面向任务的民机DIMA动态重构策略

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.06.19

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to improve the ability of civil aircraft distributed integrated modular avionics (DIMA) system to cope with mission switching and resource failure, the dynamic reconfiguration environment and mechanism of DIMA are analyzed. And the task oriented dynamic reconfiguration strategy is proposed. Firstly, the relationship matrix of "task-function-resource" and the effectiveness evaluation system of dynamic reconfiguration are proposed. Then, the combined optimization weight method is introduced to calculate the priority weight of function application in different task modes. Finally, an example is used to analyze and compare the support degree of system resources to system functional integrity between task oriented dynamic reconfiguration strategy and common reconfiguration strategy under different task modes. The research results show that the task oriented dynamic reconfiguration strategy can significantly improve the effectiveness of dynamic reconfiguration with the increasing number of module failures.

Key words: avionics system, distributed integrated modular avionics (DIMA), dynamic reconfiguration, combination weighting, effectiveness

CLC Number:

V243

Peng WANG, Jiachen LIU, Lei DOND, Changxiao ZHAO. Task oriented DIMA dynamic reconfiguration strategy for civil aircraft[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1618-1627.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.5

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.6

Table 5

Table 6

Fig.7

References 30

1	ROBATI T , GHERBI A , MULLINS J . A modeling and verification approach to the design of distributed IMA architectures using TTE thernet[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 83, 229- 236. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.120
2	WOLFIG R, JAKOVLJEVIC M. Distributed IMA and DO-297: architectural, communication and certification attributes[C]//Proc.of the Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2008.
3	WANG H C , NIU W S . A review on key technologies of the distri-buted integrated modular avionics system[J]. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 2018, 25 (3): 358- 369. doi: 10.1007/s10776-018-0412-5
4	詹志娟, 周庆, 洪蓉. DIMA动态重构管理方法研究[C]//航空试验测试技术学术交流会论文集, 2016: 201-203, 208.
	ZHAN Z J, ZHOU Q, HONG R. Research on the method of the dynamic reconfiguration management in DIMA[C]//Proc.of the Aeronautical Test and Measurement & Control Technology Press, 2016: 201-203, 208.
5	林木, 陈伊卿, 孙志颖. 基于综合处理平台的任务系统动态重构技术[J]. 信息通信, 2019, (10): 252- 253.
	LIN M , CHEN Y Q , SUN Z Y . Dynamic reconfiguration technology of task system based on comprehensive processing platform[J]. Information & Communications, 2019, (10): 252- 253.
6	JU H Y, WANG S H. Reliability analysis for the process of DIMA dynamic reconfiguration[C]//Proc.of the 26th European Safety and Reliability Conference, 2016: 679-684.
7	阎芳, 刑培培, 赵长啸, 等. 基于联合k/n(G)模型的DIMA系统可靠性建模与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39 (6): 185- 193.
	YAN F , XING P P , ZHAO C X , et al. Reliability modeling and analysis of DIMA system based on joint k/n(G) model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39 (6): 185- 193.
8	郭阳明, 米琪, 张双, 等. 基于故障预测与健康管理的DIMA动态重构技术综述[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2019, 27 (10): 1- 4, 40.
	GUO Y M , MI Q , ZHANG S , et al. Review of DIMA dynamic reconstruction technology based on prognostic and health management[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2019, 27 (10): 1- 4, 40.
9	赵长啸, 何锋, 李浩, 等. 基于效能的先进战斗机航电系统动态重构方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41 (6): 355- 365.
	ZHAO C X , HE F , LI H , et al. Dynamic reconfiguration method based on effectiveness for advanced fighter avionics system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41 (6): 355- 365.
10	ARINC Document ARINC Specification 653 P1-3. Airlines electronic engineering committee. Avionics application software standard interface part 1-required services[S]. Annapolis: Aeronautical Radio Incorporated, 2010.
11	4626-2005 Modular and open avionics architecture (part Ⅰ: architecture)[S]. Belgium Brussels: North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2005.
12	何锋. 航空电子系统综合调度理论与方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2017.
	HE F . Theory and approach to avionics system integrated scheduling[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2017.
13	ROBINSON R, LI M, LINTELMAN S, et al. Electronic distribution of airplane software and the impact of information security on airplane safety[C]//Proc.of the 26th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, 2007: 28-39.
14	杨威, 常磊, 李姗. 机载分布式系统管理中故障管理机制探究[J]. 信息通信, 2020, (2): 141- 142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1131.2020.02.064
	YANG W , CHANG L , LI S . Research on fault management mechanism in airborne distributed system management[J]. Information & Communications, 2020, (2): 141- 142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1131.2020.02.064
15	JOLLIFFE G. Producing a safety case for IMA blueprints[C]//Proc.of the 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2005: 14-18.
16	DE N D, LAKSHMANAN K, RAJKUMAR R. On the sche-duling of mixed-criticality real-time task sets[C]//Proc.of the IEEE 30th Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2009: 291-300.
17	冯飞. DIMA架构下的航电系统有效性评估技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2014.
	FENG F. Research on validity evaluation technology of avionics system with DIMA architecture[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014.
18	王奔驰, 杜军, 丁超, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS法的飞机起飞阶段飞行品质评价[J]. 飞行力学, 2019, 37 (1): 83- 87, 91.
	WANG B C , DU J , DING C , et al. Flight quality evaluation of aircraft take-off stage based on AHP-TOPSIS method[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2019, 37 (1): 83- 87, 91.
19	LIU Y, GAN X S, YANG N. Fuzzy matter-element safety assessment of military ATC system based on combination weighting[C]//Proc.of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Computer Science, 2018: 270-273.
20	WU Q, LI Y, LI Y, et al. Research on evaluation model for transportation efficiency of equipment based on subjective and objective combination weighting method[C]//Proc.of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Infocomm Technology, 2019: 191-198.
21	白思俊. 系统工程[M]. 3版. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2013: 213- 222.
	BAI S J . System engineering[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2013: 213- 222.
22	NI X M , WANG H W , CHE C C , et al. Civil aviation safety evaluation based on deep belief network and principal component analysis[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 112, 90- 95. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.012
23	AI L H, LIU S, MA L, et al. A multi-attribute decision making method based on combination of subjective and objective weighting[C]//Proc.of the 5th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics, 2019: 576-580.
24	房冠成, 王海峰, 官霆, 等. 面向军用飞机任务能力的健康评估方法[J]. 航空工程进展, 2020, 11 (1): 37- 45.
	FANG G C , WANG H F , GUAN T , et al. Health assessment method for military aircraft based on mission capabilities[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2020, 11 (1): 37- 45.
25	AC-25-11B. Airplane electronic display system[S]. Washington D.C.: Federal Aviation Authority, 2014.
26	Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Statistical summary of commercial jet aircraft accidents, worldwide operations, 1959-2016[R]. Seattle: Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 2017: 18-20.
27	鲁志东, 张曙光, 戴闰志, 等. 大型民机进近着陆段异常能量风险判据研究[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 40 (1): 24132.
	LU Z D , ZHANG S G , DAI R Z , et al. Research on abnormal energy risk criteria of large civil airplanes in approach and landing[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 40 (1): 24132.
28	BRYAN M. Flight data for tail 687[EB/OL].[2012-12-04] https://c3.nasa.gov/dashlink/resources/664/.
29	Airbus SAS. A319/A320/A321 flight crew operating manual-flight operations[EB/OL].[2020-08-21]. https://www.scribd.com/document/54352593/Airbus-A320x-Flight-Crew-Operating-Manual-3.
30	AC-120-71B. Standard operating procedures and pilot monitoring duties for flight deck crew members[S]. Washington D.C.: Federal Aviation Authority, 2017.

