面向任务的装备保障体系多Agent建模与评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.33

Abstract

Abstract:

With the development of the war form towards systematization and intelligence, new challenges are raised to the equipment support system of systems (SoS). At the same time, the dynamic variation of battle field environments requires the equipment support SoS to adapt to the battlefield situation and dynamically support the combat missions. Existed researches on the equipment support SoS neither relate to combat tasks closely, nor match the equipment system. Meanwhile, the autonomy of the equipment support SoS has not been well explained. Firstly, based on the multi-agent method, the equipment support SoS are modeled according to the task layer, base layer and equipment layer, and the time and space constraints in the support tasks are concerned. Secondly, the evaluation index of task-oriented equipment support system is proposed and the index model is constructed. Finally, the rationality and feasibility of the model are verified by simulating different support activities for different combat tasks, then the effectiveness evaluation of equipment support system is completed. This research may have advantages on the optimization of the structure and flow design of equipment support SoS in the future.

Key words: equipment support system of systems (SoS), agent modeling, support process, anylogic simulation

CLC Number:

Junsen LI, Yining FANG, Yun'an ZHANG, Guanghan BAI, Junyong TAO. Multi-agent modeling and evaluation method for mission-oriented equipment support SoS[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 279-290.

Figures/Tables 25

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

Table 11

Table 12

References 37

6	HAN Z, LU Y, GU P. Research on the test of maintenance support force system based on the theory of complex network[C]//Proc. of the 26th China Conference on Control and Decision Making, 2014.
7	赵东波, 胡雪松, 王晖. 浅析构建一体化装备保障体系的途径[J]. 装甲兵工程学院学报, 2006, 20 (2): 26- 28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1497.2006.02.006
	ZHAO D B , HU X S , WANG H . Analyze the way of constructing integrated equipment support system[J]. Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2006, 20 (2): 26- 28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1497.2006.02.006
8	祝传生. 基于信息系统的战时战术级装备保障体系[J]. 装甲兵工程学院学报, 2014, 28 (5): 7- 10.
	ZHU C S . Wartime tactical equipment support system based on information system[J]. Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2014, 28 (5): 7- 10.
9	张勇, 杨宏伟, 白勇, 等. 基于复杂网络理论的装备保障网络实证研究[J]. 装备学院学报, 2014, 25 (1): 83- 87. doi: 10.3783/j.issn.2095-3828.2014.01.019
	ZHANG Y , YANG H W , BAI Y , et al. Empirical research on equipment support network based on complex network theory[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 2014, 25 (1): 83- 87. doi: 10.3783/j.issn.2095-3828.2014.01.019
10	邢彪, 宋太亮, 曹军海. 装备保障体系建模与仿真关键技术研究[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2016, 24 (4): 108- 111.
	XING B , SONG T L , CAO J H . Research on key technology of modeling and simulation of equipment support system[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2016, 24 (4): 108- 111.
11	邢彪, 曹军海, 宋太亮, 等. 基于复杂网络的装备保障体系建模方法[J]. 装甲兵工程学院学报, 2016, 30 (2): 12- 15.
	XING B , CAO J H , SONG T L , et al. Modeling method of equipment support system based on complex network[J]. Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2016, 30 (2): 12- 15.
12	李勇. 物流保障网络级联失效抗毁性研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2009.
	LI Y. Research on cascade failure resistance of logistics support network[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2009.
13	KIZIM A V , DENISOV M V , DAVYDOVA S V , et al. A conceptual agent-based model to supporting the production equipment technical service and repair organization[J]. Procedia Technology, 2014, 16, 1176- 1182. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.132
14	DU X, PEI G, XUE Z, et al. An Agent-based simulation framework for equipment support command[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence & Design, 2016.
15	LI K , FAN W H , SONG S , et al. Modeling and simulation method of equipment support system based on multiple agents[J]. Scientia Sinica (Informationis), 2018, 48 (7): 794- 809. doi: 10.1360/N112017-00301
16	ZHAO X, CHEN G. Research on the structure of an equipment assistant decision support system based on multi-agent technology[C]//Proc. of the 2008 Asia Simulation Conference-7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scienti-fic Computing, 2008.
17	XING B , SONG T L , CAO H J , et al. Research on equipment support activity process simulation based on Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2018, 23 (2): 250- 255. doi: 10.1007/s12204-017-1901-x
18	尹丽丽, 寇力, 范文慧. 基于多Agent的装备保障体系分布式建模与仿真方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29 (12): 3185- 3194.
	YIN L L , KOU L , FAN W H . Distributed modeling and simulation method of equipment support system based on multi-agent[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29 (12): 3185- 3194.
19	刘伟, 胡起伟, 王广彦. 基于Agent的战时装备维修保障效能评估方法研究[J]. 计算机与数字工程, 2011, 39 (2): 68- 72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2011.02.018
