基于改进CRITIC-GAHP的通信干扰效果在线评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.07.31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对通信干扰效果在线评估的无标签样本分类问题, 提出一种基于主客观权重的通信干扰效果在线评估方法。从发送方抗干扰的角度选取多种通信行为参数作为干扰效果评估指标, 分别使用改进的准则重要性相关法(criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation, CRITIC)和群层次分析法(group analytic hierarchy process, GAHP)确定客观和主观权重。通过最小信息熵原理确定组合权重后, 根据各指标参数的变化程度判断干扰效果, 划分干扰效果等级, 实现无标签样本分类。同时, 提出动态更新各指标归一化参数的方法, 使其应对变化的环境。实验结果表明, 提出的方法在指标参数范围变化和小样本情况下仍具有较稳定的性能。

关键词: 通信干扰效果, 在线评估, 无标签样本分类, 主客观权重

Abstract:

For the problem of online evaluation of communication interference effect without labelled samples, a communication interference effect online evaluation method based on subjective and objective weighting is proposed. This method selects various communication behavior parameters from the perspective of anti-interference of the transmitter as interference effect evaluation indicators, and determines the objective and subjective weights of the indicators respectively using the improved criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) method and the group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) method. After determining the combination weight by the principle of minimum information entropy, the interference effect is judged by the degree of change of each indicator parameter and divided into interference effect grades, achieving the classification of unlabelled samples. At the same time, a method of dynamically updating the normalization parameters of each indicator is proposed to adapt to changing environments. The experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper has stable performance under the condition of changing indicator parameter ranges and small sample size.

Key words: communication jamming effect, online evaluation, unlabeled sample classification, subjective and objective weighting

中图分类号:

TN975

侯文君, 彭闯, 金虎, 雷迎科. 基于改进CRITIC-GAHP的通信干扰效果在线评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(7): 2389-2398.

Wenjun HOU, Chuang PENG, Hu JIN, Yingke LEI. Online evaluation method of communication interference effect based on improved CRITIC-GAHP[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(7): 2389-2398.

