系统工程与电子技术

• 系统工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

无人机扫描线区域覆盖中的转弯航迹规划

万明1, 代忠2, 褚文奎1   

  1. 1. 空军工程大学航空航天工程学院, 陕西 西安 710038;
    2. 空军职教部, 北京 100073
  • 出版日期:2014-09-12 发布日期:2010-01-03

Turning path planning for UAV in region coverage with scanline

WAN Ming1, DAI Zhong2, CHU Wen-kui1   

  1. 1. Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering Institute, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China; 
    2. Air Force Vocational Education Department, Beijing 100073, China
  • Online:2014-09-12 Published:2010-01-03

摘要:

针对无人机采用扫描线实现区域覆盖的方式中,未充分考虑无人机最小转弯半径的问题,提出了两种可行的转弯方式,即Ω形转弯和α形转弯,并对两种方式的转弯时机、半径和航迹进行了分析计算。理论分析证明:对于同一转弯方式,无人机的转弯半径越小则规划航迹越短;在相同条件下,无人机执行Ω形转弯的路径要少于α形转弯的路径。实例分析表明:当无人机最小转弯半径小于扫描线间隔的一半时,Ω形转弯优于常规半圆转弯方式,且无人机最小半径越小,Ω形转弯的路径越短;当最小转弯半径大于扫描线宽度的一半时,常规半圆转弯方式已不能满足需要,而Ω形转弯仍然有效。

Abstract:

In flight path planning for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) by scanline to achieve region coverage, the minimum turning radius is not fullly considered. To solve this problem, two feasible turning methods, which are named as Ω-turning and α-turning, are proposed. The turning occasion, radius and path are also analyzed and calculated. Theoretical analysis shows that for the same turning method, the smaller the turning radius is, the shorter the UAV’s planning path is; under the same conditions, the path length of Ω-turning is less than that of α-turning. Example shows that when the UAV’s minimum turning radius is less than half the spacing of the scanlines, the path length of Ω-turning is shorter than the path length of the conventional semi-circle turning; when the UAV’s minimum turning radius is greater than half the spacing of the scanlines, the conventional semicircle turning is unavailable but Ω-turning is still effective.