	LIU W , HU Q W , WANG G Y . Research of assessment methodology of equipment maintenance support effectiveness based on multi-agent simulation[J]. Computer & Digital Engineering, 2011, 39 (2): 68- 72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2011.02.018
1	樊兆雄. 基于复杂网络的装备保障体系研究现状及展望[J]. 数字通信世界, 2020, (2): 58. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-7274.2020.02.032
	FAN Z X . Research status and prospect of equipment support system based on complex network[J]. Digital Communication World, 2020, (2): 58. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-7274.2020.02.032
2	JASON L. System of systems reliability for multi-state systems[C]//Proc. of the Reliability and Main-tainability Symposium, 2009.
3	胡峰笙. 美国的伊拉克战争作战指导的主要特点[J]. 军事历史, 2020, (6): 93- 99.
	HU F S . The main features of America's Iraq war operations guidance[J]. Military History, 2020, (6): 93- 99.
4	JIN L . Transatlantic relationship: toward a loose alliance?[J]. China International Studies, 2018, (5): 109- 127.
5	BARZOKI H S , RAHNEJAT A M , AVAKH F , et al. The prevalence of depression among Iran-Iraq war veterans, combatants and former prisoners of war: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. International Journal of Psychology, 2022, 57 (2): 295- 305. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12813
20	MOHAMMAD S , GEORGES K . Agent-based simulator of dynamic flood-people interactions[J]. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2021, 14 (2): e12695.
21	ZHANG J X , ROBINSON D T . Replication of an agent-based model using the Replication Standard[J]. Environmental Mo-delling and Software, 2021, 139 (4): 105016.
22	SHAYMAA E M , OKASHA A E , HOSNY H A . Agent-based models of administrative corruption: an overview[J]. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 2022, 42 (2): 350- 358.
23	吴溪, 徐达, 穆歌, 等. 基于数字样机的装备维修时间验证方法研究[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2013, (12): 72- 75.
	WU X , XU D , MU G , et al. Research on verification method of equipment maintenance time based on digital prototyping[J]. Manufacturing Technology & Machine Tool, 2013, (12): 72- 75.
24	GB/T 13400.2-2009. 网络计划技术第2部分: 网络图画法的一般规定[S]. 北京: 国家标准化管理委员会, 2009.
	GB/T 13400.2-2009. Network planning techniques—Part 2: General rules for representation of network diagram[S]. Beijing: Standardization Administration of the P.R. C, 2009.
25	JB/T 5056.2-2006. 网络计划技术网络图的绘制规程[S]. 北京: 国家发展和改革委员会, 2006.
	JB/T 5056.2-2006. Technology of network plan—Rules of network drawings[S]. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission, 2006.
26	SINHA P . Towards higher maintenance effectiveness[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2015, 32 (7): 754- 762.
27	BAIDYA R , GHOSH S K . Model for a predictive maintenance system effectiveness using the analytical hierarchy process as analytical tool[J]. IFAC Papersonline, 2015, 48 (3): 1463- 1468.
28	PANG S , JIA Y X , LIU X , et al. Study on simulation modeling and evaluation of equipment maintenance[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2016, 21 (5): 594- 599.
29	PAOLO C , IRINA K , BERNHARD E . Maintenance optimization and nuclear power plant life management: a proposal for an integrated set of maintenance effectiveness indicators[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2012, 134 (3): 427- 533.
30	EDUARDO G , SANTIAGO F , AITOR A , et al. Simulation of predictive maintenance strategies for cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. International Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2017, 231 (13): 2242- 2250.
31	DUFFUAA S O , BENDYA M , ALSULT K S , et al. A gene-ric conceptual simulation model for maintenance systems[J]. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2001, 7 (3): 207- 219.
32	BAIDYA R , GHOSH S K . Model for a predictive maintenance system effectiveness using the analytical hierarchy process as analytical tool[J]. International Federation of Automatic Control Papersonline, 2015, 48 (3): 1463- 1468.
33	潘星, 张振宇, 张艳梅, 等. 基于Sobol敏感性分析的装备体系保障效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (2): 390- 398.
	PAN X , ZHANG Z Y , ZHANG Y M , et al. Equipment SoS support effectiveness evaluation based on Sobol sensitivity analysis[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (2): 390- 398.
34	YANG W J, YUAN C X, ZHAO J, et al. Research on weapon and equipment requirement analysis method based on DoDAF[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Virtual Reality and Intelligent Systems, 2019: 317-319.
35	AGUEDA A , MARINA A , ESTIBALIZ M , et al. Decision management making by AHP (analytical hierarchy process) through GIS data[J]. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2009, 7 (1): 101- 106.
36	ZHANG X Y , TRAME M , LESKO L , et al. Sobol sensitivity analysis: a tool to guide the development and evaluation of systems pharmacology models[J]. CPT: Pharmacometrics Systems Pharmacology, 2015, 4 (2): 69- 79.
37	WEI X L , CHEN Z W , ZHOU Z Z . Fuzzy comprehensive eva-luation on the quality of vehicle equipment maintenance based on membership degree transformation algorithm[M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 453- 458.