图/表 15

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

表3

表4

图4

表5

表6

图5

表7

表8

图6

图7

参考文献 35

1	LIU M Q , LIU Z L , LU W D , et al. Distributed few-shot learning for intelligent recognition of communication jamming[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2022, 16 (3): 395- 405.
2	PARLIN K , RIIHONEN T , NIR V L , et al. Full-duplex tactical information and electronic warfare systems[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2021, 59 (8): 73- 79.
3	FENG Z B , XU Y H , JIAO Y T , et al. Fight against smart communication rival: an intelligent jamming approach with trend-oriented efficacy evaluation[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2022, 11 (11): 2290- 2294.
4	YAN Q, CHEN Z M, SUN Z G, et al. Performance analysis of MSK modulation under a single-tone jamming[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Communication, 2023: 58-63.
5	THORNTON C E, BUEHRER R M. Linear jamming bandits: sample-efficient learning for non-coherent digital jamming[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2022: 198-203.
6	ZHANG X X , ZHAO H T , ZHU H B , et al. NAS-AMR: neural architecture search-based automatic modulation recognition forintegrated sensing and communication systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2022, 8 (3): 1374- 1386.
7	XU L , SONG G L . A recursive parameter estimation algorithm for modeling signals with multi-frequencies[J]. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 2020, 39 (8): 4198- 4224.
8	BAI Z G , LIU Q M , LIU Y . Risk assessment of water inrush from coal seam roof with an AHP-CRITIC algorithm in Liu-zhuang coal mine, China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (4): 364.
9	LIU J , ZHANG Q , XIE M Y , et al. A blockchain platform selection method with heterogeneous multi-criteria decision-making based on hybrid distance measures and an AHP-EWM weight method[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 256, 124910.
10	BILIŞIKON , DUMAN N H , TAŞ E . A novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy CRITIC-TOPSIS methodology: an application for transportation mode selection problem for a glass production company[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 235, 121134.
11	NAFEI A , AZIZI S P , EDALATPANAH S A , et al. Smart TOPSIS: a neural network-driven topsis with neutrosophic triplets for green supplier selection in sustainable manufacturing[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 255, 124744.
12	YIN P, LIU Y A. Cosine-grey correlation analysis model based on combination weighting and its application[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications, 2020: 38-42.
13	甘佳霖. 不确定多属性干扰效果评估技术研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2022.
	GAN J L. Research on evaluation technology of uncertain multi-attribute jamming effect[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2022.
14	李仕勇. 通信干扰效果评估方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2022.
	LI S Y. Research on evaluation method of communication jam ming effect[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2022.
15	孙志国, 肖硕, 吴毅杰, 等. 面向认知通信防护的穿透式干扰效能评估方法[J]. 通信学报, 2023, 44 (11): 161- 172.
	SUN Z G , XIAO S , WU Y J , et al. Evaluation method of penetrating jamming effectiveness for cognitive communication protection[J]. Journal on Communications, 2023, 44 (11): 161- 172.
16	TEHRANIF J, NASIHATKON B, AL-QAWASMI K, et al. An efficient classifier: kernel SVM-LDA[C]//Proc. of the International Engineering Conference on Electrical, Energy, and Artificial Intelligence, 2022.
17	王伟, 杨俊安, 崔琳, 等. 基于支持向量机的通信干扰效果在线评估算法[J]. 电子信息对抗技术, 2017, 32 (2): 51- 57.
	WANG W , YANG J A , CUI L , et al. Online communication jamming effect evaluation based on support vector machine[J]. Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 2017, 32 (2): 51- 57.
18	雷震烁, 刘松涛, 葛杨, 等. 干扰效果在线评估参数筛选与特征表示方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (12): 2755- 2760. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.12.11
	LEI Z S , LIU S T , GE Y , et al. Parameter selection and fea ture representation method of jamming effect online evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (12): 2755- 2760. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.12.11
19	汪慧阳, 刘松涛, 赵帅. 基于GA-ELM的通信干扰效果在线评估方法研究[J]. 电光与控制, 2021, 28 (12): 71-75, 80.
	WANG H Y , LIU S T , ZHAO S . GA-ELM based online eva-luation of jamming effect in communication countermeasure[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2021, 28 (12): 71-75, 80.
20	孙志国, 肖硕, 吴毅杰, 等. 基于迁移学习和参数优化的干扰效能评估方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46 (4): 2515- 2524.
	SUN Z G , XIAO S , WU Y J , et al. Interference performance evaluation method based on transfer learning and parameter optimization[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46 (4): 2515- 2524.
21	ZHANG H Z, XU J Z, SHI Z L, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive safety state evaluation of energy storage batteries based on variable weight theory and combination weighting[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Power System Technology, 2023.
22	ZHAO J C, ZHANG Q, ZHANG X, et al. Evaluation of the anti-jamming performance of SAR based on ELECTRE-Ⅲ[C]// Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications, 2021: 752-756.
23	LI L , LIU Y P , HE K X . Meteorological satellite stakeholder relationship network based on social network analysis[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (4): 907- 926.
24	HOU J , GAO T , YANG Y , et al. Battery inconsistency evaluation based on hierarchical weight fusion and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 84, 110878.
25	SIKKA R, KUMARI N, OJHA A. Enhanced signal-to-noise ratio performance in long-haul optical communication systems using advanced forward error correction techniques[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Optimization Computing and Wireless Communication, 2024.
26	PRASAD S V S, NATARAJAN P B, SHANKAR L B. Broadening 3-bit burst er ror-correction codes with quadruple adjacent error correction[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies, 2021.
27	KANG P , XIE Y X , YANG L , et al. Enhanced quasi-maximum likelihood decoding based on 2D modified min-sum algorithm for 5G LDPC codes[J]. IEEE Trans.on Communications, 2020, 68 (11): 6669- 6682.
28	LI R Z, ZHANG J Y, CHEN P P, et al. Design of protograph-based LDPC codesfor DVB-S2 systems[C]//Proc. of the IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications, 2021.
29	CHEN D C, ZHANG J W, ZHAO R. Adaptive modulation and coding in satellite-integrated 5G communication system[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 21st International Conference on Communication Technology, 2021: 1402-1407.
30	HUANG J H , SU Y X , LIU W X , et al. Adaptive modulation and coding techniques for global navigation satellite system inter-satellite communication based on the channel condition[J]. IET Communications, 2016, 10 (16): 2091- 2095.
31	WANG Z , ZHONG Y , CHAI S L , et al. Product design evaluation based on improved CRITIC and comprehensive cloud-TOPSIS-applied to automotive styling design evaluation[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2024, 60, 102361.
32	王坚浩, 王龙, 张亮, 等. 灰色群组聚类和改进CRITIC赋权的供应商选择VIKOR多属性决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (1): 155- 164. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001.506X.2023.01.19
	WANG J H , WANG L , ZHANG L , et al. Supplier selection VIKOR multi-attribute decision making of grey group clustering and improved CRITIC weighting[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (1): 155- 164. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001.506X.2023.01.19
33	LIU Z J, DONG Z, XU B, et al. State evaluation method of distribution line based on improved combination weighting method[C]//Proc. of the 7th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering, 2022: 976-981.
34	SUN J, LIU S D, WANG L, et al. Safety resilience evaluation of urban public bus based on comprehensive weighting method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science, 2020: 370-379.
35	WU X L , HU F . Analysis of ecological carrying capacity using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 113, 106243.

评估指标	参数范围
LDPC码率范围	1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 5/6, 1
功率范围/W	20~200
频率范围/MHz	30~400
通信行为持续时长/s	5~30

调制样式	SNR/dB	调制样式	SNR/dB
2PSK	-0.9	4PSK	2.1
DQPSK	4.9	8PSK	5.8
16QAM	7.9	16PSK	9.9
32QAM	10.8	64QAM	12.8
128QAM	15.3	256QAM	17.6

组别	调制样式	LDPC码率	功率	频率	通信行为持续时长/s
1	256 QAM	1	56	124	—
1	256 QAM	1	56	124	30
2	2 PSK	1/2	168	282	—
2	4 PSK	1/2	162	280	25.089 0
3	2 PSK	1/2	196	167	—
3	None	0	0	0	10.986 6
4	16 PSK	1/2	143	296	—
4	32 QAM	1/2	149	299	20.670 6
5	DQPSK	1/2	199	274	—
5	4 PSK	1/2	191	173	7.770 4
6	16 QAM	2/3	102	31	—
6	8 PSK	2/3	107	30	12.389 6

组别	调制样式	LDPC码率	功率	频率	通信行为持续时长/s
1	0	0	0	0	0
2	-0.441 2	0	-0.018 2	0	0.196 5
3	1	1	1	1	0.760 8
4	-0.132 4	0	0.018 2	0	0.373 3
5	0.411 8	0	-0.054 6	1	0.889 5
6	0.308 8	0	0	0	0.704 7

组别	干扰效果得分		干扰效果等级
组别	S′	S	干扰效果等级
1	0	0	0
2	-0.093 5	-0.075 5	0
3	0.908 6	0.978 1	4
4	-0.023 8	0.010 3	0
5	0.460 4	0.541 7	2
6	0.063 1	0.127 6	1