重要程度标度值	说明
1	同样重要
3	稍重要
5	重要
7	重要得多
9	极为重要

指标	n
指标	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
RI	0	0	0.52	0.89	1.12	1.26	1.36	1.41	1.46

序号	真实空速/kn	相对气压高度/ft	无线电高度/ft	垂直速度/(ft·min^-1)	俯仰角/(°)	航向角/(°)
1	119.125 0	1 187	242	940	-2.889 32	174.534 6
2	118.937 5	1 175	221	720	-2.548 75	175.204 7
3	117.937 5	1 163	211	720	-2.823 40	175.325 6
⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮
58	34.125 0	998	-0.25	0	-0.758 03	172.842 7
59	33.687 5	997	-0.5	0	-0.692 12	170.909 2
60	31.125 0	998	-0.5	0	-0.725 08	168.387 9

名称	载荷系数
名称	主成分1	主成分2
空速/kn	0.652	0.565
相对气压高度/ft	0.946	-0.013
无线电高度/ft	0.955	0.119
垂直速度/(ft·min^-1)	0.971	0.121
俯仰角/(°)	-0.813	0.380
航向角/(°)	0.329	-0.843

编号	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5
A	Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅲ	Ⅵ, Ⅳ	Ⅰ	—
B	—	Ⅱ, Ⅲ	Ⅵ, Ⅳ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	—
C	—	—	Ⅵ, Ⅳ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅲ
D	—	—	Ⅵ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅲ
E	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅲ
F	—	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ

Task oriented DIMA dynamic reconfiguration strategy for civil aircraft

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

编号	模块					编号	模块					编号	模块
编号	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	编号	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	编号	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5
A₁	Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅰ	—	A₂	Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅰ	—	A₃	Ⅱ	Ⅴ, Ⅵ	Ⅳ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ	—
B₁	—	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	—	B₂	—	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	—	B₃	—	Ⅴ, Ⅵ	Ⅳ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	—
C₁	—	—	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	C₂	—	—	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	C₃	—	—	Ⅳ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅴ, Ⅵ
D₁	—	—	Ⅳ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	D₂	—	—	Ⅳ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	D₃	—	—	Ⅳ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅴ, Ⅵ
E₁	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	E₂	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅲ, Ⅴ	E₃	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅴ, Ⅵ
F₁	—	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	F₂	—	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	F₃	—	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅱ

编号	模块					编号	模块					编号	模块
编号	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	编号	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	编号	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5
A₄	Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅵ	Ⅳ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ	—	A₅	Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅱ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ	—	A₆	Ⅴ	Ⅲ, Ⅳ	Ⅵ, Ⅱ	Ⅰ	—
B₄	—	Ⅱ, Ⅵ	Ⅳ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	—	B₅	—	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	Ⅱ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	—	B₆	—	Ⅲ, Ⅳ	Ⅵ, Ⅱ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	—
C₄	—	—	Ⅳ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅵ	C₅	—	—	Ⅱ, Ⅲ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	C₆	—	—	Ⅵ, Ⅱ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅲ, Ⅳ
D₄	—	—	Ⅳ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅵ	D₅	—	—	Ⅱ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	D₆	—	—	Ⅵ	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅲ, Ⅳ
E₄	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅱ, Ⅵ	E₅	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅳ, Ⅵ	E₆	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	Ⅲ, Ⅳ
F₄	—	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	F₅	—	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ	F₆	—	—	—	—	Ⅰ, Ⅴ

[1]	Shunqi HUAN, Zhemei FAN, Jianbo WANG. System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2191-2200.
[2]	Jun MA, Jingyu YANG, Xi WU. Evaluation of operational system of systems effectiveness based on pre-clustering active semi-supervised learning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 1889-1896.
[3]	Jiachen LIU, Lei DONG, Changxiao ZHAO, Hongbing CHEN. Simulation and verification of DIMA dynamic reconfiguration based on formal method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(4): 1282-1290.
[4]	Feiran GUO, Jianqiao YU, Bao SONG. Optimal design of missile types in missile equipment system based on assignment model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 850-862.
[5]	Xiangyang LIN, Qinghua XING, Fuxian LIU. Research on optimization of combat force for key air defense model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 921-928.
[6]	Luyun QIU, Zhigeng FANG, Liangyan TAO, Qiucheng TAO. Effectiveness evaluation of network SoS based on improved FDNA model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3728-3737.
[7]	Chenrui SHI, Lu TIAN, Zhan XU, Ruxin ZHI, Jinhui CHEN. Effectiveness evaluation method of emergency communication and sensing equipment based on PSO-BP [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3455-3462.
[8]	Tiejun JIANG, Chun YU, Chengjie ZHOU. Fleet level repair plan optimization considering expected system effectiveness attenuation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3571-3578.
[9]	Yajuan HAN, Lulu ZHANG, Xiaohu LEI. Health assessment for aero-engine based on improved FDOD measurement [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3579-3586.
[10]	Zhiwei CHEN, Jing WANG, Changchao GU, Jianchun ZHANG, Jilong ZHONG. Performance availability and resilience analysis of weapon system of systems considering dynamic reconfiguration [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(8): 2347-2354.
[11]	Xing PAN, Zhenyu ZHANG, Yanmei ZHANG, Ranran WANG. Equipment SoS support effectiveness evaluation based on Sobol sensitivity analysis [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 390-398.
[12]	Ang GAO, Qisheng GUO, Zhiming DONG, Shaoqing YANG. Research on efficiency evaluation method of multi unmanned ground vehicle system based on EAS+MADRL [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3643-3651.
[13]	Weisheng YANG, Yu WANG, Yang YANG, Liang TANG. Combat network effectiveness evaluation under different node attack strategies based on operation loop [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228.
[14]	Chi HAN, Wei XIONG. Operational effectiveness evaluation of space reconnaissance equipment based on SVR optimized by improved grey wolf optimizer [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2902-2910.
[15]	Bokai ZHANG, Weigang ZHU. Construction and key technologies of cognitive jamming decision-making system against MFR [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(9): 1969-1975.