名称	描述	数量
Airplane	作战(待保障)装备	10
Repair car	基地自我修复装备	5
Recourse pool	保障基地资源储备	12
UAV	基地检查无人机	2
Worker	保障人员	6
Airport	装备保障基地	4

编号	出发、返回	任务类型	任务时长/min
1	基地2 基地3	运输	84.14
2	基地2 基地1	运输	102.22
3	基地3 基地1	作战	66.17
4	基地1 基地4	作战	154.58
5	基地2 基地1	作战	102.22
6	基地1 基地4	运输	154.58

任务序列	各战机保障时间/min
任务序列	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1	79.079	90.869	96.132	79.025	90.473	91.792	79.045	81.545	87.084	83.716
2	81.882	85.82	98.843	82.191	87.887	88.352	79.98	86.202	93.277	81.713
3	77.205	90.032	99.014	81.321	86.698	83.893	81.003	85.834	90.8	89.914
4	83.195	83.567	97.217	82.095	97.453	94.127	91.06	80.059	90.474	78.872
5	86.861	92.434	103.912	78.098	86.879	85.768	83.43	86.083	85.087	89.083
6	77.256	90.223	94.21	82.023	86.529	93.066	84.846	92.899	101.133	78.453
8	91.48	91.48	91.48	91.48	91.48	91.48	91.48	91.48	91.48	91.48

任务序列	各战机保障决策时间/min
任务序列	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1	6.059	8.127	6.008	9.714	6.609	5.065	8.069	6.532	8.839	7.82
2	7.275	6.924	7.943	5.131	6.8	6.244	8.416	6.807	8.525	8.144
3	7.34	5.402	7.227	6.076	6.59	5.08	8.295	8.274	7.584	7.903
4	7.166	7.312	7.613	8.04	7.985	8.742	8.973	7.399	8.045	7.694
5	9.149	6.354	5.797	7.008	6.582	5.928	5.435	4.932	6.811	8.942
6	8.871	4.582	6.657	6.725	8.854	6.8	6.695	8.12	7.397	5.759

任务序列	各战机保障操作时间/min
任务序列	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1	64.962	56.958	66.324	62.274	59.321	58.505	57.649	66.084	65.007	57.991
2	63.534	62.274	65.943	53.323	61.036	64.312	59.322	60.597	61.981	63.666
3	63.225	50.917	62.42	63.536	51.666	59.639	65.826	55.724	53.142	69.171
4	58.529	60.501	56.285	59.312	58.978	53.264	61.621	57.567	58.691	58.002
5	63.502	63.099	60.436	57.912	56.815	55.554	53.995	66.776	61.92	55.467
6	57.436	56.634	55.901	56.965	66.36	58.223	55.269	62.113	61.137	63.588

Multi-agent modeling and evaluation method for mission-oriented equipment support SoS

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 25

References 37

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

任务序列	平均完好率/%
任务序列	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1	65	65	64	63	60	58	62	65	50	50
2	66	59	70	65	74	60	55	57	69	44
3	57	65	77	60	63	64	57	56	71	66
4	53	60	73	57	48	69	76	47	64	58
5	68	71	61	73	62	53	60	60	52	71
6	47	54	65	43	62	62	57	55	51	62

任务序列	成功修复时间/min
任务序列	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1	48	43	49	43	45	39	41	41	54	60
2	45	48	40	48	42	46	36	47	42	43
3	43	44	53	39	45	42	35	54	41	44
4	40	56	41	57	48	51	39	51	47	56
5	53	42	43	44	38	45	36	52	39	50
6	34	46	51	40	35	40	45	35	40	57

任务序列	设备占用数/台
任务序列	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1	15	15	11	14	13	16	14	13	16	15
2	12	15	14	13	15	12	12	13	14	12
3	13	14	14	13	14	13	14	14	14	14
4	13	13	13	13	12	14	13	14	13	15
5	14	13	15	12	12	13	12	15	14	13
6	11	14	15	12	16	12	15	15	13	14

指标符号	无量纲值
指标符号	0~0.4	0.4~0.6	0.6~0.8	0.8~1
C₁	＞8	6~8	4~6	＜4
C₂	＞70	60~70	50~60	＜50
C₃/%	＜40	40~60	60~80	＞80
C4/%	＜40	40~60	60~80	＞80
C₅	＞50	45~50	40~45	＜40
C₆/%	＜40	40~60	60~80	＞80
C₇/%	＜40	40~60	60~80	＞80

B₁	C₁	C₂	C₃	特征向量	一致性检验
C₁	1	1/5	1/7	0.073 772 11	CR=0.056 47＜0.1
C₂	5	1	1/3	0.282 839 02
C₃	7	3	1	0.643 388 87

A	B₁	B₂	B₃	特征向量	一致性检验
B₁	1	5	3	0.619 352 09	CR=0.074 73＜0.1
B₂	1/5	1	1/4	0.096 419 44
B₃	1/3	4	1	0.284 228 47

指标	矩阵阶数
指标	1	2	3	4	5
RI	0	0	0.58	0.9	1.12