基于依存句法规则的信息技术项目图谱构建

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.12.16

Abstract

Abstract:

Knowledge graphs provide a graphical structured knowledge storage method, which can effectively manage unstructured knowledge. However, for the management of information technology project texts, general knowledge extraction methods still find it difficulty to obtain satisfactory knowledge. Therefore, an extraction framework based on dependency syntax rules that addresses the aforementioned problem by combining dependency analysis and syntax rules is proposed. The proposed framework firstly expands and integrates entities by constructing a dependency syntax structure and forms hyponymy relationships between entities. Then, it establishes relationships between entities based on their hyponymy relationships and solves the issue of multivariate relationships modeling between entities using hyperedges. Finally, the feasibility of the proposed method is verified through a case experiment.

Key words: dependency analysis, information technology, project management, knowledge graph, text mining, knowledge extraction

CLC Number:

Mu LIN, Zhe SHU, Tongxin LI, Weiping WANG. Information technology projects graph construction based on dependency syntax rules[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(12): 4074-4082.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig.5

Fig.6

References 35

1	CAMARA R A , PEDRON C D , CHAVES M S . Using social media to promote knowledge sharing in information technology projects: a systematic review and future research agenda[J]. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 2021, 21 (4): 203- 229.
2	HEWITT B , WALZ D B , MCLEOD A . The effect of conflict and knowledge sharing on the information technology project team performance[J]. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2020, 16 (1): 1- 20.
3	DE-CASTRO R O , SANIN C , LEVULA A , et al. The development of a conceptual framework for knowledge sharing in agile IT projects[J]. Cybernetics and Systems, 2022, 53 (5): 529- 540. doi: 10.1080/01969722.2021.2018541
4	ATENCIO E , BUSTOS G , MANCINI M . Enterprise architecture approach for project management and project-based organizations: a review[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (16): 9801. doi: 10.3390/su14169801
5	LIN M L , YI S H , ZHANG M M , et al. A coevolutionary framework of business-IT alignment via the lens of enterprise architecture[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31 (5): 983- 995. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2020.000073
6	ZHANG M M, CHEN H H, LYYTINEN K. Principles of organizational co-evolution of business and IT: a complexity perspective[C]//Proc. of the European Conference on Information Systems, 2019.
7	KOTUSEV S . TOGAF-based enterprise architecture practice: an exploratory case study[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2018, 43 (1): 321- 359.
8	AGARWAL R, THAKUR V, CHAUHAN R. Enterprise architecture for e-government[C]//Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2017: 47-55.
9	CHEN W, HESS C, LANGERMEIER M, et al. Semantic enterprise architecture management[C]//Proc. of the International Workshop on Security in Information Systems, 2013.
10	ROSINA P, BAUER B. Semantic technologies for the integration of methods into an enterprise architecture[C]//Proc. of the 5th International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, 2016: 62-79.
11	CAI H M , XIE C , JIANG L H , et al. An ontology-based semantic configuration approach to constructing data as a service for enterprises[J]. Enterprise Information Systems, 2016, 10 (3): 325- 348. doi: 10.1080/17517575.2015.1070916
12	RASMUSSEN M H , LEFRANÇOIS M , PAUWELS P , et al. Managing interrelated project information in AEC knowledge graphs[J]. Automation in Construction, 2019, 108, 102956. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102956
13	XU J , HE M Q , JIANG Y . A novel framework of knowledge transfer system for construction projects based on knowledge graph and transfer learning[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 199, 116964. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116964
14	李丽霞, 任卓明, 张子柯. 基于关键词的知识图谱挖掘信息技术学科演化趋势[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2020, 49 (5): 780- 787.
	LI L X , REN Z M , ZHANG Z K . Trend of information technology discipline based on mining the keywords of knowledge graph[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2020, 49 (5): 780- 787.
15	DOZAT T, MANNING C D. Deep biaffine attention for neural dependency parsing[EB/OL]. [2023-03-01]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.01734.pdf .
16	NIVRE J . Dependency parsing[J]. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2010, 4 (3): 138- 152. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00187.x
17	CHEN X Y , ZHANG M , XIONG S W , et al. On the form of parsed sentences for relation extraction[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022, 251, 109184. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109184
18	ZHAI P J , HUANG X , ZHANG B B , et al. Relation extraction based on fusion dependency parsing from Chinese EMRs[J]. Scientific Pr ogramming, 2020, 2020, 8658040.
19	ALAM M , GANGEMI A , PRESUTTI V , et al. Semantic role labeling for knowledge graph extraction from text[J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 10, 309- 320. doi: 10.1007/s13748-021-00241-7
20	DOZAT T, MANNING C D. Deep biaffine attention for neural dependency parsing[EB/OL]. [2023-03-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01734 .
21	TIAN Y H, SONG Y, XIA F. Enhancing structure-aware encoder with extremely limited data for graph-based dependency parsing[C]//Proc. of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2022: 5438-5449.
22	梁静茹, 鄂海红, 宋美娜. 基于属性图模型的领域知识图谱构建方法[J]. 计算机科学, 2022, 49 (2): 174- 181.
	LIANG J R , E H H , SONG M N . Method of domain knowledge graph construction based on property graph model[J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49 (2): 174- 181.
23	BAKEN N. Linked data for smart homes: comparing RDF and labeled property graphs[C]//Proc. of the 8th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop, 2020: 23-36.
24	WARDANI D W, KUNG J. Property hypergraphs as an attributed predicate RDF[C]//Proc. of the Confederated International Conferences on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, 2015, 9415: 329-336.
25	CHERNENKIY V, GAPANYUK Y, NARDID A, et al. Using the metagraph approach for addressing RDF knowledge representation limitations[C]//Proc. of the 7th International Conference Internet Technoligies and Applications, 2017: 47-52.
26	MASMOUDI M , LAMINE S B A B , ZGHAL H B , et al. Knowledge hypergraph-based approach for data integration and querying: application to Earth observation[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2021, 115, 720- 740. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2020.09.029
27	CARROLL J J, BIZER C, HAYES P, et al. Named graphs, provenance and trust[C]//Proc. of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2005: 613-622.
28	SOURIPRIYA D, JAGANNATHAN S, MATTHEW P. A tale of two graphs: property graphs as RDF in oracle[C]//Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, 2014
29	CHEN W Y, HUANG J W, LUO S H, et al. Research on space-time evolution model of Xiangshan culture knowledge graph based on named graph[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 2nd Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, 2017: 673-678.
30	BRETTO A . Applications of hypergraph theory: a brief overview[M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.
31	DUMITRIU D , POPESCU M A M . Enterprise architecture framework design in IT management[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2020, 46, 932- 940. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.011
32	ROUHANI B D, MAHRIN M N, NIKPAY F, et al. A comparison enterprise architecture implementation methodologies[C]//Proc. of the Internat ional Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia, 2013.
33	CAMERON B H , MCMILLAN E . Analyzing the current trends in enterprise architecture frameworks[J]. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 2013, 9 (1): 60- 71.
34	TAO Z G , LUO Y F , CHEN C X , et al. Enterprise application architecture development based on DoDAF and TOGAF[J]. Enterprise Information Systems, 2017, 11 (5): 627- 651.
35	WARDANI D W, KUNG J. An attributed predicate RDF[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 2015: 410-416.

参数	参数调用方法	参数含义
i	token.i	当前词id
j	token.head.i	当前词的上级词id
k	token.head.head.i	当前词的上上级词id
ii	token.tag_	当前词词性
jj	token.head.tag_	上级词词性
kk	token.head.head.tag_	上上级词词性
ij	token.dep_	当前词到上级词的弧
jk	token.head.dep_	上级词到上上级词的弧

参数调用	参数含义
ROOT	指向中心词
nsubj	指向名词性主语
nmod	指向名词性修饰语
conj	连接词关系
compound	复合词关系
NN/NNP/NNPS/NNS	名词词性
VB/VBD/VBG/VBN	动词词性
IN	介词词性

id	实体	i	j	k	ii	jj	kk	ij	jk	符合的规则
0	This project	0	1	1	NN	VBZ	VBZ	nsubj	ROOT	1, 20
1	provides	1	1	1	VBZ	VBZ	VBZ	ROOT	ROOT	-1
2	the analyst	2	1	1	NN	VBZ	VBZ	dobj	ROOT	20
3	with	3	1	1	IN	VBZ	VBZ	prep	ROOT	-1
4	the ability	4	3	1	NN	IN	VBZ	pobj	prep	7, 20
5	to	5	7	4	TO	VB	NN	aux	acl	-1
6	rapidly	6	7	4	RB	VB	NN	advmod	acl	-1
7	find	7	4	3	VB	NN	IN	acl	pobj	-1
8	and	8	7	4	CC	VB	NN	cc	acl	-1
9	fuse	9	7	4	VB	VB	NN	conj	acl	-1
10	multiple intelligence sources	10	9	7	NNS	VB	VB	dobj	conj	6, 20
11	of	11	10	9	IN	NNS	VB	prep	dobj	-1
12	battlespace information	12	11	10	NN	IN	NNS	pobj	prep	2, 20
13	for	13	12	11	IN	NN	IN	prep	pobj	-1
14	improved situational awareness	14	13	12	NN	IN	NN	pobj	prep	3, 20
15	,	15	9	7	,	VB	VB	punct	conj	-1
16	and	16	7	4	CC	VB	NN	cc	acl	-1
17	to	17	19	7	TO	VB	VB	aux	conj	-1
18	better	18	19	7	RBR	VB	VB	advmod	conj	-1
19	detect	19	7	4	VB	VB	NN	conj	acl	-1
20	and	20	19	7	CC	VB	VB	cc	conj	-1
21	find	21	19	7	VB	VB	VB	conj	conj	-1
22	anomalies	22	21	19	NNS	VB	VB	dobj	conj	6, 20
23	.	23	1	1	.	VBZ	VBZ	punct	ROOT	-1

id	候选实体	起始位置	终止位置	是否有邻接或交叉
1	This projects	0	1	否
2	the analyst	2	3	否
3	the ability	4	5	否
4	rapidly find and fuse multiple intelligence sources	6	11	是
5	multiple intelligence sources of battlespace information	10	13	是
6	improved situational awareness	14	15	否
7	better detect and find anomalies	18	23	否

id	候选实体	起始位置	终止位置	root	hops	level
1	This projects	0	1	This projects	-1	0
2	the analyst	2	3	the analyst	1	1
3	the ability	4	5	the ability	2	2
4	rapidly find and fuse multiple intelligence sources of battlespace information	6	13	find	3	3
5	improved situational awareness	14	15	improved situational awareness	8	4
6	better detect and find anomalies	18	23	detect	3	3

Information technology projects graph construction based on dependency syntax rules

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 35

Related Articles 8

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Dong WANG, Sihang ZHOU, Jian HUANG, Zhongjie ZHANG. Hierarchical pooling sequence matching based optimal selection method of query graph for complex question answering over knowledge graph [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(8): 2686-2695.
[2]	Nuanchen WANG, Xiaolong WANG, Ge MU, Xinjin LI. Construction of equipment system knowledge graph based on meta-model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2374-2382.
[3]	Ruipeng LUAN, Jing ZHANG, Likun LIU. Knowledge graph ontology construction for data governance in equipment testing and indentification field [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 1013-1020.
[4]	Zeyang JI, Chungang YANG, Fuqiang LI, Ying OUYANG, Xianglin LIU. Intent-driven network representation based on natural language processing [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(1): 318-325.
[5]	Tongxin LI, Weiping WANG, Tao WANG, Xiaobo LI. Strategic agent BDI model based on knowledge graph [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 119-126.
[6]	Yufeng MA, Nan XIANG, Yajie DOU, Jiang JIANG, Kewei YANG, Yuejin TAN. Application and research of knowledge graph in military system engineering [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 146-153.
[7]	Yuqi CHEN, Tingxue XU, Jianping HAO, Cheng LU, Zhiqiang LI. Task capability dependency analysis of weapon system of systems based on FDN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1721-1728.
[8]	GUO Zhong-lai，WU Hua，HU Yong-gang，ZHANG Wei-hua. Equipment state evaluation model based on data depth [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(5): 895-899.