C version 1.2[EB/OL]. [2023-05-22]. https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.2.
27	IBM Corporation. IBM rational system architect user guide release 11.3.1[EB/OL]. [2023-05-07]. http://developer.ibm.com.
28	IBM Software Group. Systems engineering best practices with the rational solution for systems and software engineering deskbook release 3.1.2[R]. Somers: IBM Corporation, 2011.
29	IBM Software Group. Systems engineering best practices with the rational solution for systems and software engineering deskbook release 4.0[R]. Somers: IBM Corporation, 2013.
30	蒋浴芹. M-Design-多域产品系统建模平台的研究与实现[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2011.
	JIANG Y Q. M-Design: a platform for modeling of multi domain system engineering[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011.
31	刘玉生,樊红日,蒋浴芹,等.M-Design: 多域复杂机电产品系统建模平台[J].软件学报,2012,23(2):8-20.
	LIUY S,FANH R,JIANGY Q,et al.M-Design: system modeling platform for multi-domain complex mechatronics[J].Journal of Software,2012,23(2):8-20.
32	苏州同元软控信息技术有限公司. MWorks 2.5用户手册[EB/OL]. [2023-05-07]. http://www.tongyuan.cc/product/MWorks.
	Suzhou Tongyuan Software&Control Technology Company Limited. MWorks 2.5 user guide[EB/OL]. [2023-05-07]. http://www.tongyuan.cc/product/MWorks.
33	王怀民,吴文峻,毛新军,等.复杂软件系统的成长性构造与适应性演化[J].中国科学: 信息科学,2014,44(6):743-761.
	WANGH M,WUW J,MAOX J,et al.Growing construction and adaptive evolution of complex software system[J].Scientia Sinica (Informationis),2014,44(6):743-761.
34	韩雨泓. 面向军事复杂软件系统的协同开发演化发展研究[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2021.
	HAN Y H. Research on collaborative development and evolution of military complex software system[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan University, 2021.
35	Systems Engineering Vision 2025 Project Team of the International Council on Systems Engineering. A world in motion-systems engineering vision 2025[R]. California: INCOSE, 2014.
36	MIRANDAG M,ALMEIDAJ P A,AZEVEDOC L B,et al.An ontological analysis of capability modeling in defense enterprise architecture frameworks[J].Ontobras,2016,11-22.
37	刘兆鹏,罗睿,王强,等.基于功能和效应的作战能力指标体系设计[J].火力与指挥控制,2020,45(6):24-29.
	LIUZ P,LUOR,WANGQ,et al.Design of combat capacity index system based on measures from performance and effective perspective[J].Fire Control & Command Control,2020,45(6):24-29.
38	刘爱伦,厉康.行动识别理论[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):913-915. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.04.037
	LIUA L,LIK.The theory of action identification[J].Psychological Science,2004,27(4):913-915. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.04.037
39	GEORGIEVSKI I, AIELLO M. An overview of hierarchical task network planning[EB/OL]. [2023-05-07]. https://srxiv.org/abs/1403.7426.
40	MULCAHYN J,CALLJ.Apes save tools for future use[J].Science,2006,312(5776):1038-1040. doi: 10.1126/science.1125456
41	LUCCIS,KOPECD.Artificial inteligence in the 21st century[M].Herndon:Mercury Learning and Information, Inc,2016.
42	RAKESH A, RAMAKRISHNAN S. Fast algorithms for mining association rules[C]//Proc. of the 20th Very Large Data Bases Conference, 2000.
43	罗睿,常歌,王强.基于时空控制指标的联合作战能力分析[J].指挥控制与仿真,2019,41(6):12-17.
	LUOR,CHANGG,WANGQ.Joint operational capacity analysis based on temporal-spatial control effectiveness mea-sures[J].Command Control & Simulation,2019,41(6):12-17.
44	郑冲,章林锋,张婷,等.装备型谱的理论基础研究[J].航天标准化,2019,3,20-23.
	ZHENGC,ZHANGL F,ZHANGT,et al.Research on theoretical basis of equipment structure[J].Aerospace Standardization,2019,3,20-23.
45	孔德鹏,马溢清,郑保华,等.面向不确定多任务场景的海上联合作战装备体系贡献率评估方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2022,44(12):3775-3782. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.12.22
	KONGD P,MAY Q,ZHENGB H,et al.Contribution rate assessment method of maritime joint operations equipment system of systems for uncertain multi-mission scenes[J].Systems Engineering and Electronics,2022,44(12):3775-3782. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.12.22
46	章华平,郑少秋,潘清,等.新型作战场景设计方法与实践[J].指挥信息系统与技术,2020,11(6):20-25.
	ZHANGH P,ZHENGS Q,PANQ,et al.Designing method for new operational scenario and its practice[J].Command Information System and Technology,2020,11(6):20-25.
47	戎光,刘新发,夏惠诚.基于DoDAF的大型舰艇编队防空反导系统作战体系结构[J].舰船电子对抗,2012,35(6):22-25.
	RONGG,LIUX F,XIAH C.Operation architecture of air defense and anti-missile system of large warship formation based on DoDAF[J].Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure,2012,35(6):22-25.

能力关系	能力树	有向图
顺序
并行
选择
重复

[1]	Zhibing CHEN, Heng WU, Zhanhu LUO, Jianguo WANG. Research on the concept of operation for tropospheric airship based on MBSE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 1004-1012.
[2]	Haoliang REN, Jianchao ZHANG, Huichuan CHENG. Modeling and analysis method of weapon equipment system capability requirements based on SysML [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(9): 2843-2851.
[3]	Jinyan GAO, Luyuan WANG, Zhongshi PAN, Humei WANG. MBSE architecture modeling of Mars maintenance and management device [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(5): 1441-1450.
[4]	Xinfeng WU, Qibo PENG, Ran HUANG, Jinglin LI. Escape and rescue strategy of launch vehicle ascending section based on MBSE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(4): 1121-1126.
[5]	Wanbin LIAO, Yunfeng CAO, Xinyao WANG. DSL building for requirement analysis of complex system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3443-3454.
[6]	Delin LI, Wenhao BI, An ZHANG, Qiucen FAN. MBSE-based process management in the development of civil aircraft [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(8): 2209-2220.
[7]	ZHANG Jie, LU Yang, LIU Guang-liang. Algebraic approach of software reliability estimation based on architecture analysis [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(11): 2654-2662.

Bidirectional coupling analysis and design method for complex software system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 47

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments