基于作战环的反无人机作战体系贡献率评估

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.07.20

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of lack of effective capability evaluation methods for weapons and equipment in the current anti drone combat system, a contribution rate evaluation method for equipment system based on the combat loop is proposed. Abstracting the relationships among multifunctional equipment involved in anti drone operations as the relationships among rings, nodes, and edges, and constructing a combat network model. This paper proposes a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to calculate the weight of edges, obtains a comprehensive impact index, evaluates the combat capability of equipment in the anti drone combat system, and calculates the contribution rate of equipment in the anti drone combat system through the system contribution evaluation model. Finally, taking a typical combat scenario as an example, the contribution rate evaluation of the multifunctional equipment system for anti drones is carried out to verify the feasibility of the method. This provides decision-making basis for the development and design of anti drone equipment and effective implementation of combat.

Key words: combat loop, anti drone, equipment, system contribution rate, evalution

CLC Number:

TN975

Beiping WU, Jing HE, Huiying DANG, Dijiu YUE. Evaluation of contribution rate of anti drone combat system based on combat loop[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(7): 2267-2274.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.8

Table 4

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 37

1	AMMAR M , HARTWIG H . Analyzing the violation of drone regulations in three VGI drone portals across the US, the UK, and France[J]. Geo-spatial Information Science, 2024, 27 (2): 364- 383.
2	ANONYMOUS . TRD brings next-generation anti-drone capability to the arab world[J]. Armada International, 2024, 48 (1): 13.
3	KNOWLES J . Air mobility command ponders "on aircraft" counter-drone capability[J]. Journal of Electromagnetic Dominance, 2024, 47 (8): 17.
4	KANU J N , GUPTA E , PENDKAR M S , et al. A few suggestions to improve anti-drone measures for combating against the drone menace[J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2024, 105 (3): 761- 787.
5	李际超, 徐雪明, 姜江, 等. 装备体系贡献率评估方法研究综述[J]. 军事运筹与评估, 2024, 39 (2): 70- 74.
	LI J C , XU X M , JIANG J , et al. A review of research on eva-luation methods for equipment system contribution rate[J]. Mi-litary Operations and Evaluation, 2024, 39 (2): 70- 74.
6	孙逸钧, 李修和, 张逸. 装备体系贡献率评估方法综述[C]//第12届中国指挥控制大会, 2024: 512-517.
	SUN Y J, LI X H, ZHANG Y. Review of evaluation methods for equipment system contribution rate[C]//Proc. of the 12th China Command and Control Conference, 2024: 512-517.
7	杜敏, 程中华, 董恩志, 等. 装备体系贡献率评估综述[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50 (1): 7- 18.
	DU M , CHENG Z H , DONG E Z , et al. Overview of equipment system contribution rate evaluation[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50 (1): 7- 18.
8	赵丹玲. 基于异质网络的武器装备体系贡献率评估方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019.
	ZHAO D L. Research on the contribution rate evaluation method of weapon and equipment systems based on heterogeneous networks[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.
9	李际超, 杨克巍, 张小可, 等. 基于武器装备体系作战网络模型的装备贡献度评估[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
	LI J C , YANG K W , ZHANG X K , et al. Evaluation of equipment contribution based on the combat network model of weapon and equipment systems[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
10	李小波, 王维平, 林木, 等. 体系贡献率评估的研究框架、进展与重点方向[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
	LI X B , WANG W P , LIN M , et al. Research framework, progress, and key directions of system contribution rate evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2019, 39 (6): 1623- 1634.
11	罗承昆, 陈云翔, 何桢, 等. 基于故障树分析的航空装备体系结构贡献度评估方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2021, 43 (1): 155- 162.
	LUO C K , CHEN Y X , HE Z , et al. Evaluation method for contribution of aviation equipment architecture based on fault tree analysis[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43 (1): 155- 162.
12	王涛, 李小波, 张杰, 等. 基于"项目-能力"关联的战略规划项目体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (8): 2295- 2304. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.08.01
	WANG T , LI X B , ZHANG J , et al. Evaluation method for contribution rate of strategic planning project system based on "project capability" correlation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (8): 2295- 2304. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.08.01
13	姜晓辉, 黄炎焱, 朱江, 等. 基于MMF-OODA框架的体系赋能指标生成方法研究[J]. 军事运筹与评估, 2023, 38 (3): 35- 39.
	JIANG X H , HUANG Y Y , ZHU J , et al. Research on the method of generating system empowerment indicators based on the MMF-OODA framework[J]. Military Operations Research and Evaluation, 2023, 38 (3): 35- 39.
14	沈枫炜, 徐享忠. 基于作战环的合成营装备体系效能分析[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2022, 44 (5): 61- 67.
	SHEN F W , XU X Z . Efficiency analysis of composite battalion equipment system based on combat environment[J]. Command and Control and Simulation, 2022, 44 (5): 61- 67.
15	安庆杰, 张伟, 张义, 等. 基于任务边界的武器装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2023, 14 (2): 17- 22.
	AN Q J , ZHANG W , ZHANG Y , et al. Evaluation method for contribution rate of weapon and equipment systems based on task boundaries[J]. Command Information Systems and Technology, 2023, 14 (2): 17- 22.
16	张琦, 葛玉雪, 李攀, 等. 基于ABMS的全光化无人机集群体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44 (11): 3422- 3435.
	ZHANG Q , GE Y X , LI P , et al. Evaluation method for contribution rate of fully optical unmanned aerial vehicle cluster system based on ABMS[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44 (11): 3422- 3435.
17	王晓军, 管宇锋. 基于TOPSIS法和仿真法的反集群无人机装备体系贡献率研究[J]. 空天防御, 2021, 4 (1): 33- 40.
	WANG X J , GUAN Y F . Research on the contribution rate of anti cluster unmanned aerial vehicle equipment system based on TOPSIS method and simulation method[J]. Aerospace Defense, 2021, 4 (1): 33- 40.
18	LAI C G , CHEN X H , CHEN X Y , et al. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 77 (2): 1243- 1259.
19	DUNKEL D . Getting ahead of the new normal: counter-drone security[J]. Security, 2023, 60 (12): 31- 32.
20	周琛, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 等. 基于作战环的航空武器装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43 (2): 314- 325.
	ZHOU C , SHANG B L , SONG B F , et al. Evaluation of contri bution rate of aviation weapon equipment system based on combat environment[J]. Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 43 (2): 314- 325.
21	PETER J M . Missile defense equation: factors for decision making[M]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics Incorporated, 2004.
22	JEFFREY R C . An information age combat model[M]. Newport: Alidade, 2004.
23	张国强, 刘小荷, 蒋方婷, 等. 基于"作战环"的区域反导装备体系效能评估[J]. 系统工程, 2016, 34 (5): 154- 158.
	ZHANG G Q , LIU X H , JIANG F T , et al. Efficiency evaluation of regional anti missile equipment system based on "combat environment"[J]. Systems Engineering, 2016, 34 (5): 154- 158.
24	雷梓烽. 基于OODA环的作战体系对抗博弈建模研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020.
	LEI Z F. Research on the modeling of adversarial games in combat systems based on OODA loop[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2020.
25	岳地久, 何晶, 邹晓浩, 等. 反巡作战GPS干扰装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2021, 28 (7): 21- 25.
	YUE D J , HE J , ZOU X H , et al. Evaluation of contribution rate of GPS interference equipment system in anti patrol operations[J]. Electro Optics and Control, 2021, 28 (7): 21- 25.
26	马超, 刘宗敏, 杨俊, 等. 反无人机导航欺骗技术发展与应用[J]. 国防科技, 2023, 44 (3): 59- 67.
	MA C , LIU Z M , YANG J , et al. Development and application of anti drone navigation deception technology[J]. National Defense Technology, 2023, 44 (3): 59- 67.
27	梁家林, 熊伟. 武器装备体系贡献度评估方法综述[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39 (4): 67- 71.
	LIANG J L , XIONG W . Review of contribution evaluation methods for weapon equipment systems[J]. Journal of Weapon Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39 (4): 67- 71.
28	HOU J, WANG R H, WANG J J, et al. Research on evaluation index system of information system equipment system contribution rate[C]//Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Compute Science Communication and Network Security, 2021.
29	SONG J H, LI L, GUO Q, et al. System contribution rate assessment methods[C]//Proc. of the 2nd Conference on Computer Mechatron and Electron, 2017.
30	WANG J J, HU H B, HOU J, et al. Evaluation method of equipment system contribution rate based on machine learning[C]// Proc. of the International Conference on Applied Statistics, Computational Mathematics, and Software Engineering, 2022.
31	卜晓东. 战术导弹武器系统体系贡献度评估方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2021.
	BU X D. Research on the contribution evaluation method of tactical missile weapon system system[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021.
32	刘鹏. 基于体系贡献率的武器装备组合选择方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2021.
	LIU P. Research on weapon and equipment combination selection method based on system contribution rate[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2021.
33	李际超. 异质信息网络数据挖掘关键技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019.
	LI J C. Research on key technologies of heterogeneous information network data mining[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.
34	吴沛霆. 面向防化装备论证的体系贡献率评估方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2021.
	WU P T. Research on the evaluation method of system contribution rate for defense equipment demonstration[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Technology, 2021.
35	唐召胜. 基于DoDAF的反无人机装备体系结构建模[J]. 兵工自动化, 2024, 43 (8): 55- 59.
	TANG Z S . Modeling of anti UAV equipment architecture based on DoDAF[J]. Ordnance Automation, 2024, 43 (8): 55- 59.
36	CHENG E W L , LI H . Analytic hierarchy process: an approach to determine measures for business performance[J]. Measuring Business Excellence, 2001, 5 (3): 30- 37.
37	WANG J S , DENG X C . Comprehensive economic benefit eva-luation method of coastal enterprises based on AHP[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 103 (1): 24- 28.

序号	功能节点	名称
1	S₁	低空探测雷达
2	S₂	光电雷达
3	S₃	IR/EO探测系统
4	S₄、D₁	地导防空指控系统
5	S₅、D₂	预警机
6	S₆、D₃、A₁	近程防空导弹武器系统
7	A₂	导航信号干扰器
8	A₃	高功率微波拦截器
9	T₁	大型无人机
10	T₂	中小型无人机

作用功能	包含边	连接概率
侦察监视边	T₁→S₁、T₂→S₂、T₂→S₃、T₂→S₄、T₁→S₄、T₁→S₅、T₂→S₆	0.760 5
决策控制边	S₁→D₁、S₂→D₁、S₃→D₁、S₄→D₁、S₅→D₂、S₆→D₃、D₁→A₁、D₁→A₂、D₁→A₃、D₃→A₁	0.856 3
打击或干扰边	A₁→T₁、A₁→T₂ A₂→T₁、A₂→T₂ A₃→T₁、A₃→T₂	0.732 4 0.824 3 0.652 3
侦察情况共享边	S₁→S₂	0.821 3
指令决策下达边	D₂→D₁	0.849 1

符号	作战环	影响能力度量
OL₁^T₁	T₁→S₁→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.408 4
OL₂^T₁	T₁→S₁→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.459 7
OL₃^T₁	T₁→S₁→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.363 7
OL₄^T₁	T₁→S₁→S₂→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.335 4
OL₅^T₁	T₁→S₁→S₂→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.377 5
OL₆^T₁	T₁→S₁→S₂→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.298 7
OL₇^T₁	T₁→S₄→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.408 4
OL₈^T₁	T₁→S₄→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.459 7
OL₉^T₁	T₁→S₄→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.363 7
OL₁₀^T₁	T₁→S₅→D₂→D₁→A₁→T₁	0.346 8
OL₁₁^T₁	T₁→S₅→D₂→D₁→A₂→T₁	0.390 3
OL₁₂^T₁	T₁→S₅→D₂→D₁→A₃→T₁	0.308 9
OL₁₃^T2	T₂→S₂→D₁→A₁→T₂	0.408 4
OL₁₄^T2	T₂→S₂→D₁→A₂→T₂	0.459 7
OL₁₅^T2	T₂→S₂→D₁→A₃→T₂	0.363 7
OL₁₆^T2	T₂→S₃→D₁→A₁→T₂	0.408 4
OL₁₇^T2	T₂→S₃→D₁→A₂→T₂	0.459 7
OL₁₈^T2	T₂→S₃→D₁→A₃→T₂	0.363 7
OL₁₉^T2	T₂→S₄→D₁→A₁→T₂	0.408 4
OL₂₀^T2	T₂→S₄→D₁→A₂→T₂	0.459 7
OL₂₁^T2	T₂→S₄→D₁→A₃→T₂	0.363 7
OL₂₂^T2	T₂→S₆→D₃→A₁→T₂	0.408 4

序号	功能节点	名称	体系贡献率/%
1	S₁	低空探测雷达	35.72
2	S₂	光电雷达	24.52
3	S₃	IR/EO探测系统	8.41
4	S₄、D₁	地导防空指控系统	97.21
5	S₅、D₂	预警机	16.66
6	S₆、D₃、A₁	近程防空导弹武器系统	35.02
7	A₂	导航信号干扰器	36.28
8	A₃	高功率微波拦截器	28.71

[1]	Jiahao LIU, Renjie XU, Maotong SUN, Jiuyao JIANG, Jichao LI, Kewei YANG. Reinforcement learning-based resilience optimization method of equipment system-of-systems [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(7): 2216-2223.
[2]	Ruijing CUI, Jianbin SUN, GKewei YAN, Minghao LI. Construction method of equipment operational test indicator system based on UAF [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(5): 1536-1550.
[3]	Xiaofan SHANG, Qi XUE, Xin GAO, Tong LIU. Approach to equipment portfolio configuration analysis for capability demand [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(5): 1575-1581.
[4]	Yunwen FENG, Zhicen SONG, Cheng LU, Xiaoyu CHEN. Cross-scale equivalent elasticity-based damage and repair performance assessment of aviation equipment [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(2): 508-517.
[5]	Zhigang HU, Jingjun LOU, Yuedong SHI, Junbo HU. Regional guarantee scheduling model research based on structured data [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(2): 544-554.
[6]	Lei WANG, Xiang GAO, Xiaoxiao HU. Beamforming method based on sparse Bayesian inference in LDACS [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(1): 332-339.
[7]	Weiwei CUI, Dexin WANG, Lianfeng LI, Liang WANG, Guanjun LIU, Zhiwei CHEN. Process-driven support resource allocation simulation and optimization for missile equipment [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(9): 3040-3049.
[8]	Zhigang HU, Jingjun LOU, Yuedong SHI. Research on regional guarantee scheduling model from the perspective of resource distribution [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(9): 3093-3102.
[9]	Lei WANG, Jin ZHANG, Qiuxuan YE. Spectrum sensing method based on cyclic spectrum and residual neural network in LDACS system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(9): 3231-3238.
[10]	Dongxia LI, Jiani WANG, Xiangqing PENG, Haitao LIU, Lei WANG. DME pulse interference suppression method based on cSVB algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(8): 2877-2885.
[11]	Nuanchen WANG, Xiaolong WANG, Ge MU, Xinjin LI. Construction of equipment system knowledge graph based on meta-model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2374-2382.
[12]	Qiangqiang XU, Hua CHAI. Optimization of task dispatch plan for vehicular optical observation equipment based on NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2393-2400.
[13]	Tao WANG, Wenya ZHOU, Jitang GUO, Bo WANG. Improved Gaussian cloud model and its application in equipment support system capability evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(5): 1673-1681.
[14]	Lu ZHAO, Zhigeng FANG, Liang YU, Yadong ZHANG, Xirui QIU, Chenchen HUA. Cost prediction model based on grey relational synergistic effect weight allocation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(4): 1309-1319.
[15]	Linhu CONG, Yuqi CHEN, Liming CHEN, Yuliang CHEN, Chao WANG. Overall evaluation of mission success of SoS based on HDSPN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 616-630.

Evaluation of contribution rate of anti drone combat system based on combat loop

RichHTML

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 37

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments